24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,056
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,056
.270 Win., because, well...

'Merica!




GR

GB1

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 8,906
Likes: 2
M
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 8,906
Likes: 2
I have a usrac m70 fwt in 6.5x55 don't know why I'd trade it for either...mb


" Cheapest velocity in the world comes from a long barrel and I sure do like them. MB "
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,597
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,597
Originally Posted by Brad
Originally Posted by Dogger
270 or 308? And justify your pick...

I have both - both stainless Fwt’s made in 1996, and just a couple hundred serial numbers apart. The 308 is my favorite cartridge, so that’s what I’d go with. However, what one will do, the other will do.

I also have a Portuguese made M70 EW in 6.5 CM, but that’s a different conversation… :
)

Do tell, Brad?

Always an ear for your thoughts on rifles.


"Chances Will Be Taken"


Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 1
P
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 1
So easy. The .270. Never shoot it, but instead send directly to JES for 9.3x62 rebore. Then go hunt anything.

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,898
Likes: 6
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,898
Likes: 6
Guess we have to ask, everything in VA, or worldwide?

IC B2

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,928
Well since we already have a pre 64 Featherweight in 308 I'll go with that one

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,850
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,850
I have both in the modern M70 - Kimber Montana. I haven't shot the latest 270 but have killed a pile of critters with the 308. The Kimber MT 308 is close to Nirvana for a big game rifle. I switched to 150 gr monos this year in the 308 and run them at 2900. I only shot 3 animals (1 elk, 2 deer) but will be investing in a substantial amount of 150 gr etips - as soon as Nosler decides to make more.

The 270 129 LRX shoots a good bit flatter but not 150 gr/0.277 bullets driven by anything other than Re26. Re 26 turns the 270 into another cartridge. My last 270 easily got 3000 with 150 gr Partitions. Elk and deer didn't much like that combo. But in a light rifle, the 0.277/1503000 combo will let you know it when it goes off.

Mostly the 270 will get 2900 with a 150. Sound familiar? Due to higher BC of 0.277/150, it will shoot a little bit flatter at 500 than the 150/0.308 but I likely am not a good enough marksman to capitalize on the 1-5 inch advantage (depending on bullet and associated BC) at 500 the 270/150 offers. Plus the 308 will be shorter and lighter - in Kimbers, the way I set them up, it's 1/2 lb difference and a good 2 inches shorter.

Neither is a bad choice but if someone held a gun to my head, for all of the big game hunting I do, the 308, specifically a Kimber MT 308 would get the pick. But I'd be happy with a 270 which is why I own both. A 270 set up to shoot 129/130 monos at 3100 shoots flat - flat enough for me and does offer an advantage I can use. And at a recoil level that won't modify your eyebrows. I'll likely use the 270/129 LRX all next year to see what I think. I have a bunch of WY antelope points that need used before they screw up the WY NR tags.


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,313
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,313
308 for me. I'll never be able to take advantage of the 270's flatter trajectory, but I can take advantage of the 308 more reliable ammo supply.


Brushbuster: "Is this thread about the dear heard or there Jeans?"
Plugger: "If you cant be safe at strip club in Detroit at 2am is anywhere safe?"
Deer are somewhere all the time
To report a post you disagree with, please push Alt + F4. Thank You.
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,681
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,681
I have two of them in the closet. One an 06 and the other a 300WM. Both are so smooth it's unreal. Sending the 06 to my guy for the stock trim down and reshape. Thinking to have the factory barrel copied into a new 06 and trim to 23 inches. I have a barrel band sling swivel already and just need some sights. Budget working type rifle build I guess but bad medicine for.most things.


The way life should be.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
D
Dogger Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,369
A recent bad experience with a high end rifle and cartridge brings home the fun fact that reliability and availability trumps panache when the planets line up with Murphy's Law... which brings me to the reliability of the M70 and availability of 270/308...

IC B3

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,799
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,799
Likes: 2
Since I’m never gonna be rafting down Alaskan rivers or crawling around in the desert, the complicated trigger isn’t an issue for me. That leaves the splined bolt handle as a potential weak point, but that seems to rarely be an issue, and home for another rifle is a short trip.

As bluefish said, mine is very slick, comparable to my Fieldcraft. The striker spring issue caused first accuracy problems, then misfires, but the new spring they sent fixed both. Now it shoots like a .308 oughta.

Very nice rifle at 7lbs 12oz with a 3-9 Accupoint.


