I have quite an array of high end optics. Zeiss, Swarovski, and Leica. Several pairs of binos, spotting scopes, rifle scopes, and range finders. I seem to favor Swarovski optics as I own mostly Swarovski.
I bought a pair of Swarovski SLC NEU 15x56 back in 2007. Use the heck out of them.
About a year ago, I came across a guy who was selling his Leica 15x56 Geovid HD R for $900. As I typically hunt with my son in laws and they didn’t have good optics, I bought the Leicas so they could use them. Besides, for $900, how could I go wrong. And the Leicas had that rangefinder to boot.
I side by side compared the Swarovski 15x56 and Leica 15x56 looking at the mountains about 3 miles away, and other objects (pine trees with their pine needles) about 300 yards away from my back porch for a couple hours. Also compared them both in low light.
I found the image color in both to be neutral. The edge image clarity in the Swarovski might be a tad better. The center image clarity of the Leica seemed to be a tad better. Low light clarity was the same in both, which was obviously good. Brightness was the same. Overall, I think I preferred the Leicas maybe a tiny bit better.
As mentioned, I own more Swarovski optics than any other brand. But that said, I think I might be grabbing those Leicas when I head out in the woods. But you couldn’t go wrong with either pair.
The above is just my opinion and what I saw through my eyes, and you got what you paid for in my opinion, which was free.
Last edited by flagstaff; 01/13/24.