24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
T
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
Getting ready to load some 270 win 110 gr Barnes TSX bullets and barnes said to seat the bullets from .030" to .070" from the lands for best performance. I was wondering if anyone has load these bullets yet? I was going to start from .010" off the lands first, then seat the bullet deeper after I find the right powder load. I plan on using Reloader 17 powder. Any suggestions?

GB1

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954
A
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954
They shot good in my .270, but I smaked a deer in the ribs twice with one and he went out of sight..I caught up with him about a mile away from where I shot him and finished him off..both of the shots were in double lung hits, but those bullets didn't seem to do a heck of a lot of damage to be going so fast??? It sorta soured me on using the overly light bullets on big game. I think the 130 barnes X bullets work a lot better, at least for me they have...

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,201
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,201
Safariman and others including myself have found that the TSX's tend to shoot better when seated far off the lands. I would start with it seated pretty deeply and work outwards instead of the other way around. Let me know how that combo works out since I am about get my new .270 soon.
Lee

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,286
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,286
I seat them down to the beginning of the last visible ring.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
T
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
Thanks for sharing some info. I have a 300 win mag using 130gr Tsx seated deep like winmodel70 said with last visible ring showing. With my 243 win they are .018" off the lands.

I just check the max COAL and it's 3.303" touching the lands. Barnes post in their load data 3.240" COL. I might start like .070" and work out. I'll post my results after the weekend.


IC B2

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
T
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
I have a few questions about some loads. Loads that Im testing are 270 win
110gr. TSX bullets using reloader 17, all seated .050" off the lands. Please
look at the pictures attached.

56gr picture: 1st two shots were good (.430"), third kind of a flyer (opened
1.90"). Don't know why?

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y212/trailrider121/56gr.jpg



57gr. Picture: Best group of the three which was .916"

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y212/trailrider121/91657gr.jpg


58gr. Picture: group opened up to 1.950"

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y212/trailrider121/58gr.jpg


Can you help with what would be the best thing to do to close the groups up?

Last edited by trailrider121; 10/05/09.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 154
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 154
If it was me I would load up 3 at 56.5, 57, 57.5. Dont change the seating depth

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 798
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 798
Trailrider,
I have been loading the Tsx and TTsx for about as long as they have been out and for several calibers including the 270 and 270WSM. And like you i started by following the Barnes advice about loading them .050 off the lands. I kept having ver inconsistent groupings so i started testing them just like i do any other bullet by starting at .005 off the lands and seating them deeper by .005 on each loading. To my surprise they began to shoot more accurately and more consistently CLOSER to the lands and each caliber tends to have a range of jump it prefers. I never experienced any pressures issues from the TSXs or TTSxs more than any other bullet by loading them close to the lands and my accuracy improved considerably. Hope this helps,
Bill

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
T
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
Thanks guys. I ended up settling on 57 grs.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y212/trailrider121/DSCF3282.jpg [Linked Image]

Last edited by trailrider121; 09/22/10.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,201
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,201
Nice shooting. What kind of velocities were you getting with those?

IC B3

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
T
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,945
I just got a pro chrono about 3 weeks ago. I should have some velocities soon, I'm guessing around 3350-3400fps.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

538 members (1minute, 1badf350, 270cowboy, 2500HD, 280Jeff, 59 invisible), 2,365 guests, and 1,305 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,170
Posts18,503,147
Members73,993
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.134s Queries: 36 (0.012s) Memory: 0.8430 MB (Peak: 0.9048 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-10 23:05:44 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS