24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Online Content
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
I have been using the Barnes reloading data thus far in my reloading efforts and have had good luck. My 130 & 150 Grn TTSX loads have been giving me the sub MOA groups I am looking for with my CA Mesa. I have ordered some 165 grain TTSX to work with but Barnes does not list H4350 load data for the 165 TTSX.

Just wondering if any one had a pet load using 165 TTSX and H4350. Or if there is a reason I should not be using H4350 with the heavier bullets that info would be appreciated.

Thanks and have a great day.

Clifford


A man without a stick will get bitten even by sheep.
HR IC

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
A
Campfire Regular
Online Shocked
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
150 to 165 not much of a difference, but give it a shot. Generally speaking 180 or heavier yeah. Data out there somewhere.

Last edited by anothergun; 11/14/23.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,721
Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,721
Likes: 6
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


They list both imr and H in the 150 which shows ~1/2 grain difference in start charge. Since there is 7 grain’s difference between start and max I would use the IMR start charge and work up.



Swifty
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
I
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
I
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
Did I just see some idiot recommend data for 150 and 165 gr bullets as interchangeable??????????

How about data for C&C vs monometal, is that interchangeable as well?????????

Damn! I sure hope none take this guy's comments as serious.

To the OP, nothing wrong with Swifty's suggestion. I would go that way if H4350 is all I had. My preference would be 4831 burn rate which is a bit slower. I usually use Hogdon's but sometimes one can squeeze a little more velocity from IMR. In my experience, one has been as accurate as the other for hunting purposes.


People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
A
Campfire Regular
Online Shocked
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
Ummmm no not data being interchangeable but using the powder he was asking about. Maybe that’s what you perceived.

Quote
Or if there is a reason I should not be using H4350 with the heavier bullets
Needing to use a slower powder won’t really make a difference going from a 150 to a 165 is what l was referring to. You need to calm down, seriously.

Last edited by anothergun; 11/14/23.
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
I
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
I
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,101
Likes: 20
Maybe you need to learn how to communicate a coherent thought in a sentence which can be understood by..................anybody.


People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
A
Campfire Regular
Online Shocked
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
Maybe you heed to read more thoroughly in the OP..You’re the only one who has a problem with it. You got an axe to grind, you need to find somebody else.

Last edited by anothergun; 11/14/23.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,323
Likes: 40
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,323
Likes: 40
Alright guys. Generally when a powder is not listed for a certain bullet, that means it is not optimum. At least when they (Barnes) did their testing. Why not just use a good powder that is listed in the Barnes load data? Here's how I'd approach it:

RL19, RL22, Hunter, and H4831. Probably not in that exact order, but the powders I'd try. The first one I'd likely try is Hunter, with a max charge of 78 grains. That means I'd start at 76 grains, and work up in increments of 1/2 a grain, until I reach 78grains. The OAL will likely have an effect on group size. Barnes suggests .050" off the lands, but I've had good luck at .025" off the lands. Every rifle is different, but that's how I'd go about it. If you have a good rifle, it should put 5 shots into moa or less with one of those loads. Half a box of bullets would be gone, but you'd likely find a load that is very acceptable. The second powder I'd try would be H4831, but more than likely the first one would give me the results I am looking for.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,931
Likes: 14
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,931
Likes: 14
If it works with one powder for 150 grain bullets and you want to try out 165 grainers.. of the same type of bullet..

All of us should know, just drop your charge a hair or two, and just work back up..

so you sacrifice 5 or 6 semi spendy bullets.. thats a lot cheaper than sacrificing an eye or worse...

This should be pretty common knowledge for any reload with even a little bit of experience.


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by anothergun
Maybe you heed to read more thoroughly in the OP..You’re the only one who has a problem with it. You got an axe to grind, you need to find somebody else.
Pretty sure everyone by now has a problem with your dickhole posts. You are an annoying twerp. And no need to send me anymore pm’s, just going to delete them without opening.

IC B3

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
A
Campfire Regular
Online Shocked
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,339
Actually l had better accuracy and performance with 180 or heavier in my 300 Weatherby.

Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Online Content
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by Seafire
If it works with one powder for 150 grain bullets and you want to try out 165 grainers.. of the same type of bullet..

All of us should know, just drop your charge a hair or two, and just work back up..

so you sacrifice 5 or 6 semi spendy bullets.. thats a lot cheaper than sacrificing an eye or worse...

This should be pretty common knowledge for any reload with even a little bit of experience.

