24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 20 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 19 20
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
H
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,981
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by JacquesLaRami
Did anyone ever consider how many more elk and deer and even trout there would be in the mountains, on public land, if the cattle and domestic sheep were moved down to the prairie where we own our land. Most of those broke ranchers in the mountains that I've seen have helicopter pads, Lincoln and Cadillac SUVs, and hundreds of thousands of acres to graze that they even don't own. But you better have the latest maps and know where you are at or they'll tell you that they own everything for miles every direction -- even if it is BLM or Nat'l Forrest land.

How is a capitalist rancher on private property supposed to compete with that? Especially when they get those leases for nearly nothing and get to "count" their own cattle when they settle the grazing fees. Most of you would be flabbergasted as to the size of the wild herds that could be sustained in the high country if the cattle hadn't of grazed it all off.

About every senator and congressman, state and national, that has come out of this state for a long time is tied to that gov't land, and you hear mostly what is best for them IMO. Wolves are just part of this hype too. It gets in their pockets. Outfitters, will say the same, they hunt those ranches too.

Yeah They want to keep the game numbers high as well, then charge you a $1000 bucks or more to shoot "their" elk, but those herd numbers would be even higher yet if somebody told them not to graze land if it's not worth the going rate that it is on the private property at the bottom of the mountain.




Funny, I ran into said Senator last time I hunted out there. He wasn't very nice, even though his BLM access was paid for.

I think he just wanted to chew some ass, as he had no ground to stand on. We even had his permission in writing.

No schit.

GB1

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,629
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,629
Alpine, rather than go through the whole tiresome point by point thing, I'll let you do your own watching and reading.

Wolves kill 122 sheep in Montana

Save our elk

Feds kill 2 wolves in Oregon


The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. --H. L. Mencken

www.oregonfirearms.org
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,550
JOG Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,550
Casey,

To your point, NW Minnesota has had plenty of controversy over the reintroduction of elk and crop damage.


Forgive me my nonsense, as I also forgive the nonsense of those that think they talk sense.
Robert Frost
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 52,680
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 52,680
Originally Posted by BrentD
Originally Posted by elkhunter76
Funny ...not! I was eluding to the fact that you are full of schitt! Damn straight you ain't my type! You are a liberal and a boy to boot. Sorry to disappoint you but I like women! Funny how you gayboys always refer to that movie. I never heard of it.


Common guy, we all know you are one of those closet types. They always scream the loudest. You just keep up your cover boy. Some guy out there will find you plenty cute (if not to bright).


It is too not to smart azz

funny how you gay boys always resort to insults when someone proves you wrong....have to say if you were to say that to my face, which you won't ...you would be picking up teeth.


Liberalism is a mental disorder that leads to social disease.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by JacquesLaRami
Did anyone ever consider how many more elk and deer and even trout there would be in the mountains, on public land, if the cattle and domestic sheep were moved down to the prairie where we own our land. Most of those broke ranchers in the mountains that I've seen have helicopter pads, Lincoln and Cadillac SUVs, and hundreds of thousands of acres to graze that they even don't own. But you better have the latest maps and know where you are at or they'll tell you that they own everything for miles every direction -- even if it is BLM or Nat'l Forrest land.

How is a capitalist rancher on private property supposed to compete with that? Especially when they get those leases for nearly nothing and get to "count" their own cattle when they settle the grazing fees. When they fill the salebarns with cattle, they knock the heck out of the price of beef, and we had to pay several times what they did for pasture if we lease it. Most of you would be flabbergasted as to the size of the wild herds that could be sustained in the high country if the cattle hadn't of grazed it all off.




Once again Brad, you come through with a truth--most of the larger "ranches" in the Rocky Mountains today are owned by the wealthy who want to play cowboy--and they take advantage of the taxpayer as much or more than the former ranch owners who were just trying to make a living off the land.

Honestly, I would MUCH rather see livestock than coal mines, gas wells, condominiums, ski areas and 10,000 sq ft "cabins" that cost a few million to build. Livestock are easier to manage, and good grazing techniques can minimize impacts to the land.


Casey


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 52,680
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 52,680
I agree with you on that Casey!


Liberalism is a mental disorder that leads to social disease.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,071
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,071
Jacques, interesting points. Glad you and Casey chimed in as I respect both your opinions.

