If Leupold is trying to restore their image in the community, maybe hiring a competent web page proof-reader would be a good place to start. The objective typo is the kind of stuff I'd expect to see on a Chincom website. .02.
I like that it has 6" of straight tube for scope mounting on a long action. Like others have said, if it will hold zero it may have some merit. Until proven I will just stay with Nightforce.
Almost a dupe for the NF SHV 3x10, but not illuminated.
Time will tell if it's same-ol or not. Hard not to buy NF for that package & price so their gonna have a tough market nut to crack.
MM
The big difference is that the Leupold is FFP which I don't believe one can acquire in any of the max 10X NF offerings.
I get that L is trying to meet a price-point, but, FFP and max 10x magnification seems like Illumination is almost a must unless you're never going to use it under 5/6X.
I like L's TMR reticle as I had a few swapped into scopes when their custom shop still did it. I greatly prefer it to a Windplex as the TMR is quite a bit finer. Though I'm referring to SFP TMR, I've never used or looked through an L w/FFP TMR so I could be way off base.
I like that it has 6" of straight tube for scope mounting on a long action. Like others have said, if it will hold zero it may have some merit. Until proven I will just stay with Nightforce.
If it would just hold zero and dial reliably it’s a no brainer.
...
Added a bit.
If only... I'd love to sing Leupold's praises and if they had the reliability of NF I'd jump on the Big L bandwagon so fast it would upset the applecart of every other maker. If only...
Checks too many boxes for me to not at least give one a try. From what I've seen of the TMR reticle, it's very good for all around big game use.
While I use and very much like a few NF's, I'm not really in love with any of their reticles for my uses. If functionality turns out to be equal, I'd go for the Leupold in reference over anything NF currently offers in a similar size and X range.
I haven't had the best luck with a few Leulolds dialing reliably through the years, but all a guy can do is give this one a try. Maybe they're working on QI, maybe not, but either way I trust my own results over internet influencers and those who otherwise stand to gain or loose on companies' reputations.
Almost a dupe for the NF SHV 3x10, but not illuminated.
Time will tell if it's same-ol or not. Hard not to buy NF for that package & price so their gonna have a tough market nut to crack.
MM
The big difference is that the Leupold is FFP which I don't believe one can acquire in any of the max 10X NF offerings.
I get that L is trying to meet a price-point, but, FFP and max 10x magnification seems like Illumination is almost a must unless you're never going to use it under 5/6X.
I like L's TMR reticle as I had a few swapped into scopes when their custom shop still did it. I greatly prefer it to a Windplex as the TMR is quite a bit finer. Though I'm referring to SFP TMR, I've never used or looked through an L w/FFP TMR so I could be way off base.
While I havent yet looked at one in this particular scope, in general Leupold does a nice job with the FFP TMR. The measuring portions of the windage crosswire is kept reasonable, as is drop compensation on the lower elevation wire; as such, on low X the heavier lines come close enough to center to give quick aim/bracketing points, making it very useful throughout the X range, even without illumination.
It is illuminated and has a reticle leveling feature.
Interesting scope, and looking forward to seeing an unbiased review. I like my SHV 2-10, as well my Vx5 2-10. I am not a huge dialer or long range hunter. Nice to see a SFP and FFP option, as FFP is not my personal preference.
It is illuminated and has a reticle leveling feature.
Interesting scope, and looking forward to seeing an unbiased review. I like my SHV 2-10, as well my Vx5 2-10. I am not a huge dialer or long range hunter. Nice to see a SFP and FFP option, as FFP is not my personal preference.
I believe MM is correct. They sure make it challenging to tell though.
I am traveling and on my phone,do you have a 183738 in stock?
Thanks…………..
LMFAO. Nothing like a show pony! If your to fùckn stupid to order using your phone, the following review will be better than the last where your fat face keeps you constantly out of plumb. Jesus, just order one and stop the look at me guys shït. It's sad. Hint!
I am traveling and on my phone,do you have a 183738 in stock?
Thanks…………..
LMFAO. Nothing like a show pony! If your to fùckn stupid to order using your phone, the following review will be better than the last where your fat face keeps you constantly out of plumb. Jesus, just order one and stop the look at me guys shït. It's sad. Hint!
We do not have these scopes on our site yet as we are waiting for enough detail to build correct pages, so asking through this thread seems to me to be a smart move as at this time it cannot be ordered through our site. Hopefully these scopes as well as other brands new for 2024 products will be on our site in short order.
It's a new offering. By extension, it's reasonable to conclude that retailers might not yet have them in stock and ready to ship. Further, several posters on and followers of this thread are interested in obtaining one, so BS asking publicly if they are currently available is, in fact, a service to others.
Stick is a poster on an internet forum. If you find any internet poster to be so irksome that it causes you to peruse their posts in an attempt to find something, anything to use as fodder in a type of "get even" post, then, for your own good, you need to find a new pastime. Maybe try shooting!
Leupold was dominating the PRS/NRL game with the MK5.
With the pricing on the MK4 HD it's going to be a bloodbath.
I give them credit for building what a lot of folks have been asking for. I haven't bought a Leupold in a few years, but I like a lot about these scopes fore several applications, and I will hopefully be knocking around with one before too long.
I'm aware that it's a new product. Simple email or PM to Doug would've guaranteed that the first one that came in the door would've been on the way to nowhere Alaska. How ever the need for attention brings him to. " I only have my phone and I'm traveling" guys look at me. It's all but obvious that the only guy that needs more attention than the pygmy doctor from Alaska is John burns.
Poor poor (literally) Squirms,always on the outside licking windows,Dreaming about getting in. Hint.
To be continued. Hint…………
You have spent that last year plus running first class Chinese crap and bragging like you really found a gem. John for all his faults is still your father.
Almost a dupe for the NF SHV 3x10, but not illuminated.
Time will tell if it's same-ol or not. Hard not to buy NF for that package & price so their gonna have a tough market nut to crack.
MM
Uh, not even close. FFP vs SFP
I could give a schitt less about FFP in that mag range. Besides I do have a rangefinder.
Move the min mag up to 5 or 6, then I might begin to care a little.
Especially if it doesn't have illumination.
Contrary to some thinking, there have really been more than a few things actually killed with SFP scope.
MM
All these stupid fu cks thinking they need to use a FFP scope to make hits way out there are funny as hell. SFP has gotten it done for a very long time. What kind of scopes do you think Carlos Hathcock used? I think a lot here just don't have the actual experience, and believe what they hear. A FFP scope actually sucks at close range, where most game is killed, Where it really matters at long distance, you'll have your scope magnification cranked up, where it won't matter if you are using a first or second focal plan scope. On a 2-10 power scope, you guys are arguing about something that doesn't make a schit bit of difference.
Almost a dupe for the NF SHV 3x10, but not illuminated.
Time will tell if it's same-ol or not. Hard not to buy NF for that package & price so their gonna have a tough market nut to crack.
MM
Uh, not even close. FFP vs SFP
I could give a schitt less about FFP in that mag range. Besides I do have a rangefinder.
Move the min mag up to 5 or 6, then I might begin to care a little.
Especially if it doesn't have illumination.
Contrary to some thinking, there have really been more than a few things actually killed with SFP scope.
MM
All these stupid fu cks thinking they need to use a FFP scope to make hits way out there are funny as hell. SFP has gotten it done for a very long time. What kind of scopes do you think Carlos Hathcock used? I think a lot here just don't have the actual experience, and believe what they hear. A FFP scope actually sucks at close range, where most game is killed, Where it really matters at long distance, you'll have your scope magnification cranked up, where it won't matter if you are using a first or second focal plan scope. On a 2-10 power scope, you guys are arguing about something that doesn't make a schit bit of difference.
I've had a lot of success with both over the years. And while I don't disagree that a SFP that tops out at 10 isn't a deal breaker as far as reticles, I still prefer a well designed FFP if given the choice.
Jimmypop Your doing yourself proud. Projecting it’s a thing…..
This ^^ makes not a single bit of sense. Literally not any! I don't own a single Chinese scope. But I only have three guns and two are iron sights.
Drawing attention to oneself…..
I could explain it to you but I can’t make you understand it……
LOL I guess less than a post a day is definitely enough to make drama queen status. Jeff you sad ball washing beotch. Calling it straight makes you nervous but the truth is John and John Jr are in a desperate drama queen battle for campfire domination. LOL.
Jimmypop Your doing yourself proud. Projecting it’s a thing…..
This ^^ makes not a single bit of sense. Literally not any! I don't own a single Chinese scope. But I only have three guns and two are iron sights.
Drawing attention to oneself…..
I could explain it to you but I can’t make you understand it……
LOL I guess less than a post a day is definitely enough to make drama queen status. Jeff you sad ball washing beotch. Calling it straight makes you nervous but the truth is John and John Jr are in a desperate drama queen battle for campfire domination. LOL.
Regards Ksmithinhimmer. LOL.
I’m sorry I thought you were stupid I didn’t realize you’re retarded…..
Almost a dupe for the NF SHV 3x10, but not illuminated.
Time will tell if it's same-ol or not. Hard not to buy NF for that package & price so their gonna have a tough market nut to crack.
MM
Uh, not even close. FFP vs SFP
I could give a schitt less about FFP in that mag range. Besides I do have a rangefinder.
Move the min mag up to 5 or 6, then I might begin to care a little.
Especially if it doesn't have illumination.
Contrary to some thinking, there have really been more than a few things actually killed with SFP scope.
MM
All these stupid fu cks thinking they need to use a FFP scope to make hits way out there are funny as hell. SFP has gotten it done for a very long time. What kind of scopes do you think Carlos Hathcock used? I think a lot here just don't have the actual experience, and believe what they hear. A FFP scope actually sucks at close range, where most game is killed, Where it really matters at long distance, you'll have your scope magnification cranked up, where it won't matter if you are using a first or second focal plan scope. On a 2-10 power scope, you guys are arguing about something that doesn't make a schit bit of difference.
Sorry bsa, but this is nonsense. There are a lot of variables within that paragraph that can change the conclusion. You've made a pretty strong assertion based on a bunch of assumptions, which I would argue. Have you spent much time using FFP scopes?
I'm betting Carlos Hathcock got from Point A to Point B just fine in his 80's technology vehicle, too, but that doesn't make it the best choice in today's world.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
I am traveling and on my phone,do you have a 183738 in stock?
Thanks…………..
LMFAO. Nothing like a show pony! If your to fùckn stupid to order using your phone, the following review will be better than the last where your fat face keeps you constantly out of plumb. Jesus, just order one and stop the look at me guys shït. It's sad. Hint!
We do not have these scopes on our site yet as we are waiting for enough detail to build correct pages, so asking through this thread seems to me to be a smart move as at this time it cannot be ordered through our site. Hopefully these scopes as well as other brands new for 2024 products will be on our site in short order.
You’re the consummate gentleman and businessman Doug. Appreciate your presence here. Trijicon should follow suit and offer similar or offer the 2-10x36 in 42mm with the reticle from the 2.5-15 and a SFP option.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
Jimmypussy is a sockpuppet of Fake SEAL and STOLEN VALOR poster KSMITH, Kris Smith.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
With the owner being such a giant part of this site I'm curious if anyone has bought one?
Fake KSMITH SEAL sockpuppet who claims STOLEN VALOR wants to whine because I jammed sand up her couchie?
Who saw that coming? Kris Smith saw it coming for her couchie.
Originally Posted by KSMITH Fake SEAL STOLEN VALOR
Thanks for playin, Sockpuppet
Originally Posted by WYcoyote
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
With the owner being such a giant part of this site I'm curious if anyone has bought one?
Living rent free.
Originally Posted by SKane
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
LOL! keep trying John. I'm not a sock.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
LOL! keep trying John. I'm not a sock. Just a guy that can spot a pile of wasted human skin.
I am traveling and on my phone,do you have a 183738 in stock?
Thanks…………..
LMFAO. Nothing like a show pony! If your to fùckn stupid to order using your phone, the following review will be better than the last where your fat face keeps you constantly out of plumb. Jesus, just order one and stop the look at me guys shït. It's sad. Hint!
We do not have these scopes on our site yet as we are waiting for enough detail to build correct pages, so asking through this thread seems to me to be a smart move as at this time it cannot be ordered through our site. Hopefully these scopes as well as other brands new for 2024 products will be on our site in short order.
You’re the consummate gentleman and businessman Doug. Appreciate your presence here. Trijicon should follow suit and offer similar or offer the 2-10x36 in 42mm with the reticle from the 2.5-15 and a SFP option.
Funnily enough but I dig their 2-10x36 FFP.
It’s great to have options and good gear we have.
I do like the 2.5x15 SFP as well. Trijicon has made some good gear as of late.
I am traveling and on my phone,do you have a 183738 in stock?
Thanks…………..
LMFAO. Nothing like a show pony! If your to fùckn stupid to order using your phone, the following review will be better than the last where your fat face keeps you constantly out of plumb. Jesus, just order one and stop the look at me guys shït. It's sad. Hint!
We do not have these scopes on our site yet as we are waiting for enough detail to build correct pages, so asking through this thread seems to me to be a smart move as at this time it cannot be ordered through our site. Hopefully these scopes as well as other brands new for 2024 products will be on our site in short order.
You’re the consummate gentleman and businessman Doug. Appreciate your presence here. Trijicon should follow suit and offer similar or offer the 2-10x36 in 42mm with the reticle from the 2.5-15 and a SFP option.
Funnily enough but I dig their 2-10x36 FFP.
It’s great to have options and good gear we have.
I do like the 2.5x15 SFP as well. Trijicon has made some good gear as of late.
Picked up a 2.5-15 for my Rim-X and a 1-8x for an AR. Almost grabbed a 2-10x36 for a Montana but grabbed a 3-10 SHV MOAR instead mainly because I have them on a couple other rifles and picked it up for $799.
I think the trijicons are flying under the radar and a big bang for the buck.
I am traveling and on my phone,do you have a 183738 in stock?
Thanks…………..
LMFAO. Nothing like a show pony! If your to fùckn stupid to order using your phone, the following review will be better than the last where your fat face keeps you constantly out of plumb. Jesus, just order one and stop the look at me guys shït. It's sad. Hint!
We do not have these scopes on our site yet as we are waiting for enough detail to build correct pages, so asking through this thread seems to me to be a smart move as at this time it cannot be ordered through our site. Hopefully these scopes as well as other brands new for 2024 products will be on our site in short order.
You’re the consummate gentleman and businessman Doug. Appreciate your presence here. Trijicon should follow suit and offer similar or offer the 2-10x36 in 42mm with the reticle from the 2.5-15 and a SFP option.
Funnily enough but I dig their 2-10x36 FFP.
It’s great to have options and good gear we have.
I do like the 2.5x15 SFP as well. Trijicon has made some good gear as of late.
The 2-10x36 is growing on me. Grabbed other rifles this year for hunting but I am going to hunt the [bleep] out of it next year.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
I was generous calling you retarded….
I was serious about you clean those cocks! Don't fret over me pulling your card those hands gotta be soft as silk to do what you do.
Capping the windage and a locked zero stop is a great thing. FFP is one of the last things I would consider in a hunting scope but I only hunt when it's daylight. Hint.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
I was generous calling you retarded….
I was serious about you clean those cocks! Don't fret over me pulling your card those hands gotta be soft as silk to do what you do.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
I was generous calling you retarded….
I was serious about you clean those cocks! Don't fret over me pulling your card those hands gotta be soft as silk to do what you do.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
Jimmypussy is a sockpuppet of Fake SEAL and STOLEN VALOR poster KSMITH, Kris Smith.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
With the owner being such a giant part of this site I'm curious if anyone has bought one?
Fake KSMITH SEAL sockpuppet who claims STOLEN VALOR wants to whine because I jammed sand up her couchie?
Who saw that coming? Kris Smith saw it coming for her couchie.
Originally Posted by KSMITH Fake SEAL STOLEN VALOR
Thanks for playin, Sockpuppet
Originally Posted by WYcoyote
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
With the owner being such a giant part of this site I'm curious if anyone has bought one?
Living rent free.
Originally Posted by SKane
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
LOL! keep trying John. I'm not a sock.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Originally Posted by Jimmypop
LOL! keep trying John. I'm not a sock. Just a guy that can spot a pile of wasted human skin.
Definitely a sockpuppet.
John, I'm Kris smith!!! and you are a starving rifle builder with a good reputation. LMFAO.
Two time bronze medalist in the look at me event, 2020/2021 special Olympics. Guess who got first and second. Hint. Keep washing those campfire cocks Jeffp.
I was generous calling you retarded….
I was serious about you clean those cocks! Don't fret over me pulling your card those hands gotta be soft as silk to do what you do.
Poor poor (literally) Squirms,always on the outside licking windows,Dreaming about getting in. Hint.
To be continued. Hint…………
You have spent that last year plus running first class Chinese crap and bragging like you really found a gem. John for all his faults is still your father.
But you’ve been here all of what?….4 months bigshot? Give it a rest.
If nothing else it’s funny as fu.ck to watch the ankle biters bitch and nip their way into internet stardom…
............ I've had a lot of success with both over the years. And while I don't disagree that a SFP that tops out at 10 isn't a deal breaker as far as reticles, I still prefer a well designed FFP if given the choice.
Use what suits your needs and sensibilities.
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
...........
I'm betting Carlos Hathcock got from Point A to Point B just fine in his 80's technology vehicle, too, but that doesn't make it the best choice in today's world.
