24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 116
9
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
9
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 116
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1019607551
I figured the guy didn't know his years, but the the serial number and the barrel don't fit any gun I know of.
Mike

GB1

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,360
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,360
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory


"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
Hunter S. Thompson
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
T
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
T
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
...Marble 69 rear sight should be on a Monte Carlo stock. Just sayin'

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,686
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,686
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Seller said that there are no markings on the bolt. All mine have the serial number etched into the bolt.


NRA Lifetime Endowment Member
IC B2

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
Come on, you guys can tear it apart better than that. That is a pieced together rifle.

First off, that bolt is from a 1959-1963 rifle. The 1951 receiver has been modified slightly and doesn't even have the proof mark that is supposed to be in line with the one on the barrel. There's a very good chance it's been rebarreled. The stock is an original low comb, but not original to that receiver. The floor plate was not original to that rifle either. The rear sight sticks out like a sore thumb. Again, screaming pieced together. I would not trust that seller.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Ken_L
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Seller said that there are no markings on the bolt. All mine have the serial number etched into the bolt.
Pocono can correct me since he has Rule memorized better than I; but that is really early for a drilled bolt.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Ken_L
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Seller said that there are no markings on the bolt. All mine have the serial number etched into the bolt.
Pocono can correct me since he has Rule memorized better than I; but that is really early for a drilled bolt.

Read my post above. As for the bolt ovoid, a lot of the 308 fwts were not even drilled in '52. I've seen a few that had solid bolts knobs, even in 1953. There's more to the bolt that you guys are not seeing. I'll let you keep eyeballing it though. The bolt is from a '59-'63 rifle. Hence the reason someone removed the serial # etching from the bolt body.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Come on, you guys can tear it apart better than that. That is a pieced together rifle.

First off, that bolt is from a 1959-1963 rifle. The 1951 receiver has been modified slightly and doesn't even have the proof mark that is supposed to be in line with the one on the barrel. There's a very good chance it's been rebarreled. The stock is an original low comb, but not original to that receiver. The floor plate was not original to that rifle either. The rear sight sticks out like a sore thumb. Again, screaming pieced together. I would not trust that seller.

Yep - took a better look on a bigger screen and you’re absolutely right – definitely not flat on that bolt.

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Read my post above. As for the bolt ovoid, a lot of the 308 fwts were not even drilled in '52. I've seen a few that had solid bolts knobs, even in 1953. There's more to the bolt that you guys are not seeing. I'll let you keep eyeballing it though. The bolt is from a '59-'63 rifle. Hence the reason someone removed the serial # etching from the bolt body.

Yes, we posted at the same time. I suspect it was probably a transition somewhat like the metal part plate to plastic – over a period of time.

IC B3

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Read my post above. As for the bolt ovoid, a lot of the 308 fwts were not even drilled in '52. I've seen a few that had solid bolts knobs, even in 1953. There's more to the bolt that you guys are not seeing. I'll let you keep eyeballing it though. The bolt is from a '59-'63 rifle. Hence the reason someone removed the serial # etching from the bolt body.

Yes, we posted at the same time. I suspect it was probably a transition somewhat like the metal part plate to plastic – over a period of time.

Yes, it was definitely a transition period. None were drilled in '51 though. There are some other tell tale's of that bolt, that tell us when it was made/manufactured.

Probably what really needs to be said here is it's a pieced together rifle. The funny thing is a lot of guys/bidders don't know that. I see it as a parts gun, but with the mods I see, I would not trust it. If you like a low comb and shoot irons, that is a nice stock and worth about $450.00. The receiver not worth much to me, and the bolt would have to go with a newer rifle to be correct. This is the kind of stuff I look for when I buy a rifle. I'd rather buy a 100% original fwt barreled action in a Mcmillan, than a pieced together rifle like this one. Hopefully that answers some of the questions the op had, about "what's wrong with this gun".


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,360
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 7,360
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Ken_L
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Seller said that there are no markings on the bolt. All mine have the serial number etched into the bolt.
Pocono can correct me since he has Rule memorized better than I; but that is really early for a drilled bolt.