I'm still guessing I'll never fully grasp this debate unless I was right there in the middle of it.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by JOG
Casey,

To your point, NW Minnesota has had plenty of controversy over the reintroduction of elk and crop damage.


You are right--the restoration of large mammals have almost always created opposition and controversy. It's just that there is such a visceral over-reaction to predators, and so much intentional misinformation about wolves.

But how many folks on the Campfire will cheer an illegally killed elk?


Casey


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,550
JOG Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,550
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
But how many folks on the Campfire will cheer an illegally killed elk?


I wouldn't cheer...shoot, shovel, and shut-up. wink


Forgive me my nonsense, as I also forgive the nonsense of those that think they talk sense.
Robert Frost
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,629
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,629
Originally Posted by JOG
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
But how many folks on the Campfire will cheer an illegally killed elk?


I wouldn't cheer...shoot, shovel, and shut-up. wink


Or baste, barbecue, and be quiet. smile


The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary. --H. L. Mencken

www.oregonfirearms.org
IC B3

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,825
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,825
Well, I would take the ranches over mines and ski resorts too, but I would take an all wild, wildlife approach over that, wolves included on public land. Ranchers on private land should shoot 'til their hearts content at them though, wolf populations should be managed on public land as well as all the other wild animals that belong up there.


Too many people buy stuff they don't want, with money they don't have, to impress people they don't like!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,746
T
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
T
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,746
Originally Posted by rkamp
Ironically many hunters are unwilling to subject themselves to such an environment. Too many these days favor high fences and canned hunts.


I think the ironically part is that this comes from a guy from TX.


Camp is where you make it.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35,293
N
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
N
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35,293
Conservation ethics are alive and well at the campfire.

If folks here figure they have a wolf problem in their backyard, well I'm not going to try to tell them they don't.

You Lee24 a page full of stats and accuse the campfire in general of lacking conservation ethics. The truth is there is an ever growing intolerance for a specific protected canine species here. This isn't a flash in the pan hollywood trend. This is real, people are upset, they have been for a long time.

You can choose to revert to your "stats" or you can ask yourself "why are these people so upset?"

The answer is somewhere in the middle.

Me personally, I hope & pray that more states will become envious over funds generated in Idaho & Montana on this years wolf tags.





Something clever here.

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,168
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,168
Originally Posted by elkhunter76
Originally Posted by BrentD
Well, just about as I expected. I see that the hypocrisy on this site continues to rule.

Meanwhile, and for the clueless, wolves were never reintroduced to Minnesota. I know that is a foreign concept to a lot of you, but it might really be true. They have been there for 12-15,000 years, or 6000 for you 'Young Earth People'.

Meanwhile deer have been re-introduced to Iowa along with elk in Arizona and countless other species (turkeys, pheasants, misc salmonids, etc.). Deer and elk are, of course, quite destructive to livestock, timber, crops, automobiles, and humans when they propell themselves at high speed. So, they come at a cost, and many would love to exterminate them for it - or get government subsidies for damages (even better for the socialist farmer/rancher out there). BTW, the Arizona Elk, like the Dakota bighorns are most decidedly NOT the same subspecies that originally inhabited those places.

So, wolves decimate everything in their path and then move on? Interesting. In my lifetime, deer in NE Minnesota where I grew up have exploded in number. While the wolf population has similarly grown. Seems to be no shortage of deer up there, nor wolves. How can that be?

I can see that the future of hunting is really not rosy. Hunters today are not interested in the wild. They are interested in targets. Hunting is not an ethical/emotional pursuit, it is a political objective. And the mouthpieces of the hunting community are doing themselves no favors in ignoring the roots of the game. The Erringtons, Leopolds, Roosevelts among so many others, roll in their graves in disgust.

Brent


Are your eyes brown????


Looking for a brown eye eehhh?

[Linked Image]


"Knowledge is good"
� Emil Faber
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,175
Likes: 7
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,175
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by BrentD
Well, just about as I expected. I see that the hypocrisy on this site continues to rule.

Maybe you should just leave then Brent. You hate everyone here and think that most of us are just [bleep] on your boots...
You contribute nothing but bad vibes... Adios mo-fo...