I play with a lot of scopes, both shooting and hunting. The end goal of all that play time is placing a bullet where I want it when hunting. I could get by just fine with SFP scopes. I could get by just fine with FFP scopes with a well designed reticle. End result is I've come to prefer a well designed FFP reticle for all around use.
Originally Posted by jackmountain
.... You’re the consummate gentleman and businessman Doug. Appreciate your presence here. ....
Doug really is. He spends his time laying out options and allows each of us to make a choice that "suits your needs and sensibilities" as Starbuck stated.
As of a little while ago these new Leupold are in our site. Thanks for your patience
No joy. Hint.
Do you have a feel as to when? Hint...........
According to our rep scopes will start shipping in the next couple of weeks. He's supposed to get a better guesstimate of which scopes when either today or Monday. As I get intel I will share
As of a little while ago these new Leupold are in our site. Thanks for your patience
No joy. Hint.
Do you have a feel as to when? Hint...........
According to our rep scopes will start shipping in the next couple of weeks. He's supposed to get a better guesstimate of which scopes when either today or Monday. As I get intel I will share
Can you ask him if these will work properly (ie retain zero and track)?
As of a little while ago these new Leupold are in our site. Thanks for your patience
No joy. Hint.
Do you have a feel as to when? Hint...........
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
According to our rep scopes will start shipping in the next couple of weeks. He's supposed to get a better guesstimate of which scopes when either today or Monday. As I get intel I will share
Doug,
Those are going to be very popular scopes. I hope Cameraland sells a bunch of them.
Has Larry contacted you about his claimed defective Leupold MK 5?
If one was to order a Leupold MK 4 and found it defective what is the procedure for refund or replacement?
You carry a pretty wide selection of nice scopes. What does your data say about customer satisfaction for Leupold vs other scopes?
Most of us are victims of our experience but you must get a lot of customer feedback and it would be strange for you to carry a product line that, according to a few vocal posters, has a very large number of defective units.
Thanks in advance for providing some unbiased information that customers can use in deciding future purchases.
Perhaps the Reupold MK5 3.6-18x would benefit via retrofit,of a Reupold Spotting Scope Erector Assembly,because as issued,they are not worth a flying fhuqk. Hint.
I am traveling and on my phone,do you have a 183738 in stock?
Thanks…………..
LMFAO. Nothing like a show pony! If your to fùckn stupid to order using your phone, the following review will be better than the last where your fat face keeps you constantly out of plumb. Jesus, just order one and stop the look at me guys shït. It's sad. Hint!
We do not have these scopes on our site yet as we are waiting for enough detail to build correct pages, so asking through this thread seems to me to be a smart move as at this time it cannot be ordered through our site. Hopefully these scopes as well as other brands new for 2024 products will be on our site in short order.
You’re the consummate gentleman and businessman Doug. Appreciate your presence here. Trijicon should follow suit and offer similar or offer the 2-10x36 in 42mm with the reticle from the 2.5-15 and a SFP option.
Funnily enough but I dig their 2-10x36 FFP.
It’s great to have options and good gear we have.
I do like the 2.5x15 SFP as well. Trijicon has made some good gear as of late.
Picked up a 2.5-15 for my Rim-X and a 1-8x for an AR. Almost grabbed a 2-10x36 for a Montana but grabbed a 3-10 SHV MOAR instead mainly because I have them on a couple other rifles and picked it up for $799.
I think the trijicons are flying under the radar and a big bang for the buck.
I’ve been using the 3-18 TenMile for a few years now on the Mashburn. Just snagged up another one the other day for a few bucks over a 1000 which is several 100 under where they usually sell. Favorite scope so far. The 2-10 is very good as well.
I have the 2.5-15 on a few rifles as well that work well. Also their 3-9 Credo on my old 338. Lately they’ve been my pick for serious stuff.
Be great to have Leupold be great cause they have a very good vets program that I’d use the heck out of. Here’s hoping the MK4 is good.
Perhaps the Reupold MK5 3.6-18x would benefit via retrofit,of a Reupold Spotting Scope Erector Assembly,because as issued,they are not worth a flying fhuqk. Hint.
Just sayin'.........
Dearest LiL Fish,
Do you feel the MK5 you purchased was defective in design or in manufacture?
Have you contacted Doug for a return?
If I had such EPIC STRUGGLES with any brand of product it would be hard to purchase anymore but you sure seem excited to order another Leupold from Cameraland.
I've quite a few 'scopes from CL,that exceed their billing. Reupold simply can't begin to hang. Hint.
Likely hardware too. Hint.
A coupla NightFarces lit over night. Hint.
Pardon the reality,of reality. Hint..............
Dearest LiL Fish,
That's great but it does make one wonder why you are so anxious to get another Leupold from Cameraland when your last one caused you to STRUGGLE in such an EPIC fashion.
I mean, we all got a laugh out of the thread, and if you goal is entertainment it sure worked.
I will say your attempts at testing Leupolds and then posting pictures of the STRUGGLE almost seems like a job.
What did you here back from Doug about a return on the MK 5? I'd like to keep track of that scope.
As of a little while ago these new Leupold are in our site. Thanks for your patience
No joy. Hint.
Do you have a feel as to when? Hint...........
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
According to our rep scopes will start shipping in the next couple of weeks. He's supposed to get a better guesstimate of which scopes when either today or Monday. As I get intel I will share
Doug,
Those are going to be very popular scopes. I hope Cameraland sells a bunch of them.
Has Larry contacted you about his claimed defective Leupold MK 5?
If one was to order a Leupold MK 4 and found it defective what is the procedure for refund or replacement?
You carry a pretty wide selection of nice scopes. What does your data say about customer satisfaction for Leupold vs other scopes?
Most of us are victims of our experience but you must get a lot of customer feedback and it would be strange for you to carry a product line that, according to a few vocal posters, has a very large number of defective units.
Thanks in advance for providing some unbiased information that customers can use in deciding future purchases.
John, I agree these new Leupold scopes seem like a great addition to their offerings. Of course, time and usage will be the review of them.
He has not reached out to me to intervene on his MK 5 issue. As with any issues with any brand we handle, whether it was originally purchased from us or not, it's our pleasure to assist.
With any newly purchased product, be it this new series of scope or anything else, if it is an initial defective reach out to us. Every brand has varying methods of handling this type of issue. In some cases the brand will e-mail a pick up tag to get the product back, in some cases we will. If it is a refund we will issue the refund. If it is an exchange sometimes the brand will send the replacement and other times we will. Again, it depends of the brands policy. We try to be as efficient as possible and to keep UPS and Fed Ex at a minimum. Obviously, the most efficient way is the brand sends a pick up tag and a replacement product. Much better than ship to us, ship to brand, brand ships to us and we ship to you.
Our experience with Leupold has been positive. By that I mean we sell a fair amount of their scopes and I cannot recall the last one that I got contacted about with an issue.
Overall the brands we carry have solid quality. We do our best to choose and carry quality brands. We do not carry anything and everything to make every sale. We prefer to carry brands that we can offer quality customer service, brands that when we need an answer to a question we can reach a rep and when there's an issue we can efficiently assist and of course brands with quality offerings. Through the years we have carried brands that as you can see we no longer carry. There's reasons of course and these reasons vary. Unfortunately, over the decades, this industry has changed. Companies that once were filled with industry folks who started at the bottom and worked their way up and understood not only the needs of the consumer but the needs of their retail partners have retired and the new regime, in some cases, are bean counters that come from either other industries or ivy league schools and, IMO, haven't a clue about their products or care about their consumers or retail partners. In some cases companies have been bought out by public corporations and the bean counters care more about the stock holders than the consumers that keep them in business. It's an ever changing industry which is why we go to SHOT Show every year. To see the people we work with, to cultivate relationships with the people we buy from, to look for new quality offerings and to listen and learn what's going on industry wide.
I will repeat what I always post......ALWAYS feel free to pick up the phone and call us, 516-217-1000, to discuss what it is you're interested in, to compare different options, if you need assistance with an issue (not an issue with your spouse as we do not have that much free time) or what we can do for you on the product that does interest you.
It is never not funnier than fhuqk,when Drooling Dumbfhuqks become a "we",to extoll their VERY well founded and countless Insecurities. Hint.
Not even I,can gun wares until they exist and I'm rather at ease with using my loot for R&D,to see actually WTF. My MK5 Reupold is a screaming pile of fhuqking schit,none of which is on any Vendor and Doug's involvement is less than zero. Hint.
If/when the 183738 is available,I'll simply shoot it with Live Ammo,to see WTF. After same,I will report said findings,no different than any of the 100's of other scopes in my larder. Hint.
"Here" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon the power of my words and a simplistic critique by me,swaying the Market. It could go NO other way. Hint.
As of a little while ago these new Leupold are in our site. Thanks for your patience
No joy. Hint.
Do you have a feel as to when? Hint...........
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
According to our rep scopes will start shipping in the next couple of weeks. He's supposed to get a better guesstimate of which scopes when either today or Monday. As I get intel I will share
Doug,
Those are going to be very popular scopes. I hope Cameraland sells a bunch of them.
Has Larry contacted you about his claimed defective Leupold MK 5?
If one was to order a Leupold MK 4 and found it defective what is the procedure for refund or replacement?
You carry a pretty wide selection of nice scopes. What does your data say about customer satisfaction for Leupold vs other scopes?
Most of us are victims of our experience but you must get a lot of customer feedback and it would be strange for you to carry a product line that, according to a few vocal posters, has a very large number of defective units.
Thanks in advance for providing some unbiased information that customers can use in deciding future purchases.
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
John, I agree these new Leupold scopes seem like a great addition to their offerings. Of course, time and usage will be the review of them.
He has not reached out to me to intervene on his MK 5 issue. As with any issues with any brand we handle, whether it was originally purchased from us or not, it's our pleasure to assist.
With any newly purchased product, be it this new series of scope or anything else, if it is an initial defective reach out to us. Every brand has varying methods of handling this type of issue. In some cases the brand will e-mail a pick up tag to get the product back, in some cases we will. If it is a refund we will issue the refund. If it is an exchange sometimes the brand will send the replacement and other times we will. Again, it depends of the brands policy. We try to be as efficient as possible and to keep UPS and Fed Ex at a minimum. Obviously, the most efficient way is the brand sends a pick up tag and a replacement product. Much better than ship to us, ship to brand, brand ships to us and we ship to you.
Our experience with Leupold has been positive. By that I mean we sell a fair amount of their scopes and I cannot recall the last one that I got contacted about with an issue.
Overall the brands we carry have solid quality. We do our best to choose and carry quality brands. We do not carry anything and everything to make every sale. We prefer to carry brands that we can offer quality customer service, brands that when we need an answer to a question we can reach a rep and when there's an issue we can efficiently assist and of course brands with quality offerings. Through the years we have carried brands that as you can see we no longer carry. There's reasons of course and these reasons vary. Unfortunately, over the decades, this industry has changed. Companies that once were filled with industry folks who started at the bottom and worked their way up and understood not only the needs of the consumer but the needs of their retail partners have retired and the new regime, in some cases, are bean counters that come from either other industries or ivy league schools and, IMO, haven't a clue about their products or care about their consumers or retail partners. In some cases companies have been bought out by public corporations and the bean counters care more about the stock holders than the consumers that keep them in business. It's an ever changing industry which is why we go to SHOT Show every year. To see the people we work with, to cultivate relationships with the people we buy from, to look for new quality offerings and to listen and learn what's going on industry wide.
I will repeat what I always post......ALWAYS feel free to pick up the phone and call us, 516-217-1000, to discuss what it is you're interested in, to compare different options, if you need assistance with an issue (not an issue with your spouse as we do not have that much free time) or what we can do for you on the product that does interest you.
Doug,
Thanks for the response.
It's good to know your experience with Leupold matches mine. I have great luck with Leupold and your customer feed back is another good indicator the MK4 will be a big hit with shooters and hunters.
If Larry reaches out for a refund I would be interested in purchasing that MK 5 that caused him such struggles.
As of a little while ago these new Leupold are in our site. Thanks for your patience
No joy. Hint.
Do you have a feel as to when? Hint...........
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
According to our rep scopes will start shipping in the next couple of weeks. He's supposed to get a better guesstimate of which scopes when either today or Monday. As I get intel I will share
Doug,
Those are going to be very popular scopes. I hope Cameraland sells a bunch of them.
Has Larry contacted you about his claimed defective Leupold MK 5?
If one was to order a Leupold MK 4 and found it defective what is the procedure for refund or replacement?
You carry a pretty wide selection of nice scopes. What does your data say about customer satisfaction for Leupold vs other scopes?
Most of us are victims of our experience but you must get a lot of customer feedback and it would be strange for you to carry a product line that, according to a few vocal posters, has a very large number of defective units.
Thanks in advance for providing some unbiased information that customers can use in deciding future purchases.
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
John, I agree these new Leupold scopes seem like a great addition to their offerings. Of course, time and usage will be the review of them.
He has not reached out to me to intervene on his MK 5 issue. As with any issues with any brand we handle, whether it was originally purchased from us or not, it's our pleasure to assist.
With any newly purchased product, be it this new series of scope or anything else, if it is an initial defective reach out to us. Every brand has varying methods of handling this type of issue. In some cases the brand will e-mail a pick up tag to get the product back, in some cases we will. If it is a refund we will issue the refund. If it is an exchange sometimes the brand will send the replacement and other times we will. Again, it depends of the brands policy. We try to be as efficient as possible and to keep UPS and Fed Ex at a minimum. Obviously, the most efficient way is the brand sends a pick up tag and a replacement product. Much better than ship to us, ship to brand, brand ships to us and we ship to you.
Our experience with Leupold has been positive. By that I mean we sell a fair amount of their scopes and I cannot recall the last one that I got contacted about with an issue.
Overall the brands we carry have solid quality. We do our best to choose and carry quality brands. We do not carry anything and everything to make every sale. We prefer to carry brands that we can offer quality customer service, brands that when we need an answer to a question we can reach a rep and when there's an issue we can efficiently assist and of course brands with quality offerings. Through the years we have carried brands that as you can see we no longer carry. There's reasons of course and these reasons vary. Unfortunately, over the decades, this industry has changed. Companies that once were filled with industry folks who started at the bottom and worked their way up and understood not only the needs of the consumer but the needs of their retail partners have retired and the new regime, in some cases, are bean counters that come from either other industries or ivy league schools and, IMO, haven't a clue about their products or care about their consumers or retail partners. In some cases companies have been bought out by public corporations and the bean counters care more about the stock holders than the consumers that keep them in business. It's an ever changing industry which is why we go to SHOT Show every year. To see the people we work with, to cultivate relationships with the people we buy from, to look for new quality offerings and to listen and learn what's going on industry wide.
I will repeat what I always post......ALWAYS feel free to pick up the phone and call us, 516-217-1000, to discuss what it is you're interested in, to compare different options, if you need assistance with an issue (not an issue with your spouse as we do not have that much free time) or what we can do for you on the product that does interest you.
Doug,
Thanks for the response.
It's good to know your experience with Leupold matches mine. I have great luck with Leupold and your customer feed back is another good indicator the MK4 will be a big hit with shooters and hunters.
If Larry reaches out for a refund I would be interested in purchasing that MK 5 that caused him such struggles.
Thanks again.
John, I strongly suggest you look at the GPO GPOTAC 45 Spotting Scope. It's normally $1,299.99 and we have it on promo for $899.99. It is an excellent optic.
"The GPOTAC 45 15-45X spotting scope is designed for shooters looking for an advantage in shot placement. It has a custom-designed first-focal plane reticle built for the precision long-range shooter and includes bonus features such as Picatinny rails for supplemental sighting and a honeycomb objective filter lens cap that minimizes objective lens reflection. As a bonus feature, its PLR reticle is matched with the first focal plane PLRi reticle in the GPOTAC 4.5-27x50i riflescope. This creates the ultimate scope and spotter combination."
FEATURES: Mil-based first focal plane (FFP) PLR reticle Picatinny rail mounting system Matching FFP reticle to GPOTAC 4.5-27×50 riflescope Armored for durability GPObright high-transmission lens coatings DOUBLE HD objective lens
It is never not funnier than fhuqk,when Drooling Dumbfhuqks become a "we",to extoll their VERY well founded and countless Insecurities. Hint.
Not even I,can gun wares until they exist and I'm rather at ease with using my loot for R&D,to see actually WTF. My MK5 Reupold is a screaming pile of fhuqking schit,none of which is on any Vendor and Doug's involvement is less than zero. Hint.
If/when the 183738 is available,I'll simply shoot it with Live Ammo,to see WTF. After same,I will report said findings,no different than any of the 100's of other scopes in my larder. Hint.
"Here" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon the power of my words and a simplistic critique by me,swaying the Market. It could go NO other way. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!............
Dearest LiL Fish,
Would you consider yourself an "influencer" and would that influence to sway "the Market" have any value to a scope company.
I know Athalon has been pretty agressive with their marketing using "influencers". Maybe you could get on the Team and have a little side hustle?
It is never not funnier than fhuqk,when Drooling Dumbfhuqks become a "we",to extoll their VERY well founded and countless Insecurities. Hint.
Not even I,can gun wares until they exist and I'm rather at ease with using my loot for R&D,to see actually WTF. My MK5 Reupold is a screaming pile of fhuqking schit,none of which is on any Vendor and Doug's involvement is less than zero. Hint.
