|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 68
Campfire Greenhorn
|
OP
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 68 |
i have been looking a pools of hunters that killed moose showing how many moose taken with what caliber and how long did it take the moose to die and how far it go. one this i dident understand is that the 300 win mag had the shartest distance after the shot with 24m but it had the higher shot taken with 1.9 even the 308 win had 1.4 shots and 270 had 1.6. one thing i never got was that withe the higher velocity dose more damage to the vital organs causing quicker kills. so is a 300 win mag better then the 338 win mag for moose? and if u can can u show me pics of moose shot buy the 300 and 338 or any caliber to compare damage from animal to animal and ur opinion on speed vs slow and heavy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,634
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,634 |
luiss WHERE the damage is is more important than HOW MUCH damage was done. Hoof and hair shots might kill by infection weeks later, but an Aorta cut in two leaves the critter about 7 heart beats.
Also, higher velocity may not create more damage than lower. It is all about bullet construction, and again, where the damage is done. Especially with moose the bullet needs to dig deep to find vitals.
The smaller cartridges often scare folks less so they shoot them better. A 243 in the right place is better than a 338 in the wrong place.
1) Shot placement 2) bullet construction 3) cartridge
That is how I would rank the factors involved in killing quickly. art
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704 |
Check out the Scandinavian "moose" shooting studies -- they've been doing it a long time. They've received slightly better results over the past 50 years or so with 6.5x55 rounds -- like Art, I suspect from good shooting more than "good" bullets.
This whole concept is very simple -- a good bullet at a decent velocity fired accurately at a reasonable distance will work better than a heavy fast bullet fired poorly, particularly one at long range, every single time. It's just that simple.
Dennis
"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."
"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."
"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,391
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,391 |
Listen to what these guys have said and don't overthink the caliber to much . You can analize it to the cows come home. The bottom line is you have to put the bullet in the right place . Sitka deer's wife has killed brown bear with a 7mm-08 because she put it where it neeeded to go at a reasonable distance. A 308 will kill anything in North America at appropriate ranges if you do your part. Focus more on the hunt and knowing when to take the shot not the cartridge.
I Kill Things......deal with it..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,634
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,634 |
Well, she hunted brown bear with her 7-08, but the only bear she killed was a black bear... Aside from that I agree fully.
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
I have killed moose with 6.5 X 55 Swede, 7mm-08, 30-30 WCF, 30-06, 340 Weatherby, 45-70, 375, 358 Winchester, and seen many shot with the 300 Win Mag and also some with 223, 6mm, and 308. They simply die when shot lethally. A light caliber works best if you've got the best bullets possible, ie: penetrators over expanders. Heavier calibers; any adequate bullet will work. Moose fall down when major somethings supporting them get broken or decommissioned. Otherwise they are pretty good at soaking up energetic impacts regardless the caliber or bullet. They eventually get weak; then they fall down. A 300 Win mag is a great caliber, so is a 338. A 30-06 is excellent as well. Smaller cartridges may have penetration problems if the distances get longer even with excellent bullets. Don't discount the massive nature of the northern North American moose. But don't waste a lot of time fretting over what will work or won't. If you've got a 30-06 or similar, load it with 180, 200, or 220 Partitions, or 165-180 GMX or TSX and you're good to go, even if they'll only shoot 2 MOA in your rifle. Don't worry about the killing. Think instead about the cutting and transporting. That's the part that can get worrisome.
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 330
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 330 |
The .338 is about the same speed as the .300 with the .180 and .200 grain bullets. I would say the .338 would be better than a .300 but the .300 is plenty for Moose.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736 |
Don't make this harder than it is. You don't NEED a "magnum" cartridge to hunt moose. A cup and core in the right place is better than a premium in the wrong place. But a premium bullet in the right place is even better.
Furthermore, a moose needs a little time to understand he is dead.
My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,521 Likes: 4
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,521 Likes: 4 |
... WHERE the damage is is more important than HOW MUCH damage was done. Hoof and hair shots might kill by infection weeks later... This generally is true, but I carefully dip my hunting bullets in a fast-spreading flesh-eating bacteria. It usually will drop the animal within minutes even with a hoof/hair shot.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,634
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,634 |
Good luck eating that!
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,554
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,554 |
Nothing wrong with the 300WM or the 338WM but as what was already stated, you don't need a magnum to kill moose. I've shot moose with the 300WM, 375 H&H, and my favorite M70 in 270. All of them were killed using Nosler Partitions and not ever went more than 20 yards and most were DRT. Shoot whatever you feel most comfortable with and put the bullet where it counts and you'll have a dead moose.
That's ok, I'll ass shoot a dink.
Steelhead
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,231 Likes: 25
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,231 Likes: 25 |
Placement, Bullet, Cartridge is the mantra to follow. Worrying about or even considering tenths of shots: ...it had the higher shot taken with 1.9 even the 308 win had 1.4 shots and 270 had 1.6. is meaningless. Lies, damn lies and statistics.
If you take the time it takes, it takes less time. --Pat Parelli
American by birth; Alaskan by choice. --ironbender
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,231 Likes: 25
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 86,231 Likes: 25 |
If you take the time it takes, it takes less time. --Pat Parelli
American by birth; Alaskan by choice. --ironbender
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,539
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,539 |
One saying that I live by when shooting KS whitetails is "shoot 'em high and watch 'em die". Spine/neck shots will drop any deer type game in its tracks. A .250 Sav will kill deer, elk, caribou, and moose like Thor's hammer if shot high. If you shoot over, no tracking.
|
|
|
|
596 members (10gaugemag, 01Foreman400, 12344mag, 007FJ, 06hunter59, 1234, 61 invisible),
2,337
guests, and
1,258
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,265
Posts18,486,514
Members73,968
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|