Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Optics Formidilosus - paid forum user?

Agree 100% with everything Jordan posted in the above posts.

Would also add, a "drop test" will likely provide more helpful data for a guy who's backpacking in the mountains than a guy who walks to a deer stand or shoots gophers next to a pickup truck (both of which are supremely satisfying pursuits).

Also, if an erector sucks, it doesn't matter if the scope is used for dialing or is just a set and forget BDC reticle.

Like I said somewhere else, I currently have 14 (maybe more) Leupold scopes. But I've known for a long time what a half-assed erector system they have - long before I read Form's comments. His, and others, observations only reinforced what I'd already seen myself. I'd also add, his scope mounting is EXACTLY how I've mounted scopes for the last 35 years. Apparently we think about mechanical things similarly.

I want Leupold to be better than they are, but they aren't. Probably good enough for what I do or will do in the future, but if I were serious about dialing I'd be 100% in with NF, SWFA, Trijicon, or a couple others.

Not a hater but I made it about six minutes and that was all I could take.

Two + hours, not a chance.

Lol, me at a match?

Hunt only, I like gear, and trialling, in field, my own gongs, my own 3d targets...then hunting, or fishing. Not playing touch willy at some match doing a bunch of the wrong kind of practice. But hey, if you’re bored and shoot is what your hobby is then giver. Hunt is mine. They still don’t make a match proper for hunting. 3d archery is close but where is that for the bang sticks? 200 rounds, sighters, little square plates (great on target reference...not), sighters, teams, much of it past real hunting distances, requiring unrealistic gear and methods. Don’t worry, even if they did get it right I’d still be hunting or fishing instead lol and prs pansies can tell my walls and my freezer how amazing ffp/mil Hubble tank is for filling both. 200 rounds...lmfao. The latest f-class.

I had this go round on rokslide and a guy who dove right in admitted he was so wrapped up in it his walls and freezer were empty. Guess some of you need to figure out what’s more important. Trying to be some rockstar to other dudes in matches or just out there doing it without giving a flying fack if anyone knows about it. And this these threads in hunting optics sections going on and on about all this useless sh1t.

Lol...we will right this ship. People will wake up and we will find ourselves a new trend to turn into a big ole money factory. Prs is a dandy right now but we will come full circle and focus on what’s fastest simplest toughest and best for 0-600 yards HUNTING prep, including a competition lol. And it won’t have square targets and it won’t be 200 rounds and it won’t have guns over 10 lbs, save your ‘but but nrl’ arguments, same wrong with it, not enough right. 1/2 to 3/4 sec time of flights like 3d, where killin happens, animals with flappers, solo, custom and reload, and factory including ammo, a box of shells a day.

Like I said, drag this crap into the prs pansy touch willy sub forums where it belongs. I get to be rude like this here lol, it’s great. So many lost in the weeds, can’t see the forest. 😉

The first minute was them giggling like middle school girls at a slumber party when absolutely nothing funny was said. I can't stomach that crap.

You mean the intro? Are you aware you can actually skip past the intro? Probably not, because you are stupid.

I will help your dumbazz out once more...Paul spoonfed Barnard. Go to one minute forty-one seconds. Form clearly states he does not get paid by Rokslide or nightforce and never has. Kinda contradicts the bs in the OP.

But facts are irrelevant with the clueless

Not going to listen to the 2 hrs of torture, but who is footing the bill for the scopes, the rifles, and the [bleep]-ton of ammo he says he burns up?

I did listen long enough to hear him say something I agree with. That Nightforce does not make a reticle that is good for hunting.

The answer to your question is literally covered in the podcast.

Then I will never know, and I'm good with that.

I did listen long enough to hear him say something I agree with. That Nightforce does not make a reticle that is good for hunting.

The illum mil-dot and IHR aren't too bad for hunting. Although for the mil-dot I'd want the turrets in mil instead of moa.

The illum mil-dot and IHR aren't too bad for hunting.

You mean the intro? Are you aware you can actually skip past the intro? Probably not, because you are stupid.

I will help your dumbazz out once more...Paul spoonfed Barnard. Go to one minute forty-one seconds. Form clearly states he does not get paid by Rokslide or nightforce and never has. Kinda contradicts the bs in the OP.

But facts are irrelevant with the clueless

Been using the MOAR and liking it good enough so far.

he says he’s not and has never been paid by any gun industry company. I didn’t hear him say he wasn’t paid by RS. Maybe he does later in the show.

Just prior to all that at 1:08 when asked about his tests, he does specifically say: “for Rokslide, was last winter”, which indicates to me that he does get some sort of benefit from Rokslide for doing his tests.

That seems tenuous to me.

That seems tenuous to me.

It’s pretty fhuqking easy to shoot on your own nickle and simply relate the findings. Hint…………