If/when the 183738 is available,I'll simply shoot it with Live Ammo,to see WTF. After same,I will report said findings,no different than any of the 100's of other scopes in my larder. Hint.
"Here" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon the power of my words and a simplistic critique by me,swaying the Market. It could go NO other way. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!............
Dearest LiL Fish,
Would you consider yourself an "influencer" and would that influence to sway "the Market" have any value to a scope company.
I know Athalon has been pretty agressive with their marketing using "influencers". Maybe you could get on the Team and have a little side hustle?
Do you consider yourself an influencer or a salesman?
I simply shoot what I want,when I want,because I can,as per whim. Hint.
"Athalon" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon my sway of the Market and the power of my words greatly exceeding your's. I've a rather nice part time job. Today is pay day and that check has (5) whole digits. Your financial woes,assuredly aren't mine. Hint.
Your countless very WELL founded Inseurities,are fhuqking HILARIOUS. Hint............
Poor poor (literally) Squirms,always on the outside licking windows,Dreaming about getting in. Hint.
To be continued. Hint…………
You have spent that last year plus running first class Chinese crap and bragging like you really found a gem. John for all his faults is still your father.
But you’ve been here all of what?….4 months bigshot? Give it a rest.
If nothing else it’s funny as fu.ck to watch the ankle biters bitch and nip their way into internet stardom…
Stop it please!!! You hurt my feelings LOL. R&D happens more here than anywhere else on the internet 🛜. Jeffp's mastered the reach around. The campfire experts are all 100# over weight and lonely. Who can see this is a shït show with shït winds drifting [bleep] roof top deep.
I simply shoot what I want,when I want,because I can,as per whim. Hint.
"Athalon" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon my sway of the Market and the power of my words greatly exceeding your's. I've a rather nice part time job. Today is pay day and that check has (5) whole digits. Your financial woes,assuredly aren't mine. Hint.
Your countless very WELL founded Inseurities,are fhuqking HILARIOUS. Hint............
I think the term that (sticks) out was, "WORD CLASS WEARS!! Then a shelf full of Chinese scopes is pictured and no one needs any more information than that.
As of a little while ago these new Leupold are in our site. Thanks for your patience
No joy. Hint.
Do you have a feel as to when? Hint...........
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
According to our rep scopes will start shipping in the next couple of weeks. He's supposed to get a better guesstimate of which scopes when either today or Monday. As I get intel I will share
Doug,
Those are going to be very popular scopes. I hope Cameraland sells a bunch of them.
Has Larry contacted you about his claimed defective Leupold MK 5?
If one was to order a Leupold MK 4 and found it defective what is the procedure for refund or replacement?
You carry a pretty wide selection of nice scopes. What does your data say about customer satisfaction for Leupold vs other scopes?
Most of us are victims of our experience but you must get a lot of customer feedback and it would be strange for you to carry a product line that, according to a few vocal posters, has a very large number of defective units.
Thanks in advance for providing some unbiased information that customers can use in deciding future purchases.
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
John, I agree these new Leupold scopes seem like a great addition to their offerings. Of course, time and usage will be the review of them.
He has not reached out to me to intervene on his MK 5 issue. As with any issues with any brand we handle, whether it was originally purchased from us or not, it's our pleasure to assist.
With any newly purchased product, be it this new series of scope or anything else, if it is an initial defective reach out to us. Every brand has varying methods of handling this type of issue. In some cases the brand will e-mail a pick up tag to get the product back, in some cases we will. If it is a refund we will issue the refund. If it is an exchange sometimes the brand will send the replacement and other times we will. Again, it depends of the brands policy. We try to be as efficient as possible and to keep UPS and Fed Ex at a minimum. Obviously, the most efficient way is the brand sends a pick up tag and a replacement product. Much better than ship to us, ship to brand, brand ships to us and we ship to you.
Our experience with Leupold has been positive. By that I mean we sell a fair amount of their scopes and I cannot recall the last one that I got contacted about with an issue.
Overall the brands we carry have solid quality. We do our best to choose and carry quality brands. We do not carry anything and everything to make every sale. We prefer to carry brands that we can offer quality customer service, brands that when we need an answer to a question we can reach a rep and when there's an issue we can efficiently assist and of course brands with quality offerings. Through the years we have carried brands that as you can see we no longer carry. There's reasons of course and these reasons vary. Unfortunately, over the decades, this industry has changed. Companies that once were filled with industry folks who started at the bottom and worked their way up and understood not only the needs of the consumer but the needs of their retail partners have retired and the new regime, in some cases, are bean counters that come from either other industries or ivy league schools and, IMO, haven't a clue about their products or care about their consumers or retail partners. In some cases companies have been bought out by public corporations and the bean counters care more about the stock holders than the consumers that keep them in business. It's an ever changing industry which is why we go to SHOT Show every year. To see the people we work with, to cultivate relationships with the people we buy from, to look for new quality offerings and to listen and learn what's going on industry wide.
I will repeat what I always post......ALWAYS feel free to pick up the phone and call us, 516-217-1000, to discuss what it is you're interested in, to compare different options, if you need assistance with an issue (not an issue with your spouse as we do not have that much free time) or what we can do for you on the product that does interest you.
Doug,
Thanks for the response.
It's good to know your experience with Leupold matches mine. I have great luck with Leupold and your customer feed back is another good indicator the MK4 will be a big hit with shooters and hunters.
If Larry reaches out for a refund I would be interested in purchasing that MK 5 that caused him such struggles.
Thanks again.
Originally Posted by gr8fuldoug
John, I strongly suggest you look at the GPO GPOTAC 45 Spotting Scope. It's normally $1,299.99 and we have it on promo for $899.99. It is an excellent optic.
"The GPOTAC 45 15-45X spotting scope is designed for shooters looking for an advantage in shot placement. It has a custom-designed first-focal plane reticle built for the precision long-range shooter and includes bonus features such as Picatinny rails for supplemental sighting and a honeycomb objective filter lens cap that minimizes objective lens reflection. As a bonus feature, its PLR reticle is matched with the first focal plane PLRi reticle in the GPOTAC 4.5-27x50i riflescope. This creates the ultimate scope and spotter combination."
FEATURES: Mil-based first focal plane (FFP) PLR reticle Picatinny rail mounting system Matching FFP reticle to GPOTAC 4.5-27×50 riflescope Armored for durability GPObright high-transmission lens coatings DOUBLE HD objective lens
Doug,
That looks like a great spotter but I have quite a few and am not looking for another right now.
I can say that one would be on the short list and it looks like someone put some thought into the attachments.
The price is amazing and if you say it's an excellent optic that's a pretty good recommendation. Lots of good optics these days.
I simply shoot what I want,when I want,because I can,as per whim. Hint.
"Athalon" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon my sway of the Market and the power of my words greatly exceeding your's. I've a rather nice part time job. Today is pay day and that check has (5) whole digits. Your financial woes,assuredly aren't mine. Hint.
Your countless very WELL founded Inseurities,are fhuqking HILARIOUS. Hint............
I think the term that (sticks) out was, "WORD CLASS WEARS!! Then a shelf full of Chinese scopes is pictured and no one needs any more information than that.
Some gals are relegated to setting on the sidelines of Life,rattling Brokedick Pom-Pom's as they "live" vicariously and reading is as close as they will EVER get to "doing"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
"World" and "Wares" are VERY Big Words. Hint.
Pardon wares that exist,as you "get" to Pretend aloud. Hint.
I simply shoot what I want,when I want,because I can,as per whim. Hint.
"Athalon" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon my sway of the Market and the power of my words greatly exceeding your's. I've a rather nice part time job. Today is pay day and that check has (5) whole digits. Your financial woes,assuredly aren't mine. Hint.
Your countless very WELL founded Inseurities,are fhuqking HILARIOUS. Hint............
I think the term that (sticks) out was, "WORD CLASS WEARS!! Then a shelf full of Chinese scopes is pictured and no one needs any more information than that.
Some gals are relegated to setting on the sidelines of Life,rattling Brokedick Pom-Pom's as they "live" vicariously and reading is as close as they will EVER get to "doing"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
"World" and "Wares" are VERY Big Words. Hint.
Pardon wares that exist,as you "get" to Pretend aloud. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
She’s a child who grew up with the autonomy of the internet, and developed diarrhea of the mouth
How could one use this website on the road, but not be able to do online commerce on the road?
If these scopes hold up, track, and maintain zero, they will check a ton of boxes. I wish they made something between the 2.5-10x and the 4.5-18x, or a side-focus on the 2.5-10x. I don't care for the large weight penalty jump between the two.
Why would anyone reach out to a retailer for a defect? They would contact the manufacturer.
We get it burns. Leupold sales put food in your fat f ucking gullet...
Yep. Only a sheister, scammer, or complete idiot would think of sending a mounted and used scope back to the retailer.
Doug already stated he would stand behind the optic if he is the one who sold it.
It's actually pretty standard practice to get a refund from the retailer for a defective product.
I have also offered LiL Fish a refund if the MK5 is in LNIB condition.
We have pretty much proven Leupold does not have a systemic issue as Doug is not seeing any customer issues so LiL Fish's STRUGGLES are an outLIAR.
You’re grasping now. Why would anyone involve CL with a Leupold issue?
Doug has some of the best customer service in the business and would no doubt get involved with an issue that wasn’t satisfactorily resolved by a manufacturer, but starting with CL doesn’t even make since.
I simply shoot what I want,when I want,because I can,as per whim. Hint.
"Athalon" is a VERY Big Word. Hint.
Pardon my sway of the Market and the power of my words greatly exceeding your's. I've a rather nice part time job. Today is pay day and that check has (5) whole digits. Your financial woes,assuredly aren't mine. Hint.
Your countless very WELL founded Inseurities,are fhuqking HILARIOUS. Hint............
I think the term that (sticks) out was, "WORD CLASS WEARS!! Then a shelf full of Chinese scopes is pictured and no one needs any more information than that.
Some gals are relegated to setting on the sidelines of Life,rattling Brokedick Pom-Pom's as they "live" vicariously and reading is as close as they will EVER get to "doing"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
"World" and "Wares" are VERY Big Words. Hint.
Pardon wares that exist,as you "get" to Pretend aloud. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
She’s a child who grew up with the autonomy of the internet, and developed diarrhea of the mouth
LOL. Ksmith has found her way under the skin. Jeff's hand soft John Jr?
Why would anyone reach out to a retailer for a defect? They would contact the manufacturer.
We get it burns. Leupold sales put food in your fat f ucking gullet...
Yep. Only a sheister, scammer, or complete idiot would think of sending a mounted and used scope back to the retailer.
Doug already stated he would stand behind the optic if he is the one who sold it.
It's actually pretty standard practice to get a refund from the retailer for a defective product.
I have also offered LiL Fish a refund if the MK5 is in LNIB condition.
We have pretty much proven Leupold does not have a systemic issue as Doug is not seeing any customer issues so LiL Fish's STRUGGLES are an outLIAR.
You’re grasping now. Why would anyone involve CL with a Leupold issue?
Doug has some of the best customer service in the business and would no doubt get involved with an issue that wasn’t satisfactorily resolved by a manufacturer, but starting with CL doesn’t even make since.
Yep, it's not that hard. Doug hasn't bankrupted 2 companies so far either................
Professional Victim Snake Oil Salesmen,are funnier than fhuqk,with their very WELL founded Insecurities. Hint.
Not all wares are "equal",nor close. Hint.
Flipside. Hint.
I'll yank the newest Accuracy International AT-X Seex Kreed outta it's packing parcel,maybe here in a bit. Hint.
Pardon spent primers,being THE Supreme Tutorial. Hint.............
To be fair Stick, John burns is just as much a fat pile of [bleep] as you, it would take more time than it's worth to declare a victor. Jeffp's voting record doesn't count he's only in it for himself. Ace's enjoy a golfer that knows more about ballistics than you. Hahahahah.
I'll yank the newest Accuracy International AT-X Seex Kreed outta it's packing parcel,maybe here in a bit. Hint.
Pardon spent primers,being THE Supreme Tutorial. Hint.............
Well every time you gaze upon the aluminum bedding block think of your buddy down in Wyoming having a LiL chuckle.
Every time.
Hopefully now that you have given up on trying to cobble together a good rifle you won't have such scope STRUGGLES.
MR. Stick this has to sting just a little! Being made fun of by Johnburns with him kinda sorta having the upper hands got to bring the blood pressure up a little.
I'm better at this whole pissing on punks thing than I thought I would be. Not bad for a first try!
Why would anyone reach out to a retailer for a defect? They would contact the manufacturer.
We get it burns. Leupold sales put food in your fat f ucking gullet...
Yep. Only a sheister, scammer, or complete idiot would think of sending a mounted and used scope back to the retailer.
Doug already stated he would stand behind the optic if he is the one who sold it.
It's actually pretty standard practice to get a refund from the retailer for a defective product.
I have also offered LiL Fish a refund if the MK5 is in LNIB condition.
We have pretty much proven Leupold does not have a systemic issue as Doug is not seeing any customer issues so LiL Fish's STRUGGLES are an outLIAR.
You’re grasping now. Why would anyone involve CL with a Leupold issue?
Doug has some of the best customer service in the business and would no doubt get involved with an issue that wasn’t satisfactorily resolved by a manufacturer, but starting with CL doesn’t even make since.
Not only that, but the vast majority of Leup buyers are 1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters that will never use the scopes in such a way as to discover any deficiencies. The same goes for buyers of other brands that target that type of hunter as their customer base.
Why would anyone reach out to a retailer for a defect? They would contact the manufacturer.
We get it burns. Leupold sales put food in your fat f ucking gullet...
Yep. Only a sheister, scammer, or complete idiot would think of sending a mounted and used scope back to the retailer.
Doug already stated he would stand behind the optic if he is the one who sold it.
It's actually pretty standard practice to get a refund from the retailer for a defective product.
I have also offered LiL Fish a refund if the MK5 is in LNIB condition.
We have pretty much proven Leupold does not have a systemic issue as Doug is not seeing any customer issues so LiL Fish's STRUGGLES are an outLIAR.
Originally Posted by SLM
You’re grasping now. Why would anyone involve CL with a Leupold issue?
Doug has some of the best customer service in the business and would no doubt get involved with an issue that wasn’t satisfactorily resolved by a manufacturer, but starting with CL doesn’t even make since.
Well if you buy from a fly by night internet dealer and get a ChiCom Leupold knock off I doubt you will get a refund.
If you buy a Leupold at Scheels you have a year to get a complete refund for any reason.
Buying from Doug is a safe bet that if the product is truly defective and you don't want another he will make it right.
The idea that good retailers just pawn a buyer off on the manufacture is just wrong.
LiL Fish and a few here squall that Leupolds are all defective so why would anyone with LDS want anything but a refund?
Why would anyone with LDS ever buy another?
These new MK 4s are going to be hard to get for a while so if you regularly STRUGGLE with with scope you should hold off and let the guys with good rifles buy the MK 4s.
Not only that, but the vast majority of Leup buyers are 1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters that will never use the scopes in such a way as to discover any deficiencies. The same goes for buyers of other brands that target that type of hunter as their customer base.
LOL.
In your hallucination the new MK 4s are for "1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters"?
The MK 5 is the dominate scope in PRS/NRL and this new MK 4 is targeted to the same high volume shooters who run the dials hard.
Doug has already told us that he sees zero issues with the Leupolds he sells and if you are the first guy with issues he is just a phone call away. Pretty good reason to give him your buisness.
For Pete's sake, we don't need to see the same photos again.
They are only new to the posting party, everyone else knows his fat face pushed the scope out of level. The world class R&D will continue. LOL. I typed that with a strait face.
Pardon wares that exist,while you "get" to Pretend aloud,as you "live" vicariously. Hint.
Your Hurt Feeler Reports are soothing. Hint...............
Copy paste! Seems when you get rattled you go keyboard warrior and get yourself in a deeper hole! Just keep copy pasting its survival of the fattest up in here.
Jeff I farted easily want check my nuts for splatter! LOL.
For Pete's sake, we don't need to see the same photos again.
They are only new to the posting party, everyone else knows his fat face pushed the scope out of level. The world class R&D will continue. LOL. I typed that with a strait face.
Must stink to have such a fragile ego in life that you protect yourself by claiming everybody critical of you is jealous or has "hurt feelings". But for pete's sake, I can't log on without seeing the same photos reposted and crummy youtube videos that are over a decade old for the millionth time. Too bad there is nothing useful to add to the discussion by either of those turds.
The idea that good retailers just pawn a buyer off on the manufacture is just wrong. .
Where did anyone say or even insinuate that?
When I buy a Leupold, Leupold gives me the life time warranty, not the retailer. Why would anyone with 2 firing brain cells take a warranty issue to a retailer? I have had some issues with Meopta optics that were purchased from CL, never did it cross my mind to contact CL vs Meopta that issued the warranty. There was definitely comfort knowing if there was an issue with Meopta, CL would be a big help.
In your never ending quest to try and appear as the smartest man in the room, you come up with some off the wall stuff.
The idea that good retailers just pawn a buyer off on the manufacture is just wrong. .
Where did anyone say or even insinuate that?
When I buy a Leupold, Leupold gives me the life time warranty, not the retailer. Why would anyone with 2 firing brain cells take a warranty issue to a retailer? I have had some issues with Meopta optics that were purchased from CL, never did it cross my mind to contact CL vs Meopta that issued the warranty. There was definitely comfort knowing if there was ann issue with Meopta, CL would be a big help.