What fresh Hell is this?
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,078
Likes: 5
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,078
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Pappy348
Since the USRAC is as dead as Disco, since 1989 according to Wikidiki, one might better set their affections on an FN-made one. I bought an EW last year, and aside from a weak striker spring that I replaced, it’s a fine specimen, better made by far than a couple of Classic SS models my sons owned, which both had quality issues (no, I don’t know how many digits were in the serial numbers).

I bought a .308 because it’s what was available, and because I have enough .308 stuff to last until the next Ice Age. The same would’ve been the case if it were a .270, both a bit much for this area when fully pumped.

Current ones feature Bergara barrels. Mine has a B&C stock. Not sure where the actions are manufactured, but the parts are screwed together in Portugal, hence the marking on the barrel.

You have a rifle that was a POS right out of the gate and you talk it up? OK.. carry on.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,281
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,281
Originally Posted by johnw
Originally Posted by Brad
Originally Posted by Dogger
270 or 308? And justify your pick...

I have both - both stainless Fwt’s made in 1996, and just a couple hundred serial numbers apart. The 308 is my favorite cartridge, so that’s what I’d go with. However, what one will do, the other will do.

I also have a Portuguese made M70 EW in 6.5 CM, but that’s a different conversation… :
)

Do tell, Brad?

Always an ear for your thoughts on rifles.

John, I've had several EW's. A 300 WSM I had was one of the most consistently accurate out of the box rifles I've ever owned. An Ernies trigger spring kit turns the MOA trigger into a 2.75lb joy. I want to have a couple 6.5 CM's on hand for the future, and the EW seems like a great place to put money. I'll likely restock it in something lighter and more svelt, but the factory stock isn't too bad, ugly splatter paint job aside.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,078
Likes: 5
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,078
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Dogger
A recent bad experience with a high end rifle and cartridge brings home the fun fact that reliability and availability trumps panache when the planets line up with Murphy's Law... which brings me to the reliability of the M70 and availability of 270/308...

People have mentioned the cartridges, now I'm going to suggest featherweight rifles. They handle better and don't need much right from the factory. Your choice of USRAC trumps the Browning rifles. I'd also suggest 5 or 6 digit classic. Find a nice stainless/walnut rifle and go forth and kill schidt or sit at the bench and enjoy nice tight groups.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 5
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 5
Brad,
I share your same thoughts and opinions of the BACO rifles. I have a 50/50 split of New Haven classics and BACOs. My EW 308 is now a 358 Win deer and bear killing machine that someday I'll invest in a lighter stock for.

Thanks, Dinny


Medics bury their mistakes..
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 959
D
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 959
I'd go with a 308. The shorter action is eager to mount a scope to my liking.


Nobody's right if everybody's wrong.
Getting into reloading to save money is like getting married for free sex.
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,799
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,799
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by Pappy348
Since the USRAC is as dead as Disco, since 1989 according to Wikidiki, one might better set their affections on an FN-made one. I bought an EW last year, and aside from a weak striker spring that I replaced, it’s a fine specimen, better made by far than a couple of Classic SS models my sons owned, which both had quality issues (no, I don’t know how many digits were in the serial numbers).

I bought a .308 because it’s what was available, and because I have enough .308 stuff to last until the next Ice Age. The same would’ve been the case if it were a .270, both a bit much for this area when fully pumped.

Current ones feature Bergara barrels. Mine has a B&C stock. Not sure where the actions are manufactured, but the parts are screwed together in Portugal, hence the marking on the barrel.

You have a rifle that was a POS right out of the gate and you talk it up? OK.. carry on.

POS? That’s a bit extreme for a simple spring problem don’t you think?

Compared to the two USRACs my sons owned, it’t a peach. They were clearly slapped together with little care.

Every review of the current M70s I’ve read has been positive, glowing even, concerning their quality. Those carry more weight with me than the grumblings of a cranky old internet goober, -that’s you by the way.


What fresh Hell is this?
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,621
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,621
.270 Win for me. I love the 150gr Nosler Partition and with that bullet there isn’t much one can’t do with larger game.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

697 members (007FJ, 1beaver_shooter, 10gaugemag, 1eyedmule, 160user, 74 invisible), 3,221 guests, and 1,326 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,105
Posts18,483,265
Members73,966
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.155s Queries: 51 (0.011s) Memory: 0.8954 MB (Peak: 1.0087 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-02 02:26:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS