Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Australia Covid 19 mitigation strategy in Australia

What I know is that almost everyone that got the shot got Covid. And most everyone that didn't hasn't had it to this day.

I know I refuse to trust anything dealing with government.

I know I don't trust things that stink. And having a tad of medical background the way this was all handled was beyond stupid.

Vaccination wasn't meant to prevent you from getting covid, just preventing serious illness, hospitalization or death. Nor was it expected to have 100% efficacy and no side effects.

It was a trade off, that on the balance the vax does far more good than harm.

Time will tell how the balance worked out.

Time is already telling in my neck of the woods. Vaccinated people are getting sick and some have died. Not so much for the ones of us that took the ''horse butt paste" which probably worked on me because I've been referred to as a horse's ass on occasion.

My neighbor friend that I went off with looking for wild hogs in a closed truck is likely the one who transmitted the China virus to me. I'm sure glad he got vaccinated 3 times prior to contracting the virus or he might have died. He and his wife and his disabled adult son suffered way worse effects from the virus than I did or my wife did. All we used was "horse butt paste" except our paste was the liquid version of ''horse butt paste''.

Anyway what's the latest on the Australian actress Melle Stewart that is suing AstraZeneca over the vaccine disabling her?

Still not much more than anecdotes. People are not dropping like flies here. Death may be due to any number of reasons, underlying conditions, etc, and getting covid was probably worse for you than the vax, which is known have side effects.

Meanwhile, the randomized trials that have been done on horse paste have not shown any great efficacy, and it too has bad side effects if overdosed.

Well, it is like this. If I had gotten the ''vax'' I almost certainly would have contracted the Corona-19 anyway. The ''horse butt paste" liquid version proper dose I took by mouth knocked out my symptoms totally in 24 hours, like wise for my wife who tested positive the next day.

Our randomized trial and others that I'm aware of in the area were not subject to government censorship and all shook off the virus nicely if taken at onset. I have enough "horse butt paste" in the liquid form to treat several dozen cases so I hoping I don't get busted for intent to distribute. They might put a prison sentence for having the horse butt paste for disputing Joe Biden.

Joe is running a Gestapo you know. They picked up a couple more Louisiana citizens today for invading our capital and scaring congress on the dark day of January 6,2021. Maybe somebody should point out to the director of the FBI Mr. Wray AKA J. Edgar Jr. that when you are busy doing things you shouldn't be doing, you cannot be doing those things that you should be doing.

Nobody is disputing that. The point of vaccination is to prep your immune system to the threat, so that when you get the virus your immune system is better prepared to fight it off, which means that you don't get as sick as you would have without that introduction.


As mentioned a number of times. Covid didn't kill everyone who caught it. Not everyone who caught it needed Hospitalizing.

That you recovered may be incidental to taking horse paste.


The only way to determine its efficacy are randomized, double blind trials. Which has been done, but show no great efficacy.



Government overstep, gestapo tactics, antics, power, control and hysteria is a different issue.....nor is it something I would dispute.

Those in power have a lot to answer for.

The fact that you buy into all that dogshyte is proof just how far and how bad you're washed of brain ....

My advice to you would be to keep on asserting excuses until you've emotionally healed - give it a few more years I reckon.

Aside for a moment, everytime I see a post of yours I can't help but picture your 'lordship' being over a compilation of the expelled contents of AceBlowhard's bidet. Just my dimes worth.

You are funny. Which is something, I guess.

[/quote]


Do you know how randomized, 'double blind' experiments work?

There lies your answer.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2801827[/quote]

I'll use you lots words and be done.
"you believe what you wish as will I"

No ill will here etc
I'm out, have a good life!

Do you know how randomized, 'double blind' experiments work?

There lies your answer.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2801827[/quote]

I'll use you lots words and be done.
"you believe what you wish as will I"

No ill will here etc
I'm out, have a good life![/quote]
JAMA did that study. They have proven to be not trustworthy. Big Pharma, WHO, CDC, FAUCI INC., WEF, BIDEN, U.S. Government likewise.

Figures lie when liars figure.

Hastings - your last post triggered mauserboy into five consecutive tantrum responses. You live in their heads.

Wondering the over-under on this one?

Que horse, butt, vijay jay poo poo comments from the aforementioned arrested developed in 3...2....