In your never ending quest to try and appear as the smartest man in the room, you come up with some off the wall stuff.
Who are you buying Leupolds or any optics from?
As I posted the big stores like Scheels have a very generous refund policy.
Doug has stated he has a refund/return policy but has never had any customer complaints about Leupold. Just because he has never had a customer complaint about leupold does not mean he won't be there to help the first Struggler.
Your issues with where ever you're buying are readily solved. Work with a good retailer.
Why would anyone reach out to a retailer for a defect? They would contact the manufacturer.
We get it burns. Leupold sales put food in your fat f ucking gullet...
Yep. Only a sheister, scammer, or complete idiot would think of sending a mounted and used scope back to the retailer.
Doug already stated he would stand behind the optic if he is the one who sold it.
It's actually pretty standard practice to get a refund from the retailer for a defective product.
I have also offered LiL Fish a refund if the MK5 is in LNIB condition.
We have pretty much proven Leupold does not have a systemic issue as Doug is not seeing any customer issues so LiL Fish's STRUGGLES are an outLIAR.
You’re grasping now. Why would anyone involve CL with a Leupold issue?
Doug has some of the best customer service in the business and would no doubt get involved with an issue that wasn’t satisfactorily resolved by a manufacturer, but starting with CL doesn’t even make since.
Not only that, but the vast majority of Leup buyers are 1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters that will never use the scopes in such a way as to discover any deficiencies. The same goes for buyers of other brands that target that type of hunter as their customer base.
I find it amazing that you have met the vast majority of leupold owners.
For Pete's sake, we don't need to see the same photos again.
They are only new to the posting party, everyone else knows his fat face pushed the scope out of level. The world class R&D will continue. LOL. I typed that with a strait face.
Must stink to have such a fragile ego in life that you protect yourself by claiming everybody critical of you is jealous or has "hurt feelings". But for pete's sake, I can't log on without seeing the same photos reposted and crummy youtube videos that are over a decade old for the millionth time. Too bad there is nothing useful to add to the discussion by either of those turds.
Pardon my complete control of all facets of your "Life". Hint.
The idea that good retailers just pawn a buyer off on the manufacture is just wrong. .
Where did anyone say or even insinuate that?
When I buy a Leupold, Leupold gives me the life time warranty, not the retailer. Why would anyone with 2 firing brain cells take a warranty issue to a retailer? I have had some issues with Meopta optics that were purchased from CL, never did it cross my mind to contact CL vs Meopta that issued the warranty. There was definitely comfort knowing if there was ann issue with Meopta, CL would be a big help.
In your never ending quest to try and appear as the smartest man in the room, you come up with some off the wall stuff.
Who are you buying Leupolds or any optics from?
As I posted the big stores like Scheels have a very generous refund policy.
Doug has stated he has a refund/return policy but has never had any customer complaints about Leupold. Just because he has never had a customer complaint about leupold does not mean he won't be there to help the first Struggler.
Your issues with where ever you're buying are readily solved. Work with a good retailer.
Again, where have I stated any issues with a retailer?
For Pete's sake, we don't need to see the same photos again.
They are only new to the posting party, everyone else knows his fat face pushed the scope out of level. The world class R&D will continue. LOL. I typed that with a strait face.
Must stink to have such a fragile ego in life that you protect yourself by claiming everybody critical of you is jealous or has "hurt feelings". But for pete's sake, I can't log on without seeing the same photos reposted and crummy youtube videos that are over a decade old for the millionth time. Too bad there is nothing useful to add to the discussion by either of those turds.
Pardon my complete control of all facets of your "Life". Hint.
Keep The Hurt Feeler Reports coming. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..........
Nobody has "hurt feelers". You just keep posting the same crap over and over again. Do you have anything fresh? Or meaningful to add to the discussion? I'm guessing not, more copy-paste bullshit. Your fragile ego...
The idea that good retailers just pawn a buyer off on the manufacture is just wrong. .
Where did anyone say or even insinuate that?
When I buy a Leupold, Leupold gives me the life time warranty, not the retailer. Why would anyone with 2 firing brain cells take a warranty issue to a retailer? I have had some issues with Meopta optics that were purchased from CL, never did it cross my mind to contact CL vs Meopta that issued the warranty. There was definitely comfort knowing if there was ann issue with Meopta, CL would be a big help.
In your never ending quest to try and appear as the smartest man in the room, you come up with some off the wall stuff.
Who are you buying Leupolds or any optics from?
As I posted the big stores like Scheels have a very generous refund policy.
Doug has stated he has a refund/return policy but has never had any customer complaints about Leupold. Just because he has never had a customer complaint about leupold does not mean he won't be there to help the first Struggler.
Your issues with where ever you're buying are readily solved. Work with a good retailer.
Originally Posted by SLM
Again, where have I stated any issues with a retailer?
I’ll wait.
Hence the reason I asked you in the post you quoted of mine.
Now I guess I'll wait while you try to figure out how to not answer where you are buying Leupolds that won't offer a refund policy.
Doug has one but has never had any customer ask for a refund on Leupolds.
Pretty sure Cameraland would be a great place to get one of the new MK 4 HDs.
For Pete's sake, we don't need to see the same photos again.
They are only new to the posting party, everyone else knows his fat face pushed the scope out of level. The world class R&D will continue. LOL. I typed that with a strait face.
Must stink to have such a fragile ego in life that you protect yourself by claiming everybody critical of you is jealous or has "hurt feelings". But for pete's sake, I can't log on without seeing the same photos reposted and crummy youtube videos that are over a decade old for the millionth time. Too bad there is nothing useful to add to the discussion by either of those turds.
Pardon my complete control of all facets of your "Life". Hint.
Keep The Hurt Feeler Reports coming. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..........
Nobody has "hurt feelers". You just keep posting the same crap over and over again. Do you have anything fresh? Or meaningful to add to the discussion? I'm guessing not, more copy-paste bullshit. Your fragile ego...
Sweetie,
Imitation is THE most Sincere form of Flattery and pardon my controlling your punctuation too. Hint.
How many times a day,do you think about me and what are average durations of same? Hint.
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
For Pete's sake, we don't need to see the same photos again.
They are only new to the posting party, everyone else knows his fat face pushed the scope out of level. The world class R&D will continue. LOL. I typed that with a strait face.
Must stink to have such a fragile ego in life that you protect yourself by claiming everybody critical of you is jealous or has "hurt feelings". But for pete's sake, I can't log on without seeing the same photos reposted and crummy youtube videos that are over a decade old for the millionth time. Too bad there is nothing useful to add to the discussion by either of those turds.
Pardon my complete control of all facets of your "Life". Hint.
Keep The Hurt Feeler Reports coming. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..........
Nobody has "hurt feelers". You just keep posting the same crap over and over again. Do you have anything fresh? Or meaningful to add to the discussion? I'm guessing not, more copy-paste bullshit. Your fragile ego...
Sweetie,
Imitation is THE most Sincere form of Flattery and pardon my controlling your punctuation too. Hint.
How many times a day,do you think about me and what are average durations of same? Hint.
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!............
You won't like the eye box on the NX8 but the compact is a dream of an optic if the reviews are right. Hint.
Imitation is THE most Sincere form of Flattery and pardon my controlling your punctuation too. Hint.
How many times a day,do you think about me and what are average durations of same? Hint.
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!............
Copy/paste, prop up your fragile ego. Broken record. Go away. Come back when you have something productive to post. You are a waste of bandwidth.
Sweetie,
Fortunately for you and your ilk,Imagination and Pretend are free,so even YOU can "afford" to "contribute"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Gee, I went over and was checking out what people on Sniper's Hide think of certain scopes. It seems there's a lot of people with verifiable resume's that somehow get magical scopes that work. Then you have a huge retailer here saying the same thing.
Fortunately for you and your ilk,Imagination and Pretend are free,so even YOU can "afford" to "contribute"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..........
Very predictable. Nothing new. What is it that I am pretending about? What is it I can or can't afford?
If you can't tell us your experience with the Mark 4HD, which you can't, you're wasting bandwidth as usual.
The idea that good retailers just pawn a buyer off on the manufacture is just wrong. .
Where did anyone say or even insinuate that?
When I buy a Leupold, Leupold gives me the life time warranty, not the retailer. Why would anyone with 2 firing brain cells take a warranty issue to a retailer? I have had some issues with Meopta optics that were purchased from CL, never did it cross my mind to contact CL vs Meopta that issued the warranty. There was definitely comfort knowing if there was ann issue with Meopta, CL would be a big help.
In your never ending quest to try and appear as the smartest man in the room, you come up with some off the wall stuff.
Who are you buying Leupolds or any optics from?
As I posted the big stores like Scheels have a very generous refund policy.
Doug has stated he has a refund/return policy but has never had any customer complaints about Leupold. Just because he has never had a customer complaint about leupold does not mean he won't be there to help the first Struggler.
Your issues with where ever you're buying are readily solved. Work with a good retailer.
Originally Posted by SLM
Again, where have I stated any issues with a retailer?
I’ll wait.
Hence the reason I asked you in the post you quoted of mine.
Now I guess I'll wait while you try to figure out how to not answer where you are buying Leupolds that won't offer a refund policy.
Doug has one but has never had any customer ask for a refund on Leupolds.
Pretty sure Cameraland would be a great place to get one of the new MK 4 HDs.
You sure you’re not a Democrat?
I’d guess 80% of all my optics have come from CL, but again, if I have a warranty issue after the product has been used, I’m going straight to the company that issued the warranty.
Ps; I re-read Doug’s post and your reading things into it that I’m not.
Fortunately for you and your ilk,Imagination and Pretend are free,so even YOU can "afford" to "contribute"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..........
Very predictable. Nothing new. What is it that I am pretending about? What is it I can or can't afford?
If you can't tell us your experience with the Mark 4HD, which you can't, you're wasting bandwidth as usual.
Sweetie,
Was hoping to purchase one yesterday,while setting in First Class. Hint.
Keep your Hurt Feeler Reports coming,as they sure are soothing. Hint.
Fortunately for you and your ilk,Imagination and Pretend are free,so even YOU can "afford" to "contribute"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..........
Very predictable. Nothing new. What is it that I am pretending about? What is it I can or can't afford?
If you can't tell us your experience with the Mark 4HD, which you can't, you're wasting bandwidth as usual.
Sweetie,
Was hoping to purchase one yesterday,while setting in First Class. Hint.
Keep your Hurt Feeler Reports coming,as they sure are soothing. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
Yeah and you’re too [bleep] dumb to use your smartphone for anything other than copy-paste.
Wanting to purchase one doesn’t make you qualified.
Keep extolling your very WELL founded Insecurities,via Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Pardon my inability to procure wares,until they exist,while you "get" to Pretend aloud...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint.
You'll be GLUED to my critique of same and ogling the Splendid Pixels,as you continue to follow me around and "live" vicariously. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!............
Can’t spell, can’t use a smart phone, can’t predict who owns what, can’t properly mount a scope, can’t shoot! That’s Little Dick in a nutshell. You’re a laughing stock waste of bandwidth.
Fortunately for you and your ilk,Imagination and Pretend are free,so even YOU can "afford" to "contribute"...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Pardon wares that exist,as you Pretend aloud and pen more Hurt Feeler Reports. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..........
Very predictable. Nothing new. What is it that I am pretending about? What is it I can or can't afford?
If you can't tell us your experience with the Mark 4HD, which you can't, you're wasting bandwidth as usual.
Sweetie,
Was hoping to purchase one yesterday,while setting in First Class. Hint.
Keep your Hurt Feeler Reports coming,as they sure are soothing. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
Yeah and you’re too [bleep] dumb to use your smartphone for anything other than copy-paste.
Wanting to purchase one doesn’t make you qualified.
As we all know and I pointed out a simple email to Doug would have saved a scope for John Jr when they were available. In fact most likely the first one out. It wasn't anything to do with getting a scope it was about attention! The guy is so desperate for attention it's sad. But what would you expect for a guy that can't email from a smartphone.
Gee, I went over and was checking out what people on Sniper's Hide think of certain scopes. It seems there's a lot of people with verifiable resume's that somehow get magical scopes that work. Then you have a huge retailer here saying the same thing.
Funny how that works.
I knew there was a splash of retard in your genes when I looked at that picture you posted of yourself. Now its crystal clear. Frank himself said they fail like crazy in his classes. Had to have ATACR loaners on hand just for that reason.
The hide is littered with Leupold [bleep] the bed threads, especially the mark v.
Hence the reason I asked you in the post you quoted of mine.
Now I guess I'll wait while you try to figure out how to not answer where you are buying Leupolds that won't offer a refund policy.
Doug has one but has never had any customer ask for a refund on Leupolds.
Pretty sure Cameraland would be a great place to get one of the new MK 4 HDs.
You sure you’re not a Democrat?
I’d guess 80% of all my optics have come from CL, but again, if I have a warranty issue after the product has been used, I’m going straight to the company that issued the warranty.
Ps; I re-read Doug’s post and your reading things into it that I’m not.
It's hard to tell if you're bitching or bragging?
If you have it all figured out then enjoy.
If another was thinking about buying one of the new hotness Leupold MK 4 HDs then Doug has said he has a refund policy if you find the optic defective and want your money back instead of a repair.
Some of you guys seem to just enjoy the STRUGGLE when the easy button is right in front.
LiL Fish just posted her EPIC MK 5 STRUGGLE and instead of seeking a refund she is trying to order more Leupold goodness.
Hence the reason I asked you in the post you quoted of mine.
Now I guess I'll wait while you try to figure out how to not answer where you are buying Leupolds that won't offer a refund policy.
Doug has one but has never had any customer ask for a refund on Leupolds.
Pretty sure Cameraland would be a great place to get one of the new MK 4 HDs.
You sure you’re not a Democrat?
I’d guess 80% of all my optics have come from CL, but again, if I have a warranty issue after the product has been used, I’m going straight to the company that issued the warranty.
Ps; I re-read Doug’s post and your reading things into it that I’m not.
It's hard to tell if you're bitching or bragging?
If you have it all figured out then enjoy.
If another was thinking about buying one of the new hotness Leupold MK 4 HDs then Doug has said he has a refund policy if you find the optic defective and want your money back instead of a repair.
Some of you guys seem to just enjoy the STRUGGLE when the easy button is right in front.
LiL Fish just posted her EPIC MK 5 STRUGGLE and instead of seeking a refund she is trying to order more Leupold goodness.
The less expensive model will definitely be better.
Goop runneth over,cracks me the fhuqk up,nearly almost as much as vicarious "living" Brokedick Crying Kchunts and their perpetual Hurt Feeler Reports do. ALMOST. Hint.
I'll feign my GREAT "surprise!",that you are glued to my EVERY word and Splendid Pixel,if only to escape suffering being you,for fleeting moments. Hint.
I'll let all you Leo-Tards beta test the new alphabet soup models for 1500 rounds of so. If by some wild chance you find one that makes it that far and still works. Let me know. I might actually try one.
Weren't my intent to horn you up,but your HomoErotic Proclivities are without bounds...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Keep filling out those Hurt Feeler Reports and I'll happily fuel the paper for same. Hint.
Your Whine is soothing. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
Little Dick posts the same 15 year-old videos again; ignoring criticism to protect that precious ego. What a hoot!
The only thing more pathetic than someone who post old videos of doing things is people who whimper about it and have no videos of doing anything.
Just Sayin, Kiddo.
Its the same four or five videos over and over. I don't make videos...sounds like you want me to. His aren't serving a purpose. Who would have thought you and stick turned out to be butt-buddies?
Meanwhile, I've posted dead animals, and proof of winning.
I'll let all you Leo-Tards beta test the new alphabet soup models for 1500 rounds of so. If by some wild chance you find one that makes it that far and still works. Let me know. I might actually try one.
dave
You should begin the quest to source a good rifle. Based on your past performance it's going to take a bit so an early start is prudent.
Weren't my intent to horn you up,but your HomoErotic Proclivities are without bounds...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Keep filling out those Hurt Feeler Reports and I'll happily fuel the paper for same. Hint.
Your Whine is soothing. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
Little Dick posts the same 15 year-old videos again; ignoring criticism to protect that precious ego. What a hoot!
The only thing more pathetic than someone who post old videos of doing things is people who whimper about it and have no videos of doing anything.
Just Sayin, Kiddo.
Originally Posted by drop_point
Its the same four or five videos over and over. I don't make videos...sounds like you want me to. His aren't serving a purpose. Who would have thought you and stick turned out to be butt-buddies?
Meanwhile, I've posted dead animals, and proof of winning.
I guess a dead coyote is quite something in the Ozarks.
Weren't my intent to horn you up,but your HomoErotic Proclivities are without bounds...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Keep filling out those Hurt Feeler Reports and I'll happily fuel the paper for same. Hint.
Your Whine is soothing. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
Little Dick posts the same 15 year-old videos again; ignoring criticism to protect that precious ego. What a hoot!
The only thing more pathetic than someone who post old videos of doing things is people who whimper about it and have no videos of doing anything.
Just Sayin, Kiddo.
Originally Posted by drop_point
Its the same four or five videos over and over. I don't make videos...sounds like you want me to. His aren't serving a purpose. Who would have thought you and stick turned out to be butt-buddies?
Meanwhile, I've posted dead animals, and proof of winning.
