24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,113
Likes: 12
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,113
Likes: 12
Moral of the story. Keep your runout less than .003", by whatever means/method you like. As long as that method is consistent. If you are not checking the rounout of your loaded ammo, then why mess with fancy equipment at all? I've shot ammo with a lot of runout and compared it to ammo with less runout and some groups were cut in half by the straighter ammo. Expensive die sets and stuff like that, that require all kinds of bushings and stuff should be left to benchrest shooters with benchrest rifles. But runout has an effect on accuracy/precision more than most think.

Here's an example of a hunting rifle (Ruger M77 MK2 300RSAUM) that I found brass with inconsistent neck thickness to be the issue. This in turn has a direct impact on runout. I threw out some brass that was really bad, giving more than .006" TIR. You can't get rid of inconsistent neck thickness issues with a fancy die. No matter how hard you try. It's just not going to happen.

Poor runout:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Acceptable runout:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

And then checking the straighter ammo at 400 yards:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Holding less than 3/4 moa at 400 yards is acceptable enough for the hunting I do.

A double check of the straighter ammo:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Still holding 3/4 moa at 400 yards.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

This is just a hunting rifle, but it plainly shows how runout affects the groups. Other groups shot with the poor runout showed the same results. I threw those targets away, they were so bad.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
GB1

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 58,567
Likes: 10
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 58,567
Likes: 10
BullSchitArtist,

You are an AMAZINGLY Stupid Clueless Drooling Brokedick Fhuqk...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?

[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]

How are the 108's and the like,treating you in your 6x45 Krunchenticker? HINT.

Bless your poor poor(literally) heart,for TRYING so hard.

Hint.

Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............


Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,929
Likes: 1
S
SLM Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
S
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,929
Likes: 1
I’m confused, now it doesn’t take 2, 10 shot groups to be valid?

3 shot groups are ok now?

Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Moral of the story. Keep your runout less than .003", by whatever means/method you like. As long as that method is consistent. If you are not checking the rounout of your loaded ammo, then why mess with fancy equipment at all? I've shot ammo with a lot of runout and compared it to ammo with less runout and some groups were cut in half by the straighter ammo. Expensive die sets and stuff like that, that require all kinds of bushings and stuff should be left to benchrest shooters with benchrest rifles. But runout has an effect on accuracy/precision more than most think.

Here's an example of a hunting rifle (Ruger M77 MK2 300RSAUM) that I found brass with inconsistent neck thickness to be the issue. This in turn has a direct impact on runout. I threw out some brass that was really bad, giving more than .006" TIR. You can't get rid of inconsistent neck thickness issues with a fancy die. No matter how hard you try. It's just not going to happen.

Poor runout:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Acceptable runout:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

And then checking the straighter ammo at 400 yards:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Holding less than 3/4 moa at 400 yards is acceptable enough for the hunting I do.

A double check of the straighter ammo:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Still holding 3/4 moa at 400 yards.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

This is just a hunting rifle, but it plainly shows how runout affects the groups. Other groups shot with the poor runout showed the same results. I threw those targets away, they were so bad.

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 2
And what happened to hitting the orange sticker?

FWIW I did not buy my bushing dies because I needed to reduce run-out...


Too close for irons, switching to scope...
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 71
F
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
F
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 71
Interesting to see everyones opinions on the topic. I just bought a Redding FL bushing die to reload for my GAP Crusader. Using "standard" Redding sizing die, I was getting lots of .4moa groups. Not all the time mind you, but quite often! I'll be out to the range tomorrow with the same load, but brass resized with the new bushing die to see if there is any difference. For those interested, this load performs well on every .308 I've shot it through. YMMV, of course.

168 Z-max, 42.2gr IMR4064, Lapua brass and CCI 200.

Last edited by foamantelope; 09/29/23.
IC B2

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by foamantelope
Interesting to see everyones opinions on the topic. I just bought a Redding FL bushing die to reload for my GAP Crusader. Using "standard" Redding sizing die, I was getting lots of .4moa groups. Not all the time mind you, but quite often! I'll be out to the range tomorrow with the same load, but brass resized with the new bushing die to see if there is any difference. For those interested, this load performs well on every .308 I've shot it through. YMMV, of course.

