Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire 20+ Years On The Force

Double down on stupid, dumb f uck.

Shoot someone's dog today?...Naw...I bet you wanted to.

I'm not an atf agent, genius.....keep doubling down on how retarded you are. You have strange fantasies btw

Didn't say you were successful...just that you wanted to.

You know...being all tacked up with nowhere to storm.

Keep fantasizing about it.....maybe one day your dreams will come true.

To be honest I'd probably be more willing to shoot a k9 before someone else's dog....they are a useless resource suck (much like you)

I've had a couple opportunities to shoot dogs, but with half a brain (unlike you) it's avoidable...along with the paperwork. Although I really wanted to shoot a pit that gnawed off a three year old's face. You know real life stuff that doesn't happen at the old folks home.

You are a chick aren't you?

I'm civil but not friendly, pretty such as they are trained to be. I answer reasonable questions such as where I'm coming from. If asked where I'm going, I point out that as could not have committed a crime there yet they had no need to know. I know why they ask, it just annoys me.

Again youre fantasizing about strange s hit......i feel bad for the other residents at the senior citizen joint...

You know, this is a safe space and you don't have to stay in the closet.

We support you dear.

Don't answer questions, Ever.

If you are required by law to provide ID, then do it, if not then exercise your 4th Amendment rights and refuse, but never-ever answer questions.

This has been posted many times, but it's worth another look.

I know you think it's a safe space for you, which is why you cry like a b itch when someone points out how stupid you are.

Sweety, that doesn't really make sense...are you suuuure you are a policewoman?

Has it been awhile since your family visited you at the old folks home? Is this a cry for help?

Lol fugging boomers

learn your law rights but be decent about it with all officers , some officer`s are arses some are very decent ,i have dealt with both . the worst ones are always the little guys they wanna act tuff .

You seem tense...is it that time for you?

Fixed it for ya.

It's always a good thing when bad cops have to face consequences.

I put together the first Citizens Police Academy for our department. One of the first things I did was give the students a list of definitions that we used every day while doing our job. Included in the list was reasonable suspicion and probable cause. Both are related and both are important parts of any investigation and possible arrest. It's a sad state of affairs that those 2 officers could not recite it for the person asking about it.

We have no restrictions about filming or taking pictures outside of any government buildings, especially while standing on public property. Inside of buildings where there are people who do not want to be filmed or there is a security issue, that is completely different.

Maybe the local court has some kind of jurisdiction outside of the building. That would be unusual. Is it possible the Court had restrictions on pictures and video outside of the building ? Yes. Keep in mind, we are talking about democRAT controlled Chicago.

None the less, those 2 officers should of been able to know what "reasonable suspicion" and "probable cause" are all about. And, if the judges who sit in that Courthouse had some kind of restrictions on taking pictures of that building, the officers should of been able to quote the order.

kwg

Actually Hawk, it is always a good thing when everyone is held accountable for their actions.