I am not sure what constitutes "even a little bit of experience". I have been reloading for my hunting rifles for less than six months. I ordered the 165 grainers and planned on doing exactly what you posted above. I was just curious as to any ideas others on this forum might have on the topic.

Thanks for your input.

Clifford


A man without a stick will get bitten even by sheep.
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Online Content
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Alright guys. Generally when a powder is not listed for a certain bullet, that means it is not optimum. At least when they (Barnes) did their testing. Why not just use a good powder that is listed in the Barnes load data? Here's how I'd approach it:

RL19, RL22, Hunter, and H4831. Probably not in that exact order, but the powders I'd try. The first one I'd likely try is Hunter, with a max charge of 78 grains. That means I'd start at 76 grains, and work up in increments of 1/2 a grain, until I reach 78grains. The OAL will likely have an effect on group size. Barnes suggests .050" off the lands, but I've had good luck at .025" off the lands. Every rifle is different, but that's how I'd go about it. If you have a good rifle, it should put 5 shots into moa or less with one of those loads. Half a box of bullets would be gone, but you'd likely find a load that is very acceptable. The second powder I'd try would be H4831, but more than likely the first one would give me the results I am looking for.

Thanks for your input. I will try to locate some Hunter. I have had good luck with my CA Mesa with .030" of the lands. Seating depth as you point out seems to be a bit different with the Barnes liking a bit of jump.

Thanks again for the help.

Clifford


A man without a stick will get bitten even by sheep.
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,366
Likes: 13
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,366
Likes: 13
I may be the odd guy out, but I have had incredible good results with H4350 in the 300 Win. My long time hunting partner has used 180 PT, Sierra 180 and Speer 180's since H4350 was introduced and has killed alot of elk with the combo.

Cartridge : .300 Win. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet : .308, 165, Barnes 'TTSX'BT 30368
Useable Case Capaci: 79.680 grain H2O = 5.174 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H4350 *T

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.704% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-07.0 92 66.00 2878 3034 49794 10752 97.5 1.232
-06.3 93 66.50 2898 3077 50869 10824 97.8 1.220
-05.6 93 67.00 2918 3120 51966 10895 98.0 1.208
-04.9 94 67.50 2938 3163 53085 10963 98.2 1.196
-04.2 95 68.00 2959 3207 54229 11030 98.4 1.184
-03.5 95 68.50 2979 3251 55396 11095 98.5 1.173 ! Near Maximum !
-02.8 96 69.00 2999 3295 56589 11159 98.7 1.162 ! Near Maximum !
-02.1 97 69.50 3019 3339 57806 11220 98.9 1.150 ! Near Maximum !
-01.4 97 70.00 3039 3383 59049 11280 99.0 1.139 ! Near Maximum !
-00.7 98 70.50 3059 3428 60319 11337 99.1 1.128 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 99 71.00 3079 3473 61616 11392 99.3 1.117 ! Near Maximum !
+00.7 99 71.50 3099 3518 62941 11446 99.4 1.107 ! Near Maximum !
+01.4 100 72.00 3119 3563 64295 11497 99.5 1.096 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.1 101 72.50 3138 3609 65677 11546 99.6 1.086 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.8 102 73.00 3158 3654 67090 11593 99.7 1.075 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.5 102 73.50 3178 3700 68534 11639 99.8 1.065 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 99 71.00 3197 3744 71986 11073 100.0 1.044 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 99 71.00 2915 3113 51368 11222 94.9 1.213



My brother uses H4350 with 200 AB's and gets amazing results in his 1-8 300 Win as well.

So, just as was mentioned, work up with min data and let the get tell you where it wants to be. It may not set speed records, but I'd bet a dollar it will be accurate.


Semper Fi
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Online Content
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by beretzs
I may be the odd guy out, but I have had incredible good results with H4350 in the 300 Win. My long time hunting partner has used 180 PT, Sierra 180 and Speer 180's since H4350 was introduced and has killed alot of elk with the combo.

