|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,609
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,609 |
I am curious about peoples experience with the recoil difference between the .375 H&H and the 9.3x62. I have looked at recoil tables and some seem to show that .375 is about 1/3 more than 9.3 x 62.. True in real life?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277 |
IMO, if you keep both the guns similar the 375 will have more bounce. I mean hey you're talking about a big mag case vs a 06 case necked up to 9.3, of course it's gonna have more to it.
Dober
"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954 |
The 9.3x62 is capable of shooting side by side with the 375 H&H with handloads..A 9.3 will push a 320 gr. Woodlieh to 2400 FPS as compared to a .375 pushing a 300 gr. bullet at 2500 FPS..As you can see the recoil would be about the same all things equal..
A lot of 9.3 stuff is underloaded, thus the recoil is somewhat less than a .375 H&H...
Both are excellent calibers and qualify for dangerous game IMO, but I suppose I prefer the .375 H&H, having used both on Cape Buffalo..
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104 |
I handload for both, but haven't so far used any bullets heavier than 270 grains in the .375 and heavier than 286 in the 9.3x62. With loads in the upper range shown in the reloading manuals that I use, the .375 does have noticeably more recoil, but I would not guess that it is a third more. Since I had been shooting my .375s for several years before I acquired a 9.3x62, I don't find the recoil of either objectionable.
I actually get most of my "try" loads from Load From a Disk and check them against the reloading manuals just to be sure...
Ben
Some days it takes most of the day for me to do practically nothing...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,639
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,639 |
Mark R Dobrenski - Very true! My RSM in .375 is on the heavier side but it's a real pleasure to shoot, even off the bench! My .35 Whelen is about 2 pounds lighter and with 250 gr Partitions lets me know I've pulled the trigger! I love'em both!
Speak softly and use a big bore... Where's El Cid when we need him...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,609
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,609 |
Is there any ammo manufacturer that has .375 ammo in milder versions for non critical situations... like target or hog hunting?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 311
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 311 |
Try PMC. At least for me, they tend to run a little slower than some other brands, for a more reasonable price.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249 |
There is a noticeable difference, but neither is a particularly hard kicker.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294 |
with the 9.3 you get an extra in the belly two, no?
woofer
"I would build one again, if it were not for my 350RM (grin)."
MtnHtr
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 14,104 |
Two, in my Model 70...of course, my .375 is a Wby Mk. V.
Ben
Some days it takes most of the day for me to do practically nothing...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954 |
You can always load the .375 down to a 35 Remington or lower if you want..If you don't handload someone will do it for you..I have shot pigs and a few deer with a .375 and lead bullets at about 1800 FPS and it worked well enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,609
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,609 |
I sure do like the looks of the CZ 550 FS in 9.3 x 62. It's got some character. From what I have seen on here you might loose 50 fs in velocity by having the 3" shorter barrel over the CZ 550 American. I have not a fan of recoil so the .375 is probably more than I want anyway. At least for now..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249 |
The CZ's are fairly heavy. To me recoil is about like a lighter weight .30-06 with stout 180-grain loads. With 286's and Ramshot Big Game, they will run right at 2500 fps out of the longer barrel, meaning the difference between it and the .375 is 14 grains of bullet weight.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,826 |
Sure,
And you could put a governor on an Indy racer too, but who would want to? The whole concept of the 375 is to reach out and kill something very, very, DRT. Like puttin' water in a good double malt whiskey. yuk
Wayne
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 30 |
I love the 9.3. Used it on bison with amazing results and find it has less recoil than 375.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,581 |
|
|
|
|
431 members (10Glocks, 160user, 10gaugemag, 10ring1, 17CalFan, 42 invisible),
17,150
guests, and
1,118
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,885
Posts18,538,419
Members74,050
|
Most Online20,796 04:44 PM
|
|
|
|