|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,713
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,713 |
Bullets kill.
In these days of the space age premium bullets, its not the cartridge performance that matters so much as bullet selection and trigger discipline.
...new laws were most numerous when the commonwealth was most corrupt. ~ Publius Cornelius Tacitus
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,371
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,371 |
This thread should be a doozy....kinda like Grimms Fairy Tales. Never seen a reasonable cartridge fail to kill well;seen some lousy shooting,but nothing a guy could blame on the cartridge. Exactly....... A couple decades ago if somebody told me a guy could handily kill elk with 243, I would be skeptical............ Casey Seriously? That's all my hunter's ed teacher used....and yes elk too. That was about 40 yrs ago. I'm gettin' old
Steve
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,170 Likes: 17
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,170 Likes: 17 |
Hey, don't remind me of "old"....
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,371
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,371 |
Hey, don't remind me of "old".... Never again....
Steve
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,472
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,472 |
SU35,
I have heard that somewhere as well, but don't remember where and don't know if it was substatiated.
I'm pretty sure it was Jim Carmichael.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,170 Likes: 17
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,170 Likes: 17 |
It probably was. I believe I heard about it on the 'net, but don't usually read OUTDOOR LIFE anymore so probably missed the column. It isn't exactly one of the burning issues among average hunters.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,154
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,154 |
I was raised on a far West Texas ranch on the Mexican Border in the Big Bend Country and the 30-30 was king of the Mule Deer rifles back then, the 300 Savage was a magnum and people envied the 250-3000 user. The 25-35 was every ranch kids first rifle. ......The point is if used properly most any caliber will kill efficiently under certain circumstances...Under controled conditions and at short range the 222 is an excellent deer round, but it can also lead to failure if your careless with placement, same for the 25-35, the shot MUST be in the heart lung as a gut shot is a lost animal, he will go miles. Ray, your post on the 25-35 reminded me of my time in a small mountain community in Colorado, located pretty close to the back fence of the Forbes Trinchera ranch. A lot of the locals had old 25-20 and 22 Hornet rifles which I thought was odd for big game country. Took me about a year to figure out why these non-hunters always had elk and deer in the freezer. A whole lot of don't ask, don't tell there. LOL.
Last edited by Allen917; 02/05/10.
My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 318
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 318 |
I'll submit my experience with the 7mm Rem Magnum. I have yet to obtain a 1 shot drop with this rifle and cartridge yet. Probably just a combination of conditions at the times it's been used, but still frustrating.
Once was at long range with a big muley that just wouldn't go down. I hit him in the front shoulder, the leg was literally hanging there and we tracked him for over 8 hours before catching up to him again. An additional shot in the neck from my 7 Mag, one in the chest from my buddy's .30-06 brought him down but a pistol shot was need to finish the job.
Two other times were with elk at very close range. One was a neck shot the other was a chest shot. Both animals bolted and had to be tracked and brought down with a second shot. In both instances the first shot had gone clean through and exited without hitting bone or vital organs. Bullets used were 175gr. Speer Grand Slams. The only thing we could figure was at such close range with the sectional destiny of the 7 Mag and its velocity, the bullets just zipped through and never expanded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,959
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 21,959 |
Hitting the front shoulder.....leg hanging. Neck shot/chest shot. Since they we're recovered, we have a bullet path, right?
Nicking stuff around the edges the first shot sometimes makes stuff "bulletproof".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
I'll submit my experience with the 7mm Rem Magnum. I have yet to obtain a 1 shot drop with this rifle and cartridge yet. Probably just a combination of conditions at the times it's been used, but still frustrating.
Once was at long range with a big muley that just wouldn't go down. I hit him in the front shoulder, the leg was literally hanging there and we tracked him for over 8 hours before catching up to him again. An additional shot in the neck from my 7 Mag, one in the chest from my buddy's .30-06 brought him down but a pistol shot was need to finish the job.
Two other times were with elk at very close range. One was a neck shot the other was a chest shot. Both animals bolted and had to be tracked and brought down with a second shot. In both instances the first shot had gone clean through and exited without hitting bone or vital organs. Bullets used were 175gr. Speer Grand Slams. The only thing we could figure was at such close range with the sectional destiny of the 7 Mag and its velocity, the bullets just zipped through and never expanded. Well Mosby,it seems you have been just damned unlucky...... Read your sentence above for the key to your problem....you say "in both instances the first shot had gone clean through and exited without hitting bone or vital organs "...... You did not have a cartridge problem, nor a bullet problem,...you had a shooting/placement problem. And "no",bullets started at high velocity don't zip through without expanding. Bullets fired from any cartridge can't kill (at least quickly) unless they hit vital organs. On the ironclad mule deer, you may have broken the shoulder,but you did not get a bullet into the vitals;you now know that deer with one broken shoulder can travel....use a bullet that will break shouders and penetrate vitals,and you won't have the problem
Last edited by BobinNH; 02/06/10.
