|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7 |
Burnsy's got a hard-on for Physicists. It's hilarious. Not all of them. Just the ones that don't know that laminar flow does not happen in terminal bullet performance. EVER. Turbulent flow does happen in terminal bullet performance every single time. In the first case, the mechanism by which FMJ bullets damage tissue is by de-stabilizing and tumbling. I haven't calculated the destabilization of the bullet due to the laminar drag of the tissue, but I suspect chaotic behaviour, so the effect of increased rotational speed isn't clear to me. He is litterally spouting pure Bull Schitt. Just sayin. Wrong again, not that I would expect anything different. Keep pretending with Wikipedia as your guide, and talking about things you neither know nor understand. Your ankle-biting is becoming extremely predictable.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1 |
Burnsy's got a hard-on for Physicists. It's hilarious. Not all of them. Just the ones that don't know that laminar flow does not happen in terminal bullet performance. EVER. Turbulent flow does happen in terminal bullet performance every single time. In the first case, the mechanism by which FMJ bullets damage tissue is by de-stabilizing and tumbling. I haven't calculated the destabilization of the bullet due to the laminar drag of the tissue, but I suspect chaotic behaviour, so the effect of increased rotational speed isn't clear to me. He is litterally spouting pure Bull Schitt. Just sayin. Whoa, slow down there, I'm still studying your earlier treatise on the economics of nuclear fission.
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,168 Likes: 16
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,168 Likes: 16 |
Not all of them. Just the ones that don't know that laminar flow does not happen in terminal bullet performance. EVER. Turbulent flow does happen in terminal bullet performance every single time. In the first case, the mechanism by which FMJ bullets damage tissue is by de-stabilizing and tumbling. I haven't calculated the destabilization of the bullet due to the laminar drag of the tissue, but I suspect chaotic behaviour, so the effect of increased rotational speed isn't clear to me. He is litterally spouting pure Bull Schitt. Just sayin. Whoa, slow down there, I'm still studying your earlier treatise on the economics of nuclear fission. Don't forget I included Fusion. Wrong again, not that I would expect anything different.
Keep pretending with Wikipedia as your guide, and talking about things you neither know nor understand. Your ankle-biting is becoming extremely predictable. I haven't calculated the destabilization of the bullet due to the laminar drag of the tissue, but I suspect chaotic behaviour, so the effect of increased rotational speed isn't clear to me. Feel free to explain to the class about laminar drag forces in tissue and how such laminar drag would styme your calculations. If you have time explain how any laminar flow is "chaotic" when the defintion of laminar flow is a lack of chaos. As I posted earlier it might be a better if we all kept to real world results and skipped the PHD guessing.
John Burns
I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,228 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,228 Likes: 1 |
Burnsy's got a hard-on for Physicists. It's hilarious. Your be waaaaaay better off taking notes than flipping your lip. 👍
Ping pong balls for the win.
Once you've wrestled everything else in life is easy. Dan Gable
I keep my circle small, I’d rather have 4 quarters than 100 pennies.
Ain’t easy havin pals.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,360 Likes: 10
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,360 Likes: 10 |
Great posts Dwayne, I remember reading and rereading that post.
And yeah, my affliction with twist came from Bob as well. It worked for him. Works well for me too.
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,558 Likes: 7 |
Feel free to explain to the class about laminar drag forces in tissue and how such laminar drag would styme your calculations.
If you have time explain how any laminar flow is "chaotic" when the defintion of laminar flow is a lack of chaos.
As I posted earlier it might be a better if we all kept to real world results and skipped the PHD guessing. Everything in your post is wrong. I said nothing about "stymying" my calculations, I said I hadn't done any on that particular quantity. I also never said anything about chaotic behaviour of the fluid flow (English is hard. I get it. But the sentence was about the chaotic behaviour of the bullet). It's your typical MO or gaslighting and twisting the truth to suit your agenda. It's a waste of time to try and teach someone who can't be taught. But I will give you a hint. You might want to re-think this statement: laminar flow does not happen in terminal bullet performance. EVER. You're right, it might be better if we all kept to the real world. Perhaps it would be better for you to stick to acting like an ankle-biting troll, instead of acting like a pretend physicist. But as usual, you'll carry on with this instead of doing something useful and meaningful. It's not a good use of my time to continue, so enjoy.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,168 Likes: 16
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,168 Likes: 16 |
Feel free to explain to the class about laminar drag forces in tissue and how such laminar drag would styme your calculations.
If you have time explain how any laminar flow is "chaotic" when the defintion of laminar flow is a lack of chaos.
As I posted earlier it might be a better if we all kept to real world results and skipped the PHD guessing. Everything in your post is wrong. I said nothing about "stymying" my calculations, I said I hadn't done any on that particular quantity. I also never said anything about chaotic behaviour of the fluid flow (English is hard. I get it. But the sentence was about the chaotic behaviour of the bullet). It's your typical MO or gaslighting and twisting the truth to suit your agenda. It's a waste of time to try and teach someone who can't be taught. But I will give you a hint. You might want to re-think this statement: laminar flow does not happen in terminal bullet performance. EVER. You're right, it might be better if we all kept to the real world. Perhaps it would be better for you to stick to acting like an ankle-biting troll, instead of acting like a pretend physicist. But as usual, you'll carry on with this instead of doing something useful and meaningful. It's not a good use of my time to continue, so enjoy. LOL. Word Salad. I haven't calculated the destabilization of the bullet due to the laminar drag of the tissue, but I suspect chaotic behaviour, so the effect of increased rotational speed isn't clear to me.
John Burns
I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130 Likes: 1 |
Burnsy's got a hard-on for Physicists. It's hilarious. Your be waaaaaay better off taking notes than flipping your lip. 👍 Setting aside any concerns for sounding too Burnsey, I'm one of those people who didn't have to take notes. LOL
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
|
|
|
|
|
497 members (257 roberts, 219 Wasp, 2500HD, 270wsmnutt, 1badf350, 2ndwind, 53 invisible),
1,946
guests, and
1,253
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,029
Posts18,520,914
Members74,023
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
