It's an Aero Precision lightweight mount. I just bought another one from Arms or Ally. I guess I should of looked a little harder. Another inch of offset would of been nice to have.
kwg
It took me a while to find that. My usual gotos - Leupold, PRI and PTG, aren't showing the +2"s & 3"s. The Vortex are fine though. I have them on at least one gun. It's no wonder people aren't getting what they need for these.
The LOP takes precedence over all else - you cannot grow nor shorten your arms. Once you find your comfort zone, then you move the scope, accordingly, based on eye relief.
This^^^
I've got a MSR with a side charging handle, and an A1 stock. My scope is mounted far back for my very short LOP. Well past where the Charging handle would have been. Shoots just fine for me
I rarely use my ARs and when I saw your recommendation, I checked how I had my Mark 4 mounted.
When I mounted it, I just set it on the rail for good eye relief. The ocular was just behind the charging handle, but eye relief was fine. I pushed the rifle away from my eyes and eye relief stayed fine and realized I could move the assembly to its most forward notch, putting the ocular in the correct position
Originally Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
The LOP takes precedence over all else - you cannot grow nor shorten your arms. Once you find your comfort zone, then you move the scope, accordingly, based on eye relief.
This has always been my approach and I've encountered zero issues. I dgaf if someone doesn't like how it looks.
Mr. Burns, very interesting topic and for the most part, very informative posts here. The only scope I have mounted on any of my ARs is the SWFA 1-4 and it's clearly not aligned with the charging handle. I know you were starting the topic with the AR platform but I'm wondering whether the reason to have the ocular in line with the charging handle has any applicability to bolt rifles, even though they obviously are missing the charging handle (I assume the rearmost point on the bolt would be the analog).
I took a look at the hunting rifles I have out awaiting an end of season cleaning and noticed that I seem to have a habit of mounting the scope so the ocular is pretty far back from the ass end of the bolt. I have no problem hitting what I aim at but I'm wondering if I'm missing something that might improve accuracy. And apologies for those who are triggered by foreign flags, I didn't want to redecorate the reloading room for a picture.
Eliminate qualified immunity and you'll eliminate cops who act like they are above the law.
The LOP takes precedence over all else - you cannot grow nor shorten your arms. Once you find your comfort zone, then you move the scope, accordingly, based on eye relief.
This has always been my approach and I've encountered zero issues. I dgaf if someone doesn't like how it looks.
It is more that having the same position relative to the trigger on your rifles is ideal. It's not how retarded Stick's scope hanging waaaaay off the back looks (and it looks retarded), it's that other rifles he posts pictures of have wildly different positions relative to the trigger.
You'll notice he hasn't posted a picture of him shooting that rifle with that scope mounted in that position. That's what he always calls a hint.
The LOP takes precedence over all else - you cannot grow nor shorten your arms. Once you find your comfort zone, then you move the scope, accordingly, based on eye relief.
This has always been my approach and I've encountered zero issues. I dgaf if someone doesn't like how it looks.
It is more that having the same position relative to the trigger on your rifles is ideal. It's not how retarded Stick's scope hanging waaaaay off the back looks (and it looks retarded), it's that other rifles he posts pictures of have wildly different positions relative to the trigger.
You'll notice he hasn't posted a picture of him shooting that rifle with that scope mounted in that position. That's what he always calls a hint.
Dumb question, but why have you latched on to this as your cause du jour? If I had to guess, there’s a good chance it was done purposefully just to garner reactions such as yours and that retard Burn’s… Or maybe set up for a really small child to shoot?
Mr. Burns, very interesting topic and for the most part, very informative posts here. The only scope I have mounted on any of my ARs is the SWFA 1-4 and it's clearly not aligned with the charging handle. I know you were starting the topic with the AR platform but I'm wondering whether the reason to have the ocular in line with the charging handle has any applicability to bolt rifles, even though they obviously are missing the charging handle (I assume the rearmost point on the bolt would be the analog).
I took a look at the hunting rifles I have out awaiting an end of season cleaning and noticed that I seem to have a habit of mounting the scope so the ocular is pretty far back from the ass end of the bolt. I have no problem hitting what I aim at but I'm wondering if I'm missing something that might improve accuracy. And apologies for those who are triggered by foreign flags, I didn't want to redecorate the reloading room for a picture.
Remsen,
My belief is the ocular, scopes with the same eye relief, should have the same relationship to the trigger across platforms much like the length off pull should be the same across platforms.
This keeps the eye/head and the trigger finger/shooting hand in the same relationship across platforms.
Fit can have an affect on accuracy but that can be worked around given extra time during shooting. Fit really pays off when going fast.
My good friend Kyle shows proper fit in this video on speed and accuracy.
Last edited by JohnBurns; 12/22/23.
John Burns
I have all the sources. They can't stop the signal.