|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043 |
Thinking of reworking my 130 grain hunting load. I have been running Reloder 17 @ 3100 fps with the Nosler Ballistic tips and getting just under 1moa. Nice easy every day working load in full length resized 1-2x Remington brass. But not exactly fully temperature stabilized.
Now I'm thinking I want to reboot as I'm looking for a reliable point of impact all tempature load. Thinking of using Reloder 16 or possibly Ramshot Hunter. This will be used on Black bear, Pronghorn, Mule deer, Whitetails & other targets of opportunity in west/east Montana September thru November, so the temperatures will be all over the map. Was planning on using a standard Federal 210 primer.
Thoughts?
41
We deal in lead, friend.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089 |
Have had excellent luck with RL-16 and 130s in the .270. Best load tried so far is 54.5 grains with the 130 Nosler E-Tip, for right around 3100 from a 22-inch barrel.
It's a little fast-burning for heavier bullets, but still does pretty well with 140s.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,301
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,301 |
If 17 has been working for you in MT I couldn’t see changing. If you’re having problems with sensitivity during the seasonal temp shifts then sure, if you can secure enough 16 to be stocked up.
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652 |
RL16 works well, RL17 works well, If using Alliant powders my choice is RL26 If you are saying "temperatures will be all over the map" my choice would be H4831sc and always with a Fed 210.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,042
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,042 |
Brownells has reloader 15, 15.5, 16, 17, 19 and other alliant powders right now... expensive as hell though after haz and taxes.
Kent
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 169
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 169 |
I have had fantastic results with RL-16 in my 7mm-08, used RL-26 in my 270's. Both are great powders for accuracy and velocity. The problem I see is getting the damn stuff....I haven't seen RL-26 in about two years. RL-16 is almost as scarce around here. Will definitely try that load in my 270 with RL-16. Thanks for posting!!!!!
Last edited by msinc; 07/16/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089 |
RL16 works well, RL17 works well, If using Alliant powders my choice is RL26 If you are saying "temperatures will be all over the map" my choice would be H4831sc and always with a Fed 210. Have tried RL-66 in my primary .270, and while accuracy and, especially, velocity were great, when I ran my normal temperature test of group-shooting and chronographing at both 70 and zero Fahrenheit, there was over 50 fps difference in velocity and a 1-1/2" shift in point-of-impact at 100 yards. This is exactly the short of thing I'm trying to avoid when using truly temp-resistant powders, such as RL-16 or H4831SC.
Last edited by Mule Deer; 07/16/22.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,301
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,301 |
RL16 works well, RL17 works well, If using Alliant powders my choice is RL26 If you are saying "temperatures will be all over the map" my choice would be H4831sc and always with a Fed 210. Have tried RL-16 in my primary .270, and while accuracy and, especially, velocity were great, when I ran my normal temperature test of group-shooting and chronographing at both 70 and zero Fahrenheit, there was over 50 fps difference in velocity and a 1-1/2" shift in point-of-impact at 100 yards. This is exactly the short of thing I'm trying to avoid when using truly temp-resistant powders, such as RL-16 or H4831SC. No kidding. I would have guessed it would’ve worked better for you. Not much different than 17 or 26 if that’s the case. Or enough different to matter. 16 has been an easy powder for accuracy in a few I’ve tried though.
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089 |
I would have too, but when RL-26 appeared Alliant claimed that while it wasn't developed as a temp-stable powder, it worked fairly well that way.
Today their website says RL-26 has "Controlled temperature stability." Dunno whether they made some changes or not--but my supply was purchased within a year or so after 26 was introduced.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043 |
Have tried RL-16 in my primary .270, and while accuracy and, especially, velocity were great, when I ran my normal temperature test of group-shooting and chronographing at both 70 and zero Fahrenheit, there was over 50 fps difference in velocity and a 1-1/2" shift in point-of-impact at 100 yards.
This is exactly the short of thing I'm trying to avoid when using truly temp-resistant powders, such as RL-16 or H4831SC. Ok I see your were talking about Reloder 26, so I'm still a go on working up a RL 16 load
We deal in lead, friend.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,701
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,701 |
I tried rl-16 with 130 nosler partitions in kimber 84 classic select with 24” barrel last year. Velocities matched published loads which was a hair over 3200 fps at max published charge. Since I often hunt in hot weather I dropped down a grain and was still at 3140 avg for 3 shots. Accuracy was around 3/4” for 3 shots. So very good powder for 130s to me especially since temp stable
Lou
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 315
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 315 |
RL16 works well, RL17 works well, If using Alliant powders my choice is RL26 If you are saying "temperatures will be all over the map" my choice would be H4831sc and always with a Fed 210. Have tried RL-16 in my primary .270, and while accuracy and, especially, velocity were great, when I ran my normal temperature test of group-shooting and chronographing at both 70 and zero Fahrenheit, there was over 50 fps difference in velocity and a 1-1/2" shift in point-of-impact at 100 yards. This is exactly the short of thing I'm trying to avoid when using truly temp-resistant powders, such as RL-16 or H4831SC. Did you mean to say you have tried RL-26 in your primary .270? Or maybe RL-17? Judging from the context of boatanchor's post and your last sentence, it seems like there may have been a typo?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089 |
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239 |
I'm lucky in that where I predominately hunt, temp stability is not much of an issue. I try to develop loads in temps around 60* or so, which is very close to the average temps I hunt here in the desert.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,608
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,608 |
Have used 4.5 lbs of rl-16.
338 rcm, 9.3x62, 416 ruger, 416 Rigby, 308 win.
Extremely clean burning, and held zero to -37 below zero Temps in my winter rifle.
Here in Alaska, a rifle can be thawing out near wood stove after a spill on the snow shoes, heat soaked to 100 degrees.
Or cold soaked to 40-50 below zero somewhere on the winter trail.
In either instant, a herd of caribou pops out, 300-400 yards out, I need the gun holding zero.
RL 16 has been the most temp-stable powder I've used.
For my extreme temp swings here in interior alaska, it's my favorite powder. I've never had an inaccurate load across 5 rifles, very consistent.
Last edited by mainer_in_ak; 07/16/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,017
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,017 |
With 130 gr bullets in .270 Win, I found RL16 gave better velocity, but less accuracy than IMR4451 in my rifles.
Your mileage may vary....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,421
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,421 |
You only live once, but...if you do it right, once is enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,763 |
H4831SC is the answer which you seek.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652 |
H4831SC is the answer which you seek. That's what I said earlier in this thread.....but somehow got twisted sideways
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043 |
Have used 4.5 lbs of rl-16. In a 338 rcm, 9.3x62, 416 ruger, 416 Rigby, 308 win. Extremely clean burning, and held zero to -37 below zero Temps in my winter rifle.
Here in Alaska, a rifle can be thawing out near wood stove after a spill on the snow shoes, heat soaked to 100 degrees, or cold soaked to 40-50 below zero somewhere on the winter trail. In either instant, a herd of caribou pops out, 300-400 yards out, I need the gun holding zero. RL 16 has been the most temp-stable powder I've used. For my extreme temp swings here in interior alaska, it's my favorite powder. I've never had an inaccurate load across 5 rifles, very consistent. I think this sums it up perfectly. Thanks for that post. 41
We deal in lead, friend.
|
|
|
|
558 members (1badf350, 1Longbow, 10gaugemag, 1936M71, 1beaver_shooter, 01Foreman400, 64 invisible),
2,537
guests, and
1,366
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,454
Posts18,471,089
Members73,934
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|