I bought a super nice model 70 in 270 WSM from a friend this past year. I am just curious about the value of it and also roughly the year it is from. Also considering selling it because its just too pretty to hunt with and I am not a hardcore collector. I was thinking it was a featherweight because all other featherweights I have seen have that same style stock on it....but there is not any featherweight markings on the barrel or action. Thoughts? Professional opinions?
Well, at least you posted photos, but damn near worthless because I can't zoom in on them. No pics of the schnabel and you don't give the serial #. I'm going to assume it's a 7 digit classic made after 2001. I'd make sure the chamber is not oval and is indeed round. Some of these earlier WSM's had issues. The 7 digit classics also had some issues of their own. This makes these rifles some of the least desirable of the bunch. Besides the plastic stock and duratouch walmart models.
Winchester may have termed this one a featherweight, when indeed it really is not. Basically a sporter thrown in a modified fwt stock. Nice rifles, but I'd want to be sure the chamber is nice and round and the scope mount holes are drilled in line with the center axis of the bore. Some of them were not. Some were bad enough that you could actually see they were out with the naked eye. If everything checked out on this rifle, I'd expect it to top out around $875-900.00.. There's not guarantee on that price even, as the 270 wsm is basically dead in the water. This is the first time you'll hear me say this, but if it were a BACO 2008 limited ediiton 270 WSM, it would be worth slightly more.
Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.
If everything checked out on this rifle, I'd expect it to top out around $875-900.00.. There's not guarantee on that price even, as the 270 wsm is basically dead in the water..
And that's the biggest value killer - the 270 WSM.
Ex- USN (SS) '66-'69 Pro-Constitution. LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
If everything checked out on this rifle, I'd expect it to top out around $875-900.00.. There's not guarantee on that price even, as the 270 wsm is basically dead in the water..
And that's the biggest value killer - the 270 WSM.
I hear that a lot . I have unloaded a 270 WSM Kimber Montana and a 300 WSM Model 70 in the past year. They did take a while but they sold for a decent buck as well. I would not buy a new one in either cartridge any time soon.
If everything checked out on this rifle, I'd expect it to top out around $875-900.00.. There's not guarantee on that price even, as the 270 wsm is basically dead in the water..
And that's the biggest value killer - the 270 WSM.
I hear that a lot . I have unloaded a 270 WSM Kimber Montana and a 300 WSM Model 70 in the past year. They did take a while but they sold for a decent buck as well. I would not buy a new one in either cartridge any time soon.
Well, keep me in mind for any well priced Montana 300 WSM's you all need to get rid of!
Well, at least you posted photos, but damn near worthless because I can't zoom in on them. No pics of the schnabel and you don't give the serial #. I'm going to assume it's a 7 digit classic made after 2001. I'd make sure the chamber is not oval and is indeed round. Some of these earlier WSM's had issues. The 7 digit classics also had some issues of their own. This makes these rifles some of the least desirable of the bunch. Besides the plastic stock and duratouch walmart models.
Winchester may have termed this one a featherweight, when indeed it really is not. Basically a sporter thrown in a modified fwt stock. Nice rifles, but I'd want to be sure the chamber is nice and round and the scope mount holes are drilled in line with the center axis of the bore. Some of them were not. Some were bad enough that you could actually see they were out with the naked eye. If everything checked out on this rifle, I'd expect it to top out around $875-900.00.. There's not guarantee on that price even, as the 270 wsm is basically dead in the water. This is the first time you'll hear me say this, but if it were a BACO 2008 limited ediiton 270 WSM, it would be worth slightly more.
Per usual, using your charm to make friends. He basically stated he's not a Win guy and is looking for help. Rather than criticize maybe you could have nicely said "more information would be helpful". I'm not saying you're wrong about his rifle (because you're not) but FFS, why do you b---h about everyone's picture habits? Not everyone wants to spend the amount of time here you do. He's been a member longer than you and has about 44k less posts. Not everyone that posts in this section has your Winchester knowledge. There is a way to do this and not be a d--k. Cut him some slack, be decent and if you can't move the f--k on. your insults and bluster about pictures is old and tired.
If everything checked out on this rifle, I'd expect it to top out around $875-900.00.. There's not guarantee on that price even, as the 270 wsm is basically dead in the water..
And that's the biggest value killer - the 270 WSM.
I hear that a lot . I have unloaded a 270 WSM Kimber Montana and a 300 WSM Model 70 in the past year. They did take a while but they sold for a decent buck as well. I would not buy a new one in either cartridge any time soon.
Well, keep me in mind for any well priced Montana 300 WSM's you all need to get rid of!
I'm selling a 300 WSM Tikka to a buddy, for $600.00. I like the cartridge well enough, but have others that work just as well. 30-06 comes to mind there. The nice thing about the old 06 is most of mine carry 5 and 6 in the magazine. I'll likely hang on to that stainless Ruger m77 300 RSAUM though. That thing impresses me.
Originally Posted by Technoman26
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Well, at least you posted photos, but damn near worthless because I can't zoom in on them. No pics of the schnabel and you don't give the serial #. I'm going to assume it's a 7 digit classic made after 2001. I'd make sure the chamber is not oval and is indeed round. Some of these earlier WSM's had issues. The 7 digit classics also had some issues of their own. This makes these rifles some of the least desirable of the bunch. Besides the plastic stock and duratouch walmart models.
