24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,230
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Clarkm
Women smell other women and synchronize mensuration.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menstrual_synchrony

The whole crew was on the rag.

you can measure that....


Originally Posted by jorgeI
...Actually Sycamore, you are sort of right....

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,764
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,764
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Clarkm
DIVERSITY: Shortly after a Navy P-8A overshot the runway and landed in Kaneohe Bay (everyone survived)



I'm no aviation expert but I'd wager that photo was shot before the plane crashed in the bay.

It’s a file photo not the crew that went swimming.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,104
Likes: 6
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,104
Likes: 6
Yes, I know that.



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 986
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 986
Originally Posted by CharlieSisk
Here is the metar.
PHNG 210019Z COR 07014G21KT 1 1/2SM -RA BR SCT018 BKN026 OVC035 25/22 A2995 RMK A02 SFC VIS 4 VIS SW 1 1/2SM P0000 T02500222 COR 0046

It's been a long time and I am a Private Pilot, but if I am reading this right, the winds were from 070 degrees at 14 knots, GUSTING to 21. There were scattered clouds at 1800 feet, a broken overcast (more than 50% coverage) at 2600 and a solid overcast at 3500 feet. Visibility a mile and a half, so you probably could not see one end of the runway from the other. Clearly IFR conditions.

With mountains at one end and water at the other, I wouldn't be surprised if the runway was sloped down. Someone said a 10kt tailwind would add 20% to the landing run and a wet runway adds another 30%. So how much more for the downward slope and a 14-21kt tailwind gust?

So they don't touch down on the numbers, but a little long maybe, and cannot see well enough to judge how little runway they have left...until too late for a go-around decision. It's easy for us to question why they didn't divert to Honolulu or Hickam, where precision approaches, longer runways and maybe different weather may have been available. The crew made a judgment call, as flight crews do constantly.

So, as in most other aviation accidents, there was a collection of factors that all contributed to cause this. The pilots thought they could make it, and they almost did!

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,861
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,861
Originally Posted by bearbacker
Originally Posted by CharlieSisk
Here is the metar.
PHNG 210019Z COR 07014G21KT 1 1/2SM -RA BR SCT018 BKN026 OVC035 25/22 A2995 RMK A02 SFC VIS 4 VIS SW 1 1/2SM P0000 T02500222 COR 0046

It's been a long time and I am a Private Pilot, but if I am reading this right, the winds were from 070 degrees at 14 knots, GUSTING to 21. There were scattered clouds at 1800 feet, a broken overcast (more than 50% coverage) at 2600 and a solid overcast at 3500 feet. Visibility a mile and a half, so you probably could not see one end of the runway from the other. Clearly IFR conditions.

With mountains at one end and water at the other, I wouldn't be surprised if the runway was sloped down. Someone said a 10kt tailwind would add 20% to the landing run and a wet runway adds another 30%. So how much more for the downward slope and a 14-21kt tailwind gust?

So they don't touch down on the numbers, but a little long maybe, and cannot see well enough to judge how little runway they have left...until too late for a go-around decision. It's easy for us to question why they didn't divert to Honolulu or Hickam, where precision approaches, longer runways and maybe different weather may have been available. The crew made a judgment call, as flight crews do constantly.

So, as in most other aviation accidents, there was a collection of factors that all contributed to cause this. The pilots thought they could make it, and they almost did!
Well, at least they didn't have to worry about hot brakes... 🤭

IC B2

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,620
Likes: 1
Simple, the PIC f ucked up. Should have realized the problem by merely looking at the distance (in feet) remaining boards, check airspeed, go to MRT and just go the f uck around and divert.


A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
T
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
T
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
...We know the wx conditions, the length of the runway (7771') Hypothetically, let's assume the a/c weight was 150,000# and the approach speed was 145kts. Touchdown at the 1,000' mark, speed brakes deploy one second after touch down, reversers fully deploy and are effective 3-4 seconds later, followed by max brake/anti-skid. Touchdown speed of 145kts, plus 16kts tailwind component which is 161kts which is 185mph. In the 5 seconds after touchdown the a/c has traveled approximately 1355'. Total r/w length is 7771' minus touchdown 1,000', minus 1355'runout leaves 5416' of usable (?) r/w remaining. Now add the tailwind component of 16kt, and the wet r/w penalty of 30%. Not much margin for error to remain, FEET DRY. PPP=PPP


"

Last edited by TSIBINDI; 11/22/23.
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,965
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,965
Hickam AFB, which shares runways with Honolulu Intl, and Barbers Point NAS are about 5 minutes to the west. Both have plenty of length, direction, and ability to handle a diversion. Even if the weather was down both have ample approaches and would be a better shot than a downwind approach and landing.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,347
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,347
Once I went into KCXO (Conroe Texas) , was going to land on 32. It is 7501 feet. I was in my 182. Several jets coming in, and the tower kept saying "keep your speed up". Well I did. Across the numbers I was at about 130 knots. I had my head waaayyy up my ass. At about 1/2 way down the runway I told the tower 'I've got to go around". It was very humbling. Very humbling. But, I made the pattern, got the speed right, and made the first exit. Lesson learned.
Charlie


The data and opinions contained in these posts are the results of experiences with my equipment. NO CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE DRAWN FROM ANY DATA PRESENTED, DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ATTEMPT TO REPLICATE THESE RESULTSj
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,967
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,967
Originally Posted by CharlieSisk
Once I went into KCXO (Conroe Texas) , was going to land on 32. It is 7501 feet. I was in my 182. Several jets coming in, and the tower kept saying "keep your speed up". Well I did. Across the numbers I was at about 130 knots. I had my head waaayyy up my ass. At about 1/2 way down the runway I told the tower 'I've got to go around". It was very humbling. Very humbling. But, I made the pattern, got the speed right, and made the first exit. Lesson learned.
Charlie


Got told to keep the speed up in the cub once. I was doing all it could do, in a slight dive. I asked if they thought I could get out and push.

I see people here land all over the runway as if they have no idea where they will actually touch down. Maybe a long runway induces some amount of complacency. I try to hit my spot every time, regardless of how much runway I have so hopefully when it does matter I don't have an over run.


Don't just be a survivor, be a competitor.
IC B3

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,861
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,861
It was during the '76~'77 time frame MAC lost a C-141 at Thule AFB Greenland. The runway has a pretty big up slope to it, you can get the illusion that you're closer to the end of the runway that you really are. The 141 touched down at the normal point, the pilot must of felt that they landed too long and wouldn't be able to stop in time. He went to full power on the engines, lifted off at the correct speed and crashed into the face of the glacier that was just past the end of the runway. The crew was a few hours past the normal duty day, they blamed the crash on pilot fatigue. The same day another 141 was shooting an approach into RAF Mildenhall when it flew into a thunderstorm. They were hit by a wind shear. The right wing that had a previously cracked wing spar that went undected broke off, the aircraft crashed with 18 SOB. Not a good day for McGuire AFB.
Mildenhall Crash

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

60 members (akrange, APTXBROWN, 7mm_Loco, 300_savage, 8 invisible), 1,542 guests, and 757 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,627
Posts18,492,920
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.166s Queries: 37 (0.007s) Memory: 0.8601 MB (Peak: 0.9430 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-06 08:07:45 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS