Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Lake loosing again

Judge just ruled against Lake. I guess U.S. Republicans or Maga’s are just going to have to learn to cheat like the Democrats. Can’t believe all these cases go for the Rats. All of the twitter files proving Trump right nothing ever happens for this side. The Arizona governor elect campaigned like Biden and hid can’t believe that judges ruling. This country is in the toilet just waiting for China to flush. Get ready for so really bad times.

Yes, it's highly unlikely that there's going to be a miraculous turnaround..............ship has lost both rudders.

MM

From what's reported, it looks like the Judge wanted Lake ta prove she woulda won the election without the vote fraud.

Impossible standard.

nothing to do with the RNC was ever MAGA , the mistake we made was ever associating the two

Don’t schit yourself, the Republicans cheated every way possible to make sure Lake, Masters, Walker and Oz did not get elected.

A female Trump is not allowed into their private club

Had a lawyer once ask me, "know what is the last thing to enter a courthouse?"

"The truth."

Ymmv

Correct

The judge ruled that there was no clear and convincing evidence of intentional misconduct.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ar...akes-challenge-to-gubernatorial-election

IDK, this is what I saw:

"After a two-day trial, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson concluded that Lake had not established that election officials’ willful misconduct was sufficient to alter the outcome of the race."

https://thelibertydaily.com/judge-rules-against-kari-lake-allows-katie-hobbs-to-steal-arizona/

We get thrown a tidbit of hope, then it’s yanked away. How depressing.

Lucy and the football,
all over again

It has to be this way
Our Courts need to show that they are corrupt before the Military can step in.

Who else believes this judge got a…, call?

Black rats have all the gu-ment jobs counting the votes.

.



Elon’s next.




.

The expert said the change was intentional by a password protected operation. The official himself admitted to changing the paper size! One official perjured himself. The entire system is blatantly corrupt. Judges bought and sold need a stronger incentive to behave themselves in a legal fashion. But who can afford to risk the consequences when no mass protests can even be imagined much less organized to revolt? The situation is getting serious beyond comprehension. McConnell and the Republican machine are totally behind it too. Democrats don't have to campaign, debate or appear in public to be elected these days. Third world countries are rioting over stuff like this. But their suffering is greater than ours .... so far. Unbelievable. The border invasion. The Ukraine lottery. Twitter twaddle. Monetary destruction. We are living the decline and fall of Western Civilization in real time. It's all an unbelievable nightmare.

If you want a primer on how the left set up the courts to be their enforcers, this is it.

If you make a claim of discrimination, you often don't have to prove that there was intentional discrimination or that actual discrimination was the cause of your harm. There's a legal theory in use called "disparate impact" and the effect of this theory is that all you have to do is show that you, as a member of a "protected class", didn't get something that you wanted (this is a simplification, of course, but it's what the practical effect is). So if you're a woman who works as a cop, you can complain that men get promoted more often than women and you will have proven your case, even if the real reason men get promoted more often is that the job requires physical strength and women tend to not be as strong as men.

Surprisingly, this theory is used to help certain groups (gays, blacks, etc.) and never to help other groups (White men, conservatives, etc.).

There's another legal theory called "res ipsa loquitur" (latin for "the thing speaks for itself"), where you don't have to provide evidence of someone or something doing harm to you, all you have to show is that you didn't cause your own injury and the person you claim to have caused it can't provide an explanation for how he wasn't responsible (again, a simplification).

While these two theories aren't used in election disputes, a court could easily employ the theories, reasoning by analogy, that if there are all sorts of errors in tabulating votes and the errors were of the nature that they likely affected the outcome of an election, the election should be voided and redone. OF COURSE you won't find smoking guns in election fraud, especially when the person engaging in the fraud controls the vote tabulation, but when you look at the patterns of who gets hurt with these "errors" and how they play out, it's pretty effing obvious that someone is behind the curtain.

I assure you that if it was a Democrat who complained about errors in vote tabulation the court would have no problem applying a form of disparate impact theory or res ipsa loquitur to call for a new election.