I guess a dead coyote is quite something in the Ozarks.
What have you won?
Its more than Little Dick has killed with her Accuracy International. She says ownership is competence all the time.
I've already posted things I've won, more than once. I'm glad to see you two girls kissed and made up.
Weren't my intent to horn you up,but your HomoErotic Proclivities are without bounds...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Keep filling out those Hurt Feeler Reports and I'll happily fuel the paper for same. Hint.
Your Whine is soothing. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
Little Dick posts the same 15 year-old videos again; ignoring criticism to protect that precious ego. What a hoot!
The only thing more pathetic than someone who post old videos of doing things is people who whimper about it and have no videos of doing anything.
Just Sayin, Kiddo.
Originally Posted by drop_point
Its the same four or five videos over and over. I don't make videos...sounds like you want me to. His aren't serving a purpose. Who would have thought you and stick turned out to be butt-buddies?
Meanwhile, I've posted dead animals, and proof of winning.
I guess a dead coyote is quite something in the Ozarks.
What have you won?
Its more than Little Dick has killed with her Accuracy International. She says ownership is competence all the time.
I've already posted things I've won, more than once. I'm glad to see you two girls kissed and made up.
It's a love hate relationship, happens a lot with families.
Not only that, but the vast majority of Leup buyers are 1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters that will never use the scopes in such a way as to discover any deficiencies. The same goes for buyers of other brands that target that type of hunter as their customer base.
LOL.
In your hallucination the new MK 4s are for "1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters"?
The MK 5 is the dominate scope in PRS/NRL and this new MK 4 is targeted to the same high volume shooters who run the dials hard.
Doug has already told us that he sees zero issues with the Leupolds he sells and if you are the first guy with issues he is just a phone call away. Pretty good reason to give him your buisness.
Your case of LDS is all on you.
You excel at twisting facts into falsehoods. Especially when you stand to make a dollar as a result. The data on Leupold customers that contact retailers, specifically Doug in this case, for service support includes all Leupold scope purchases, not just the not-even-available-yet MK4. Your (lack of) logic is shocking, sometimes.
Leupold does not dominate the PRS/NRL market. In your vaunted chart, notice that other brands are broken down into various models, where Leup has just the MK5. When you look at brands, not just models, Vortex is right up there, as well.
Your suggestion that I'm the first guy with Leupold issues solidly cements the fact that you're the one with LDS, not me. In fact, I mentioned that the data for other brands are convoluted as well, not just Leup. You are blinded to the whole story by your compromised motives and lust for relevance and success. I have no ulterior motive nor bias, but simply make observations based on my experiences. You, on the other hand...
Weren't my intent to horn you up,but your HomoErotic Proclivities are without bounds...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Keep filling out those Hurt Feeler Reports and I'll happily fuel the paper for same. Hint.
Your Whine is soothing. Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!...............
Little Dick posts the same 15 year-old videos again; ignoring criticism to protect that precious ego. What a hoot!
The only thing more pathetic than someone who post old videos of doing things is people who whimper about it and have no videos of doing anything.
Just Sayin, Kiddo.
Originally Posted by drop_point
Its the same four or five videos over and over. I don't make videos...sounds like you want me to. His aren't serving a purpose. Who would have thought you and stick turned out to be butt-buddies?
Meanwhile, I've posted dead animals, and proof of winning.
I guess a dead coyote is quite something in the Ozarks.
What have you won?
Its more than Little Dick has killed with her Accuracy International. She says ownership is competence all the time.
I've already posted things I've won, more than once. I'm glad to see you two girls kissed and made up.
I can call out LiL Fish's lies and yours with ease.
Toxic posters who hide but want to be part of a mob are just as bad as pathological liars.
I am good at multi tasking.
Originally Posted by scottryan
Sorry to interrupt, but is the new "Scopes" thread? lol
Yes.
Cameraland has them on the site but the scopes are not out just yet.
We figured to do a bit of house cleaning and tidy up around here while we wait.
I can call out LiL Fish's lies and yours with ease.
Toxic posters who hide but want to be part of a mob are just as bad as pathological liars.
I am good at multi tasking.
Yet you can't point out a single lie. You and Lil enjoy your time together. I'm really glad you guys got back together. No, you're not good at anything except intoxicating yourself and getting fat.
I can call out LiL Fish's lies and yours with ease.
Toxic posters who hide but want to be part of a mob are just as bad as pathological liars.
I am good at multi tasking.
Yet you can't point out a single lie. You and Lil enjoy your time together. I'm really glad you guys got back together. No, you're not good at anything except intoxicating yourself and getting fat.
You excel at twisting facts into falsehoods. Especially when you stand to make a dollar as a result. The data on Leupold customers that contact retailers, specifically Doug in this case, for service support includes all Leupold scope purchases, not just the not-even-available-yet MK4. Your (lack of) logic is shocking, sometimes.
Leupold does not dominate the PRS/NRL market. In your vaunted chart, notice that other brands are broken down into various models, where Leup has just the MK5. When you look at brands, not just models, Vortex is right up there, as well.
Your suggestion that I'm the first guy with Leupold issues solidly cements the fact that you're the one with LDS, not me. In fact, I mentioned that the data for other brands are convoluted as well, not just Leup. You are blinded to the whole story by your compromised motives and lust for relevance and success. I have no ulterior motive nor bias, but simply make observations based on my experiences. You, on the other hand...
If we're being honest, there's a lot of binary thinking on both sides. Several of the Athlon Helos gen 2 2-12's, including a friend's, have had huge tracking issues, but most don't. My friend's was replaced ASAP, and my two both work.
The whole "MY" scope(s) ALL work and your scope(s) ALL don't is a joke.
But, this is 24HC, where everyone not putting chicom glass on a Vudoo is a broke dick idiot, so......
Stick PMd me, and we ended up having a great chat. I asked him if he'd be willing to share pics of some of his trophies and awards. His humility won't let him show them off here and I respect that, but I am tired of him being unfairly maligned. Suck it boys.
Stick PMd me, and we ended up having a great chat. I asked him if he'd be willing to share pics of some of his trophies and awards. His humility won't let him show them off here and I respect that, but I am tired of him being unfairly maligned. Suck it boys.
You excel at twisting facts into falsehoods. Especially when you stand to make a dollar as a result. The data on Leupold customers that contact retailers, specifically Doug in this case, for service support includes all Leupold scope purchases, not just the not-even-available-yet MK4. Your (lack of) logic is shocking, sometimes.
Leupold does not dominate the PRS/NRL market. In your vaunted chart, notice that other brands are broken down into various models, where Leup has just the MK5. When you look at brands, not just models, Vortex is right up there, as well.
Your suggestion that I'm the first guy with Leupold issues solidly cements the fact that you're the one with LDS, not me. In fact, I mentioned that the data for other brands are convoluted as well, not just Leup. You are blinded to the whole story by your compromised motives and lust for relevance and success. I have no ulterior motive nor bias, but simply make observations based on my experiences. You, on the other hand...
If we're being honest, there's a lot of binary thinking on both sides. Several of the Athlon Helos gen 2 2-12's, including a friend's, have had huge tracking issues, but most don't. My friend's was replaced ASAP, and my two both work.
The whole "MY" scope(s) ALL work and your scope(s) ALL don't is a joke.
You excel at twisting facts into falsehoods. Especially when you stand to make a dollar as a result. The data on Leupold customers that contact retailers, specifically Doug in this case, for service support includes all Leupold scope purchases, not just the not-even-available-yet MK4. Your (lack of) logic is shocking, sometimes.
Leupold does not dominate the PRS/NRL market. In your vaunted chart, notice that other brands are broken down into various models, where Leup has just the MK5. When you look at brands, not just models, Vortex is right up there, as well.
Your suggestion that I'm the first guy with Leupold issues solidly cements the fact that you're the one with LDS, not me. In fact, I mentioned that the data for other brands are convoluted as well, not just Leup. You are blinded to the whole story by your compromised motives and lust for relevance and success. I have no ulterior motive nor bias, but simply make observations based on my experiences. You, on the other hand...
If we're being honest, there's a lot of binary thinking on both sides. Several of the Athlon Helos gen 2 2-12's, including a friend's, have had huge tracking issues, but most don't. My friend's was replaced ASAP, and my two both work.
The whole "MY" scope(s) ALL work and your scope(s) ALL don't is a joke.
But, this is 24HC, where everyone not putting chicom glass on a Vudoo is a broke dick idiot, so......
Evidently I'm broke despite showing me with my Accuracy International AX with S&B and suppressor. Only on the Fire.
Your HomoErotic Tendencies consume you and just so you know,I keep your FAVORITE appendage of mine,on the portside. That precludes exploding clutches,clutch springs,broken chains,'tip rivets and pitch pockets. Hint.
Like you were there,as you Pretend aloud,you Prick Looking Phony Fhuqk! Hint.
Stick PMd me, and we ended up having a great chat. I asked him if he'd be willing to share pics of some of his trophies and awards. His humility won't let him show them off here and I respect that, but I am tired of him being unfairly maligned. Suck it boys.
You excel at twisting facts into falsehoods. Especially when you stand to make a dollar as a result. The data on Leupold customers that contact retailers, specifically Doug in this case, for service support includes all Leupold scope purchases, not just the not-even-available-yet MK4. Your (lack of) logic is shocking, sometimes.
Leupold does not dominate the PRS/NRL market. In your vaunted chart, notice that other brands are broken down into various models, where Leup has just the MK5. When you look at brands, not just models, Vortex is right up there, as well.
Your suggestion that I'm the first guy with Leupold issues solidly cements the fact that you're the one with LDS, not me. In fact, I mentioned that the data for other brands are convoluted as well, not just Leup. You are blinded to the whole story by your compromised motives and lust for relevance and success. I have no ulterior motive nor bias, but simply make observations based on my experiences. You, on the other hand...
If we're being honest, there's a lot of binary thinking on both sides. Several of the Athlon Helos gen 2 2-12's, including a friend's, have had huge tracking issues, but most don't. My friend's was replaced ASAP, and my two both work.
The whole "MY" scope(s) ALL work and your scope(s) ALL don't is a joke.
But, this is 24HC, where everyone not putting chicom glass on a Vudoo is a broke dick idiot, so......
Jordan has LDS issues and I have had to post up the messages where he wanted me to give him a job so we have a history.
I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
My sample size is pretty large and Mk-6s have always been a problem child due to meeting the SOCOM size requirement.
Why would anyone reach out to a retailer for a defect? They would contact the manufacturer.
We get it burns. Leupold sales put food in your fat f ucking gullet...
Yep. Only a sheister, scammer, or complete idiot would think of sending a mounted and used scope back to the retailer.
Doug already stated he would stand behind the optic if he is the one who sold it.
It's actually pretty standard practice to get a refund from the retailer for a defective product.
I have also offered LiL Fish a refund if the MK5 is in LNIB condition.
We have pretty much proven Leupold does not have a systemic issue as Doug is not seeing any customer issues so LiL Fish's STRUGGLES are an outLIAR.
You’re grasping now. Why would anyone involve CL with a Leupold issue?
Doug has some of the best customer service in the business and would no doubt get involved with an issue that wasn’t satisfactorily resolved by a manufacturer, but starting with CL doesn’t even make since.
Not only that, but the vast majority of Leup buyers are 1-2-boxes-of-ammo-per-year hunters that will never use the scopes in such a way as to discover any deficiencies. The same goes for buyers of other brands that target that type of hunter as their customer base.
I find it amazing that you have met the vast majority of leupold owners.
How many scope models does/has Leupold offered, and what target market are they aimed at? When looking at distribution channels like big-box stores, what do the display cases look like and what scopes are the counter staff showing to customers most often? How many Leupold scopes are out in the wild, and what type of user typically owns them? You don't need the entirety of data to have some notion of the situation. Vortex is similar. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Vortex sells a whole lot more Diamondbacks and Vipers than Razor AMGs.
Stick PMd me, and we ended up having a great chat. I asked him if he'd be willing to share pics of some of his trophies and awards. His humility won't let him show them off here and I respect that, but I am tired of him being unfairly maligned. Suck it boys.
Paula,
Imaginary Pretend Ignore has lost it's "power"...the "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Don't ask her about her ChiCom Avatar,she'll change it. Hint.
Professional "Victims" to the front of the line. Hint.
How many times a day do you "think" about me and what are the durations?!? HINT.
How many scope models does/has Leupold offered, and what target market are they aimed at? When looking at distribution channels like big-box stores, what do the display cases look like and what scopes are the counter staff showing to customers most often? How many Leupold scopes are out in the wild, and what type of user typically owns them? You don't need the entirety of data to have some notion of the situation. Vortex is similar. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Vortex sells a whole lot more Diamondbacks and Vipers than Razor AMGs.
Doug sells a variety of Leupolds and he has zero customer complaints.
Yet you LDS sufferers see more failures than possible.
You see what your bias shows you.
Do you ever wonder why guys who gets Leupolds to work, hold zero, and track like AESA radar never bad mouth other optics?
How many scope models does/has Leupold offered, and what target market are they aimed at? When looking at distribution channels like big-box stores, what do the display cases look like and what scopes are the counter staff showing to customers most often? How many Leupold scopes are out in the wild, and what type of user typically owns them? You don't need the entirety of data to have some notion of the situation. Vortex is similar. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Vortex sells a whole lot more Diamondbacks and Vipers than Razor AMGs.
Doug sells a variety of Leupolds and he has zero customer complaints.
Yet you LDS sufferes see more failures than possible.
You see what your bias shows you.
Do you ever wonder why guys who gets Leupolds to work, hold zero, and track like AESA radar never bad mouth other optics?
Doug didn't say he has had zero customer complaints.
How many scope models does/has Leupold offered, and what target market are they aimed at? When looking at distribution channels like big-box stores, what do the display cases look like and what scopes are the counter staff showing to customers most often? How many Leupold scopes are out in the wild, and what type of user typically owns them? You don't need the entirety of data to have some notion of the situation. Vortex is similar. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Vortex sells a whole lot more Diamondbacks and Vipers than Razor AMGs.
Doug sells a variety of Leupolds and he has zero customer complaints. Yet you LDS sufferes see more failures than possible. You see what your bias shows you. Do you ever wonder why guys who gets Leupolds to work, hold zero, and track like AESA radar never bad mouth other optics?
Doug didn't say he has had zero customer complaints.
Originally Posted by Doug @ Cameraland
Our experience with Leupold has been positive. By that I mean we sell a fair amount of their scopes and I cannot recall the last one that I got contacted about with an issue.
How many scope models does/has Leupold offered, and what target market are they aimed at? When looking at distribution channels like big-box stores, what do the display cases look like and what scopes are the counter staff showing to customers most often? How many Leupold scopes are out in the wild, and what type of user typically owns them? You don't need the entirety of data to have some notion of the situation. Vortex is similar. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Vortex sells a whole lot more Diamondbacks and Vipers than Razor AMGs.
Doug sells a variety of Leupolds and he has zero customer complaints.
Yet you LDS sufferes see more failures than possible.
You see what your bias shows you.
Do you ever wonder why guys who gets Leupolds to work, hold zero, and track like AESA radar never bad mouth other optics?
Doug didn't say he has had zero customer complaints.
Stick PMd me, and we ended up having a great chat. I asked him if he'd be willing to share pics of some of his trophies and awards. His humility won't let him show them off here and I respect that, but I am tired of him being unfairly maligned. Suck it boys.
LMAO........on another note, I bet Doug at CL is thrilled to death having Burns as his new pitch man.
Stick PMd me, and we ended up having a great chat. I asked him if he'd be willing to share pics of some of his trophies and awards. His humility won't let him show them off here and I respect that, but I am tired of him being unfairly maligned. Suck it boys.
LMAO........on another note, I bet Doug at CL is thrilled to death having Burns as his new pitch man.
How many scope models does/has Leupold offered, and what target market are they aimed at? When looking at distribution channels like big-box stores, what do the display cases look like and what scopes are the counter staff showing to customers most often? How many Leupold scopes are out in the wild, and what type of user typically owns them? You don't need the entirety of data to have some notion of the situation. Vortex is similar. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Vortex sells a whole lot more Diamondbacks and Vipers than Razor AMGs.
Doug sells a variety of Leupolds and he has zero customer complaints. Yet you LDS sufferes see more failures than possible. You see what your bias shows you. Do you ever wonder why guys who gets Leupolds to work, hold zero, and track like AESA radar never bad mouth other optics?
Doug didn't say he has had zero customer complaints.
Originally Posted by Doug @ Cameraland
Our experience with Leupold has been positive. By that I mean we sell a fair amount of their scopes and I cannot recall the last one that I got contacted about with an issue.
How many?
1?
5?
How about ZERO?
John, as you well know, these are very serious conversations here. While it might seem like a nitpick on my part, there is a difference between "zero customer complaints" and "I cannot recall the last one that I got contacted about with an issue." I'd like to think that you'd show a little more gratitude for my trying to help you retain the good standing and stellar reputation you have built here over the years.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
So I take it that you won't be dusting off the C clamps for the 2.5-10 FFP Mk4?
I see you didn't bother to give the FFP TMR a serious look before posting.
It's designed such that the heavy outer lines on the crosswire and verticle under center will extend to near center on 2.5X. It's a very well designed FFP, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's actually faster to get on close targets with it than many SFP designs that have windage and holdover components.
Why didn’t you buy them from a reputable retailer and get a refund?