Maybe they will repent and admit their mistakes. But more importantly maybe others will realize DBT and Mauser aren’t making any sense and this thread will ratify their wise decision to not run off the cliff with the crowd that took Big Pharma, the government, and their mainstream medical journals as being honest. There is no doubt in my mind that something evil is afoot. A bit of paranoia is in order.

Well he maintains his obsession with men’s butts and what comes out of them. When you’re on a public forum proclaiming to the world that you “…can’t help but picture…” that kind of stuff, there’s nothing really more to say (although he consistently brings up the topic).. 🤷🏽

I'll use you lots words and be done.
"you believe what you wish as will I"

No ill will here etc
I'm out, have a good life![/quote]
JAMA did that study. They have proven to be not trustworthy. Big Pharma, WHO, CDC, FAUCI INC., WEF, BIDEN, U.S. Government likewise.

Figures lie when liars figure.[/quote]


Being caught in a kind of Grand Conspiracy Mindset, you guys simply dismiss anything and everything that doesn't fit your mental image of the world.

You have it backwards; it is those who push Ivermectin against all evidence who engage dishonestly;


''The health authorities in the US, UK and EU have found there is insufficient evidence for using the drug against Covid, but thousands of supporters, many of them anti-vaccine activists, have continued to vigorously campaign for its use.

Campaigners for the drug point to a number of scientific studies and often claim this evidence is being ignored or covered up. But a review by a group of independent scientists has cast serious doubt on that body of research.

The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of the drug for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud. None of the rest show convincing evidence of ivermectin's effectiveness.

Dr Kyle Sheldrick, one of the group investigating the studies, said they had not found "a single clinical trial" claiming to show that ivermectin prevented Covid deaths that did not contain "either obvious signs of fabrication or errors so critical they invalidate the study".

Major problems included:

The same patient data being used multiple times for supposedly different people
Evidence that selection of patients for test groups was not random
Numbers unlikely to occur naturally
Percentages calculated incorrectly
Local health bodies unaware of the studies
The scientists in the group - Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Dr James Heathers, Dr Nick Brown and Dr Sheldrick - each have a track record of exposing dodgy science. They've been working together remotely on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.

They formed a group looking deeper into ivermectin studies after biomedical student Jack Lawrence spotted problems with an influential study from Egypt. Among other issues, it contained patients who turned out to have died before the trial started. It has now been retracted by the journal that published it.

The group of independent scientists examined virtually every randomised controlled trial (RCT) on ivermectin and Covid - in theory the highest quality evidence - including all the key studies regularly cited by the drug's promoters.

RCTs involve people being randomly chosen to receive either the drug which is being tested or a placebo - a dummy drug with no active properties.''


''Out of a total of 26 studies examined, there was evidence in five that the data may have been faked - for example they contained virtually impossible numbers or rows of identical patients copied and pasted.

In a further five there were major red flags - for example, numbers didn't add up, percentages were calculated incorrectly or local health bodies weren't aware they had taken place.

On top of these flawed trials, there were 14 authors of studies who failed to send data back. The independent scientists have flagged this as a possible indicator of fraud.

The sample of research papers examined by the independent group also contains some high-quality studies from around the world. But the major problems were all in the studies making big claims for ivermectin - in fact, the bigger the claim in terms of lives saved or infections prevented, the greater the concerns suggesting it might be faked or invalid, the researchers discovered.''

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809

Being caught in a kind of Grand Conspiracy Mindset, you guys simply dismiss anything and everything that doesn't fit your mental image of the world.

You have it backwards; it is those who push Ivermectin against all evidence who engage dishonestly;


''The health authorities in the US, UK and EU have found there is insufficient evidence for using the drug against Covid, but thousands of supporters, many of them anti-vaccine activists, have continued to vigorously campaign for its use.

Campaigners for the drug point to a number of scientific studies and often claim this evidence is being ignored or covered up. But a review by a group of independent scientists has cast serious doubt on that body of research.

The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of the drug for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud. None of the rest show convincing evidence of ivermectin's effectiveness.

Dr Kyle Sheldrick, one of the group investigating the studies, said they had not found "a single clinical trial" claiming to show that ivermectin prevented Covid deaths that did not contain "either obvious signs of fabrication or errors so critical they invalidate the study".

Major problems included:

The same patient data being used multiple times for supposedly different people
Evidence that selection of patients for test groups was not random
Numbers unlikely to occur naturally
Percentages calculated incorrectly
Local health bodies unaware of the studies
The scientists in the group - Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Dr James Heathers, Dr Nick Brown and Dr Sheldrick - each have a track record of exposing dodgy science. They've been working together remotely on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.

