It's not "really" dead until you can buy braced handgun AR's from retailers again like we could for over a decade.
That said, it would be a legit nightmare for the feds to try and prosecute anyone for an NFA violation for possession of a firearm that they approved numerous times, in writing, as legal.
Always wanted one. Maybe the scare tactic by the Feds was all that was planned. No manufacturer or dealer probably has the balls to ship those or sell them again.
Having owned and shot several .223 SBRs, I quickly got the whole .223 pistol notion out of my mind. More muzzle blast at the cost of performance and accuracy doesn't compute for me.
The pistol brace thing was a blatant move against the NFA. Who's kidding who - a "brace" you can shoulder in order to call it a pistol was nonsensical. All that said, I still support owning and using one if you are so inclined. Anything to destroy or erode the NFA is all good in my books even if the means is meaningless.
Pistol braces and bump stocks belong in the same clown car.
Having owned and shot several .223 SBRs, I quickly got the whole .223 pistol notion out of my mind. More muzzle blast at the cost of performance and accuracy doesn't compute for me.
The pistol brace thing was a blatant move against the NFA. Who's kidding who - a "brace" you can shoulder in order to call it a pistol was nonsensical. All that said, I still support owning and using one if you are so inclined. Anything to destroy or erode the NFA is all good in my books even if the means is meaningless.
Pistol braces and bump stocks belong in the same clown car.
Carry on...
You're missing the point:
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Having owned and shot several .223 SBRs, I quickly got the whole .223 pistol notion out of my mind. More muzzle blast at the cost of performance and accuracy doesn't compute for me.
The pistol brace thing was a blatant move against the NFA. Who's kidding who - a "brace" you can shoulder in order to call it a pistol was nonsensical. All that said, I still support owning and using one if you are so inclined. Anything to destroy or erode the NFA is all good in my books even if the means is meaningless.
Pistol braces and bump stocks belong in the same clown car.
Carry on...
You're missing the point:
And by the time he did that cute little dance, he'd have three .45's in his chest and one in his head. But it looks cool and tactical and all so carry on.
Having owned and shot several .223 SBRs, I quickly got the whole .223 pistol notion out of my mind. More muzzle blast at the cost of performance and accuracy doesn't compute for me.
The pistol brace thing was a blatant move against the NFA. Who's kidding who - a "brace" you can shoulder in order to call it a pistol was nonsensical. All that said, I still support owning and using one if you are so inclined. Anything to destroy or erode the NFA is all good in my books even if the means is meaningless.
Pistol braces and bump stocks belong in the same clown car.
Carry on...
You're missing the point:
Yep ! It’s lost on a lot here.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
Gee, I guess I missed that on my YT feed page. I did see the same info from other YT channels I subscribe to, but Colion is actually a lawyer, of some sort. So I gave his vid the first look.
Thought it was shareworthy. But I'm more interested in gun related news, than the tripe up top on the old ladies knitting circle.
Having owned and shot several .223 SBRs, I quickly got the whole .223 pistol notion out of my mind. More muzzle blast at the cost of performance and accuracy doesn't compute for me.
They occupy a space between pistols and rifles for both accuracy & power. Great tools for shooting from a driver's seat.
Having owned and shot several .223 SBRs, I quickly got the whole .223 pistol notion out of my mind. More muzzle blast at the cost of performance and accuracy doesn't compute for me.
The pistol brace thing was a blatant move against the NFA. Who's kidding who - a "brace" you can shoulder in order to call it a pistol was nonsensical. All that said, I still support owning and using one if you are so inclined. Anything to destroy or erode the NFA is all good in my books even if the means is meaningless.
Pistol braces and bump stocks belong in the same clown car.
Carry on...
You're missing the point:
Yep ! It’s lost on a lot here.
This set up can legally be carried in my truck loaded because it’s considered a pistol. Can’t do that with a rifle. Or you could just put a pistol brace on whatever upper you would like, and legally in my state, carry it loaded in your vehicle if you so desire. This is a no-brainer!
Having owned and shot several .223 SBRs, I quickly got the whole .223 pistol notion out of my mind. More muzzle blast at the cost of performance and accuracy doesn't compute for me.
The pistol brace thing was a blatant move against the NFA. Who's kidding who - a "brace" you can shoulder in order to call it a pistol was nonsensical. All that said, I still support owning and using one if you are so inclined. Anything to destroy or erode the NFA is all good in my books even if the means is meaningless.
Pistol braces and bump stocks belong in the same clown car.
Carry on...
You're missing the point:
Yep ! It’s lost on a lot here.
This set up can legally be carried in my truck loaded because it’s considered a pistol. Can’t do that with a rifle. Or you could just put a pistol brace on whatever upper you would like, and legally in my state, carry it loaded in your vehicle if you so desire. This is a no-brainer!
Yeah, we had that silly rule in WV until a couple of years ago, along with some other nonsense about what you could carry in the woods for protection. They fixed it finally. Personally, I’d rather tote a folding rifle, but that’s just one old fart’s notion.
Personally if people could read and understand the 2A the NFA and GCA of 68 should be removed. Citizens have the right to own military weapons per the 2A.
It's not "really" dead until you can buy braced handgun AR's from retailers again like we could for over a decade.
That said, it would be a legit nightmare for the feds to try and prosecute anyone for an NFA violation for possession of a firearm that they approved numerous times, in writing, as legal.
But they said those letters don't mean nothing anymore. Their newest letter said you can't now and it's somehow more important than their old letter [rollyeyes]
Gee, I guess I missed that on my YT feed page. I did see the same info from other YT channels I subscribe to, but Colion is actually a lawyer, of some sort. So I gave his vid the first look.
Thought it was shareworthy. But I'm more interested in gun related news, than the tripe up top on the old ladies knitting circle.
So am I. I just happen to dislike the Cult of Noir.
Gee, I guess I missed that on my YT feed page. I did see the same info from other YT channels I subscribe to, but Colion is actually a lawyer, of some sort. So I gave his vid the first look.
Thought it was shareworthy. But I'm more interested in gun related news, than the tripe up top on the old ladies knitting circle.
So am I. I just happen to dislike the Cult of Noir.
Thank you for your service, MM.
I get feeds from a few of the popular gun YT channels, Colion Noir, MrGunsngear, AKOU 4774, IV8888, and a few others.