24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,311
Likes: 9
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,311
Likes: 9
Not a right, a privilege.

Allowed, or not, at the discretion of the government.

Applies to ALL rights if the government can convince you of it and enforce it on you.

Prove me wrong. Show me a *right* that you have that a corrupt government cannot take from you. Up to and including your life.


_______________________________________________________
An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack

LOL

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
You should look up the NYSRPA decision SCOTUS just handed down.

Oregon is going to be a test of that decision and it looks good for you guys and the rest of us in the future.

Sorry you guys are one of the test cases but the odds are in your/our favor.


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,961
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,961
Very correct!


It was a right, until the court system was corrupted by the leftest. Sadly, we allowed this to happen!

We always hear compromise…..BS. Compromise is giving your opponent a victory without a fight!

Had we, the United States, followed Joseph McCarthy’s lead in the ‘50’s……we would be a much better nation today!

Compromise and appeasement will ultimately cost you everything! memtb


You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“I’d like to be a good rifleman…..but, I prefer to be a good hunter”! memtb 2024
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,311
Likes: 9
Campfire Kahuna
OP Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,311
Likes: 9
Thanks for the optimism John Burns, it's in short supply for at least half of the 4 million people in Oregon right now.

The judge in her decision cited the case, and chose to do a workaround anyway.


_______________________________________________________
An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack

LOL
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Fireball2
Thanks for the optimism John Burns, it's in short supply for at least half of the 4 million people in Oregon right now.

So nothing has changed?

LOL


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,941
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,941
Likes: 2
Short-term solution is We, The People, IGNORE the unconstitutional edicts emanating from .gov's


"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson

We are all Rhodesians now.






Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274
Our rights do not come from government, but I understand the point you're making.

I've had to deal with lower (i.e., Federal district) courts a lot on basic issues like the First and Second Amendments. In most cases, the lower courts absolutely do not follow precedent from the Supreme Court and rule, instead, based on political and personal considerations.

I'm working on an appeal from a case in Texas where the judge utterly disregarded precedent and the Constitution to arrive at a decision that comported with her personal beliefs. The good news is that the appeals courts tend to be a lot better, though they certainly aren't perfect. The 9th Circuit, which is where Oregon appeals go, used to be absolutely rogue but in recent years (thanks, in part, to President Trump) they have gotten better.

In other words, you can count on west coast district courts to ignore precedent and you can also count on their rulings to be overturned (if not at the 9th Circuit, the Supreme Court).


Eliminate qualified immunity and you'll eliminate cops who act like they are above the law.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Remsen
Our rights do not come from government, but I understand the point you're making.

I've had to deal with lower (i.e., Federal district) courts a lot on basic issues like the First and Second Amendments. In most cases, the lower courts absolutely do not follow precedent from the Supreme Court and rule, instead, based on political and personal considerations.

I'm working on an appeal from a case in Texas where the judge utterly disregarded precedent and the Constitution to arrive at a decision that comported with her personal beliefs. The good news is that the appeals courts tend to be a lot better, though they certainly aren't perfect. The 9th Circuit, which is where Oregon appeals go, used to be absolutely rogue but in recent years (thanks, in part, to President Trump) they have gotten better.

In other words, you can count on west coast district courts to ignore precedent and you can also count on their rulings to be overturned (if not at the 9th Circuit, the Supreme Court).

So in the mean time, conform.


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 1
[Linked Image from througharosetintedlens.files.wordpress.com]


"Social order at the expense of Liberty is hardly a bargain” de Sade
"He who'll not reason is a Bigot, he who cannot is a Fool, and he who dares not is a Slave."SirWilliamDrummond
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,712
Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,712
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by Fireball2
Prove me wrong. Show me a *right* that you have that a corrupt government cannot take from you.

You are confused about the definition of a right. That the government can infringe on them is why the Bill of Rights was written in the first place. If it wasn't possible there would have been no need and we'd all likely still be speaking....well English but the inferior version that sounds like the words are chewed up and spit out instead of spoken.

The problem you've identified is that our governments have declined to follow their obligation to avoid infringing on rights with which we were born.

IC B3

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 26,529
Likes: 3
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 26,529
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
Short-term solution is We, The People, IGNORE the unconstitutional edicts emanating from .gov's

That^^^^^


FJB & FJT
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Rights are certain, Creator-granted, and unalienable, according to Thomas Jefferson. I accept that as my definition as well. Governments cannot do anything to affect rights. You decide whether to give them up or not. I would suggest that those operating under color of law to violate your rights are guilty of serious crimes, and should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law, both that of men and that of God.

In other words, don't take that shiit they're serving you. You only have the rights you are willing to exercise and fight for, to the death if required. That is the reality.