----------------------------------------
I'm a big fan of the courtesy flush.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,746
T
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
T
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,746
Originally Posted by rrroae
Originally Posted by teal
If you have coyote troubles - multiply their size by 2.5 and IQ by 2. That's a wolf. Now figure out what kind of troubles you would have.


I'd assume my first problem would be with my dogs and then the drop in the deer population.

I'm just trying to understand what you fellas go thru so be a bit easy on me.


Wolves are scary smart. Built for killing. I've seen 2 while hunting but heard several dozen. I don't have a problem with the wolf really, but I have a problem with how they're managed and handled by the government.

I have no doubt that MN, WI, MI, and the other states can handle wolves, but they go unchecked, and then become a problem.

They absolutely devastate the deer population in an area, and then move out to the next.


Camp is where you make it.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by ebd10
Alpine, rather than go through the whole tiresome point by point thing, I'll let you do your own watching and reading.

Wolves kill 122 sheep in Montana

Save our elk

Feds kill 2 wolves in Oregon


In the 80's I worked on what was at the time the largest cougar study ever undertaken.

The study area had approximately 320,000 head of sheep that grazed on it all or part of the year (both public and private land).

On average, approximately 45 head of sheep were confirmed cougar kills (and of course, there were coyote, bear, and domestic dog kills too--and dogs probably kill more sheep than all the wild predators combined).

That works out to roughly 1/10,000 of 1 percent of the sheep population were confirmed as killed by cougars.

But, most of the sheep that were killed occurred in a relatively few number of incidents. But like Lays Potato Chips, the cougars couldn't eat just one. No, they usually had to kill 3, 4, and on occasion 10 ewes at a whack. Those relatively few incidents (aorund a dozen or so) made up the bulk of the 45 average head of sheep killed each year.

You wouldn't know that by the local newspapers scattered up and down the West Slope. When a cougar killed sheep it would make the front page of every newspaper. So on average once a month here would come a headline, reporting multiple sheep being killed.

It gave the impression that the domestic sheep population was being SLAUGHTERED by cougars. But it was only 45 head out of 330,000 sheep. If you think about it, the cougars were probably showing a heck of a lot of restraint--because cougars probably had the opportunity to kill THOUSANDS of sheep if they had a mind to.

Was the study controversial?--you bet! And some of the misinformation, and misunderstanding of the facts by the reporters (kind've like the anti-gun media) was mind boggling to me. I learned a lot how issues like this get out of hand and misinformation takes on a life of its own..........


Casey


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35,293
N
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
N
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35,293
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by JOG
Casey,

To your point, NW Minnesota has had plenty of controversy over the reintroduction of elk and crop damage.


You are right--the restoration of large mammals have almost always created opposition and controversy. It's just that there is such a visceral over-reaction to predators, and so much intentional misinformation about wolves.

But how many folks on the Campfire will cheer an illegally killed elk?


Casey


I know plenty of guys here in NW MN where I live that would cheer an illegally killed elk. We call them farmers.



And I don't understand the term "reintroduction" in regards to the NW MN elk herd????


There are a few herds up here, the grygla herd has a hunt which is a lottery hunt, same with hallock. The DNR constructed a corral years ago & herded elk into said corral as best they could and attempted to "relocate them"

It was a disaster.

Survival rate was poor from the project & those that were actually trailered & transported seemed to find their way back.

My opinion, don't [bleep] with mother nature. don't try to move chit because you feel like playing god, don't put wolves here or elk there... just leave it alone & manage with laws, reasonable laws.


Something clever here.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by BrotherBart
Maybe you should just leave then Brent. You hate everyone here and think that most of us are just [bleep] on your boots...
You contribute nothing but bad vibes... Adios mo-fo...


Stick to beer and football on TV Bart--you know, something you're good at.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,746
T
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
T
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,746
For a guy that hasn't been around long....you're really starting to bore me.



Camp is where you make it.
Page 6 of 20 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 19 20

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

568 members (007FJ, 06hunter59, 10gaugeman, 12344mag, 10gaugemag, 163bc, 55 invisible), 2,940 guests, and 1,241 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,970
Posts18,519,678
Members74,020
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.096s Queries: 55 (0.028s) Memory: 0.9309 MB (Peak: 1.0560 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-18 03:08:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS