|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127 |
I picked up a used 10/22 on the cheap, wanting the action as a doner for a KIDD build. 3 out of 4 of the scope base screw holes are stripped. Fairly common issue, my go to move is a no go however, Brownells is out of stock on the oversized 6/48 screw set they sell to remedy this issue. So I’m curious what others would do here, go 8/40 or possibly just bed the base right to the receiver?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,330 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,330 Likes: 1 |
I had that happen to me in a relatively remote setting and needed to get things in order. I used locktite 620 to secure the base to the receiver. It’s worked fine so far.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 135
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 135 |
8/40 all they way. I stripped out some 6/48s and glad I went 8/40 for the beef. JB weld if done right...still no.
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,167 Likes: 2
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,167 Likes: 2 |
Going to 8-40s is a piece of cake for a 10-22. Too bad some people don't pay attention to the fact that one cannot tighten screws on an aluminum receiver to the same torque as steel... Especially not needed on something like a 22 rimfire since recoil is basically zero..
Ex- USN (SS) '66-'69 Pro-Constitution. LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,104
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,104 |
I quit using 8-40s. I use 8-32 or 10-32. Much easier to come by, just as good. Why stick with the stupid gun- specific threads.
NRA Benefactor Member
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 296
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 296 |
Why stick with the stupid gun- specific threads. Because those stupid gun-specific threads give you 20% more threads engaged in thin receivers such as 10/22's. By the same token 6-48's give you 50% more threads engaged than 8-32's. If you don't need #8's for brute strength, the 6-48's are a better bet for most optics mounting. That's why so many guns are drilled and tapped 6-48 and so many mounts are made to fit them. There are times when 8-40 makes really good sense, particularly when resisting the shearing force of recoil. For most sane calibers, it is not necessary.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,099 Likes: 8
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,099 Likes: 8 |
Why stick with the stupid gun- specific threads. Because those stupid gun-specific threads give you 20% more threads engaged in thin receivers such as 10/22's. By the same token 6-48's give you 50% more threads engaged than 8-32's. If you don't need #8's for brute strength, the 6-48's are a better bet for most optics mounting. That's why so many guns are drilled and tapped 6-48 and so many mounts are made to fit them. There are times when 8-40 makes really good sense, particularly when resisting the shearing force of recoil. For most sane calibers, it is not necessary. Good post. Something a lot of people don't understand.
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701 |
Why stick with the stupid gun- specific threads. Because those stupid gun-specific threads give you 20% more threads engaged in thin receivers such as 10/22's. By the same token 6-48's give you 50% more threads engaged than 8-32's. If you don't need #8's for brute strength, the 6-48's are a better bet for most optics mounting. That's why so many guns are drilled and tapped 6-48 and so many mounts are made to fit them. There are times when 8-40 makes really good sense, particularly when resisting the shearing force of recoil. For most sane calibers, it is not necessary. Good post. Something a lot of people don't understand. Unfortunately, not understanding rarely keeps people from commenting. Fine threads provide more holding power than coarse. This is particularly relevant when the material is quite thin and you can only cut a few threads, like on the rear bridge of a Mauser.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,256
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,256 |
I picked up a used 10/22 on the cheap, wanting the action as a doner for a KIDD build. 3 out of 4 of the scope base screw holes are stripped. Fairly common issue, my go to move is a no go however, Brownells is out of stock on the oversized 6/48 screw set they sell to remedy this issue. So I’m curious what others would do here, go 8/40 or possibly just bed the base right to the receiver? If there is any meat at all left in the screw holes, a 6-48 tap from Brownells and Locktite should/would work.
Casey
Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively... Having said that, MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,104
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,104 |
Why stick with the stupid gun- specific threads. Because those stupid gun-specific threads give you 20% more threads engaged in thin receivers such as 10/22's. By the same token 6-48's give you 50% more threads engaged than 8-32's. If you don't need #8's for brute strength, the 6-48's are a better bet for most optics mounting. That's why so many guns are drilled and tapped 6-48 and so many mounts are made to fit them. There are times when 8-40 makes really good sense, particularly when resisting the shearing force of recoil. For most sane calibers, it is not necessary. Very seldom is the cross section thin enough to make the ultra fine 48 thread pitch necessary. Generally when threading aluminum, coarser threads are used. Most of the force on a scope base screw is in shear, not tension. The number of threads is a moot point. A number 8 is almost twice as strong as a 6. If you're threading very thin material the finer threads might be some help. So far. I've had great luck with 8-32 and 10-32. ¼-28 is a great option as well...
NRA Benefactor Member
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 4
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 4 |
8/40 all they way. I stripped out some 6/48s and glad I went 8/40 for the beef. JB weld if done right...still no. 8/40 works. My Rem 700 is set up that way intentionally.
Last edited by pcmacd; 11/22/22.
************************** Lesdicsics Of The World, UNTIE! **************************
|
|
|
|
536 members (12344mag, 219DW, 222Sako, 204guy, 2500HD, 1Longbow, 67 invisible),
2,416
guests, and
1,242
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,298
Posts18,487,062
Members73,967
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|