Because I buy directly from Leupold. I didn't want a refund so I chose to have the optics fixed. You really are having a STRUGGLE Fit.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
You'd have to be a freaking moron to take stock in Form's drop tests, if that's what you mean. His tracking/return to zero test may be interesting. Buy it from Stick and send it to him. Wonder why Form left this board?
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
You'd have to be a freaking moron to take stock in Form's drop tests, if that's what you mean. His tracking/return to zero test may be interesting. Buy it from Stick and send it to him. Wonder why Form left this board?
You kiss his azzzz on Rokslide, but badmouth him here? Fuggin backstabbin loser. He probably left because of dumphuqs like you.
I give him a huge ration of schitttt on RS over this subject, and his supposed killing of "thousands,plural" of game animals. Learn how to use the search function....it's easy to find. You'll also find his little posse of assskissers over there who won't wipe their asss without asking him first.
I give him a huge ration of schitttt on RS over this subject, and his supposed killing of "thousands,plural" of game animals. Learn how to use the search function....it's easy to find. You'll also find his little posse of assskissers over there who won't wipe their asss without asking him first.
Formidilosus is full of himself. Not impressed with him at all
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
I don’t blow anyone. I will put my money where my mouth is. Not many in this thread will follow suit. Hint
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
I don’t blow anyone. I will put my money where my mouth is. Not many in this thread will follow suit. Hint
Nice bullchit story about the nxs though. 😂.
You post a picture of 10 large with your screen name and I will photoshop a NXS in a picture for you. LOL
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
I don’t blow anyone. I will put my money where my mouth is. Not many in this thread will follow suit. Hint
Nice bullchit story about the nxs though. 😂.
You post a picture of 10 large with your screen name and I will photoshop a NXS in a picture for you. LOL
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
You'd have to be a freaking moron to take stock in Form's drop tests, if that's what you mean. His tracking/return to zero test may be interesting. Buy it from Stick and send it to him. Wonder why Form left this board?
He left this board because he wasn't being worshiped by everyone, and some had the audacity to challenge him. I think his drop tests do speak to how rugged a scope is, but I don't they are the end-all-be-all. I don't know what to make of them losing zero riding on the seat of his truck. I am skeptical of that.
SQW qwk If you publicly need to post that you don't blow anyone when someone calls you a knob gobbler. I kinda feel bad bringing up such a sore subject.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
Every scope I have run through this test has failed.
SQW qwk If you publicly need to post that you don't blow anyone when someone calls you a knob gobbler. I kinda feel bad bringing up such a sore subject.
Only bytches use sock accounts. How’s that imaginary nxs workin? 😆
SQW qwk If you publicly need to post that you don't blow anyone when someone calls you a knob gobbler. I kinda feel bad bringing up such a sore subject.
Only bytches use sock accounts. How’s that imaginary nxs workin? 😆
Spitting will get the taste out.
PS you hide your name just like me and I'm not a sock just a guy with free rent.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
You'd have to be a freaking moron to take stock in Form's drop tests, if that's what you mean. His tracking/return to zero test may be interesting. Buy it from Stick and send it to him. Wonder why Form left this board?
He left this board because he wasn't being worshiped by everyone, and some had the audacity to challenge him. I think his drop tests do speak to how rugged a scope is, but I don't they are the end-all-be-all. I don't know what to make of them losing zero riding on the seat of his truck. I am skeptical of that.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Why would someone want to drop a G on a leupold scope that they absolutely hate and trash every opportunity they get? Asking for a friend
Why would someone vote for a gun grabbing democrat just because it made you “feel” good? Asking for a friend….
Anyone voted for Obama shouldn’t be putting their opinion out there since their reasoning is obviously flawed.
Damn , I love how keep following me. But I told you I’m not interested. Tell us more how you like your gag reflex checked by stumpy. You two are a perfect match. Broke back jack mountain big stick
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
Why would someone want to drop a G on a leupold scope that they absolutely hate and trash every opportunity they get? Asking for a friend
Why would someone vote for a gun grabbing democrat just because it made you “feel” good? Asking for a friend….
Anyone voted for Obama shouldn’t be putting their opinion out there since their reasoning is obviously flawed.
Damn , I love how keep following me. But I told you I’m not interested. Tell us more how you like your gag reflex checked by stumpy. You two are a perfect match. Broke back jack mountain big stick
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
No it isn't. But alot more folks do way more typing than hunting/shooting.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
Killed a few deer last season with a SS3-9x on 5x and never wanted for anything else, but I do prefer illuminated on a FFP reticle when in low power in thick woods.
A few years ago I glassed this buck and a doe move down a narrow peninsula onto some timber on the end of it. I jumped off on the raft and paddled in while by buddy waited into the boat. I snuck a few hundred yards down the beach and got into position. The doe spotted me and went flying back to the mainland on that narrow strip of land. The buck was right behind. I took the shot with my ss 3-9 on 3 power. Did just fine on the running shot. Dang that was fun.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
Killed a few deer last season with a SS3-9x on 5x and never wanted for anything else, but I do prefer illuminated on a FFP reticle when in low power in thick woods.
Timber is my thing, have done ok without illuminated but it’s nice to hit the illumination and get that nice Christmas tree triangle at low power. Usually I just kill the buck and forget to hit the illumination.
15 yds if I remember correctly , no illumination, heavy timber 4x ffp.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
I have killed shit really close with iron sights on a revolver, that does not mean a proper 2ndFP scope won't work better.
1stFP is a compromise at low power. Sure it can work but it's still a compromise.
Leupold is smart enough to offer both reticle placements in the 2.5-10 and the 2ndFP is a better choice but the FFP is hardly a fail.
A few years ago I glassed this buck and a doe move down a narrow peninsula onto some timber on the end of it. I jumped off on the raft and paddled in while by buddy waited into the boat. I snuck a few hundred yards down the beach and got into position. The doe spotted me and went flying back to the mainland on that narrow strip of land. The buck was right behind. I took the shot with my ss 3-9 on 3 power. Did just fine on the running shot. Dang that was fun.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
I have killed shit really close with iron sights on a revolver, that does not mean a proper 2ndFP scope won't work better.
1stFP is a compromise at low power. Sure it can work but it's still a compromise.
Leupold is smart enough to offer both reticle placements in the 2.5-10 and the 2ndFP is a better choice but the FFP is hardly a fail.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
I have killed shit really close with iron sights on a revolver, that does not mean a proper 2ndFP scope won't work better.
1stFP is a compromise at low power. Sure it can work but it's still a compromise.
Leupold is smart enough to offer both reticle placements in the 2.5-10 and the 2ndFP is a better choice but the FFP is hardly a fail.
I hunted most of this year with a 2nd FP as I stole my daughter's rifle for most of my deer hunting. Didn't slow me down any.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
I have killed shit really close with iron sights on a revolver, that does not mean a proper 2ndFP scope won't work better.
1stFP is a compromise at low power. Sure it can work but it's still a compromise.
Leupold is smart enough to offer both reticle placements in the 2.5-10 and the 2ndFP is a better choice but the FFP is hardly a fail.
Originally Posted by Calvin
I hunted most of this year with a 2nd FP as I stole my daughter's rifle for most of my deer hunting. Didn't slow me down any.
A few years ago I glassed this buck and a doe move down a narrow peninsula onto some timber on the end of it. I jumped off on the raft and paddled in while by buddy waited into the boat. I snuck a few hundred yards down the beach and got into position. The doe spotted me and went flying back to the mainland on that narrow strip of land. The buck was right behind. I took the shot with my ss 3-9 on 3 power. Did just fine on the running shot. Dang that was fun.
So, you went from boat to raft, and paddled to shore?
Did you have to bring the deer back on the raft, or was there a place for the boat to pull up?
It's epic either way, but paddling back with a deer on your raft would be awesome.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
Killed a few deer last season with a SS3-9x on 5x and never wanted for anything else, but I do prefer illuminated on a FFP reticle when in low power in thick woods.
Timber is my thing, have done ok without illuminated but it’s nice to hit the illumination and get that nice Christmas tree triangle at low power. Usually I just kill the buck and forget to hit the illumination.
15 yds if I remember correctly , no illumination, heavy timber 4x ffp.
Same here but usually because I left it on the previous time and killed the battery like a dumbazz.
A few years ago I glassed this buck and a doe move down a narrow peninsula onto some timber on the end of it. I jumped off on the raft and paddled in while by buddy waited into the boat. I snuck a few hundred yards down the beach and got into position. The doe spotted me and went flying back to the mainland on that narrow strip of land. The buck was right behind. I took the shot with my ss 3-9 on 3 power. Did just fine on the running shot. Dang that was fun.
So, you went from boat to raft, and paddled to shore?
Did you have to bring the deer back on the raft, or was there a place for the boat to pull up?
It's epic either way, but paddling back with a deer on your raft would be awesome.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
I have killed shit really close with iron sights on a revolver, that does not mean a proper 2ndFP scope won't work better.
1stFP is a compromise at low power. Sure it can work but it's still a compromise.
Leupold is smart enough to offer both reticle placements in the 2.5-10 and the 2ndFP is a better choice but the FFP is hardly a fail.
Probably the smartest move they made offering both FFP and SFP in the same models, with matching turrets. Trijicons shortfall in my opinion. No idea why they would offer the lower powered/smaller obj. 2-10x36 with FFP only and the 2.5-15x42 in SFP only. My older mark 4 2.5-8 tracks well but cursed with a Mil reticle and MOA adjustments which is completely retarded.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
Killed a few deer last season with a SS3-9x on 5x and never wanted for anything else, but I do prefer illuminated on a FFP reticle when in low power in thick woods.
Timber is my thing, have done ok without illuminated but it’s nice to hit the illumination and get that nice Christmas tree triangle at low power. Usually I just kill the buck and forget to hit the illumination.
15 yds if I remember correctly , no illumination, heavy timber 4x ffp.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
I have killed shit really close with iron sights on a revolver, that does not mean a proper 2ndFP scope won't work better.
1stFP is a compromise at low power. Sure it can work but it's still a compromise.
Leupold is smart enough to offer both reticle placements in the 2.5-10 and the 2ndFP is a better choice but the FFP is hardly a fail.
1st is good for young eyes. Not me.
2nd is best for old eyes. Me/
Welcome to my life. Love to shoot long range for a while now. But used to sfp for the first 40 & wondering if I should embrace FFP & switch over. Have a couple ffp & tried them, nah,,, not with my eyes, especially on lower power. If everything is turned wide open, as I do past a few hundred, what does it mater, the dope or the reticle works fine.
Or, I've been totally missing it for a few years now.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
Killed a few deer last season with a SS3-9x on 5x and never wanted for anything else, but I do prefer illuminated on a FFP reticle when in low power in thick woods.
Timber is my thing, have done ok without illuminated but it’s nice to hit the illumination and get that nice Christmas tree triangle at low power. Usually I just kill the buck and forget to hit the illumination.
15 yds if I remember correctly , no illumination, heavy timber 4x ffp.
Beautiful..
Yeah, that a decent Blacktail in a nice setting.
Calvins much smaller and cuter than one would think based only on his posts.
This is scope designed for low power high fov quick shooting. The ffp is going to suck at 2.5x. And a 10x isn’t really enough power for over 300 where you even need reticle ticks. Verdict = fail
Please explain in detail how a feature you don't like but many others want is a fail?
If you had even briefly looked at the MK 4 HD product line you would have seen there is a 2.5-10 with SFP reticle.
I prefer 2ndFP but others don't. To be fair I don't have any interest in any of the announced MK 4HD offerings but Leupold is damn sure going to sell a shit load to shooters who like FFP at those prices.
you of all people know ffp is a fail for that scope. Will people buy it. Yeah. But most people don’t shoot much or only at a gun range. You know this.
Originally Posted by Calvin
Looking at the reticle, it looks like it will show up better than some on low power with FFP. I've killed [bleep] really close on low power with FFP. Not rocket science.
I have killed shit really close with iron sights on a revolver, that does not mean a proper 2ndFP scope won't work better.
1stFP is a compromise at low power. Sure it can work but it's still a compromise.
Leupold is smart enough to offer both reticle placements in the 2.5-10 and the 2ndFP is a better choice but the FFP is hardly a fail.
Probably the smartest move they made offering both FFP and SFP in the same models, with matching turrets. Trijicons shortfall in my opinion. No idea why they would offer the lower powered/smaller obj. 2-10x36 with FFP only and the 2.5-15x42 in SFP only. My older mark 4 2.5-8 tracks well but cursed with a Mil reticle and MOA adjustments which is completely retarded.
My eyes will only allow 2nd focal plane. 1st ffp reticle is too small until it is almost at max power.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
Every scope I have run through this test has failed.
Laffin’, you catch a lot of sh it, but I’d drink a beer with you.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
Every scope I have run through this test has failed.
Laffin’, you catch a lot of sh it, but I’d drink a beer with you.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
Every scope I have run through this test has failed.
Laffin’, you catch a lot of sh it, but I’d drink a beer with you.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
Every scope I have run through this test has failed.
Laffin’, you catch a lot of sh it, but I’d drink a beer with you.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
Every scope I have run through this test has failed.
Laffin’, you catch a lot of sh it, but I’d drink a beer with you.
I’m not struggling at all. Retailer sales me an optic that arrives in good shape, they have fulfilled their obligation. If optic has problems after use, I contact the company that provided the warranty. If I have an issue getting a satisfactory response, I contact the retailer to see if they can help or have a contact that can rectify the issue. Pretty simple really.
Nobody is struggling with how a repair works.
You and JiggloRider are STRUGGLING with a Refund vs Repair for a defective scope. The manufacturer is not going to refund you.
LiL Fish claimed her Leupold was defective out of the box. She should get a refund as she claims Leupold can't make a functional scope. Leupold can't repair her shooting or rifles.
She is not a good candidate for a repair because her MK 5 works. She STRUGGLES.
Instead of getting a refund or selling the MK 5 she is attempting to order more Leupold products.
If you are still confused please enter "refund vs repair" in your favorite search engine (Duck Duck Go).
I’m so certain that the scope Larry tested also wouldn’t pass Form’s test, I’d bet $10k on it. Any takers?
The mini NF fell from a chopper and worked well after but I read that as well. lol 10k for a guy you blow to drop a perfectly good scope on the ground. I have a sledgehammer test that I will put money on. You pathetic fool.
Every scope I have run through this test has failed.
Laffin’, you catch a lot of sh it, but I’d drink a beer with you.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I'd agree, but I think his mindset is that any one optic off the assembly line should perform so if a single unit fails his test, then that speaks for the QC of the whole model. There should be virtually zero outliers when you are spending quality money on optics. But that's not reality. There are single unit flaws in production. I'd like to see 3 or 4 units of each model tested.
Yeah, I'm not willing to buy 4 scopes to send him either, I get that too.
I also take his test with a grain of salt overall. The drops are excessive and not the typical wear and tear I expect my gear to see. In other words, if my rife and scope took even a single direct fall onto a hard surface, I'd want to fire a test shot to confirm zero regardless of whether or not it has passed the 'test'. I am obligated to making an ethical shot on game. For those that are hunting extreme conditions, I'd pay closer attention to his findings.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I'd agree, but I think his mindset is that any one optic off the assembly line should perform so if a single unit fails his test, then that speaks for the QC of the whole model. There should be virtually zero outliers when you are spending quality money on optics. But that's not reality. There are single unit flaws in production. I'd like to see 3 or 4 units of each model tested.
Yeah, I'm not willing to buy 4 scopes to send him either, I get that too.
I also take his test with a grain of salt overall. The drops are excessive and not the typical wear and tear I expect my gear to see. In other words, if my rife and scope took even a single direct fall onto a hard surface, I'd want to fire a test shot to confirm zero regardless of whether or not it has passed the 'test'. I am obligated to making an ethical shot on game. For those that are hunting extreme conditions, I'd pay closer attention to his findings.
Agreed, but if he has a good test, he needs to verify.
I took one heck of spill in Africa. The rifle/scope landed on a rock. I would not even think of shooting an animal until I checked it. Ranged a rock at 110 yards, shot off the hood and splattered the rock. Will not even mention the scope. It has been on dozens of rifles. Used to use it for load development. Now I just use a SWFA 10x for that.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
I remember that. If there ever was an exhibition of extreme ego that was it.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
I remember that. If there ever was an exhibition of extreme ego that was it.
He went full Rambo on Montana elk..... it was epic............................... bullschit
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
😀😀
He lost me when he went full-Bear-Grylls. Happy to hear he’s found a new home with plenty of appetites bellied up to the bullszchit buffet.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
😀😀
He lost me when he went full-Bear-Grylls. Happy to hear he’s found a new home with plenty of appetites bellied up to the bullszchit buffet.
The dudes over on RS won't wipe their asss without asking his permission. It's hilarious.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
I remember that. If there ever was an exhibition of extreme ego that was it.
He went full Rambo on Montana elk..... it was epic............................... bullschit
I remember the Formidilosis hunting tales of yore. They were pretty over the top.The main issue I had with the guy is that he absolutely can not abide a difference of opinion. And it got a little hard to take him seriously sometimes with his constant high level of anonymity. If you want to use an exceptional amount of "work" experience as a kind of ultimate gear and technique arbiter, then you better eventually qualify exactly what that experience consists of. IIRC, it goes so far that if he does a pod cast or some such thing they modulate his voice. I have a couple of acquaintances who were legitimate operators and some work associates who work under cover, and they weren't prolifically posting all over the internet while also trying to maintain a kind of secret identity.