Earliest FWT s/n that I’ve seen is 200,000. Anyone seen/have an earlier one?
Drilled bolts began appearing regularly on Fwts and Standard Rifles in 1954 approx s/n 280,000.
That shroud is from a much later bolt.
Wrong rear sight, the very early lc Fwt. was catalogued with either a Winchester 22K or Marbles No. 69 folding leaf rear sight. The Lyman 16A that is on this gun was not catalogued until 1955

Flattery will get you no where BSA, I readily concede that your memorization of Rule is much better than mine.


"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro."
Hunter S. Thompson
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 17,933
Likes: 11
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Perhaps it’s just the angle, but this gives me pause.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Perhaps it’s just the angle, but this gives me pause.
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Ken_L
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Seller said that there are no markings on the bolt. All mine have the serial number etched into the bolt.
Pocono can correct me since he has Rule memorized better than I; but that is really early for a drilled bolt.

Earliest FWT s/n that I’ve seen is 200,000. Anyone seen/have an earlier one?
Drilled bolts began appearing regularly on Fwts and Standard Rifles in 1954 approx s/n 280,000.
That shroud is from a much later bolt.
Wrong rear sight, the very early lc Fwt. was catalogued with either a Winchester 22K or Marbles No. 69 folding leaf rear sight. The Lyman 16A that is on this gun was not catalogued until 1955

Flattery will get you no where BSA, I readily concede that your memorization of Rule is much better than mine.

I like that detailed response.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,509
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,509
You guys are great!


Old guy, old guns.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,450
Likes: 2
1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
1
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,450
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Ken_L
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Seller said that there are no markings on the bolt. All mine have the serial number etched into the bolt.
Pocono can correct me since he has Rule memorized better than I; but that is really early for a drilled bolt.

Read my post above. As for the bolt ovoid, a lot of the 308 fwts were not even drilled in '52. I've seen a few that had solid bolts knobs, even in 1953. There's more to the bolt that you guys are not seeing. I'll let you keep eyeballing it though. The bolt is from a '59-'63 rifle. Hence the reason someone removed the serial # etching from the bolt body.

You have a SHARP eye!

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


I am always looking for factory wood stocks!
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,106
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by 160user
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Ken_L
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by Poconojack
Featherweight barrel and stock (not introduced until mid-1952) on a late 1951 receiver.
Question is if that receiver was in inventory at the factory

And if the bolt serial matches …

Seller said that there are no markings on the bolt. All mine have the serial number etched into the bolt.
Pocono can correct me since he has Rule memorized better than I; but that is really early for a drilled bolt.

Read my post above. As for the bolt ovoid, a lot of the 308 fwts were not even drilled in '52. I've seen a few that had solid bolts knobs, even in 1953. There's more to the bolt that you guys are not seeing. I'll let you keep eyeballing it though. The bolt is from a '59-'63 rifle. Hence the reason someone removed the serial # etching from the bolt body.

You have a SHARP eye!

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Yours is a '53. Don't even have to look at rules to confirm serial # DOM. I've had 1 308 win fwt made in '53, and a buddy also has one that was made in '53, and they both have the solid bolt knob. However, Winchester started doing this in 1952, but they were slow to transition. Your bolt is correct for your rifle. As you can see, the face of the bolt sleeve is flat, where the rifle in question is rounded. In 1959 Winchester went thorough a few cost saving measures, and leaving the face of the bolt sleeve round was one of them. The reason I say the bolt is likely from a 1959-1963 rifle. Your rifle looks to be in very good condition, based on the few pictures I see.


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,034
Likes: 6
V
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
V
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,034
Likes: 6
99Ozarks: Plenty "wrong" with that Rifle. I would stay away from it, that seller and "gunbreaker" at all costs!
Plus the action/gun was made on April 1st (April Fool's Day) 1951.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 197
C
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
C
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 197
Caveat Emptor!!!
Sold- $1925 (plus fees)

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,820
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,820
Thumb groove appears to differ from side to side, stock appears to have been altered/refinished.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

90 members (444Matt, 7mm_Loco, 1_deuce, 338reddog, 79S, 2ndwind, 10 invisible), 1,576 guests, and 833 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,368
Posts18,488,296
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.181s Queries: 55 (0.007s) Memory: 0.9138 MB (Peak: 1.0368 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 07:20:57 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS