24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 11
I
Campfire Tracker
OP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
I
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 11


You've got to hand it to a blind prostitute

Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 4,021
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 4,021
How to resolve the no cash bail problem.


Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,784
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 10,784
Likes: 1
Good deal. Glad homeowner wasn't injured.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,292
Likes: 2
W
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
W
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,292
Likes: 2
Good for him!

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
That woman's an idiot. Castle Doctrine had nothing at all to do with anything. That was straight up self-defense analysis. The intended victim was armed as he had a right to be. The other guy drew a gun on the intended victim. The intended victim (having done nothing wrong) beat him to the draw and won the gunfight.

IC B2

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,692
K
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
K
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,692
Michigan
Good thing he’s black


if a man speaks, and there isn't a woman around to hear him, is he still wrong?

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,850
D
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,850
Classic example of when seconds count, police are minutes away.


For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: "If a man will not work, he shall not eat."

2 Thessalonians 3:10
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 1
It was a clean shoot. 100% self defence. the other guy attemped to draw first. Although some idiot in an office somewhere will probably say he just should have waited in his house until the leo's showed up, and only defended himself if the bad guy entered the house.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by jc189
It was a clean shoot. 100% self defence. the other guy attemped to draw first. Although some idiot in an office somewhere will probably say he just should have waited in his house until the leo's showed up, and only defended himself if the bad guy entered the house.
It comes down to whether or not you have a right to confront a nut on your property, screaming and breaking your window. If yes, then he's fine. I don't know of any law that says you aren't allowed to confront someone making a ruckus and smashing stuff on your property.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,663
Likes: 15
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,663
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
That woman's an idiot. Castle Doctrine had nothing at all to do with anything. That was straight up self-defense analysis. The intended victim was armed as he had a right to be. The other guy drew a gun on the intended victim. The intended victim (having done nothing wrong) beat him to the draw and won the gunfight.

Actually, the Castle Doctrine has lots to do with that.

It means you can defend your property, and have no legal duty to retreat. In states that don't have that, the victim has a legal duty to run away before deploying deadly force.

Quote
Castle Doctrine is similar to “stand your ground,” but is typically limited to real property, including a person’s home, property and, in some states, cars or workplaces. The concept is that an individual has a right to be safe and secure within his or her own home or “castle” and should not have to retreat from his or her home in order to be safe. Depending on the state, an individual may have the right to protect himself or herself, other people, and his or her property by force — in some instances even employing deadly force against intruders without retreating.


Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla!
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
That woman's an idiot. Castle Doctrine had nothing at all to do with anything. That was straight up self-defense analysis. The intended victim was armed as he had a right to be. The other guy drew a gun on the intended victim. The intended victim (having done nothing wrong) beat him to the draw and won the gunfight.

Actually, the Castle Doctrine has lots to do with that.

It means you can defend your property, and have no legal duty to retreat. In states that don't have that, the victim has a legal duty to run away before deploying deadly force.

Quote
Castle Doctrine is similar to “stand your ground,” but is typically limited to real property, including a person’s home, property and, in some states, cars or workplaces. The concept is that an individual has a right to be safe and secure within his or her own home or “castle” and should not have to retreat from his or her home in order to be safe. Depending on the state, an individual may have the right to protect himself or herself, other people, and his or her property by force — in some instances even employing deadly force against intruders without retreating.
Good point, but the reason I say it's a non-issue in this case is that there was no opportunity to retreat. When someone draws a gun on you with intent to use it, you cannot outrun a bullet, so even if there was no castle doctrine, you'd have a right to draw and fire under any law in the land where you are permitted to be armed. In fact, even in a place like New York, you might find that you're charged with illegal possession of a weapon, but still not be charged with murder, due to the straight up self-defense circumstances of the case, castle doctrine or no castle doctrine.

Castle doctrine applies where you are aware of a deadly threat in advance, and have time to escape. Places without castle doctrine require you to even exit the house, if need be. But even where there's no castle doctrine, you can investigate folks making a ruckus in your yard, and if they draw on you, you can shoot them in self defense, because you cannot outrun a bullet.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,663
Likes: 15
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 69,663
Likes: 15
I've seen a few cases where someone didn't run and hide, in places that didn't have the Castle Doctrine. One in particular was charged with murder.

That is sickening.


Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla!
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,440
Likes: 10
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,440
Likes: 10
What right do the police have to enter his house?


PRESIDENT TRUMP 2024/2028 !!!!!!!!!!


Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,089
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,089
Likes: 2
Has the dead man's mother chimed in yet? I'm sure she thinks that man had no business shooting her son. After all the police were coming and he shot the man 4 times. He didn't need to shoot 4 times, should be charged with murder she will say.


Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Jesus: "Take heed that no man deceive you."
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
T
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
T
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,750
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Hastings
Has the dead man's mother chimed in yet? I'm sure she thinks that man had no business shooting her son. After all the police were coming and he shot the man 4 times. He didn't need to shoot 4 times, should be charged with murder she will say.
He could have shot the gun out of his hand, instead.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,440
Likes: 10
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,440
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Hastings
Has the dead man's mother chimed in yet? I'm sure she thinks that man had no business shooting her son. After all the police were coming and he shot the man 4 times. He didn't need to shoot 4 times, should be charged with murder she will say.
He could have shot the gun out of his hand, instead.

smile


PRESIDENT TRUMP 2024/2028 !!!!!!!!!!


Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 1
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 1
He should've fired 2 shotgun blasts in the air..... crazy

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,192
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,192
I'm glad the good guy won.

Why the HECK is he talking to a reporter?


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

551 members (1234, 10Glocks, 01Foreman400, 1lessdog, 17CalFan, 10gaugemag, 65 invisible), 2,475 guests, and 1,165 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,405
Posts18,488,944
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.179s Queries: 50 (0.014s) Memory: 0.8832 MB (Peak: 0.9767 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 16:21:55 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS