Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Optics Scope rings

Have a sporterized Mauser 98 at the smith’s now getting drilled and tapped for scope bases. The receiver hadn’t had the charging hump ground down so I decided on two piece warne unaltered steel bases for it. I was planning on using the vertical split maxima rings but after some reading I’m thinking about going with the Burris signature zee rings instead. Which ones should I go with? Or should I be looking at different rings?

I'd use regular ol Zee rings. They look good, are strong, svelte and lock up solid on the weaver style mounts. That's what I'm going to be running on my new mauser rifle.

Burris Zee's are absolute fhuqking Dog Schit,with perhaps only Millett below them. Hint.

Pardon some folks actually shooting. Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!.............

Burris Signature Zee rings have worked great for me.

If your gun is a heavier kicker, Burris XTR Signature rings would be better.

No ring marks. No lapping required.

Sweetie,

Signatures have THREE fhuqking times the number of 'cap fasteners and surface engagement area,along with DOUBLE the base fasteners. Zee's are THE fhuqking schittiest thing going. Hint.

You Drooling CLUELESS Fhuqktards are a HOOT! Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!..................

'Stickie,

I think you are too drunk to run your calculator.

3x!

Laughing!

Google as you MUST,Brokedick. Hint.



Pardon my simply shooting it all,as you Google aloud and fail MISERABLY. Hint.



Fhuqking LAUGHING!................

I'm VERY fhuqking "SURPRISED!",that it got 3x more quiet,when The Drooler had her nose rubbed in her own fhuqking STUPIDITY. Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!.................

3x cap fasteners?

Sig Zees have eight per pair.

XTR Sigs have 12 per pair.

8x3 =24

!00% error.

Nice try.

You are an AMAZINGLY Stupid Clueless Fhuqk...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?





Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............

A sporterized mauser is the last application for Chinese made dogshït Burris XTR Signature, aka "Horn Rings" in stikspeek. Now, if you're a broke-dïck looking to hold down Chinese scopes for drop tests, then have at it.

Those are not Signature Zees

Keep googling.

QueenKchunt "gets" to look at other folks wares...the "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?

Now WhyKchunt gets to hit edit. Hint. Fhuqking LAUGHING!





The Two Crying Kchunts together,couldn't procure a Fieldcraft. Hint.



Signatures are more than a "touch" Skookum. Pardon reality,ladies. Hint.

At least you have one another's narrow shoulders to cry upon. Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............

Regular ol Zees, work just fine on heavy kickers:


7 pound 300WBY:


If you really want something stronger, go with the Leupold PRW's shown on the 7 pound 338wm above^^^ The way it shoots is a testament as to how well the rings hold the scope:



Then a mauser style rifle, just for schidts and giggles for the midget to look at:



Zees on another pre 64 model 70:

Stick post up that pic of the shelf of Chinese scope boxes.

#analthon #arsestain

I agree, Burris Zee rings are right at the bottom of rings I'd choose.

I don't like the vertical split Warne rings either but I do like the horizontal split Maxima rings.

Have used plenty of the Zees, Sig and plain. The stupid part is that cut that lets it clamp down on the base. It will take a set and require a big flat blade screwdriver to pry it open and maybe a plastic mallet to remove from the base. The XTR Sigs are easier, but wider and heavier than necessary in some cases. Warne Mountain techs are strong and light, easy to install and remove with a 1/2” socket on your torque wrench, and all fasteners are coated stainless steel.

SWFA XTR clones are cheap as dirt, often included free in a package when the scopes are on sale, and made in China like most of the Burris rings. They use a 1/2” clamping nut too and so far have worked just fine without marking any scopes.

It annoys the crap outta me that Leupold doesn’t make DDs for 98s, but for ones without the hump, at least, there are regular Talleys.

I've failed numerous sets of Zee's,mainly because they are frail pieces of fhuqking schit and I actually shoot. As are Zeiss and Burris scopes. Hint.

What are the "odds",that QueenKchunt is a heel nipping lap dog,"living" vicariously?!? Hint.



Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............

The Warne maximas are a little bulky but they will hold a scope in place. Weaver Quadlocks hold OK too, for an aluminum ring. LeupoldQRW's are good. I never have liked the Burris rings and still don't. GD