Winchester may have termed this one a featherweight, when indeed it really is not. Basically a sporter thrown in a modified fwt stock. Nice rifles, but I'd want to be sure the chamber is nice and round and the scope mount holes are drilled in line with the center axis of the bore. Some of them were not. Some were bad enough that you could actually see they were out with the naked eye. If everything checked out on this rifle, I'd expect it to top out around $875-900.00.. There's not guarantee on that price even, as the 270 wsm is basically dead in the water. This is the first time you'll hear me say this, but if it were a BACO 2008 limited ediiton 270 WSM, it would be worth slightly more.
Per usual, using your charm to make friends. He basically stated he's not a Win guy and is looking for help. Rather than criticize maybe you could have nicely said "more information would be helpful". I'm not saying you're wrong about his rifle (because you're not) but FFS, why do you b---h about everyone's picture habits? Not everyone wants to spend the amount of time here you do. He's been a member longer than you and has about 44k less posts. Not everyone that posts in this section has your Winchester knowledge. There is a way to do this and not be a d--k. Cut him some slack, be decent and if you can't move the f--k on. your insults and bluster about pictures is old and tired.
Your sandy mangina is getting old. He didn't say he didn't know anything about Winchesters, just that it seemed strange that it's not marked featherweight anywhere. I gave an honest evaluation of his rifle. If you don't like it, you can move on.
Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.
Your sandy mangina is getting old. He didn't say he didn't know anything about Winchesters, just that it seemed strange that it's not marked featherweight anywhere. I gave an honest evaluation of his rifle. If you don't like it, you can move on.
You're a funny guy BSA. "Sandy mangina"...ha! Come up with that yourself? I like all your "helping". Keep it up. Post some more pics. We can all continue to enjoy your wit and target/rifle pictures. The funny thing is about you, you don't even realize how many people on this forum you irritate. That said, I'm sure also you don't care. So, at least you have that. I'll move on when I'm ready but I'm happy to continue to go back and forth about what a great guy you are if you want to.
Zoom works for me on the photos and, as noted, about any WSM is a tough sell. Particularly given the recent past with ammo and components. I would not touch any WSM, SAMU or RCM. No reason to. With time I suspect some of the latest greats will peter out as well.
I bought a super nice model 70 in 270 WSM from a friend this past year. I am just curious about the value of it and also roughly the year it is from. Also considering selling it because its just too pretty to hunt with and I am not a hardcore collector. I was thinking it was a featherweight because all other featherweights I have seen have that same style stock on it....but there is not any featherweight markings on the barrel or action. Thoughts? Professional opinions?
First of all...nice Model 70, sir. Secondly, the 270WSM is a fine cartridge with a lot of capability. Most of the negatives about the cartridge revolves around available factory ammo. It really shines when hand loaded.
A good friend has the exact twin to your rifle. This Spring, I pillar bedded it and with the Nosler 160 and RL19, it's a nice accurate rig for his upcoming elk hunt.
The price for your sample might not be as high as if it were chambered in a more 'classic' cartridge (30-06, 270, etc). And while I'm not a Winchester 'guy', these are still nice guns.
Good shootin' -Al
PS: No problem here enlarging your pictures. Good to keep that in mind as you weigh the worth of some responses.
I bought a super nice model 70 in 270 WSM from a friend this past year. I am just curious about the value of it and also roughly the year it is from. Also considering selling it because its just too pretty to hunt with and I am not a hardcore collector. I was thinking it was a featherweight because all other featherweights I have seen have that same style stock on it....but there is not any featherweight markings on the barrel or action. Thoughts? Professional opinions?
As bsa noted, your rifle isn't a Featherweight but a Sporter in a Featherweight stock. Winchester did that with rifles chambered for some magnum cartridges during the period that everyone is referencing.
A Sporter usually has a fairly heavy 24" or 26" barrel, while a Featherweight usually has a lighter 22" barrel. The giveaway is the little step down in barrel shank diameter right in front of the action. Compare the Featherweight to the Supergrade at https://www.winchesterguns.com/products/rifles/model-70/current.html and you'll see what I mean. This holds true for pre-64 as well as current guns.
The 270 Winchester has getting it done for nearly a century. The WSM version runs a bit faster and both have a 1:10 twist so they likely won't handle long, high-BC bullets well. Inside of 4-500 yards both are superb choices. The only issues with the WSM are that ammo can be scarce and expensive, and that it will probably be discontinued.
If you like the rifle, then take it hunting. A couple of hundred pieces of brass should last a lifetime.
Okie John
Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
OP, Perry is usually pretty spot on with their pricing. They posted this one today. You can watch it and see if it sells - just another data point for you.
Secondly, the 270WSM is a fine cartridge with a lot of capability. Most of the negatives about the cartridge revolves around available factory ammo. It really shines when hand loaded. 
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/m28jDsKs/D0-E6-EBC9-431-A-455-E-A7-BD-E65-E79-A076-FE.png)