|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 96
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 96 |
I have a Rem. 788 with an 18.5" barrel that I load a 45.5 gr. Re-15 and 150 gr. bullet. Well under max but accurate. Kills stuff just fine. My question is would loading it to max.( 47 to 49 gr. depending on which manual) improve the load or would I just be dumping unburned powder out of the end of the 18.5" barrel. I know the max load would not give me too much pressure but does a short barrel reduce the amount of powder burned by a significant amount. I don't need to up the load if it only gives me a nice fireball off the end of my barrel.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,221 Likes: 10
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,221 Likes: 10 |
RL-15's not what I'd consider a slow power relative to this cartridge, so I'd expect to see continued velocity increases up to max. I could be wrong, but it's would be a good experiment to work up across a chronograph and see what happens.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 96
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 96 |
I was going to try to obtain a chrono and see if velocity continued to increase until max or if they flattened out as they ran out of barrel to burn. As I said this load is OK but I thought maybe someone here had already tested this theory. I like RE-15 in several calibers and luckily I have plenty.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808 Likes: 2 |
I'm sure that the velocity would continue to increase since increased powder means increased pressure and that results in higher velocity.
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk. That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied. Well?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,936 Likes: 16
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,936 Likes: 16 |
something like that, I'd be using SR 4759 or 4198.....but then guys like me are different than "normal guys".....
30grains of 4198, with a 150 grain bullet would easily be 200 yd deer killer....
why jack up the recoil....
"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC
“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,552 Likes: 51
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,552 Likes: 51 |
I have a Savage Hog Hunter, short barrel. No problem to kill deer and pigs at 300 yards with a 150 GameKing and H 4895
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,542 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,542 Likes: 2 |
You won't be dumping unburned powder out of the barrel. You will have an increase in velocity, along with a possible increase in blast and muzzle flash, if you can notice it. I haven't really noticed any.
I've been using a 20" .308 for years, a hunting buddy uses a 788 just like yours. I also have a couple of 22" .308s and pretty much run the same load in all. The guy with the 18.5 inch 788 has also used a 22" quite a bit.
There is no noticeable difference in on-game performance at our normal ranges, which are typically under 200 yards.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 794
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 794 |
Leave it alone. I go by the old adage, "it it isn't broke , leave it alone". My Remington Tactical will shoot groups under ,200 with 44.5 grains, and a Sierra Matchking. For hunting Coyotes and Deer i use 150 speer soft nose. Kills them ded. Once again you have no need to mess with it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254 Likes: 1 |
You won't be dumping unburned powder out of the barrel. You will have an increase in velocity, along with a possible increase in blast and muzzle flash, if you can notice it. I haven't really noticed any.
I've been using a 20" .308 for years, a hunting buddy uses a 788 just like yours. I also have a couple of 22" .308s and pretty much run the same load in all. The guy with the 18.5 inch 788 has also used a 22" quite a bit.
There is no noticeable difference in on-game performance at our normal ranges, which are typically under 200 yards.
What he said.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,447
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,447 |
What would be considered slow velocity for 150 and 165 grain loads out of a 20” barreled 308?
What velocities are you guys getting out of 18-20” barrels!
Powders? Loads?
Liberalism is a cancer Support Christian Family values
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254 Likes: 1 |
I generally got right at 2700 with Varget/RL15/748 when loading 150gr bullets in an 18.5” factory bolt gun. I loaded 168’s in a 20” version for mid 2600 with same powders. The 130 TTSX is another nice option at 2900+ in a 20” gun with TAC or 4895.
For comparison, I shot 150/155 stuff in two 22” factory bolt guns at 2850-2880 with RL15 and H4895. Probably about to chop one to 17” for a can and I’m not going to sweat dropping down to 2700-ish. Still have to know your drops, and hitting anything that lives around here with a vitals shot should be fine inside 400yds.
Last edited by JPro; 04/16/22.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,432 Likes: 5
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,432 Likes: 5 |
What would be considered slow velocity for 150 and 165 grain loads out of a 20” barreled 308?
What velocities are you guys getting out of 18-20” barrels!
Powders? Loads? Well, this is a case one one and done I guess. I have a Ruger M77 RSI with 18.5" barrel that I got into cheap because the previous owner said he couldn't get an accurate load from the rifle. As a matter of fact I've scored two more of those rifles in .308 for that very same reason. After a little more tan two years I found a load with 165 gr. Speer Hot Cores and W760 would give a usable group. Velocity on average is 2550 FPS from the 18-5" barrel. Velocity from a 22" barrel is 2610 FPS. Switch to another 165 gr. bullet and accuracy is gone. That rifle really is a one trick pony. Funny thing is that load will work in all three of those rifles but any switch in components and accuracy goes straight to hell. Velocity was only tested in the first rifle. the others were only shot to test accuracy. Paul B.
Our forefathers did not politely protest the British.They did not vote them out of office, nor did they impeach the king,march on the capitol or ask permission for their rights. ----------------They just shot them. MOLON LABE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,552
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,552 |
I use 44.5 grains of 4895 with a 180 sierra round nose. My rifles barrel is 18.5 inches
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,204 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,204 Likes: 1 |
41g of 4895 with a 165ish bullet is magic in accuracy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,023
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,023 |
In a shorter barrel I'm usually inclined to start with the quicker burning powders, though the burn rate increases as the charge weight increases. I've also seen where a magnum primer helps get velocity up given a short runway. More often than not the most accurate loads are also near top end if not maximum loads. One of the most accurate loads in my target 308 is 47.0grs imr4320 and a Sierra palma 155gr match bullet. It'll put 5 rounds of that loads in .31" at 100yds. It's so accurate and I can't hold it still enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,933 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,933 Likes: 1 |
I'd guess that you're solidly into 300 Savage country with that charge, probably 2,600 and change. Not sure that I see any reason to change unless you need to flatten the trajectory for some reason. Okie John
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,509 Likes: 29
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,509 Likes: 29 |
4064 with 165s seems like magic in my model 7 16.5 barrel also works a mild load in the 270 and 30-06 good luck finding some now
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 96
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 96 |
I loaded some up with 46 and 46.3 gr. of Re-15. I going to check how they group. if accuracy is good I may shoot the hotter loads just for the small improvement in trajectory. If accuracy isn't as good I will revert back to 45.5 gr. since it works. Thanks for all your responses.
|
|
|
|
638 members (10gaugemag, 160user, 10ring1, 19rabbit52, 06hunter59, 12344mag, 74 invisible),
3,211
guests, and
1,151
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,630
Posts18,533,199
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|