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,218
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,218 |
High Brass,
I keep hearing the same comment about a bunch of rounds, including the .270 on elk, the .30-06 on African plains game, etc. etc. As if more powerful rounds will make up for bad bullet placement.
I have a little experience with bad bullet placement, just like anybody who has hunted more than somewhat, and have found that a "premium" .338 Winchester or .375 H&H bullet has relatively little effect when put in a leg or behind the rib cage, even on deer. Amazing, isn't it? I've been lucky (so far) that the deer that I've shot with a rifle were hit well. Now I have made some not so good hits with an arrow and a 12ga slug unfortunately. I realiized that the BS about "a 12ga slug will knock 'em down blah blah blah" was just that...BS. Deer can cover a good deal of real estate when they're not hit well, even with a 1oz. slug! I did recover the deer (next morning) but it really highlighted how shot placement is the most important component when it comes to killing game (big surprise). I also, finally admitted to myself that a light weight 12ga slug gun kicks too hard for me. So, I stick to rigs that I can handle these days.
Karma and Trouble have busses, and there's always an empty seat.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567 |
There seems to be an aversion to using premium bullets that don't come apart (Barnes, Swift, Partitions, the new Nosler/Hornady monolythics, Brenekke slugs) and shooting the durned deer/elk/antelope/goat/sheep etc. through BOTH front shoulders. Yea you might lose 5-7 pound of so so meat BUT they fall down on the spot and die right now. No ungulate can run on two legs. Been working for me since I took my first whitetail with a borrowed Model 12 and Brenekke slugs in 1957.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14,076 |
I'll submit my experience with the 7mm Rem Magnum. I have yet to obtain a 1 shot drop with this rifle and cartridge yet. Probably just a combination of conditions at the times it's been used, but still frustrating.
Once was at long range with a big muley that just wouldn't go down. I hit him in the front shoulder, the leg was literally hanging there and we tracked him for over 8 hours before catching up to him again. An additional shot in the neck from my 7 Mag, one in the chest from my buddy's .30-06 brought him down but a pistol shot was need to finish the job.
Two other times were with elk at very close range. One was a neck shot the other was a chest shot. Both animals bolted and had to be tracked and brought down with a second shot. In both instances the first shot had gone clean through and exited without hitting bone or vital organs. Bullets used were 175gr. Speer Grand Slams. The only thing we could figure was at such close range with the sectional destiny of the 7 Mag and its velocity, the bullets just zipped through and never expanded. Stick around here and read lots of threads you will learn a lot. Animal hit in the "vitals" do not travel for 8 hours Bullets don't zipp through without expanding at high velocities.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,702
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,702 |
I always thought the 12Gauge slug was way over-rated as a deer round. I have somewhat limited experience with them, but never been impressed especially once you get out around 75-100 yards.
Lou
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,094 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,094 Likes: 2 |
Cartridges do not kill. Bullets do. On that basis, there is no such cartridge that fits the question.
When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,372
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,372 |
I know we are thinking of �big game� cartridges in this thread but I surprised to not see the 17HRM mentioned. I am a small game and varmint hunter and I am fascinated by the accuracy of the 17HRM. If the critters are small such as �picket pin� ground squirrels, the 17HRM kills very well out to �unreasonable distances.� Larger, heavy bodied critters such as skunks and raccoons are an entirely different matter. The 17HRM, regardless of bullet weight, has not demonstrated and ability to �turn out the lights instantly� for me. I have experienced quicker kills on well muscled varmints using the 50-grain Federal Premium load in the 22 Magnum when aiming at the point of the shoulder or for the opposite shoulder on treed critters, or those hiding in brush. The new light weight 22 Magnum load from Remington has also proven to be quite accurate and a quick killer, although not quite as reliable as the heavier bullet from Federal. I know some hunt prairie dog with the 17HRM and I have assumed they were head shooting as I have read no mention of a lack of killing power.
Last edited by william_iorg; 02/06/10.
Slim
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,237
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,237 |
Bullets dont kill anything unless launched from the part of a total system of which one component is a cartridge, and that is the subject here.
Maybe the ones that dont kill better because of their paper ballistics are the fast big bores. If the 375H&H is good for anything alive, and we have reliable killers in the 416' R's and the 458's, not to mention the Nitro Express rounds, then what do we gain from the high energy figures for the 460 Weatherby besides dislodged shoulders?
