Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire This cop got killed by the stupidity of the brass above him

You are obviously on the wrong board.

I though Jarret was cavalier in his handling of Cueva, regardless of him knowing whether or not Cueva was a dangerous felon. Officers should be trained to be prepared for any person they come across attempting to end their life. Jarret let his guard down as Cueva was stepping out of the truck. Cost him his life.

RIP

In that case, good call by the court on granting QI to NMSP SGT. MARK MADRID, in his individual capacity, and NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE CHIEF TIM Q. JOHNSON. They couldn't have possibly known they did anything wrong.

"Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity as there is no clearly established authority particularized to the facts of this case that would have informed Defendants that their actions violated Officer Jarrott's constitutional rights."


https://casetext.com/case/jarrott-v-madrid-1

Yeah. That was unfortunate and cost him his life. He was being way too considerate of that bastard cueva. When that bastard gave the officer a coup de grace in the head, I was really hoping that he was gonna get done in when the chase finally ended. Thankfully, he did.

In reality, the politicians failed the officers and the citizens. The bad guy pulled the trigger but the politicians set up the whole scenario to get a good man killed.

kwg

You care to elaborate on that? Just curious if you’re a troll,a$$hole or mistaken.

There should be no individual immunity, everyone should be held accountable for their actions.

Most likely he is all of that.

Apparently that is not a popular position or at least some want some sort of QI annulment when the rights of an le are violated, but want QI in place for festivities like a cop shooting a 10 year old in the leg.

JohnnyLoco
Campfire Outfitter

Another CS on ignore!

Why should someone be liable for violating a right that is not clearly established in the constitution or clearly established by statute?

Oh yeah, such as these officers who stole over $225,000.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicksi...tealing-over-225000-have-legal-immunity/

QI for raiding the wrong house.

https://reason.com/2024/03/21/texas...t-gunpoint-after-raiding-the-wrong-home/

If criminals were punished as they should be the gene pool would be thinned out. Yet how many are roaming freely just waiting to kill, rape, etc. again. I wouldn't blame officers if it was standard procedure to carry a riot gun in hand on every stop!

His boss has tried to make sure le aren't encountering armed individuals.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Albuquerque_gun_ban

We had a sheriff order a deputy to take a barricaded nut instead if waiting it out. . . 2nd floor apartment bedroom, they knew he had a rifle. Expected outcome. My opinion is said sherrif should be relieved of job.

It is almost always the grunts who get deaded.

Was there a civil suit filed?

That Sheriff should be fired immediately.

"Ninth Circuit briskly concluded that “the city officers are entitled to qualified immunity.”

So you're upset with the 9th circuit as well?

Maybe you can alternate your bìtching posts, judges/le/judges/le....equally distribution of outrage.

Bad cops, bad prosecutors, and bad judges are a 3 legged stool. Why else would the judges decide that the officers couldn't possibly know that stealing cash is violating rights?