Home Forums Miscellaneous Topics Talk To Webmaster US military sniper rifles

Boy, hillbillybear, that must be the highlight of your day, acting tough on the Internet for some trolls.

Hey, leave my family out of it... grin...

C'mon you lying SOB I dare you to do something. Sue me, threaten to sue me or do something besides be a psychotic little peckerwood who hides behind a computer screen.

I have seen enough of your insane horseshit. Put up or shut up.

You missed the part where he was a Navy Seal in 69. 68 was the AMU. 70 was a Marine Sniper.

Maybe that's because you don't know the definition of "implicating". Messes with your thought processes.

so...Lee....what branch were you in, and what years? Really, that should be easy enough to answer?

Well Lee since I have never claimed to be on the AMU I dont really see what there is to say. If you want to prove I have a .243 that is a 1/2moa rifle your free to come up to Sac and watch the matches every month.

The issue at hand is you have claimed in other post to have shot on the AMU at Ft. Benning in 1968. Now you seem to be retracting that and even implicating you were there as a Marine Sniper. Now only minutes lateer you seem to be retracting that as well. If you were either one I would give you the utmost respect, but since you skirt the issue I am left with the suggestion of others that were on the AMU and that is to ignore anything else that comes from you.

" A rifle that does not shoot near the calculated trajectory needs tuning, or it will likely be limited to only one load, because it will throw other loads to another point."

....isn't that just a real peach ?

I need to paste that one up somewhere.

GTC

And why the heck would I freely give out the information your desperately trying to find? It really was not that difficult to find by asking the right people.

"Desperately trying to find" secret information from varmintsinc and a dozen other Campfire trolls who claim to have secret sources. LOL!!

The posts I made here on the thread topic credit the military photographers, the soldiers with their weapons, the military manuals cited, and officers quoted. That's the facts you folks cannot dispute. You just want to argue, but you are firing blanks.

Welcome to the "club" of those who tire of the internet troll. It would be easier to ignore him but he has a habit of getting under your skin with his artful dodging and claims. I think its much harder for those of us who give people the benefit of the doubt when they state things. I was on the fence with Lee for a long time but after enough observation - much of which is on display in this particular thread - I became a memeber of the "picking on Lee club". The guy just plain ole pisses me off with his dodging. It is somewhat entertaining to see him bob and weave questions and his claims.

Well, there are lots of 'whys' that could be asked about ole Lee24 and the spewing, slobbering assoicated with him....but, here's my why. Why not give the man credit where due? He plays y'all like chumps!!

Dude nobody is even on that anymore. This is focused on a simple question. Did you serve in the armed forces, if so what branch? Your the one making all of the claims not me, I lead a pretty simple life and its easy to keep track of.

And as I posted above it was not a secret, all I did was go on another forum heavily participated on by military people and they gave plenty of information on how to weasle you out. The fact that you have done everything they said you would do only futher secures that your a fraud.

You guys never were on the topic. Couldn't be.

That's why the same group of you try to hijack every topic you can't discuss into personal challenges, insults and threats.

Have any of you ever shot at Fort Benning?
Apparently not, because you have to keep asking for help from other web sites. Some help that is.

Gee...I've shot at Ft. Benning...Didn't see you there...

Ingwe

No I haven't shot at Ft. benning and neither have you. You lying SOB.

I INVENTED Ft. Benning !

GTC

I have never shot there or even been there, but I never claimed I have either....and yes I do think it becomes pertinent when the thread is about US military sniper rifles and their ammunition.

Since you are claiming all of the expertise it kind of falls on you to provide some credibility. Like I said the more you waffle on this the worse it gets. And yes it has been a great help, having never been in the service it has been quite educating to have service memebers telling me how to sniff out a fraud and it looks like it worked pretty well.

Rule #1 they offered is that if they are proud of their service they should happily offer their branch, unit and years of service, all of which you have sidestepped completely.

The only facts that count in this thread are the ones about the history of the rifles, which a few trolls are unable to accept or refute.

I really don't care about the personal lives of those who can't discuss the subject matter.

So I guess that is a no, you never served in the armed forces and you were never a member of the AMU. Thanks for clarifying that.