Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire SUPREMES HIT DEI

BREAKING: In a landmark 9-0 ruling on Wednesday that you will never hear about in the media, the US Supreme Court has undercut all DEI-based discrimination, sending the Marxists into a tizzy.

The US Supreme Court's ruling that a St. Louis police sergeant can sue over a job transfer she claims was discriminatory lays the foundation for legal action against employers who push discrimination against white people in job hiring, work assignment and promotion. That’s right, those “diversity-preferred” job postings, the practice of passing over whites for promotions, discriminatory job transfers, pushing unfair diversity trainings, etc…all of these are now legally actionable.

The ruling was championed by human rights groups as "an enormous win for workers,” but has lawyers for companies like Disney warning that it could have a chilling effect on employers' diversity initiatives.

Disney’s "Pale and Male is Stale" policy is a prime example. Disney has allegedly used it to drive out white animators by giving them the worst assignments, even though they them have the most experience, skill, and seniority, in order to make the job humiliating enough that they quit…which many of them have done.

The same companies argue that there is ‘good discrimination’ and “bad discrimination’, that white people should be purposely disadvantaged to pave the way for diversity. The lawyers stated that the decision will ‘complicate’ DEI programs and limit their ability to discriminate against white men.

The Supreme Court torpedoed these claims, re-asserting that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Further, the court has established a relatively ‘low standard’ for bringing discrimination cases. The victim need not suffer ‘actual harm’. An employee only must show "some harm" under the terms of their employment, AND that harm need not be "material," "substantial" or "serious." The decision makes it much easier for workers to sue over discriminatory practices.

This case was about a woman transferred from plainclothes because she was a woman, but it could be applied to DEI bullshit.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-193_q86b.pdf

For Jackson to be able to concur with the decision, wouldn't she also need to be able to define a woman??????

Good stuff, Fubarski.

I have to wonder if companies, governments and municipalities will just pretty much ignore this ruling and go on with the DEI business as usual approach and just deal with the lawsuits.

Here’s hoping that it opens up the proverbial can of worms.

Good post, Fubraski.

Example: You can't find a young white make in any USPS uniform anywhere around me here in Broward or Dade counties.

Can't wait to see how that plays out.

The case really does not address much regarding DEI. It’s a Title 9 sex discrimination case.

It’s only about the level of harm one needs to show in order for the case to move forward.

The court ruled:

There has to be harm. Not significant harm.

BMT

Actually, this is a pretty big deal"

"some harm" under the terms of their employment, AND that harm need not be "material," "substantial" or "serious."
They just made it very easy to sue and win in discrimination cases.

Think of it this way, "I didn't get an interview", is SO HARM, even if not "material," "substantial" or "serious." But now, if you can show the harm was "material," "substantial" or "serious.", your case just became a slam dunk.

Didn't
Earn
It

It's the jobs whites/US citizens won't take.

Sadly, here at this place, threads like this will get passed over, while ones about an idiot buying a can of spray oil can go pages...

My thoughts also, leftist only play by ''their'' rules.

You can thank President Trump's supreme court picks for this. Had he accomplished nothing else his time would still have been a big win for Americans just because of them. Had he been allowed to serve a second term, the conservative majority would have been 7-2 instead of 6-3 because retard Brown Jackson's spot would have been taken by someone decent.

He needs to be re-elected if for no other reason than to appoint Justice Thomas's replacement if he decides to retire.

This script would be totally reversed had Hitlery won.....we would be looking at a 7-2 or 6-3 communist majority which would have made things much worse than they are now and they are still pretty bad. Pretty much the complete end of life as we know it. The 2nd amendment certainly would have been gone for all intents and purposes.

But yeah, Orange man bad.

Yeah, nobody is paying attention to scotus rulings anymore. There's no consequences.

Ketanji is prototypical DEI hire

DEI....

Didn't earn it

I'm not seeing the Sunshine at the end of the rainbow . Especially if you read the 22 page decision.

Here is a "lighter" synopsis. I don't see much changing, except for this one woman.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/...ce-officer-workplace-discrimination.html

Rong. USPS jobs pay well and are highly sought after. At least here.

LMBO!!!!
"YES!"

LMBO!!!!
"YES!"

Justice K. B. Jackson is the epitome of DEI!
The woman (?) was nominated, NOT because of her qualifications, but because she is a black woman(?)!
J. Biden made it a point to announce that he would ONLY appoint a black woman to SCOTUS!

Ironic that one of the only two qualifications Biden required, his appointee was unable to define!

“ it could have a chilling effect on employers' diversity initiatives.”

One could only hope!!!

LMBO!!!!
"YES!"
They (liberals) have already proven the adage, "rules for thee, but not for me!".
Time and time again, we see liberals thumb their nose at SCOTUS and any other law, rule or regulation they don't agree with. Even pushing forward with CRT and DEI though both have been struck down.

^^^^THIS^^^^
Recently the SCOTUS ruled that folks like our communist mayor cannot speak of city issues on his personal Face Book or Instagram page, and then block comments. He does not recognize the ruling, and continues to do block opponent's comments. I have queried him on this, but of course, he just does not answer.