They formed a group looking deeper into ivermectin studies after biomedical student Jack Lawrence spotted problems with an influential study from Egypt. Among other issues, it contained patients who turned out to have died before the trial started. It has now been retracted by the journal that published it.

The group of independent scientists examined virtually every randomised controlled trial (RCT) on ivermectin and Covid - in theory the highest quality evidence - including all the key studies regularly cited by the drug's promoters.

RCTs involve people being randomly chosen to receive either the drug which is being tested or a placebo - a dummy drug with no active properties.''


''Out of a total of 26 studies examined, there was evidence in five that the data may have been faked - for example they contained virtually impossible numbers or rows of identical patients copied and pasted.

In a further five there were major red flags - for example, numbers didn't add up, percentages were calculated incorrectly or local health bodies weren't aware they had taken place.

On top of these flawed trials, there were 14 authors of studies who failed to send data back. The independent scientists have flagged this as a possible indicator of fraud.

The sample of research papers examined by the independent group also contains some high-quality studies from around the world. But the major problems were all in the studies making big claims for ivermectin - in fact, the bigger the claim in terms of lives saved or infections prevented, the greater the concerns suggesting it might be faked or invalid, the researchers discovered.''

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809[/quote]


Well, I guess that settles it. None of the folks that compiled all that information had any reason to lie.

Or did they?

Remember, figures lie when liars figure.

You have it backwards; it is those who push the Covid-19 "vaccine" against all evidence who engage dishonestly;


''The health authorities in the US, UK and EU have found there is insufficient evidence for using the Covid-19 vax against Covid, but thousands of supporters, many of them Jewish activists, have continued to vigorously campaign for its use.

Campaigners for the vax point to a number of scientific studies and often claim this evidence is being ignored or covered up. But a review by a group of independent scientists has cast serious doubt on that body of research.

The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of the vax for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud. None of the rest show convincing evidence of the Covid-19 vaccine's effectiveness.

Dr Kyle Sheldrick, one of the group investigating the studies, said they had not found "a single clinical trial" claiming to show that the vaccine prevented Covid deaths that did not contain "either obvious signs of fabrication or errors so critical they invalidate the study".

Major problems included:

The same patient data being used multiple times for supposedly different people
Evidence that selection of patients for test groups was not random
Numbers unlikely to occur naturally
Percentages calculated incorrectly
Local health bodies unaware of the studies
The scientists in the group - Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Dr James Heathers, Dr Nick Brown and Dr Sheldrick - each have a track record of being corrupt "scientists" promoting dodgy science. They've been working together for the Jewish elite on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.

They formed a group looking deeper into the vaccines studies after biomedical student Jack Lawrence spotted problems with an influential study from Egypt. Among other issues, it contained patients who turned out to have died before the trial started. It has now been retracted by the journal that published it.

The group of independent scientists examined virtually every randomised controlled trial (RCT) on the Covid vax and Covid - in theory the highest quality evidence - including all the key studies regularly cited by the vaccine's promoters.

RCTs involve people being randomly chosen to receive either the vax which is being tested or a placebo - a dummy vax with no active properties.''


''Out of a total of 26 studies examined, there was evidence in five that the data may have been faked - for example they contained virtually impossible numbers or rows of identical patients copied and pasted.

In a further five there were major red flags - for example, numbers didn't add up, percentages were calculated incorrectly or local health bodies weren't aware they had taken place.

On top of these flawed trials, there were 14 authors of studies who failed to send data back. The independent scientists have flagged this as a possible indicator of fraud.

The sample of research papers examined by the independent group also contains some high-quality studies from around the world. But the major problems were all in the studies making big claims for the Covid-19 vaccine - in fact, the bigger the claim in terms of lives saved or infections prevented, the greater the concerns suggesting it might be faked or invalid, the researchers discovered.''

Yawn...the fear of covid and the treatment of it continues to ravage the septic tank blowhards..

...or maybe the addiction to the various horse orifice pastes has over stressed the limited brain cells. I hear that the dumber they get, the angrier and more defiant they become - sorta like rabies I suppose. Rabid septic tank blowhards sounds about right.

Wow, who's a clever boy? .....it's a shame that it's an illusion of your childish mind. But keep trying, given probability and time, even a room full of monkeys tapping on keyboards may make sense now and then.