|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473 |
How do the Gold Ring Binoculars stack up against the rest?
I have a opportunity to buy some new 8x42's for $500.00.
I have not read anyone's review here on these bino's on this board.
Last edited by SU35; 10/18/08.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,054
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,054 |
The only review I recall was on the Better View Desired website. $500 sounds pretty good.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,742 |
i would take that and run with it
"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered." ― George Orwell, 1984
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581 |
I have always thought the Gold Rings were very good. However, at the price they are likely the earlier non HD glass. But at that price you would likely be pretty satisfied. One thing about the newer HD is a redesigned eyecup. The original, IIRC, had some complaints about being too big and uncomfortable. Also seems like Phil Shoemakerhas posted here he is working on an article on high end glass, including Gold Rings, that I think is for Successful Hunter, so I'd keep my eye peeled for that. Somebody else at the fire, Luczink, I think, has some earlier Gold Rings and seems to like them pretty well.
Last edited by SteveC99; 10/18/08.
Steve
Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473 |
Thanks for the input!
These are the newer HD Bino's. Buyer needs to sell them, just bought them and then just lost his job.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 518
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 518 |
Thanks for the input!
These are the newer HD Bino's. Buyer needs to sell them, just bought them and then just lost his job.
Buy them! Especially since they are the newer HD version. That is a steal of a deal (assuming of course they are in proper working condition.) I do have the (non-HD) 8x42 Golden Ring and I like it a lot. It currently shares top spot on my list of favorite binoculars with the Porro prism Bausch & Lomb 10x42 Discoverer (a binocular I should never have sold and would buy again in a heartbeat if I could only find one).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473 |
I should buy them, the only thing that puts me off is that they weigh 33 ounces. That's packing more weight than I like around my neck especially for a back pack hunter.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581 |
SU35 Here is a link to a review posted on Bird Forum by a Canadian Hunter (sort of a strange place for a hunting review). http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=103110
Steve
Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,799 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,799 Likes: 1 |
I looked at a pair of Leupolds last year (non-HD model, though) while gathering intel, and found the focus mechanism to be stiff and gritty. It could have been just that individual bino, but it put me off right there. I eventually bought a pair of Pentax DCF ED's (8x43) through Doug at Cameraland. Nice and bright, clear, and lightweight (Pentax's websight lists them at less than 26 ounces)-I really like them, and they ride around in my truck with me, always. If you look at CameraLand's websight, they have NRA show samples for $625, which is considerably less than I paid last year....
Kaiser Norton
The Kaiser- "If it ain't broke, I can fix that!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 81
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 81 |
Steve9C99 That is my review, I also posted it on here as well. They asked me over there to put up a review after the season. I love my 8x42GR HD. They are, for me the best glass I have looked through. I have used them for guiding, hunting, fishing and wildlife veiwing. No problems so far. The bino's come with both a neck strap and an over the shoulder strap. The otsh works with the weight so I do not notice it. For the $$$ I would buy them in a minute. Great glass for a great price. Cheers SS
If you shoot it on your own, they will cook it If you don't, they will feed you something they shot. Which is like having another man change your tire on your truck, NOT GOOD
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 518
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 518 |
I should buy them, the only thing that puts me off is that they weigh 33 ounces. That's packing more weight than I like around my neck especially for a back pack hunter. Sometimes a little extra weight can be a blessing. It helps to keep the image much more stable than is possible with light weight binoculars. You can look to other gear (spotting scope, tripod, rifle, backpack, stove, etc.) for weight savings.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581 |
Sitkaspruce
That is a good review. Now as to why I remembered it there and not here seems to be another matter. The Gold Ring is a binocular that I want to test against the Promaster.
Steve
Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,213 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,213 Likes: 3 |
su, I too am a weight junky. I think we hunt very similarly. I run the leica trinovids. I have tried to lose weight on my bino, but I have been screwd ever since I looked through what I see as the best. good optics are worth the weight to me.
I would not buy something that runs on any kind of primer given the possibility of primer shortages and even regulations. In fact, why not buy a flintlock? Really. Rocks aren't going away anytime soon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,590
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,590 |
I've got the 8x32HD model and absolutely love mine. I don't think they're quite on the level of the Leica HDs, but they're also less than 1/3 the price.
-Dan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,037
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,037 |
I love my Nikon Monarchs and hear great things about the Minox
Your Every Liberal vote promotes Socialism and is an attack on the Second Amendment. You will suffer the consequences.
GOA,Idaho2AIAlliance,AmericanFirearmsAssociation,IdahoTrappersAssociation,FoundationForWildlifeManagement ID and MT.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,819 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21,819 Likes: 3 |
I should buy them, the only thing that puts me off is that they weigh 33 ounces. That's packing more weight than I like around my neck especially for a back pack hunter. Buy 'Em! If you don't like them, I will give you your money back ($500). Just consider me a back up purchaser. BMT
"The Church can and should help modern society by tirelessly insisting that the work of women in the home be recognized and respected by all in its irreplaceable value." Apostolic Exhortation On The Family, Pope John Paul II
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473 |
Great review.
Thanks all for your input!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 961
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 961 |
For the price, and considering they do have FL glass, I think they are definitely worth the $500 that they are being offered for. I would probably buy them too if I were in your shoes.
Having said that though I must admit that the Golden Ring HDs never really appealed to me. The weight isn't an issue as I have used heavier bins before. I didn't have a problem with the focus or the ergonomics. However, there was something about the optics that didn't work well for me. I cannot really put my finger on it. I guess I expected a little better clarity and brightness...something more in tune with the Zeiss FL considering we are talking about Leupold's high end glass here.
..and for what it is worth I have nothing against Leupold. I have owned their Olympics, Cascade roofs, Yosemites and Katmais in the past....
..and, actually, just bought a pair of their Cascade porros to tinker with for a bit.
Have fun with the new bins.
Frank
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,353
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,353 |
I have the 10x42 hd's and love them. I would grab them again and at $500 it would be very easy to dump them if you don't like them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,473 |
I picked up the bin's this afternoon, I ended paying him $540.00 for them.
Worth every penny, boy did I take a quantum step up to a superior view!
I'm no expert on glass but they are far better than I thought they would be or expected.
I appreciate everyone's comments.
|
|
|
|
542 members (06hunter59, 163bc, 204guy, 1lessdog, 2500HD, 1minute, 68 invisible),
2,523
guests, and
1,217
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,787
Posts18,515,869
Members74,017
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|