I have a 3-9 SWFA I’d be willing to let go for $5k
I can do buy one, get one free at $5k. Hate to underprice you Bater; but I got mine on sale. 😜
I'd sell him my Leupold for $5,000.00. I figure it is worth it. It's the only Leupold I've ever had good luck with. Damn thing is near priceless as far as I'm concerned. It weighs 11 oz's:
Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.
I have a SWFA 3-15, it's heavy but reliable. The glass reticle on the SWFA is meh.
I just put a leupold vx3 3-10 on my 6.5 PRC, it's 14.5 oz, decent glass, the adjustment range is limited but enough for hunting ranges. They run about $500.
"Life is tough, even tougher if your stupid" John Wayne
The 6x MQ is without peer. 10yd parallax,etched reticle that jives the erector,40+ Mil's of erector travel,the inherent ability to repeat,hold zero,track and 19 ounces. Hint.
I barely have 50+ of 'em. Hint.....................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
if you like a 3-12 and depending on if you define as heavy. I have had great luck with my 3-12 huskemaw. zero stop turret, decent glass, its been bounced around all over the place for 4 coyote seasons. The scope tracks perfectly in a static fixture and has been great in use.
lots of options if you're ok with a bit more power. the 4-16 zeiss v4's are great. they don't offer turrets on the 3-12 v4's
What would be “fun” is if the lighter weight Rupolds actually tracked and returned to zero. If they did I’d own a bunch. On the other hand my March Compact 2.5-25’s just plain work
I never had any problems with dialing Leupolds but then I alway mounted them on good rifles.
YMMV.
Yeah John, we know. There's no way a competent person could have a good rifle and tracking issues with a Leupold.
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
I simply screen shotted your own Retardation and you are forced to default to Lie,if only as per your always...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Besides concocting replies that don't exist and botching names of your "friends",there's ZERO in the way of Reupold "tracking","zero retention" or "repeats",which is all VERY "surprising!". Hint. Fhuqking Laughing!
Pardon Elements beyond your feeble control and the Puns associated with your Dumbfhuqktitude. Them Kilo 6's rule. Hint.
Google as you MUST.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!.................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."