Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Cop roughs up an 18 year old female

Yep. Getting huffy over an 18 year old girl speeding by 7 mph and having a burned out headlight means you’re in the wrong profession. There are plenty of good cops out there. It’s a shame this one has spoiled the bunch. Cops should be trained or vetted to interact with the public much better than this.

What about the arresting officer demanding that old man pumping gas (then trying to leave the property )to leave his scene? That’s after he called him a woman. Holy schidt, what an idiot. Go dig ditches , Officer Schimmel. At least there if you act like a bitch, you’ll be treated like one. Just damn

I don't obsess about anything.

I do assume it is much more likely any supporter of the actions by Schimmer are in le or, less likely, an elected or appointed official who isnt likely to become a victim of Schimmer's. Anyone that isn't part of those cliques that supports that behavior is a very dim bulb.

It shouldn’t be a foreign feeling that you’re confused Mr Batard.

You are clearly obsessed with cops.

I sincerely hope you get them abolished. Posting on an obscure hunting forum will probably help.

As gratifying as it may be when a cop gets summarily fired after some egregious misconduct, it is usually window dressing to assuage public outrage. Unless he is an employee at will, if he works under any form of civil service or union contract, he will likely get his job back when the wheels of the appeal process finally finish turning. By then it will be old news. It is a byzantine, convoluted process, but rest assured, police union reps know how to work it. Approve or not, that is their job. They even have a legal obligation to diligently defend obvious dirtballs. It is called the duty of fair representation, and the union can be sued if it doesn't adhere to it. For its part, management will lose unless all the Is are dotted and Ts crossed.

Shoulds and oughts don't carry much weight.

Boring reading, but this explains it.

https://www.laboremploymentlaw.org/...ractice-Tool-Kit-Article-Due-Process.pdf

Glad to help. You are confused. 🫤

They had dash cam and security footage if the whole incident. Cop’s body cam was off until after the “takedown “.

If all citizens are supposed to get due process, why wouldn’t a police officer? It still doesn’t change the fact he fucgked up pretty bad.

No I'm not and no you don't.

You're like listening to Schimmer telling his tale about windows and lights that doesn't narrate video of the incident at all.

It's funny how often those body cameras seem to not be working when a LE is accused of doing something wrong, even though the camera seemed to be working just fine right before or right after the event.

If you support the actions of Schimmel and not in le or some kind of official he wouldn't lay a hand on, you are incredibly stupid.

That's criminal law. This is a specific form of procedural due process pertaining to some public employees. For example, most employees don't have constitutional protections of their employment. All citizens are not supposed to get due process is not strictly true. The Constitution only applies to what the government can and cannot do.

Same reason a private entity doesn't have to respect the Second Amendment.

Can you find a shorter limb to get on?

What "limb"? I was simply trying to explain a legal principle that many aren't aware of.

If you don't like it ignore it.

I think ur the stoopid one

He is in the middle of cuffing when it starts playing. Both hands seemed to be occupied.

This is some seriously fûcked up shît.

And should be saved for posterity.

It's Elkfeces.

The desperation for people to come over to his way of thinking is the same as that retard. there's no doubt it's him.

maybe everyone will get lucky and Schimmel has a job lined up in your area. Then he can inflict himself upon you like you support happening to others.

Which part?

The firing might take awhile, but the lack of a speedy arrest by their colleagues is the larger issue.