Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Handguns First CC Pistol

That’s apparent.

But what you can do is stop lying about things you’ve no experience with. Not sure why dipschits like yourself have to be reminded of this so often.

I can only call that comment bizarre. I've expressed my opinion.

Let’s try this again for the three bull schit artists.

Stop lying.

How much experience with pistol mounted optics do you have?

He can tell you all about "high bore axis" and "trigger slap" he is an expert in those areas.

I also bought a Hellcat Pro last month. Went with it after owning Shields for the last 8 years. The gun is perfection. No red dot for me. Now waiting on the free magazines and range bag.

I've expressed opinions on those and many topics related to firearms in the 20 years plus that I've been a presence here at The Fire. You are free to disagree with some or all of them, and then present your reasons why.

2-cents: I don't like optics on defensive pistols either, but as my circumstances evolve in all likelihood I'll either go with an optic or have to accept I chose a less effective solution. Accuracy is everything. The idea that 'center mass at 50 yards' and 'six inch circles' is good enough is wrong. First off, banking on the bad guy standing motionless out in the open presenting a center mass shot isn't realistic. I'm currently faster and just as accurate with irons close in, but even in my inexperience I'm much faster and more accurate with an optic when the target is small, distant, or moving. The world seems headed toward the scenario of a small piece of a target that's using cover, perhaps dozens of yards away - a mall or grocery store shooter for example.

You might remember I was a 1911 guy for years. I still am, but I had to make the concession that the world dictated I needed more than 8 or 9 rounds. It looks like the world is going to also dictate in the need for a precise and possibly distant shot. The most effective concession for that scenario is an optic.

I changed batteries in my optics last night, 5 2032's and 2 1650's. It's too late to turn back now.

^^^Dumb fugk^^^

This coming from the same fugking moron that needed 40 years to see the value in a polymer framed, striker fired pistol.

LOL

I was 30 when I bought a Gen 2 Glock 19, so I must have started considering the category when I was negative 10, LOL.

I’m sure it had a great time in your sock drawer.

LOL

Been a regular at the range since my teens. Shooting is, and has been for a very long time, my primary hobby. Try again.

Congrats on devoting your entire life to not learning.

LOL

Still waiting to hear which optic and gun combo lead you to decide optics are a “gimmick.”

Why would I involve myself in something about which I'm of the opinion that it's not needed (and poses problems)? You're not making sense. Should I invest in all sorts of things about which I'm of a similar opinion?

So which optic and handgun proved to be a “gimmick?”

You seem to not like that question.

LOL

I think dancing poodles are ridiculous, but I've never had one.

Therfore you formed an opinion based on zero experience