|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,696
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,696 |
I am planing on getting a 44 mag for deer and hog hunting. I want a Ruger Super Blackhawk but I am torn on which barrel length to get 5.5" or 7.5". I have seen some Blackhawks with a 6.5" barrel but they aren't in production anymore.
So what barrel length do you prefer for shots out to say 75 yards and under? Is a 5.5 accurate enough if I do my part or will I need the 7.5"?
Whatever a 7x57 can do a 270 can do better.
True fair chase is you in the woods buttnaked with nothing but your finger nails and teeth.
If you'e fixin' to put a hole in something, make it a hole to remember.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,998 Likes: 8
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,998 Likes: 8 |
I'd take a 5 1/2 over a 7 1/2 any day. I like from 4" to 6" max depending on the gun and caliber
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,567 |
If you are going to ambush hunt with a scope, like from a treeblind, the longer barrel will be an advantage. If you're gonna walk around and shoot irons, the 5.5 would be a lighter carry and work just fine. 300 gr hardcast and 18.5 of H110 is big medicine. Since I live with Mr Griz this is what I pack (because it weighs 26 ounces) An old picture. I now have a "tanker" style holster from El Paso Saddlery that is just a joy. http://www.epsaddlery.com/pc-96-14-1942-tanker-holster-5-12-to-8-38-barrels.aspx
Last edited by oldman1942; 02/24/10.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,090
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,090 |
In a hunting handgun using a .44 mag caliber I want that extra barrel length simply put, less recoil and less muzzle jump period. I have a model 29 Smith & Wesson and used it since the early 70's, great handgun for deer hunting.
Now if your wanting to conceal the weapon, well I use a shoulder holster under a light jacket, not as good perhaps as a 4 inch barrel but a lot easyier to control once you pull that trigger.
Thank Our Veterans! GOD Bless Them All
UNIONS BUILDING AMERICA, SALUTE ALL THE UNION TRADESMAN
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,998 Likes: 8
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,998 Likes: 8 |
You do realize that at less than an ounce per inch there is no way to tell the difference in a 44 mag in recoil. At least I can't
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,667 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,667 Likes: 3 |
I'd take a 5 1/2 over a 7 1/2 any day. I like from 4" to 6" max depending on the gun and caliber
+1, no real reason at all to go over 6". MM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 269
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 269 |
I shoot with iron sights (aperture in the rear, gold bead up front) and really like the greater sight radius that a longer barrel gives you. Someone else mentioned muzzle flip which is another benefit with hard kickers.
Huntin' season yet?
The Freewheeling Tony Smith Gunsmith/Machinist/Engine Builder
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,170
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,170 |
For dedicated hunting I might opt for the 7.5, even do for the Hunter so you can see if a scope is your cup of tea.
For more general carry and hunting I would go for the 5.5.
I have both (my 7.5 isn't a hunter) and I shoot different loads in each. In the 7.5 I shoot a pretty heavy jacketed load and I have used it mostly for hunting from stands.
In the 5.5 I shoot cast lead at about 1000fps. I use it for general woods carry (Bear, Black only where I live, two legged preditors, Deer and small game).
For me there is a very small difference in the range of the two, largely because I shoot the 5.5 much more because the light loads I have it set up for are much more pleasant (and cheaper)
The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this Republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. Coolidge
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,432 Likes: 9
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,432 Likes: 9 |
Shooting out to 75 yards or so I'd give the priority to sight radius over handiness. Given the nature of hunting where things might happen fast, you might be a bit winded, all kinds of things - I'd go for whatever gave me more practical field accuracy over any increase in carryability 2" less barrel might give.
A 7 1/2" barrel isn't any harder to carry than a 5 1/2" IF you're walking. Getting in and out of vehicles, yeah, the shorter the better but the ultimate purpose is to make a clean, accurate shot.
The longer barrel will be a slight advantage as well if you have to make a moving shot.
I've had several .44 Mag's from 4" to 8 3/8", including a couple of Redhawks and Super Blackhawks each in 5 1/2 and at least six 7 1/2 inchers. For a pure hunting weapon the standard 7 1/2" SBH is a dandy firearm.
Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery. Hit the target, all else is twaddle!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,625
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,625 |
mine are 7.5 and are fine but 5.5 is alot more packable and practical in my opinion
DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR
I LOVE MY COUNTRY IT'S THE GOV'T I FEAR
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881 |
I notice a difference between a 6.5 inch Smith 29 and the 8 3/8th's inch models as to recoil. That's because the muzzle jump/rise is less. Between the 4 inch and the longer barreled guns, the difference is much greater. It's a trade off between how you need to carry and what you use for sights. With iron sights, longer is often better unless their is too much weight out on the barrel for steady holding. As a rule, if you are carrying with a shoulder holster, you can any lenth you want. On a belt holster in warm weather, a shorter barrel is alot easier to live with. E
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,570
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,570 |
I have a Rehawk with a 5.5, it works OK, but sometimes I'd like a bit more barrel. I don't know that I'd go 7.5 though, I'd have to see how it feels.
Dale
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,090
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,090 |
Eremicus.....Exactly why I said I like my .44 mag model 29 with 8 & 3/8 barrel. It carries just as easy in a shoulder holster with vertical hang. Drawing it quickly is no problem at all with a little practice.
Now I don't use a scope on this pistol and the longer sight radius is a big plus for anyone who has tried to hit their target at 75 yards or more. I been shooting and hunting with this pistol for over 45 years now and I know what it can do and also what a 4 or 6 inch .44mag will do and I want NO PART of a hunting pistol in the .44mag cal with a 4 inch barrel nor even the 6 inch barrel, just to much muzzle jump.
Last edited by Tonk; 02/27/10.
Thank Our Veterans! GOD Bless Them All
UNIONS BUILDING AMERICA, SALUTE ALL THE UNION TRADESMAN
|
|
|
|
376 members (06hunter59, 1Longbow, 22kHornet, 2500HD, 160user, 1badf350, 32 invisible),
2,487
guests, and
1,083
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,783
Posts18,536,223
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|