Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Will US Military Act Against American Citizens

"...all enemies, foreign and domestic..."
If the military accepts that a citizen or group of citizens are a domestic enemy, then an order to to "act aggressively" could be considered lawful.

...July 28, 1932 MacArthur did it.

folks in my part of texas still remember and hold a grudge against the US army for what they did down here during Reconstruction. 1860-1870 wasnt that long ago

I've been saying this for some time now, but everybody would defiantly say "no way!!!! That'll never happen in Uhmurka!"....

If history repeats itself, yes.

How many sleeper cells do the cia,fbi,doj control?? All they have to do is turn them against any people they want taken out and they are not connected. More ways to divide we the People.

The U.S. Military has been used against American citizens off and on numerous times since the Revolutionary War. Biden took office with thousands of US troops in place in DC because the Dems were afraid of an insurrection and discontent from their stolen election.

Look at the OP's history on here.

Been happening for a while, Bro. Who broke through the Saudi Palace gates and deposed Prince Alwaleed? Who seated Prince Bin Salmon? Why is Trump allowed to touch him when only Kings are allowed to do that.






Why did Trump say Kilery was ugly but now is beautiful? Why did he say she is sorta gone?

image web hosting

They won't be told to go take out a nursing home. Their mission will be stated in such a way as to be deemed necessary. It's not about what is done as much as the perception of what is done. The military has often slaughtered citizens in the name of justice.

It is necessary. You're missing a detail. Trump is the detail.

As Q said, The only way forward is the Military.

When did Trump Federalize the National Guard?

Who do you think Trump will use to round up and deport the foreign invasion?

The way the U.S. Federal bureaucracy is in bed with the WHO, NATO, and the UN, it is likely a UN "peacekeeping" force would be deployed against the citizens of these United States. It would (UN forces) be deployed for "the good of the nation" and half the people in this country would be OK with it.

Yes, and so will the police...

Half of you should be more concerned about changing your Depends in a timely manner.


Jag, your mental illness is worsening. Please seek professional help.

Posse Comitatus (for those of you in Rio Linda, prohibition of fed troops used within US border) was not enacted until 1878...but, regardless it is just another piece of paper...laws mean nothing. I refer you to Mao in 1927: all political power grows from the end of a gun. I would add some of my homegrown philosophy to that also, who signs the paychecks of the government stooges. Think I'm exaggerating? The Border Patrol is totally and shamefully complicit and obedient. The three letter stooges do exactly as they are ordered with excess enthusiasm I might add. Capitol Police Lt Byrd got a promotion for murder. City cops do as they are ordered with no remorse whatsoever. Red county sheriffs are the ONLY ones to resist unconstitutional orders I've seen.
The Stasi is here, now.

Remember all the posters here clamoring for the military to be used to violently "squash" the BLM "protests"??? Like it or not those pukes are American Citizens too. Kinda sucks when "we" may be considered the "enemy" dont it?

while that may be true....what is your take on the question?....bob

Very interesting scenario indeed.

They will be told we are terrorists or whatever is needed, for them to feel good about their trigger pulls.

I have no doubt the majority will.

It's why th military likes reruiting 18 year olds that haven't had real world experience yet. They are trained to do as they are told, all the way to 4 star Generals and admirals, who by that time, only want to retain their pensions.