I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,131
Likes: 2
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,131
Likes: 2
Yep. Ballz be confused thinking that anyone else is responsible for him . Put your big boy pants on.


[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Looks like a State court has issued a TRO on the permit part.

https://twitter.com/GunOwners/statu...n2mI6fixZNufpdxS73fgfPBr592H2T_WYQMzeoUc

Last edited by JohnBurns; 12/06/22.

John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Rights are certain, Creator-granted, and unalienable, according to Thomas Jefferson. I accept that as my definition as well. Governments cannot do anything to affect rights. You decide whether to give them up or not. I would suggest that those operating under color of law to violate your rights are guilty of serious crimes, and should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law, both that of men and that of God.

In other words, don't take that shiit they're serving you. You only have the rights you are willing to exercise and fight for, to the death if required. That is the reality.

LOL.

Post up pictures of all your SBRs, Full Auto, and suppressors that are not registered.

Oh yeah you're just a full of schiet loudmouth running his suck on the internet.

Who saw that comin?


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,274
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by Remsen
Our rights do not come from government, but I understand the point you're making.

I've had to deal with lower (i.e., Federal district) courts a lot on basic issues like the First and Second Amendments. In most cases, the lower courts absolutely do not follow precedent from the Supreme Court and rule, instead, based on political and personal considerations.

I'm working on an appeal from a case in Texas where the judge utterly disregarded precedent and the Constitution to arrive at a decision that comported with her personal beliefs. The good news is that the appeals courts tend to be a lot better, though they certainly aren't perfect. The 9th Circuit, which is where Oregon appeals go, used to be absolutely rogue but in recent years (thanks, in part, to President Trump) they have gotten better.

In other words, you can count on west coast district courts to ignore precedent and you can also count on their rulings to be overturned (if not at the 9th Circuit, the Supreme Court).

So in the mean time, conform.

I sure as hell didn't when I lived in CA. As with so many other things, if you aren't looking for trouble you won't find trouble when it comes to disobeying bad laws. If you make do what I'm doing right now (blabbing about breaking laws), you will find trouble. Be discreet and you will almost always have no trouble.

I refused to register my AK and ARs, bought mags over 10 rounds into the state, carried without a permit, etc. If Montana ever goes the way of CA and OR, I'll refuse to comply with those laws as well. There are some things that are non-negotiable, and fundamental rights are at the top of the list for me.

FYI, this is not legal advice...


Eliminate qualified immunity and you'll eliminate cops who act like they are above the law.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Remsen
I sure as hell didn't when I lived in CA. As with so many other things, if you aren't looking for trouble you won't find trouble when it comes to disobeying bad laws. If you make do what I'm doing right now (blabbing about breaking laws), you will find trouble. Be discreet and you will almost always have no trouble.

I refused to register my AK and ARs, bought mags over 10 rounds into the state, carried without a permit, etc. If Montana ever goes the way of CA and OR, I'll refuse to comply with those laws as well. There are some things that are non-negotiable, and fundamental rights are at the top of the list for me.

FYI, this is not legal advice...

I understand.

But I don't think the majority of Oregon understands how this is going to go.


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
You should look up the NYSRPA decision SCOTUS just handed down.

Oregon is going to be a test of that decision and it looks good for you guys and the rest of us in the future.

Sorry you guys are one of the test cases but the odds are in your/our favor.

Gin Blossom Burns,

Stop pretending to be an authority on anything.

You're a proven liar and fraud.

You're also an inbred dumb fugk.


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Looks like a State court has issued a TRO on the permit part.

https://twitter.com/GunOwners/statu...n2mI6fixZNufpdxS73fgfPBr592H2T_WYQMzeoUc


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,138
Likes: 1
TRO on 114

Quote
PORTLAND, Ore. — A state circuit court judge has granted an injunction against Oregon's Measure 114 on Tuesday, just hours after a federal judge denied a motion that sought to block the ballot measure's ban on high-capacity gun magazines.

Circuit Court Judge Robert Raschio in Harney County ruled in favor of a temporary restraining order on the grounds that the measure would infringe on their right to bear arms because they would be "unable to lawfully purchase a firearm or bear a magazine capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition."

The challenge was one of several brought forth against the measure, which narrowly passed in the midterm election and was set to go into effect Thursday. It would require anyone purchasing a new firearm to get a permit through state and county law enforcement agencies, take a training course and do a background check.

WIZARD.


John Burns

I have all the sources.
They can't stop the signal.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

386 members (160user, 1Longbow, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 10ring1, 17CalFan, 33 invisible), 2,025 guests, and 1,063 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,374
Posts18,488,432
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.097s Queries: 54 (0.016s) Memory: 0.9129 MB (Peak: 1.0158 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 12:15:06 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS