Home Forums Miscellaneous Topics Talk To Webmaster US military sniper rifles

not really......had offers from VA to send me his personal firearms to try out before buying my own just on my word i would send it back.....all you had to do to gain any trust from ANYONE here was post a picture and couldnt even handle that.....

no, since you've demonstrated countless times that you are a pathological liar, and been the subject of long threads documenting your lies, and have become a forum joke, I'd say you have been completely impeached as a witness.....you have zero credibility here except with your sock puppet buddy oldman. The other 15,000 members know you're a lying sack of [bleep]. That's not attacking the witness without facts, that's impeaching the witness with his own lies. Savvy?

fluff,

yet you want us to believe you on your word alone??? provide proof with a photo....

With my computer settings this thread is 35 pages and counting.

It's not the quantity, it's the quality.

Im glad he has his thread back under control. Probably out searching garage sales for a kettlebell.

Me personally I always thought it was easier for someone to prove they have something (via photo or other means) than it is for someone to prove that something does not exist...kind of hard to take a picture of that.

I imagine the extent of control has something to do with the Thorazine dosage.

roger clemens hgh/ped defense was 'how do you prove a negative?'

didn't work too well for him either.....

Wow, I really hate to see this site slide down to the level of Big Stick's private hell hole of foul mouthed wannabes. Is the picture of ANY rifle so important as to produce all this invective? Seems to me that neither side has any proof so lets move on. Would you guys act this way if you were sitting around the table down at the VFW? There are enough "keyboard thugs" on other gun sites, lets not turn this one into a bunch or grade school kids fighting over the last cookie in the jar.

In any case all Model 70s are good barreled actions hampered by a club of a stock. Yeah I got one in 30-06 and it's a ton of fun with cast bullets and a good backup rifle or loaner.

Lee shouldn't be allowed within 200 yards of a VFW.

This would have moved from the table to the parking lot months ago.

Pretty sure that the confusion on the machine gun ammo comes from the fact that MG "overhead" fire ammo was always the first runs of any lot and inherently more uniform in tolerances. It was always marked as overhead fire ammo also AND THAT is what was normally delinked and used in lieu of match ammo early on. At least that is my 24 years experience in SF and match shooting.

BH

You can claim only so much for so long and continue to refuse any attempt to back it up before everyone calls BS. He could have ended that thread on the second page with a simple photo but got called on it. Even then he refused to back down and implied everyone else was wrong including someone who was working inside the plant.

And then I provided you with the name and phone number of someone at Winchester who also verified that no such rifles existed, even as limited production, non-cataloged items.

I provided the name and number, VA then said it was the same person he spoke to. Or did you conveniently forget this?

Hmm.. somebody who registered on 9/15/09 is referencing Big Stick? Since Big Stick's been gone quite a bit longer than that, makes you wonder who's double registered as oldman?

Hmmmm indeed...


Ingwe

Or maybe he has worms.

Yeah it seems hes got an axe to grind with Stick too....whataputz!

He's a well known moron from other places. Gone by several handles.

Thats a given.....Stick musta really stuck it to him.
LOLOLOL