Cartridge : .300 Win. Mag.(SAAMI)
Bullet : .308, 165, Barnes 'TTSX'BT 30368
Useable Case Capaci: 79.680 grain H2O = 5.174 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H4350 *T

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.704% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-07.0 92 66.00 2878 3034 49794 10752 97.5 1.232
-06.3 93 66.50 2898 3077 50869 10824 97.8 1.220
-05.6 93 67.00 2918 3120 51966 10895 98.0 1.208
-04.9 94 67.50 2938 3163 53085 10963 98.2 1.196
-04.2 95 68.00 2959 3207 54229 11030 98.4 1.184
-03.5 95 68.50 2979 3251 55396 11095 98.5 1.173 ! Near Maximum !
-02.8 96 69.00 2999 3295 56589 11159 98.7 1.162 ! Near Maximum !
-02.1 97 69.50 3019 3339 57806 11220 98.9 1.150 ! Near Maximum !
-01.4 97 70.00 3039 3383 59049 11280 99.0 1.139 ! Near Maximum !
-00.7 98 70.50 3059 3428 60319 11337 99.1 1.128 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 99 71.00 3079 3473 61616 11392 99.3 1.117 ! Near Maximum !
+00.7 99 71.50 3099 3518 62941 11446 99.4 1.107 ! Near Maximum !
+01.4 100 72.00 3119 3563 64295 11497 99.5 1.096 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.1 101 72.50 3138 3609 65677 11546 99.6 1.086 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.8 102 73.00 3158 3654 67090 11593 99.7 1.075 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.5 102 73.50 3178 3700 68534 11639 99.8 1.065 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 99 71.00 3197 3744 71986 11073 100.0 1.044 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 99 71.00 2915 3113 51368 11222 94.9 1.213



My brother uses H4350 with 200 AB's and gets amazing results in his 1-8 300 Win as well.

So, just as was mentioned, work up with min data and let the get tell you where it wants to be. It may not set speed records, but I'd bet a dollar it will be accurate.

Thanks for all of the info.

Clifford

Last edited by kinslayer1965; 11/15/23.

A man without a stick will get bitten even by sheep.
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 5
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by beretzs
My brother uses H4350 with 200 AB's and gets amazing results in his 1-8 300 Win as well.

Interesting. Could you elaborate a little more on "amazing results" if you don't mind?

I've been using RL25 forever in a 1:9.5 Krieger with 190SMKs with outstanding results out to 1000 and 1175. But Alliant is getting really hard to find these days locally.....and I really like H4350 in other chamberings.


I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children may live in peace. ~~ Thomas Paine
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,366
Likes: 13
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,366
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by beretzs
My brother uses H4350 with 200 AB's and gets amazing results in his 1-8 300 Win as well.

Interesting. Could you elaborate a little more on "amazing results" if you don't mind?

I've been using RL25 forever in a 1:9.5 Krieger with 190SMKs with outstanding results out to 1000 and 1175. But Alliant is getting really hard to find these days locally.....and I really like H4350 in other chamberings.

[Linked Image from hosting.photobucket.com]

We skipped the load work with this one and went with Kevin's proof load. It worked well and still does.


Semper Fi
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 5
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 1,970
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by beretzs
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by beretzs
My brother uses H4350 with 200 AB's and gets amazing results in his 1-8 300 Win as well.

Interesting. Could you elaborate a little more on "amazing results" if you don't mind?

I've been using RL25 forever in a 1:9.5 Krieger with 190SMKs with outstanding results out to 1000 and 1175. But Alliant is getting really hard to find these days locally.....and I really like H4350 in other chamberings.

[Linked Image from hosting.photobucket.com]

We skipped the load work with this one and went with Kevin's proof load. It worked well and still does.

👍 Thanks.


I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children may live in peace. ~~ Thomas Paine
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,366
Likes: 13
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,366
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by beretzs
Originally Posted by Feral_American
Originally Posted by beretzs
My brother uses H4350 with 200 AB's and gets amazing results in his 1-8 300 Win as well.

Interesting. Could you elaborate a little more on "amazing results" if you don't mind?

I've been using RL25 forever in a 1:9.5 Krieger with 190SMKs with outstanding results out to 1000 and 1175. But Alliant is getting really hard to find these days locally.....and I really like H4350 in other chamberings.

[Linked Image from hosting.photobucket.com]

We skipped the load work with this one and went with Kevin's proof load. It worked well and still does.

👍 Thanks.

H4350 is worth a shot if you have it.


Semper Fi
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
Campfire Greenhorn
OP Online Content
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 49
beretzs,

I will try the H4350 and thanks again for the info you posted. I also have a couple pounds of IMR 4831 sitting in the cabinet that I will try as well.

Clifford


A man without a stick will get bitten even by sheep.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

570 members (219DW, 1Longbow, 10ring1, 204guy, 1beaver_shooter, 10Glocks, 66 invisible), 2,669 guests, and 1,208 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,476
Posts18,529,590
Members74,033
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.147s Queries: 55 (0.027s) Memory: 0.9163 MB (Peak: 1.0410 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-22 16:53:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS