Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Making challenging an election a crime

https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/0...to-make-election-oversight-a-hate-crime/

It appears that if you are an attorney and you question the outcome of an elelction there is a dark money group ready to file an ethics complaint against you in order to shut you up. A big one is The 65 Group and another is Shutdown DC. Both are dark money groups with a big budget. This is just part of the article in the Federalist. It appears the democRATs want to make it a law you cannot question the results of an election.
kwg

Virginia Democrats Behind ‘Harassment’ Bill Really Want To Make Election Oversight A ‘Hate Crime’

SB 364 arrives as Democrats push the narrative that conservatives are a threat to democracy at large and election workers in particular.

ERIN MARIE JOYCE 02/05/2024

Annoy an election official, face a hate crime investigation?

With a government that colludes with social media platforms to suppress Americans’ speech and targets conservatives as “domestic terrorists,” election volunteers are not laughing off the possibility of such retaliation.

Senate Bill 364, which is working its way through Virginia’s Democrat-controlled General Assembly and is set to be heard in subcommittee Monday morning, would take existing criminal statutes that protect Virginians from assault, battery, or damage to property, create a protected class for election officials, and call the same offenses “hate crimes.”

Anyone convicted of such offenses against election officials would be added to the Virginia State Police “hate crime” database.

In addition, language in SB 364 would help social media companies avoid First Amendment challenges if they collude with government actors to restrict speech and suppress dissent. So long as the social media provider acts in “good faith” to “restrict access to” material that it believes is “harassing, or intended to incite hatred on the basis of” a person’s status as an elections official, it would face no tort liability. The bill arrives as major First Amendment cases involving Big Tech collusion with government agencies to suppress speech about Covid, and elections, are before the U.S. Supreme Court.

My repeated calls to Sen. Adam Ebbin, the bill’s sponsor, were not returned.

A ‘Threat Narrative’ Cottage Industry
SB 364 arrives as Democrats around the nation are pushing the narrative, fueled by the hysteria that followed the unrest at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, that conservatives are a threat to democracy at large and election workers in particular.

In a series of show trials, the partisan Jan. 6 Committee used what should have been an investigation into Capitol security failures to paint all Republicans and their concerns about election integrity with the brush of “insurrection.” The committee is now accused of withholding potentially exculpatory evidence, while Republican Reps. Barry Loudermilk and Clay Higgins have attested to video evidence showing law enforcement officers at the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters and egging protesters on.

“The left has created a cottage industry of this false narrative,” said election law attorney and frequent target of the left, Cleta Mitchell. “They can show no evidence of the problems they talk incessantly about. But they use this as a pretext to block and avoid transparency in the election process.”

Virginia already has criminal statutes on its books that protect election workers by imposing felony offenses for criminal threats, intimidation, or other behavior designed to impede the voting process.

Most, if not all, of the news stories that left-leaning publications and legacy media cite to underpin the “threat” narrative about election officials are sourced to a 2021 survey conducted by The Brennan Center, which was repeated in 2022 and again in 2023. The progressive think tank is among the networks funded by leftist billionaire George Soros.

The Brennan survey had a high margin of error, (+/-)6.4 percent, and claimed that “one in three local election officials are concerned about facing harassment or pressure while on the job.”

But that’s not the full picture. Election officials were asked to rate their concerns in order of severity from a preselected list of concerns about the 2020 election. Covid ranked the highest, followed by “pressure to certify results,” followed by “being harassed on the job.” Of the 35 percent who did express concern about harassment, there were only 13 percent who were “very concerned.”

Spinning the Narrative
Despite massive irregularities in 2020 after swing states shifted to mass mail-in ballots with loose controls on validating the ballots, the Brennan survey did not appear to follow up with respondents about why they felt pressure to certify election results.

A 2023 Brennan Center survey revealed that 77 percent of election workers did not know of any colleagues who had left their jobs out of fear of being harassed, and that nearly 90 percent planned to continue their work.

But the “threat” narrative is persistent, even if it relies on distorted data. A study out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology claimed that “as a result of former President Donald Trump’s harsh tirades against the integrity of American elections, election officials experienced an influx of violent and even criminal threats.” Despite its inflammatory introduction, the survey showed no such causation. It did, however, track an increased number of social media postings by elections officials, and then studied “sentiment” in the negative responses their postings received.

Millions of Americans were furious about the massive irregularities from the 2020 election. Polls show that trust in elections has dropped among voters across political parties.

In the past three years, the Department of Justice has pursued criminal charges against 14 individuals for threats to election officials. None of the DOJ cases involve Virginia residents or election officials.

In Cochise County Arizona two of our three county supervisors are republicans. Both of them delayed certifying the last election and our democrat state attorney general has filed felony charges against them.

Can't be exposing crime

Apparently the State Attorney General is getting financial support from The 65 Group and Shutdown DC. Both of those groups are a dark money organization focusing on intimidating anyone who challenges an election where a democRAT has "won".

kwg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ShutdownDC

https://the65project.com/

There is only cheating if the demonrat loses.

Apathetic Republicans will cower in the corner rather than be falsely accused of a hate crime.......

But, the democRATs have been getting by with lot's of "cheating" for years because they have the republicans intimidated. When the republicans are no longer intimidated by the democRATs we might get our country back. That means Americans have to use their critical thinking skills to evaluate what the politicians are or are not telling them and then vote accordingly. That is why ALL elections matter. Right down to the school board and the mayor.

At least Mike Johnson said it up front this time "It's dead in the House". Now, if we can keep him to his word.

kwg

Hang 'em from the gallows cold.

This is why The 65 project group and Shutdown DC group are doing what they are doing. They want to keep anyone who questions one of their elections "cowering in a corner". I'm surprised the Campfire has not been approached by a similar organization demanding that the forums be monitored for "unethical talk".

kwg

But it was okay for the leftist to question the election between Bush and Gore.

That's the problem I see.

It’s part of Their Business Model..

The real crime is sending the Grifter’s to Represent You..

If your paying attention their not hard to Spot ..

Like the Derby Donkey named Mitch and the Multiple Time Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee La Miserable Lindsay..

In the End it doesn’t work without a Informed Voter Class ..

Unless one personally professes such, it is impossible to prove that one does anything due to hate.

So it will be illegal now for democrats to demand recounts until they conjure up enough votes to win?

Didn't Stacey Manatee Abrams spend three years talking about stolen elections?

Unfortunately, the republicans have probably read the Constitution and know that even cowering republicans have the right to free speech. Or to just cower in the corner, whatever suits them best.

kwg