24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
E
elkrazy Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
E
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
I love my current Hi Power -- fixed up by Cylinder & Slide but am interested in the new FN and Springfields.

Does anyone have experience with these new ones? Thoughts? The FN looks to be twice as much -- worth it?

Last edited by elkrazy; 04/27/22.
GB1

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,784
Likes: 22
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,784
Likes: 22
Some folks here have purchased the Springfield version, and liked it. Do a search.

As for me, I'm quite happy with my Browning.

[Linked Image]

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
The new FN is a Hi Power in name only, its not parts interchangeable with any other Hi Powers. So it all depends on what you want out of a Hi Power. All of the Hi Powers being made these days are good guns, including the Turkish guns. Some have features that some may like, or dislike, but they're all good guns that work well and shoot straight. Go with the gun that lights your fire.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,784
Likes: 22
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,784
Likes: 22
Originally Posted by GunGeek
The new FN is a Hi Power in name only, its not parts interchangeable with any other Hi Powers. So it all depends on what you want out of a Hi Power. All of the Hi Powers being made these days are good guns, including the Turkish guns. Some have features that some may like, or dislike, but they're all good guns that work well and shoot straight. Go with the gun that lights your fire.

It could be the problems have been corrected, but in the early years after introduction to the US, the Turkish Hi Powers were getting lots of reported issues with parts breakage and unreliability.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
Haven't heard that. I have shot 3 of them thus far, and all 3 worked perfectly and shot very straight. All 3 and pretty lousy triggers, I didn't care for the sights, didn't care for the safety. But it has good bones...You could build a very nice custom from the frame, slide, & barrel, all 3 of which are made right. The Springfield looks like they just hit the ball out of the park and gave the public what it was wanting in a Hi Power. If I were shopping Hi Powers, the Springfield would be the one I'd be interested in.

The new FN looks like it will be a good pistol. Seen one, held it, but didn't get to shoot it. FN is a world class manufacturer, so its likely to be a very good pistol.

IC B2

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,376
D
dla Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,376
At it's original MSRP of $699, the Springfield SA-35 is the ONLY Hi Power I find remotely interesting.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,394
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,394
Likes: 1
In my well thought out and highly exalted opinion, FN seems to be trying to capitalize on the name but with their design it looks like they want to compete head to head with some of the latest tacticool pistols, a strategic mistake and especially at their price point. I'm sure they will sell some but most likely to folks who know the name but are not invested in the legend.

Those who really want "The Hi Power" will find an original or be drawn to the SA model since it is a very close copy of the original down to interchangeability of parts, with design changes only made to correct or upgrade the original's minor (perceived) shortcomings.



Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery.
Hit the target, all else is twaddle!
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
E
elkrazy Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
E
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 338
Reading through the materials the FN claims something like "we fixed the ergonomics so more hammer bite". Sounds like both new ones (not the Hungarian) have done away with the magazine safety. Hoping that the trigger is great though it seems to be heavy for the SA35 from what I have read here.

Really my questions are how are the triggers? Is the FN really that improved in respect to ergos? Is it better? One of the reasons I love my Hi Power is how is so natural in my hand and don't want them to mess that up.

When the price of the SA35 stabilized I will likely get one to see. If the FN is SO MUCH better I might wait .... smile

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
Turk guns trigger sucks, FN not bad at all, Springfield no clue.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,848
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,848
Went into the LGS yesterday in hopes of ordering the Springfield SA-35.........They have a waiting list of 30 names and thus far they have received a grand total of 1.........they want 50% down plus tax or $380 to get on the list........I passed.

IC B3

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Some folks here have purchased the Springfield version, and liked it. Do a search.

As for me, I'm quite happy with my Browning.

[Linked Image]

Now that's the ONLY acceptable 9mm in my book ! Or a Luger of course... smile

Last edited by jorgeI; 04/29/22.

A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
The only 9mm I own these days (although I do have a 9mm barrel for my .38 Super).

1917 DWM with reproduction stock/holster.

[Linked Image]

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,784
Likes: 22
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,784
Likes: 22
Originally Posted by GunGeek
The only 9mm I own these days (although I do have a 9mm barrel for my .38 Super).

1917 DWM with reproduction stock/holster.

[Linked Image]

Very nice. They are cool collectors pieces, even if they were crappy combat weapons, practically speaking.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,667
For their day, the Artillery Luger was pretty bad-azz
In WW1, an Artillery Luger with a snail drum magazine was a pretty awesome weapon inside a trench. So awesome it was banned for future production under the armistice "agreement". Stormtroopers were issued the LP08 and 5 snail drums for trench raids. That's a pretty awesome amount of firepower in WW1. The PDW / shoulder stocked pistol concept was much less popular after the invention of the SMG.
As a service pistol, the P08 was damn good for a first-generation semi-auto pistol. Keep in mind, that’s 1898! IIRC up to WWII, the Luger out-sold just about everything else. Lugers are far more reliable than their reputation here in the US would have you believe. If your Luger has a fresh magazine spring, you can pretty much count on it working.

Last edited by GunGeek; 04/29/22.

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

563 members (17CalFan, 160user, 1badf350, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 62 invisible), 2,357 guests, and 1,300 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,702
Posts18,494,272
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.169s Queries: 42 (0.015s) Memory: 0.8624 MB (Peak: 0.9342 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-06 21:54:45 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS