Even though the hammer block on the 97 is reportedly an improvement over the 83, I still carry my 97 six gun style, hammer on an empty chamber. Just a habit, I guess.
Short Answer, No..... unless it's going to be a Safe-Queen, they are not practical in the Real-World, had a 97 .44spl. and a 83 .44mag, once I got my Ruger Bisley BH Hunter Done, I sold them both, and haven't looked back.....
Not sure if its been mentioned, but I've always viewed the Magnum Research BFR's as sort of the "poor man's Freedom Arms". I have a couple of the BFR's, one in a .454 Casull and the other in a 5-shot .45 Colt. Lockup and fitting feels more solid than any of my Blackhawks/Super Blackhawks, and they are considerably cheaper than the FA's. Don't get me wrong, I've always lusted after one, just can't justify the expense.
Freedom Arms 475 Linebaugh, 4-3/4" barrel is probably my most favorite of all larger bore revolvers.
But, I have no issues with the 480 4-5/8" Ruger Bisley. I don't clench my teeth nearly as much when the Ruger receives a character mark when being carried.
Owned many freedoms over the years. While they are works of art, they are far from perfect. Ive had them so tight that the cylinder would bind and need cleaned after 40 rounds fired. To me, they arent worth the price. Ive sold all of mine and currently own a BFR in 500 jrh. I wouldnt trade that firearm for any freedom made. Its more accurate, stronger and pretty damn sexy. Anyone looking for a freedom should run a bfr. Pretty sure youll be skipping out on the freedom
I've packed a .454 FA for years, and it always put the grizzlies down fast, never worried about only having 4 shots because by that time they'd be chewing on me. Never needed more than 2 shots, and the 2nd was insurance! Also have 3 others, only because I appreciate quality that leads to confidence in my gun!