168 Z-max, 42.2gr IMR4064, Lapua brass and CCI 200.

I have the same die and use a .335 Short Action Customs bushing with no expander ball. Straight ammo without overworking the Lapua brass.

Last edited by MikeS; 09/29/23.

Too close for irons, switching to scope...
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by foamantelope
Interesting to see everyones opinions on the topic. I just bought a Redding FL bushing die to reload for my GAP Crusader. Using "standard" Redding sizing die, I was getting lots of .4moa groups. Not all the time mind you, but quite often! I'll be out to the range tomorrow with the same load, but brass resized with the new bushing die to see if there is any difference. For those interested, this load performs well on every .308 I've shot it through. YMMV, of course.

168 Z-max, 42.2gr IMR4064, Lapua brass and CCI 200.


That's similar to a well known load used by those who shot matches with M1A rifles.

Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 1,976
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Moral of the story. Keep your runout less than .003", by whatever means/method you like. As long as that method is consistent. If you are not checking the rounout of your loaded ammo, then why mess with fancy equipment at all? I've shot ammo with a lot of runout and compared it to ammo with less runout and some groups were cut in half by the straighter ammo. Expensive die sets and stuff like that, that require all kinds of bushings and stuff should be left to benchrest shooters with benchrest rifles. But runout has an effect on accuracy/precision more than most think.

Here's an example of a hunting rifle (Ruger M77 MK2 300RSAUM) that I found brass with inconsistent neck thickness to be the issue. This in turn has a direct impact on runout. I threw out some brass that was really bad, giving more than .006" TIR. You can't get rid of inconsistent neck thickness issues with a fancy die. No matter how hard you try. It's just not going to happen.

Poor runout:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Acceptable runout:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

And then checking the straighter ammo at 400 yards:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Holding less than 3/4 moa at 400 yards is acceptable enough for the hunting I do.

A double check of the straighter ammo:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Still holding 3/4 moa at 400 yards.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

This is just a hunting rifle, but it plainly shows how runout affects the groups. Other groups shot with the poor runout showed the same results. I threw those targets away, they were so bad.


Do you happen to have a chamber cast of this rifle? Could still be absolutely a result of the chamber/throat dimensions as per the theory of the gentleman in the video. I can’t say, but in my many custom rifles, I’ve not seen it make any difference to the point that I would have to try to screw up the rounds to get more than 0.003” anyway.


"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
BSA you wanna p.m me a cell# or email and ill show you 4or 5 Hunting rifles that were shot off a bipod that are 1.5 -2" groups at 665- 700 yards that never had one round measured for runout. Those types of groups are required for my hunting needs thats the moral of the story.
Some [bleep] matters other [bleep] dont.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
Not measuring for runout doesn't mean there is runout.

IC B3

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 468
N
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
N
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 468
I don’t waste my time worrying about runout.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
Originally Posted by mathman
Not measuring for runout doesn't mean there is runout.
Exactly, why measure if it dont matter.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
Originally Posted by sherm_61
Originally Posted by mathman
Not measuring for runout doesn't mean there is runout.
Exactly, why measure if it dont matter.
Theres alot more stuff to worry about, if less than .007 matters you got something else going on like tight freebore, fat bullets, etc.
The days of tight freebore, tight necks etc have gone out the window.
A straight chamber to the bore is alot more forging also, so maybe runout matters in a crooked chamber

Last edited by sherm_61; 09/30/23.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by sherm_61
Originally Posted by mathman
Not measuring for runout doesn't mean there is runout.
Exactly, why measure if it dont matter.

I didn't say it doesn't matter.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by sherm_61
Originally Posted by mathman
Not measuring for runout doesn't mean there is runout.
Exactly, why measure if it dont matter.

