Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Optics School me on which of these 2 scopes is best for my needs

She wasn't looking for "answers",just searching for "vindication" of her Participation "Trophy". Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!................

While it doesn’t guarantee a larger field of view, this is dependent on internal design, the larger tube does offer the potential for a larger field of view.

Field of view, in degrees, is equal to the field stop divided by focal length multiplied by 57.3.
And since the larger tube provides the capability of a larger field stop, the opportunity to design it with a larger field of view is there.

Simply shut the fhuqk up,because are talking about schit you've NEVER even fhuqking "seen". Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!................

You need help...

Touché. I’m no engineer.

Seems it rarely works out to make any practical difference, though. The difference in FOV between otherwise similar scopes w/ 1” vs 30 mm tubes usually amounts to about 1-2 tenths of a degree in viewing angle, i.e, less than peanuts.

Yeah. It’s no guarantee. And scope manufacturers rarely include internal specs. So you are relying on their advertised field of view being accurate/honest. Unless you can compare side by side.

But if designed correctly, it could be a little over 15% wider at the same magnification.

Bradgelina,

Simply dangle pics of "your" wares,you Magnificent Lying Piece Of Fhuqking Schit. Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............

Rickety/Bradgelina,

Perhaps you two Brokedick Kchunts can combine "powers" and dangle a picture between your trembling fingers and quivering lips,that actually exists?!? My other CTR looks like this. Hint.



Fortunately for you Fhuqktards,Imagination and Pretend are free,so even you Brokedick Crying Kchunts can "afford" to "contribute". Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!.............

I think I need a rifle with a 60 degree bolt....
.... so I can mount a big honkin scope nice and low.

I'll take Reality,as you Fhuqktards drool aloud. Hint.



Fhuqking LAUGHING!............

Careful on the Meopta Optikas. I did have a Optika6 that I liked, but many of their reticles are very faint, and thus not good for hunting in my opinion. Good for punching paper as long as your target is light colored.

For your stated use a 3-9x40 plex should be more than sufficient. Also google point blank range. If you want to get fancy, look at the Swarovski Z3, Trijicon Accupoint, or Nightforce SHV 3-10.

Pffft....
I don’t even see one Savage Model 10 243 with ProStaff 5 2.5-10x40 in that whole pile.

poor unfortunate soul

I could hammer those little pistols to pieces with my MkII Target 678.

You Crying Kchunts NEED some Positive Reinforcement. Hint.





Fhuqking LAUGHING!...........

The Arken SH4 has equal internals as the Athlon Helos, has a lit reticle, a better zero stop, is FFP and HD glass which the Athlon doesn't, for $150 less.

You can keep sucking hind tit if you wish or you can shoot them all the choice is yours. Arken SH4 simply beats the Athlon in every way and is less dollars and that is a fact you have yet to experience. Within the year you will be bragging to high heaven pretending it was your very own discovery once again!


Trystan

Trystain,

I enjoy your GoogleFu,but it pales to Reality. Hint.



The Arken is 34mm tube and 10 ounces heavier. Turrets don't lock and are only 8 Mil's per revolution. Their zero stop is lesser to boot. Athlon illumination,is superior. Hint.

Pardon my simply shooting it all,as you Pretend aloud,with your Brokedicktitude on full display. Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!...........

Brokedick is a closet full of Chinese scopes.

I "only" have 100's and 100's of scopes and it's nice if only for a change,to drive wares which work. Hint.





I reckon I should update that very recent picture,given the magnitude of the spending spree. Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............

I'd suggest taking a look at the Meopta Optika5 3-15X44. A 1-inch tube SFP scope that will serve your needs just fine. Set it and forget it.