not much different than the 33 wcf i always thought the 416 barnes to be the ticket however i never did it.
If one is going to go to the trouble of chambering a 348/45-70 wildcat for the Marlin 1895 I wonder why one wouldn't also modify the action to cycle a 2.7" round?
Both good and valid points but,
ctw , a 416 Barnes in our Pa. whitetail woods be IMHO ludicrous.
Jack, I sustained some serious shoulder nerve damage some years ago and over time it has greatly improved. However my love of the 1895 and lack of a 71 brought me to this solution. Never could shoot a 71 very well anyway. Sold mine awhile back. Maybe shouldn't have but, I did.
Keep 'em coming guys.