so what is a lyman or marbles tang sight worth these days ? I looked online and I guess I'm out of touch . I've got some to sell . don't do well posting pictures here but if any of you are interested send me a message . don't really know what to ask ??? I figured I'd offer them up here in the group before posting them in the classifieds
well if anyone is interested, I'd like to get 150 for a marbles . 175 for the one with the box its used but in nice condition I have two williams that I'd also asked 150 each .. the lyman ? well I gotta start somewhere with it . I know those are rare So the Lyman has been spoken for thanks Jaaack .... I also have two stith scope/mount sets 1 is a 3/4" with a weaver J2.5 I'd take 300 for that and then a 1" with a weaver K 2.5 with a post I'd asked 400 for that
The Lyman has the No 47 stem in it, these would replace the original stem and look like they will adjust almost a low as the standard stems, so they should work without changing anything else.
That's for a Marble's, not something that was offered by Lyman in the originals as far as I know. They also had them for Lyman's but sold out - .buffaloarms/47-stem-lyman If you ever see one in a Marble's it's almost certainly a reproduction, or possibly an original with a Marble's stem put on it. I will be trying to post a thread about these in a day or two, been going through my catalogs and trying to find my examples.
Added - If a sight was shipped with this stem it was called the No 52, just a standard sight with this stem installed from what I can see. I have a No 52 with box for Savage 22's and holding it on a couple guns it will adjust low enough for some, but on a couple early Model 1903's it will not quite go low enough to line up with the lowest barrel sight setting. If the sight wasn't in a marked box, there would not be a way to say it wasn't just a regular sight that had the stem replaced.
Jaaack, The patent was applied for March 31, 1913, granted May 11. 1915, so it was probably introduced later 1912~early 1913, patents had to be applied for within a year of the design being made public, but they could be applied for before that, so it could have been later. I have a few Lyman catalogs from 1932 on and the No 47 and No 52 are not in any of them, it had to be discontinued before 1932.
The one pictured is marked Pat. Pend. This is what is can be used before the application has been filed, and even after if they don't want to make a new stamp. This would suggest introduction before the patent application.
They take standard Lyman eye pieces and other makers used the same thread.
Actually, I misquoted Stroebel. He wrote "The No. 47 and No. 52 were discontinued by 1955." Since 1932 is earlier than 1955 he is technically correct. I suspected they were discontinued long before 1955.
There are probably a couple of reasons that the No. 47 is not often seen on a No. 1A or 2A SA. If one was buying a new sight and wanted one that is windage adjustable, one would probably just buy a No. 29 1/2 or 30 1/2 which was introduced about the same time. I suspect the cost difference would be negligible. Later, when receiver sights became available, most would probably go that route.
Joe, it's a No 200 King, you almost always find them in good condition because they did not last long before something went wrong, nice looking sight though. They have some delicate parts inside and the post is pressed together and can become loose.