I didn't say it doesn't matter.
Walk up to a 1,000 yard BR line and ask guys if less than .007 TIR matters.
Like I said earlier within reason TIR doesn't matter if your rifle is put together correctly.
Theres absolutely no reason you can't tune a hunting rifle same way as a BR rifle, the BR guys I know do it the same for both.
Of course the hunting rifle has to be capable thats were the smith is a big key.

Last edited by sherm_61; 09/30/23.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,314
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Online Sleepy
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,314
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by CGPAUL
Sure...necks are anealed, I do this after every firing, air cooled. I find anealing helps with consistant bullet steat depth. I also find that before sizeing and pulling the case over the expander ball, I use a very LIGHT lube of Imperial wax, applied with a cotton swab,to lube inside of the neck..then the outside of the case. Over the years, I`ve gotten a "feel" for this. Thoses who have it know. what I`m endvering to do is keep the case concentrict. I wipe the outside of the case clean, then into the trimmer. Mostly because of the pressures I run, and how I have my die set up, this only requires a touch up. After sizing, and this is step is I think, important, I put a very good champher on the inside ot the neck, then outside. I then take OOO steelwool and polish the champher, getting it smooth for the seating process. Prime and fill. The case goes into the press, I sellect a bullet at of 20, that have already been chosen for consistant BTO, place on the neck and guided into the seat die with my fingers. I then run the case and bullet up to meet the seat stem. When I contact the stem, I stop, and GENTLY, using my fingers, lift the press handle just a little and drop it on the bullet, GENTLY, several times. If you can picture this, what I`m doing is aligning bullet, die stem and case. Should you do this a bit ,you can feel the process. I do Not start the seating process until I`ve done this. Start the bullet down the case neck about half way, turn case 1/2 turn and complete the seat. Check bullet seat depth.

I`ve never checked my run out.

This sounds very time consuming but is really not. Just part of my process, and goes quickly.

YMMV
,

Holy schidt that's funny!


Screw you! I'm voting for Trump again!

Ecc 10:2
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the 24HCF.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
I'd be surprised if a 1000 yard competitor assembled cartridges with much runout anyway. With my simple gear I have no problems at all assembling stuff to .002" or less, maybe .003" if I'm using "lesser brass" that hasn't been culled.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
Originally Posted by mathman
I'd be surprised if a 1000 yard competitor assembled cartridges with much runout anyway. With my simple gear I have no problems at all assembling stuff to .002" or less, maybe .003" if I'm using "lesser brass" that hasn't been culled.
My point exactly, so why measure?
Theres good tools and bad tools, the right tool and the wrong tool.
I've ran across some pretty $hit Redding, RCBS and Horny dies. Its another reason anymore I have all inline seating dies made from my reamers in the stuff it matters even in some of my 20 cals. If I have the reamer I order a blank and make it.
I dont go to the extreme of measuring seating force but you can sure tell the " feel" of difference if your Neck brass prep is off, they go as foulers or pulled apart and preped again. Let alone the ease of doing seating depth tests or reloading at the range.

Last edited by sherm_61; 09/30/23.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863
Likes: 4
I don't have to measure every cartridge every time. I use it as a diagnostic tool to evaluate components and procedures. When I know I'm assembling straight ammunition then I know runout isn't there to affect things. I don't have to be concerned with whether or not a particular rifle is affected by it or not.

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,986
Originally Posted by mathman
I don't have to measure every cartridge every time. I use it as a diagnostic tool to evaluate components and procedures. When I know I'm assembling straight ammunition then I know runout isn't there to affect things. I don't have to be concerned with whether or not a particular rifle is affected by it or not.
I haven't measured a case runout or loaded round in probably 12 years

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

448 members (219 Wasp, 22kHornet, 06hunter59, 1Longbow, 16penny, 16gage, 51 invisible), 2,542 guests, and 1,252 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,625
Posts18,492,831
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.181s Queries: 55 (0.012s) Memory: 0.9156 MB (Peak: 1.0400 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-06 04:03:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS