|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544 |
I am starting to get muzzle blast sensitive after years of competitive shooting. I now suffer from ringing in the ears and my Doc has suggested curtailing the competition. This is a hard blow but I'll do it. I don't want to give up hunting however and I think the few shots I fire for sight in and hunting would be OK. I've decided to sell my other calibers and settle on one which hopefully has a much reduced sound signature and therefore minimum impact on my ears. I'll of course wear ear protection like I've always done when shooting. I've kind of narrowed down my choices to 2 maybe 3 calibers for hunting mule, whitetail, hogs and maybe the occasional moose. I'm kinda leaning toward the 7mm-08 but perhaps the .260 or the 6.5X55 might be better. My question is - Which of these calibers would have the least muzzle blast or is it so close that it really wouldn't matter which choice?? If thats the case than maybe the 7mm-08 might be the best choice because of the slightly better ballistics and the availability of good 7mm bullets for handloaders. I would be using at least a 22 inch barrel as a platform. Thanks for your input to my question. I'll make the decision based on the general concensus.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,070
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,070 |
PSE,
Welcome to 24hr.
Have you thought about wearing electronic ear muffs ? A buddy of mine wears them while hunting for the same reasons you cite and he is really happy with them. They both amplify sound and cut out loud noises.
Tony.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 732
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 732 |
Hey pse 6.5x55 swede over 26 inch barrel or longer easy on ears but will more than do the job.
Bearbeater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 143
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 143 |
This is a subjective kind of thing, I know. I am also suffering from having "tender ears". Muzzle blast really bothers me these days. Of the few cartridges I have hunted with in recent years, I have noticed that for some reason, the .30-06 is one of the kinder cartridges. It seems to "boom" more than "crack". My absolute favorite cartridge to hunt deer with is the 7mm/08. I am convinced that it is nirvana for whitetail deer hunting. Howsomever, I have noticed that it seems to crack more like one of the 2.5" .357 magnum revolvers I used to shoot. That said, mine is a Remington Mountain Rifle that was ported by its original owner for use by his daughter. I am sure he deafened her. Anyway, I had the barrel lopped off behind the ports, and now I have about 20" of barrel. Maybe a 24" barrel would tame the noise. I have also found the .243 Winchester to be very tolerable to my ears, and the best I have found so far, and this will sound like a band-wagon nomination, has been the .257 Roberts. I came up with one of these in a Ruger 77 just a week before gun season this year. Threw a load together and took to the field. Opening day I took three deer and really never noticed the muzzle blast with any of the shots.
One last thing that may or may not make a difference. When I load for my 7mm/08, I almost always use ball powder, specifically BL-C2 or H335. I don't know if the use of extruded powder would make a difference in the muzzle blast or not, but it is an avenue I have not experimented with.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,593
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,593 |
my dads old 26" barrelled 06 is a pussycat.....
"Chances Will Be Taken"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,057 |
A lot of the noise a rifle makes is from powder burning in front of the barrel instead of inside it. the longer the barrel the more powder you will burn inside the barrel, and the mellower the muzzle blast.
"Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way, you'll be a mile from them, and you'll have their shoes."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,762
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,762 |
I seem to recall hearing the higher the muzzle pressure the louder the blast. I`d think you`re looking for a low pressure round in a rifle with as long a barrel as is acceptible. Maybe a 7x57 in place of the 708 or a 6.5x55 vs the 260 Rem. I would make sure I had the highest rated hearing protection possible to go with the rifle.
I must confess, I was born at a very early age. --Groucho Marx
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time and your government when they deserve it. --Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,781
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,781 |
It seems to me that the smaller the caliber the higher the pitch of the crack. It's those high pitch ones that get to me.
My guess is that something like a .35 Whelan with a longer than average barrel might be a good way to go, depending on the game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,275
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,275 |
Any of the calibers you've suggested would be allright, but the further from your ears the better, try something in a 24in or longer barrel.
the most expensive bullet there is isn't worth a plug nickel if it don't go where its supposed to. www.historicshooting.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,401
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,401 |
Given the 3 choices you mentioned, I'd go with a 7mm-08 and use at least a 24" bbl. A 26" barrel using a fast burning powder should give you low muzzle blast and plenty of pop for deer and hogs....
James
But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines, the commandments of men. Mt 15:9
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 596
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 596 |
PSE, I've yet to see a definitive reference on how to control muzzle blast, ie., something by a doctor or an engineer. I have to believe, though, there are three factors to consider:
1) how much powder you are burning, ie. how much propellant gas you are making
2) what pressure all this gas is when the bullet opens the muzzle
3) how far the muzzle is from you ears
I know 3) is for certain, and the intensity falls off with the square of the distance from your ear. So get as long a barrel as you can possibly take. 28" was an old std., and I can't see any need for a short barrel. If you're using a single shot, consider 30".