One legendary killer is the 22 Hornet - that supposedly only kills well in the hands of Natives in the north, who also magically push up the power of the 222 Remington also.
Honestly the only thing that raises or lowers a cartridge above the line created by the trio of bore, bullet weight, and velocity, is the construction of the bullet itself.
Ignorance is not confined to uneducated people.
WHO IS JOHN GALT? LIBERTY!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567 |
Not impressed with a 12 bore deer slug? You are correct it is a max (ethical) 100 yard proposition by my pal's A Bolt fully rifled 12 bore will put 5 Barnes/Federal sabots in a playing card @ 100 and my 870 with a 24" Hastings bbl and a loopie 1-4 will put 5 Brenneke Golds in 4-5" at 100. Trust me they will kill anything that walks the 50 states within their proper envelope.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 626
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 626 |
My experience with small bores is in the Canadian Arctic, in the hands of my eskimo co-workers, which I had hired to accompany myself on a search of polar bear dens, on month long trips at the time over a period of 4 years. We are talking now about the first 5 years in the 1970's. On those trips they also shot their legal quota of polar bears, their seals and caribou, ptarmigan and arctic hares for our meat supplies. In short we were living mainly of the land with a good supply of bannock, tea, sugar, jam, frozen char ...............and for them lots of tobacco and cigaret paper. They shot polar bears with the .25-06,30-06, 308, 6mm, 243, .222 and one time with the 5mm Remington magnum in the head at 30 yards. The most popular cartridge there were the .22 lr for small game and the odd caribou, the .222 and the .243/6mm. The .243/6mm was regarded as alround suitable from muskoxen/bears to seals. Of the 24 bear kills I witnessed, I believe 2 were shot with the .25-06, about 4 with the 06, three with the .308, the rest were taken with the .222, .243, 6mm . Most bears were in the 250-600 lbs range, with 3 going over that. The largest one around 900 lbs killed with one lucky shots through the carotids with a .308 in a Savage 99.( He was aiming for the head). I remember the larger cals and the number of kills because we did not often carry the larger cals. Eskimos usually bring only one rifle on a hunting trip. The rifle they want to bring is the one that they happen to own or the one that will do for caribou, seals, rabbits and the odd bear. Eskimos have not been pleased by the 06 or .270 due to pelt damage on bears caused by large exit wounds. Bullet weights in those days was picked by the store managers, the eskimos in those days did not know much about bullet types and weights. However the 06 , .308 and also the .303 british were favoured for walrus/narwhal, beluga hunting. Small bores were preferred because seals are still the no.1 game animal hunted. The .222 at the time was considered just fine for seals and the Peary caribou, a small race off caribou turning white with some gray in the winter and about 100-150 lbs on the hoof. If a bear was spotted on the seal/caribou hunt it was persued and shot with the .222. Bears were hunted from the skidoo by chasing and tiring it out until they are exhausted. They are then approached and plinked of in relative safety from the skidoo with one or two good shots in the lungs, heart or brain. Not very sporting, but for the eskimos it is just fur collecting.
I witnessed quite a few kills of caribou with the .22 long rifle using solids. Peary caribou are easily approached to within 50-75 yards. One or two solids in the lungs/heart was sufficient. I never saw them run after the shot,except with heart shots.They usually lowered their heads and drowned in their own blood at the same place as they were shot, usually within 45 seconds, remembering timing a number of shots. Even when they run, it is wide open for hundreds of miles, with nowhere to go. Besides caribou,the .22 lr was mainly used for ptarmigan and arctic hares. Things have changed somewhat now I understand. Some progressive souls have been using the odd.375 or .458 for beluga and Narwhal hunting. Still the .303 with solids reigns king for that game.
Last edited by shrike; 02/06/10.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 32,312 |
The deer I killed with a .22LR both dropped instantly. Head shots. One was sick, the other injured. I'll cop to the cartridge that, to my mind, performed "less" than it's campfire reputation would suggest. 7mm-08. I've killed 7-8 deer with it and had a couple that really ran even well-hit. Just seemed unimpressed with it, they did. I mostly used the 150 NP. In my M7, which had a slowish 20" tube, my MV was lucky to top 2600 fps so that might play into it.
The CENTER will hold.
Reality, Patriotism,Trump: you can only pick two
FÜCK PUTIN!
|
|
|
|
594 members (1936M71, 1eyedmule, 10ring1, 10gaugemag, 160user, 12344mag, 66 invisible),
2,655
guests, and
1,166
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,857
Posts18,497,077
Members73,979
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|