I will say that I've found most of his gear recommendations that I've tried and or had previous experience with to be on the mark.
What's the big deal about that Reupold? That little US Optics is 1.8-10× and is illuminated. It can be ran with or without caps in any configuration you want. The thing holds zero and this one is 20+ yrs old.
Just going to return a new Reupold Santium BX5 bino back. Thing is junk. Bridge has loosened up and focus clarity has degraded to the point of a $75 bino. Same with their garbage spotters.
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
😀😀
He lost me when he went full-Bear-Grylls. Happy to hear he’s found a new home with plenty of appetites bellied up to the bullszchit buffet.
The dudes over on RS won't wipe their asss without asking his permission. It's hilarious.
Wondered where he went. I remember his hunting story/novella. 🙄
The only flaw with Form's test is the sample size. Statistically speaking.
I also take his test with a grain of salt. The drops are excessive.
I don’t know man. When you write elk hunting stories about falling off snow cliffs to kill a rag horn. Expect people to believe the story and think backpack elk hunting is something extraordinary. Admit you are a rookie elk hunter, then a few years later you are the end all know all…maybe those drops aren’t excessive.
😀😀
He lost me when he went full-Bear-Grylls. Happy to hear he’s found a new home with plenty of appetites bellied up to the bullszchit buffet.
The dudes over on RS won't wipe their asss without asking his permission. It's hilarious.
Wondered where he went. I remember his hunting story/novella. 🙄
He spends his time here.https://rokslide.com/forums/forums/optics.17/
I think for testing scopes Formadillo is probably very thorough.
I trust his reports.
Definitely wouldn’t take elk hunting advice from him though. Each have their virtues and vices.
+1
LOL.
So we all agree the guy is full of shit when he talks elk hunting but you 2 guys swallow his bullshit on scope testing?
Okay.
I might use his and others' results as data points, but only so far as they comport with my own use. I had previous experiences with some of the models he's tested that've done well and some that haven't, and my experiences weren't disparate from what he reported; by extension, it wasn't too difficult for me to see a degree of relevance in what he's doing.
But, I agree with you insofar as not blindly trusting some dude on the internet. Besides the credibility factor, many who report extensively on equipment likely stand something to gain based on what people ultimately buy or in how a brand is percieved. I pay for my own gear, and I'm not afraid to test it to the extent that it might see while being used in the field.
Over on RS, many are clamoring for certain models to be tested, and I wonder why they don't just test it themselves? It still surprises me that so many are quick to take what they read on the internet or elsewhere as unequivocal fact without verifying it for themselves.
turret block has a pretty good belly, wonder if in the henneberger 30mm 3.5's it will ride on the rail? those looking for getting best alignments to sporter stocks may wanna have a peek at that, will be fun to see how these go, sadly need more 1" beefy stuff but you really gotta watch for belly hang on 1" as weaver detach top mount lows really get down
edit, crap, I can see the incoming insults and jokes now...sorry guys
Over on RS, many are clamoring for certain models to be tested, and I wonder why they don't just test it themselves? It still surprises me that so many are quick to take what they read on the internet or elsewhere as unequivocal fact without verifying it for themselves.
They might not want to permanently bond their action to a chassis/stock. Just a hunch....
It's just data. People get worked up about it because they have an emotional attachment to a scope (or financial like tres chins)
I think for testing scopes Formadillo is probably very thorough. I trust his reports. Definitely wouldn’t take elk hunting advice from him though. Each have their virtues and vices.
+1
LOL.
So we all agree the guy is full of shit when he talks elk hunting but you 2 guys swallow his bullshit on scope testing?
Okay.
Originally Posted by bellydeep
Yeah. He’s batting .500
You’re batting 0
Nobody believes what you say about scopes or hunting. At least he’s got scopes.
LOL.
Enjoy your only view of a bull elk and you may thank me later.
Originally Posted by Starbuck
I might use his and others' results as data points, but only so far as they comport with my own use. I had previous experiences with some of the models he's tested that've done well and some that haven't, and my experiences weren't disparate from what he reported; by extension, it wasn't too difficult for me to see a degree of relevance in what he's doing.
But, I agree with you insofar as not blindly trusting some dude on the internet. Besides the credibility factor, many who report extensively on equipment likely stand something to gain based on what people ultimately buy or in how a brand is percieved. I pay for my own gear, and I'm not afraid to test it to the extent that it might see while being used in the field.
Over on RS, many are clamoring for certain models to be tested, and I wonder why they don't just test it themselves? It still surprises me that so many are quick to take what they read on the internet or elsewhere as unequivocal fact without verifying it for themselves.
Formy is not "some dude" on the internet.
He tries to hide his real history but it well known.
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
I think for testing scopes Formadillo is probably very thorough. I trust his reports. Definitely wouldn’t take elk hunting advice from him though. Each have their virtues and vices.
+1
LOL.
So we all agree the guy is full of shit when he talks elk hunting but you 2 guys swallow his bullshit on scope testing?
Okay.
Originally Posted by bellydeep
Yeah. He’s batting .500
You’re batting 0
Nobody believes what you say about scopes or hunting. At least he’s got scopes.
LOL.
Enjoy your only view of a bull elk and you may thank me later.
Originally Posted by Starbuck
I might use his and others' results as data points, but only so far as they comport with my own use. I had previous experiences with some of the models he's tested that've done well and some that haven't, and my experiences weren't disparate from what he reported; by extension, it wasn't too difficult for me to see a degree of relevance in what he's doing.
But, I agree with you insofar as not blindly trusting some dude on the internet. Besides the credibility factor, many who report extensively on equipment likely stand something to gain based on what people ultimately buy or in how a brand is percieved. I pay for my own gear, and I'm not afraid to test it to the extent that it might see while being used in the field.
Over on RS, many are clamoring for certain models to be tested, and I wonder why they don't just test it themselves? It still surprises me that so many are quick to take what they read on the internet or elsewhere as unequivocal fact without verifying it for themselves.
Formy is not "some dude" on the internet.
He tries to hide his real history but it well known.
Please elaborate on his real history. I have my thoughts based on maybe a decade of intermittently reading his posts as they pop up when I look into various topics; however, I can't say that I've specifically looked into his hx too far. The only thing I'd say I know about him is that he tries hard to obfuscate any details about what he has done or currently does that makes his findings more relevant and definitive than others'. And that he doesn't deal well with differences of opinion.
No offense to anyone in particular out there on the interwebs, but everyone is "some dude" unless I know them personally or they've otherwise proven in various ways why their findings and discernments are relevant. And even in cases where I trust the poster to a certain extent, I'm going to find out about whatever the recommendation or advice is for myself.
To me, honest reports of individual (not paid or influencer) use/testing on forums such as these is the info we wade through all the humor, despair, and back and forth to get to. That, and all the memes and gifs.
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
You could answer your questions with little effort
Over on RS, many are clamoring for certain models to be tested, and I wonder why they don't just test it themselves? It still surprises me that so many are quick to take what they read on the internet or elsewhere as unequivocal fact without verifying it for themselves.
They might not want to permanently bond their action to a chassis/stock. Just a hunch....)
That's a bit of a fallacy. Plenty of non bonded rigs do well with retaining zero after a fall or drop. And even if they don't, wouldn't you care to know the specific part of your shooting system that might let you down if/when confronted with adversity?
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
You could answer your questions with little effort
Over on RS, many are clamoring for certain models to be tested, and I wonder why they don't just test it themselves? It still surprises me that so many are quick to take what they read on the internet or elsewhere as unequivocal fact without verifying it for themselves.
They might not want to permanently bond their action to a chassis/stock. Just a hunch....)
That's a bit of a fallacy. Plenty of non bonded rigs do well with retaining zero after a fall or drop. And even if they don't, wouldn't you care to know the specific part of your shooting system that might let you down if/when confronted with adversity?
You wanted to know why others don't just do it themselves. I gave you a possibility. If you don't like that, ok. Go ask these hypothetical people and b itch at them
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
You could answer your questions with little effort
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
You could answer your questions with little effort
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
Some of the faked tests are partially on video.
Random drop heights, surface unknown, variable impact points, horrible shooting form, improvised shooting rests, target impacts unknown, the list go on and on.
Traveling with rifle/scope in tool box with random tools.
Using 1.5 MOA rifle and factory ammo to discern .5-1 MOA shifts in zero.
Unsupervised just take his word for what happens.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Brad
Originally Posted by bellydeep
I think for testing scopes Formadillo is probably very thorough. I trust his reports. Definitely wouldn’t take elk hunting advice from him though. Each have their virtues and vices.
+1
LOL.
So we all agree the guy is full of shit when he talks elk hunting but you 2 guys swallow his bullshit on scope testing?
Okay.
Originally Posted by bellydeep
Yeah. He’s batting .500
You’re batting 0
Nobody believes what you say about scopes or hunting. At least he’s got scopes.
LOL.
Enjoy your only view of a bull elk and you may thank me later.
Originally Posted by Starbuck
I might use his and others' results as data points, but only so far as they comport with my own use. I had previous experiences with some of the models he's tested that've done well and some that haven't, and my experiences weren't disparate from what he reported; by extension, it wasn't too difficult for me to see a degree of relevance in what he's doing.
But, I agree with you insofar as not blindly trusting some dude on the internet. Besides the credibility factor, many who report extensively on equipment likely stand something to gain based on what people ultimately buy or in how a brand is percieved. I pay for my own gear, and I'm not afraid to test it to the extent that it might see while being used in the field.
Over on RS, many are clamoring for certain models to be tested, and I wonder why they don't just test it themselves? It still surprises me that so many are quick to take what they read on the internet or elsewhere as unequivocal fact without verifying it for themselves.
Formy is not "some dude" on the internet.
He tries to hide his real history but it well known.
Originally Posted by Starbuck
Please elaborate on his real history. I have my thoughts based on maybe a decade of intermittently reading his posts as they pop up when I look into various topics; however, I can't say that I've specifically looked into his hx too far. The only thing I'd say I know about him is that he tries hard to obfuscate any details about what he has done or currently does that makes his findings more relevant and definitive than others'. And that he doesn't deal well with differences of opinion.
No offense to anyone in particular out there on the interwebs, but everyone is "some dude" unless I know them personally or they've otherwise proven in various ways why their findings and discernments are relevant. And even in cases where I trust the poster to a certain extent, I'm going to find out about whatever the recommendation or advice is for myself.
To me, honest reports of individual (not paid or influencer) use/testing on forums such as these is the info we wade through all the humor, despair, and back and forth to get to. That, and all the memes and gifs.
He wants to hide so I won't Dox him, just point out he's hiding as you noted.
It has always been his MO and most here caught on to the scam.
He has never shot in front of anyone here on the Campfire and for good reason.
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
Some of the faked tests are partially on video.
Random drop heights, surface unknown, variable impact points, horrible shooting form, improvised shooting rests, target impacts unknown, the list go on and on.
Traveling with rifle/scope in tool box with random tools.
Using 1.5 MOA rifle and factory ammo to discern .5-1 MOA shifts in zero.
Unsupervised just take his word for what happens.
Well, I'm not going to the length of accusing anyone of flat out faking the tests, but without a constant control group, multiple units of each scope tested, and constant environmental parameters, it could be easy to give more "attention" to those brands that one wanted to see pass such tests, and less to those that might be pandering to the crowd to fail. Just doesn't seem to be very well controlled.
I have a couple questions with the 'scope drop test':
-Is this being performed by only one or two individuals...otherwise unsupervised? Is the parameter of the shooter being "on" for each scope being tested accounted for? -Is the surface being dropped onto a constant?. Hard packed dirt. Pad or no pad. Snow pack??
You could answer your questions with little effort
Isn't that true of all questions?
Thank you sir. I mistakenly thought I was on a forum.
Enjoy your only view of a bull elk and you may thank me later.
Hey John, how many years did that mutation take you? Looks like life has been rough. Be honest now. When was the last time you saw your pecker? For real - no mirrors or phones.
Decided to get one for my 308 build, new to FFP and MOA but everything I have is Duplex so wanted something different. Don't know if I'll hunt with it as it's not illuminated but I'd like to get more proficient at longer distances (targets only, not so much big game) so we'll see. McMillan say stock is ready to ship, last piece the puzzle on the way.
Be interested to see what you think. Even how well it'll move to get it zeroed and especially once you start turning on it a little bit.
I have other Leupold 5HDs, including a 2-10, but never been a "dialer". Hoping to learn something in the process!
It's alot of fun for me. Hoping to hear good things about the Mk4. It won't take you long to know if it being good or wandering.
I could have used a few more Xs on the scope but I didn't want a jumbo scope on the small frame 308 and the next size up were 35mm tubes, further complicating things. Hope to have it at the range in a week or so...
I'm fine maxed out at 10X on a hunting scope but long range shooters these days seem to like scopes up to 15, 20x and beyond. I like my 3-15 5HDs, they seem to be the sweet spot for me for a hunting rig but not so much on this build. I think I'd be fine out to 500 yards but I'd like to be able to get on target out to 1,000. As said, this practice is new to me so I'll see what works and what's lacking.
Mathman, you're asking questions I don't know the answer to, at least not yet. I bought this scope mostly to be different from what I have and for target shooting, at distances to be determined, and to maybe learn something about using a FFP, MOA reticle and dialing for distance, that's about all I can offer at the moment.
Mathman, you're asking questions I don't know the answer to, at least not yet. I bought this scope mostly to be different from what I have and for target shooting, at distances to be determined, and to maybe learn something about using a FFP, MOA reticle and dialing for distance, that's about all I can offer at the moment.
Gotcha.
What I'm getting at is you may be impressed with what you can do with "only 10x" if the clarity and mechanical reliability are there.
The fact that it's MOA is really neither here or there with respect to the FFP aspect. The reticle is just a ruler. The FFP part means the marks on the the ruler will keep the same spacing relative to the target no matter the magnification. MOA, mils, or dillyfloops, it doesn't matter. What you want is for the scale on the adjustments to be the same as that of the reticle.
Is there a particular reason you chose the MOA scale?
You'll have a blast 257. You build some great looking rifles that shoot.
I agree with MM, you'll be able to do a bunch of good shooting with it as a 10X. I have found as I have gotten a little older I like some more X's, but for about 95% of everything a 10X top end in a good optic is pretty good. We still tear stuff up pretty good with the old 6X SS, but the reticle is pretty awesome for distance work.
Mathman, you're asking questions I don't know the answer to, at least not yet. I bought this scope mostly to be different from what I have and for target shooting, at distances to be determined, and to maybe learn something about using a FFP, MOA reticle and dialing for distance, that's about all I can offer at the moment.
Gotcha.
What I'm getting at is you may be impressed with what you can do with "only 10x" if the clarity and mechanical reliability are there.
The fact that it's MOA is really neither here or there with respect to the FFP aspect. The reticle is just a ruler. The FFP part means the marks on the the ruler will keep the same spacing relative to the target no matter the magnification. MOA, mils, or dillyfloops, it doesn't matter. What you want is for the scale on the adjustments to be the same as that of the reticle.
Is there a particular reason you chose the MOA scale?
I'll add just a couple of points to this.
In addition to the clarity and mechanical reliability of the scope, the reticle design makes a big difference when it comes to suitability of the scope for LR shooting. The ideal FFP reticle design for most hunters/shooters is to have bold outer bars that extend to about 5 mrad from the center of the scope, and then a very fine center portion with 0.2-0.5 mrad graduated hash marks. I also personally like a floating center dot, but that's largely up to personal preference. How fine the center of the reticle is, i.e., its subtension, will determine how small of a target the reticle will fit within and you can shoot, assuming sufficient magnification and clarity for you to resolve the target.
The other point, is that like mathman said, the units on the ruler don't really matter too much for your own usage, as long as the reticle and turrets match, but if you shoot with other people or plan to spot for other people and have them spot for you, it is also very useful to have common units and speak the same language.
Agree about the center dot's Jordan. Really just started using more of them recently and really like them up close for target work or planting it on hide/fur at distance.
Agree about the center dot's Jordan. Really just started using more of them recently and really like them up close for target work or planting it on hide/fur at distance.
Yeah, over the years I've grown to really like a nice, fine center dot for close- and long-range work.
Mathman, you're asking questions I don't know the answer to, at least not yet. I bought this scope mostly to be different from what I have and for target shooting, at distances to be determined, and to maybe learn something about using a FFP, MOA reticle and dialing for distance, that's about all I can offer at the moment.
Gotcha.
What I'm getting at is you may be impressed with what you can do with "only 10x" if the clarity and mechanical reliability are there.
The fact that it's MOA is really neither here or there with respect to the FFP aspect. The reticle is just a ruler. The FFP part means the marks on the the ruler will keep the same spacing relative to the target no matter the magnification. MOA, mils, or dillyfloops, it doesn't matter. What you want is for the scale on the adjustments to be the same as that of the reticle.
Is there a particular reason you chose the MOA scale?
I asked for opinions re MIL v MOA as well as illuminated and did some research online, the replies were about equal for both, depending on what the respondent was used to and how they used it. I chose MOA because it's more relatable to me (many say the same about MIL) and I really didn't want a battery in my scope or pay the extra $200 for illuminated, if I use the scope for hunting, I may regret that decision.