Next, pick the caliber you need to do the job at the lowest speed you can accept for the ranges you imagine. The slower you push the bullet, the less gas you need to give the bullet its shove. If you can live with 200 yd, a starting fps of 2200 should do.
Also, use a short, high pressure cartridge. These have the best "expansion ratio" and thus have the lowest muzzle pressure.
For your stated game, I'd recommend the .358 Win with as long a barrel as you can get. Published loads show 3031 and H-4198 give 2200 fps to 250 gn bullets with the lowest weight of powder. For short ranges, the .44 Mag with 300 gn bullets should be relatively quiet and about as effective.
Karl
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,435
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,435 |
PSE,
This may be a shot in the dark, but I would try changing from ball powder in your 7mm-08 to IMR-4064. I know that ball powder meters very well, but I have found them to have an extreme amount of muzzle flash. Many years ago, I remember reading that that was one of the characteristics of IMR-4064. It was developed to have reduced muzzle flash. That just might be your answer. Hope this helps...the9.3guy
"As you walk thru life, don't be surprised that there are fewer people that you encounter seeking truth than those seeking confirmation of what they already believe!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,817
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,817 |
250 savage with a 24" barrel or 257 roberts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,117
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,117 |
6.5x55 with a 23-inch or so barrel. it is just one of those special cartridges that works well with minimum fuss of any kind. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
abiding in Him,
><>fish30ought6<><
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,874
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,874 |
PSE, Welcome to the Campfire. I second exactly what Cheaha said: 7mm-08, 24-26", 140gr. bullets, RL-15 or RL-19. RS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544 |
Many thanks to everyone who replied to my question. There are a lot of good ideas and options. As 2525 said however, there does not seem to be any medical or engineering studies on this subject which I find hard to believe as I think there is a good percentage of middle age shooters that probably suffer from this problem. I'm definately going for the longest barrel I can but the trouble is so many firearms companies only built the shorter barrels in the 7mm-08 or the 6.5X55 which are the two calibers I'm considering. In most cases a 22 inch is about the longest one can buy. I'm thinking of getting a Tikka T3 lite stainless which is available in either of these calibers (the 6.5X55 is a special order however). This will at least give me a barrel length of 22.5 inches. This coupled with moderate loads that burn fast powder should help I hope. Again thanks for the advice and a great welcome for a new guy to this site. I like the attitude here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 85
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 85 |
I am one of those who has lost a large part of their hearing, from both shooting and work place. There are some fire arms that are definately worse than others. 44 mag comes to mind plus all the other pistol ctgs that big or bigger. There is also something about the 270 that seems particularly loud not even to mention the other mags. I have never shot a 6.5x55 or a 7-08. I do know that my 7x57, 257 R, 222R and 250 sav don't hurt my ears if I forget to put in the plugs. I wear plugs or muffs when ever at the range, just forget to put them in sometimes. I would suspect that the 260 remmy would be a whole lot like the 6.5x55. Years ago, I was looking for a 257 R to hunt with and durned near bought husky in 6.5x55 cuz I couldn't find one. Any one of the 3 are good deer ctgs in my opinion
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,435
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,435 |
PSE,
At one time, Rem made the M-700 SS BDL in 7mm-08 with a 24" BBl. Perhaps you might haunt the gun shows and come up with one. Also, the new for '04 CDl has a 24" bbl, I believe. Hope this helps...the9.3Guy
"As you walk thru life, don't be surprised that there are fewer people that you encounter seeking truth than those seeking confirmation of what they already believe!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 223
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 223 |
Hi PSE, 9.3Guy mentions the Rem 700 cdl that just came out, in 7mm-08 with a 24" barrel. I think this is a seriously nice rifle, for a reasonable price. I really want one. Here is a link to info about it: http://www.remington.com/firearms/centerfire/700cdl.htmAlso, for a few more bucks, Weatherby makes all their non-magnum rifles with a 24" barrel, including the 7mm-08. Here is one of them: http://www.weatherby.com/rifles/lw_accumark.shtmlAnd for even a few more bucks, you could just purchase an inexpensive short action rifle (new or used) of the company of your choice and have it rebarreled to whatever caliber and length you'd like, 25", 26", whatever. I hope your find something that works for you. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,225
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,225 |
I'll third the nomination for the new CDL in 7mm-08.
|
|
|
|
164 members (2ndwind, 10gaugemag, 338reddog, 450yukon, 1_deuce, 45_100, 30 invisible),
2,138
guests, and
1,023
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,387
Posts18,469,704
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|