Evidently I'm broke despite showing me with my Accuracy International AX with S&B and suppressor. Only on the Fire.
Buying those rigs would be a fun way to go broke.
Been playing with an F-T/R rifle and Berger 200.20X lately. That’s turning out to be a fun proposition.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Looks as though it comes in both FFP and SFP.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
My Reupold MK5 almost could handle 22LR recoil,until the elevation turret was moved. ALMOST. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
Last edited by JohnBurns; 01/12/24.
John Burns
I have all the sources. They can't stop the signal.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
So I take it that you won't be dusting off the C clamps for the 2.5-10 FFP Mk4?
I see you didn't bother to give the FFP TMR a serious look before posting.
It's designed such that the heavy outer lines on the crosswire and verticle under center will extend to near center on 2.5X. It's a very well designed FFP, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's actually faster to get on close targets with it than many SFP designs that have windage and holdover components.
Why didn’t you buy them from a reputable retailer and get a refund?
Because I buy directly from Leupold. I didn't want a refund so I chose to have the optics fixed. You really are having a STRUGGLE Fit.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
John Burns
I have all the sources. They can't stop the signal.
Why would someone want to drop a G on a leupold scope that they absolutely hate and trash every opportunity they get? Asking for a friend
That's a question for which you won't get an answer. It is a valid question.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
You'd have to be a freaking moron to take stock in Form's drop tests, if that's what you mean. His tracking/return to zero test may be interesting. Buy it from Stick and send it to him. Wonder why Form left this board?
Last edited by JGRaider; 01/12/24.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
You'd have to be a freaking moron to take stock in Form's drop tests, if that's what you mean. His tracking/return to zero test may be interesting. Buy it from Stick and send it to him. Wonder why Form left this board?
You kiss his azzzz on Rokslide, but badmouth him here? Fuggin backstabbin loser. He probably left because of dumphuqs like you.
I give him a huge ration of schitttt on RS over this subject, and his supposed killing of "thousands,plural" of game animals. Learn how to use the search function....it's easy to find. You'll also find his little posse of assskissers over there who won't wipe their asss without asking him first.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
I give him a huge ration of schitttt on RS over this subject, and his supposed killing of "thousands,plural" of game animals. Learn how to use the search function....it's easy to find. You'll also find his little posse of assskissers over there who won't wipe their asss without asking him first.
Formidilosus is full of himself. Not impressed with him at all
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.