FFP is entirely new to me so will have to see if I can get used to it, my eyes are not what they were but the initial focus on the scope seems fine. I doubt I'll use the reticle for measuring distances as I carry a rangefinder (it was a really nice Leica when I bought it, seems dated now) but I would like to educate myself on the process.
I've really no clue if I'll like FFP or not but I'll find out pretty soon.
You'll have a blast 257. You build some great looking rifles that shoot.
I agree with MM, you'll be able to do a bunch of good shooting with it as a 10X. I have found as I have gotten a little older I like some more X's, but for about 95% of everything a 10X top end in a good optic is pretty good. We still tear stuff up pretty good with the old 6X SS, but the reticle is pretty awesome for distance work.
Thanks Beretzs, to say I "build" them is a bit too much credit but I do assemble the parts once they are accumulated, getting them all is the hardest part. One of the reasons I like McMillan is that they typically turn out the stocks in less than two months.
Mathman, you're asking questions I don't know the answer to, at least not yet. I bought this scope mostly to be different from what I have and for target shooting, at distances to be determined, and to maybe learn something about using a FFP, MOA reticle and dialing for distance, that's about all I can offer at the moment.
Gotcha.
What I'm getting at is you may be impressed with what you can do with "only 10x" if the clarity and mechanical reliability are there.
The fact that it's MOA is really neither here or there with respect to the FFP aspect. The reticle is just a ruler. The FFP part means the marks on the the ruler will keep the same spacing relative to the target no matter the magnification. MOA, mils, or dillyfloops, it doesn't matter. What you want is for the scale on the adjustments to be the same as that of the reticle.
Is there a particular reason you chose the MOA scale?
I'll add just a couple of points to this.
In addition to the clarity and mechanical reliability of the scope, the reticle design makes a big difference when it comes to suitability of the scope for LR shooting. The ideal FFP reticle design for most hunters/shooters is to have bold outer bars that extend to about 5 mrad from the center of the scope, and then a very fine center portion with 0.2-0.5 mrad graduated hash marks. I also personally like a floating center dot, but that's largely up to personal preference. How fine the center of the reticle is, i.e., its subtension, will determine how small of a target the reticle will fit within and you can shoot, assuming sufficient magnification and clarity for you to resolve the target.
The other point, is that like mathman said, the units on the ruler don't really matter too much for your own usage, as long as the reticle and turrets match, but if you shoot with other people or plan to spot for other people and have them spot for you, it is also very useful to have common units and speak the same language.
Is there a particular reason you chose the MOA scale?
I asked for opinions re MIL v MOA as well as illuminated and did some research online, the replies were about equal for both, depending on what the respondent was used to and how they used it. I chose MOA because it's more relatable to me (many say the same about MIL) and I really didn't want a battery in my scope or pay the extra $200 for illuminated, if I use the scope for hunting, I may regret that decision.
FFP is entirely new to me so will have to see if I can get used to it, my eyes are not what they were but the initial focus on the scope seems fine. I doubt I'll use the reticle for measuring distances as I carry a rangefinder (it was a really nice Leica when I bought it, seems dated now) but I would like to educate myself on the process.
I've really no clue if I'll like FFP or not but I'll find out pretty soon.
This worries me a bit. You should get away from thinking along the lines of "an MOA is about an inch at a hundred yards" if that's what you mean.
Make your dope charts in MOA of correction rather than amounts of linear drop at various distances.
You'll have a blast 257. You build some great looking rifles that shoot.
I agree with MM, you'll be able to do a bunch of good shooting with it as a 10X. I have found as I have gotten a little older I like some more X's, but for about 95% of everything a 10X top end in a good optic is pretty good. We still tear stuff up pretty good with the old 6X SS, but the reticle is pretty awesome for distance work.
Thanks Beretzs, to say I "build" them is a bit too much credit but I do assemble the parts once they are accumulated, getting them all is the hardest part. One of the reasons I like McMillan is that they typically turn out the stocks in less than two months.
That is handy. That is one thing they have gotten right after the change of ownership. They do make great stocks.
I doubt I'll use the reticle for measuring distances as I carry a rangefinder (it was a really nice Leica when I bought it, seems dated now) but I would like to educate myself on the process.
That's good because with today's quality LRFs, using the reticle to estimate range is pretty far down the list of useful applications of a graduated reticle.
I find the math of MOA more relatable, for example:
308/168 gr/2700 fps
-32" at 400 yards
32/4 (distance) = 8 MOA come-up
or
475 yards, -50", 50/4.75 = 10.5 come-up
But then again, I'd have my dope cards sorted before I did any real shooting, I'm just scratching the surface on this stuff.
It may be obvious to you that "maths" is not my vocation, the university (FSU) has other ideas for me in that regard.
Skip the steps like the ones I highlighted.
Generate your dope in MOA at distance.
The point is you shouldn't have to do any math, whatever the scale. Put your load into the ballistic calculator. Generate the dope directly in MOA, mils, or dillyfloops to match your scope scale whatever it is.
I doubt I'll use the reticle for measuring distances as I carry a rangefinder (it was a really nice Leica when I bought it, seems dated now) but I would like to educate myself on the process.
That's good because with today's quality LRFs, using the reticle to estimate range is pretty far down the list of useful applications of a graduated reticle.
I've found that mine is a bit bulky, really needs two hands to operate and struggles beyond 500 yards on non-reflective surfaces, a new one will have to wait a bit, a few other priorities are ahead on the list.
I find the math of MOA more relatable, for example:
308/168 gr/2700 fps
-32" at 400 yards
32/4 (distance) = 8 MOA come-up
or
475 yards, -50", 50/4.75 = 10.5 come-up
But then again, I'd have my dope cards sorted before I did any real shooting, I'm just scratching the surface on this stuff.
It may be obvious to you that "maths" is not my vocation, the university (FSU) has other ideas for me in that regard.
I just let my ballistic ap on my phone generate that stuff
Need to get that app!
Not sure, but I have an easy one called Bullet Drop + on my Iphone I keep for easy stuff. It works well enough for getting started and is pretty user friendly. I think it is still free or maybe 5 bucks. Allows you to save a ton of profiles as well, so I use it when someone asks me this or that. I also have Ballistic AE for more dedicated stuff. I am sure the others will have some good rec's as well.
Agree about the center dot's Jordan. Really just started using more of them recently and really like them up close for target work or planting it on hide/fur at distance.
On lower power scopes for targets I really like a center diamond around a floating dot or a mil/MOA type reticle that has hash marks in even increments from the center that I can use to frame the circle on a target or a steel disc. Hunting we do, a #4 with an illuminated dot is my favorite but a lot of my hunting scopes are a simple duplex. Our hunting is mostly in close, in thick woods though. Hunting I’m rarely above 4-5x because that’s what I leave a variable set at. Normally no need or no time to crank it up.
And I’m with Jordan, an MOA reticle is doable but mils are so much simpler especially with FFP Why anyone ever produced a scope with Mil reticle and MOA adjustments is beyond me, Absolutely stupid
And I’m with Jordan, an MOA reticle is doable but mils are so much simpler especially with FFP Why anyone ever produced a scope with Mil reticle and MOA adjustments is beyond me, Absolutely stupid
When you don't understand how things happened much of history will befuddle you.
Leupold was the first scope manufacturer to offer a Mil reticle.
At that time all adjustments in the high end Leupolds were MOA.
Nobody offered a Mil Reticle with Mil adjustments at that time so just having a Mil reticle was ground breaking.
Through Premier Reticle I had custom reticles in MOA and adjustments in MOA long before you knew which end of a Red Ryder spit out the BBs.
You and girlz like you sit back with 30years of hindsight and whine but have no understanding of how and why the things you take for granted were pushed into production.
Zip those lips and enjoy what the PLAYERS have done to give you so many reticle and adjustment options.
Custom MOA reticle and MOA adjustments long before any scope had Mil Reticle/Mil Adjustments.
Agree about the center dot's Jordan. Really just started using more of them recently and really like them up close for target work or planting it on hide/fur at distance.
On lower power scopes for targets I really like a center diamond around a floating dot or a mil/MOA type reticle that has hash marks in even increments from the center that I can use to frame the circle on a target or a steel disc. Hunting we do, a #4 with an illuminated dot is my favorite but a lot of my hunting scopes are a simple duplex. Our hunting is mostly in close, in thick woods though. Hunting I’m rarely above 4-5x because that’s what I leave a variable set at. Normally no need or no time to crank it up.
I hunt about the same kinda places at home and run similar stuff. This year we took a few elk around and I don't think the scope went above 8X or so (490, 595 and 605 were the last readings before the shots). Brother and I have been shooting the SS 6X's for so long, anything above that seems like ALOT more. It is nice to have on target work, but on elk sized stuff 8X was plenty, especially with the dot in the center. The scope was a 3-18 so it had a bunch more to go, but as you know, sometimes you don't have a ton of time to mess with stuff. Lotsa ways to skin the cat and I think whatever works for you to get a shot down range as quick as possible is best.
And I’m with Jordan, an MOA reticle is doable but mils are so much simpler especially with FFP Why anyone ever produced a scope with Mil reticle and MOA adjustments is beyond me, Absolutely stupid
When you don't understand how things happened much of history will befuddle you.
Leupold was the first scope manufacturer to offer a Mil reticle.
At that time all adjustments in the high end Leupolds were MOA.
Nobody offered a Mil Reticle with Mil adjustments at that time so just having a Mil reticle was ground breaking.
Kahles made a Mil-Dot reticle w/MIL adjustments in 1969, the ZF69. Does Leupold's Mil-Dot option pre-date the Kahles?
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
I agree 257. It's a unit of measure. Get whatever one you feel best with. It don't make a bit of difference. I like mils, just since it is a 10 based system and I drag knuckles when I walk, but I can get along with either fine. Shooting is the difference, get to know either one or even both.
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
Did they say why?
No, the guy was pretty generous with his time and I didn't ask but probably should have.
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
Using MOA instead of Mils is like doing science stuff with Imperial measurements instead of metric. Base ten is more easier every time.
Since the young TacOps nut-washer thinks I can’t shoot, and wallet groups matter, just for fun, here’s a pic of a group I shot this morning doing some load development:
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
Using MOA instead of Mils is like doing science stuff with Imperial measurements instead of metric. Base ten is more easier every time.
Originally Posted by mathman
My father had a stopwatch with 1/100th minute increments. Some people couldn't get their head around it.
This. Though, if you are using MOA, it is very nice to have your ballistic calculator output your DOPE in 1/4 MOA increments. Then you just dial exactly what your DOPE says, rather than having your calculator round to the nearest 0.1 and then having to round again in your head to the nearest 0.25. A little thing, but helpful in simplifying the process.
I'm not going to read all 22 pages (well, I might ) but other than the fact it may be FFP (Not that I am sure a 10x really makes that much of a positive change), I am not sure I see the real benefit. I see other offerings that folks like such as the FFP variable from Tract (3-15ish?), but it doesn't offer anything really different than other similar scopes. Now some may prefer one brand of reticle over another and that is understandable, but it doesn't save weight or provide any other real characteristic improvement.
So to me (and YMMV) many of these new scopes elicit a meh from me. That said it is good to see what seems like a positive increase in Leupold reliability.
Through Premier Reticle I had custom reticles in MOA and adjustments in MOA long before you knew which end of a Red Ryder spit out the BBs.
You and girlz like you sit back with 30years of hindsight and whine but have no understanding of how and why the things you take for granted were pushed into production.
Zip those lips and enjoy what the PLAYERS have done to give you so many reticle and adjustment options.
Epic.
But not in the way you think it is.
We get it. You’re old. Probably not as old as you look, though. I am somewhat surprised you made it through the AIDS epidemic.
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
Did they say why?
In a follow up email yesterday, he said: "Finer adjustments for small things at long range. Moa is fine compared to to mil"
The "difference" is basically 1" at 1000yds. Hint.
Hang a TTT and whirl on that bitch,then shuffle zoom a coupla times between pokes. Be curious to see how it do. Hint.....................
Just received notice that UPS is delivering McM stock tomorrow, range time over the weekend hopefully but limited to 100 yards and these Kongsberg target systems at least for this session.
I'm poking a bit of fun at the milliradian vs minute of angle thing. Mil vs moa. We state mils of optic dialing, then express distance as yards, 100, 300, etc. Then group size in inch, or millimeter. Mixed units of measure.
In the end it's units of measure. Float yer boat however it works for you.
In my inquiry re MIL v MOA, there was much debate but it appeared to come down to personal preference to most and it appeared that MIL had a stronger following but nobody would come out and say MOA was not ok. It was more a matter of what others were using in group events, everyone wanting to use the same standard. I was on the fence but an instructor at a shooting school that I highly regard said they use MOA at the school now but had used MIL in the past, that was good enough for me to tilt slightly in the direction of MOA.
As others have stated, dialing with dope cards, the come-up is just as easy with either although I've noticed that the MOAs are less finite, ie 3.1, 4.5, 7.5 vs 0.9, 1.3 or 2.2 for MIL if that makes any difference for people who need to wear glasses to read but don't have them handy for hunting/shooting.
Using MOA instead of Mils is like doing science stuff with Imperial measurements instead of metric. Base ten is more easier every time.
There are countries that use the metric system and there is one country with a nice collection of Moon Rocks.
And I’m with Jordan, an MOA reticle is doable but mils are so much simpler especially with FFP Why anyone ever produced a scope with Mil reticle and MOA adjustments is beyond me, Absolutely stupid
When you don't understand how things happened much of history will befuddle you.
Leupold was the first scope manufacturer to offer a Mil reticle.
At that time all adjustments in the high end Leupolds were MOA.
Nobody offered a Mil Reticle with Mil adjustments at that time so just having a Mil reticle was ground breaking.
Kahles made a Mil-Dot reticle w/MIL adjustments in 1969, the ZF69. Does Leupold's Mil-Dot option pre-date the Kahles?
Maybe you missed this last time around. When did Leupold add a Mil-Dot reticle and does it pre-date the 1969 Kahles?
if hunting matters to you then set up, practice with, and use what your brain is wired for because outdoors is where Murphy lives and where we go on auto-pilot and revert to instincts to fold tags...
anything works on steel and playtime at the range, too much of that practice though, especially if it's in non-instinctual units etc. will be more likely to catch you with unfolded tags than anything else, I'd rather take my 0-600, hold inches for wind, hunting set ups to play prs and suffer at the longer end where you don't kill things anyway than drag a prs set up hunting where it's just a bunch of fat and noise destined to have you meeting murph out there on animals in the ranges animals are killed, pick your priorities, lots of time you can crossover and get it mostly done most of the time...the really smart ones who value hunting over all else...won't do that however
a little of the right practice with the right set up goes a lot further than a ton of practice with the wrong stuff, what are you wired for, and what is your priority? trophies made of fur and antler? or brass and glass? hmmmm
can't wait for this prs fad to fully be exposed and we cycle into a more rational fad lol
So, if a guy was going to test his MOA scope on a tall target at 50 yards anticipating 48ish MOA of come-ups shooting every 12 MOA, how far apart would his marks be on the tall target? The scope is supposed to be true MOA. Can I just mark every 6 inches above point of aim? What do you guys do?
So, if a guy was going to test his MOA scope on a tall target at 50 yards anticipating 48ish MOA of come-ups shooting every 12 MOA, how far apart would his marks be on the tall target? The scope is supposed to be true MOA. Can I just mark every 6 inches above point of aim? What do you guys do?
So, if a guy was going to test his MOA scope on a tall target at 50 yards anticipating 48ish MOA of come-ups shooting every 12 MOA, how far apart would his marks be on the tall target? The scope is supposed to be true MOA. Can I just mark every 6 inches above point of aim? What do you guys do?
At 100 yards an moa is close to 1.047", so halve that for 50 yards.
And I’m with Jordan, an MOA reticle is doable but mils are so much simpler especially with FFP Why anyone ever produced a scope with Mil reticle and MOA adjustments is beyond me, Absolutely stupid
When you don't understand how things happened much of history will befuddle you.
Leupold was the first scope manufacturer to offer a Mil reticle.
At that time all adjustments in the high end Leupolds were MOA.
Nobody offered a Mil Reticle with Mil adjustments at that time so just having a Mil reticle was ground breaking.
Kahles made a Mil-Dot reticle w/MIL adjustments in 1969, the ZF69. Does Leupold's Mil-Dot option pre-date the Kahles?
Maybe you missed this last time around. When did Leupold add a Mil-Dot reticle and does it pre-date the 1969 Kahles?
You should post a link. Euro optic typically have metric adjustments which approximate a Mil radian but I can find no reference of the scope you referencing.
Here’s my formula for MOA, 10/3/1.047 =3.18 MOA. 10 inches of drop/300yards/1.047=
What is the similar equation for mils?
Not sure you need a formula. You just use a dope card. Its not that hard. No reason to convert linear measurements to angular measurements and then back again.
Here’s my formula for MOA, 10/3/1.047 =3.18 MOA. 10 inches of drop/300yards/1.047=
What is the similar equation for mils?
A little help here guys?
It works the same way if you insist on converting between linear and angular measurements.
"1 moa subtends 1.047" at 100 yards" corresponds to "0.1 mil subtends 1 cm at 100 meters".
I agree that for dialing/holding DOPE, there is no reason at all to think in linear quantities. For measuring group size or target size, you can also use the fact that 1 mrad is equal to 3.6" of displacement at 100 yards. So you could do the equivalent calculation as 10"/3/3.6"=0.926 mrad.