24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 13 14
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,748
M
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,748
he says ".270-08" again, someone slap him in the sack.

GB1

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,066
M
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,066
The comparison is rigged in favor of the 270.

Your comparing a bullet with a good BC in the 270, to different style bullet with a relatively low BC in the 7mm.

If you want to do a reasonably fair comparison, put a .277" 130gr Corlokt (BC .336) against a .284" 140gr Corlokt (BC .390) and see how they stack up.

Or A .277" 130gr NBT (BC .433) vs a .284" 140gr NBT (BC .485) and compare ballistics.




That said, the newer lightweight monometal bullets for the 6.8 SPC would surely make the 270-08 a fast stepper.


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
Originally Posted by HUNTS
I want the 5 minutes of my life back that I just wasted reading this thread.


You must be one hell of a speed reader, it takes a week to read 65BR's posts much less the thread



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,810
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,810
65BR,

If it alright with you, I'll have an orange.


laissez les bons temps rouler
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by HUNTS
I want the 5 minutes of my life back that I just wasted reading this thread.


You must be one hell of a speed reader, it takes a week to read 65BR's posts much less the thread


Your (bad) choice. The solution is easier than the effort and angst involved in bitching. There are sites where no one says anything that isn't worthwhile. You should be cautioned that your query back in November may have only one response however.


Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
IC B2

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,661
Originally Posted by 65BR
Now for the Loony types who have kept up w/my thread here on the Opportunity for Winchester to go head to head against Remington's 7mm-08.

We can crunch numbers all day long w/bullet weights but let's stick to common weights deer hunters use in the 270 - the 130, and 7/08 users run - the 140.

I ran some numbers w/various bullets per someone's proposal on ammo choices that I agreed with on loads to intro a new round in 270-08.

130 ~ 2950 mv
110 ~ 3200 mv
85 ~ 3400-3500

Granted Speed sells and if one wanted to use the lighter two bullets to impress in Muzzle Velocity, it may be great for marketing, here is how I see pitting a 270-08 against the 7/08 Real World comparison.

A 270 is a known killer on deer, and in a package wrapped up Short like the famous 308 Winchester, yet w/o Magnum recoil. Hence the 270-08.

We can call it any of the below, OR whatever the marketing guru's decide:

270 WPE Winchester Pony Express (yeah, just use your rider on a horse logo)
270 SS Pony Express (Super Special " ")
270-08 Winchester Express

Yada Yada Yada

Now you Loony types here, let's assume how I see Real World Use.

Guy grabs a 7mm-08 for deer hunting, plans to run factory ammo, and says to his self, "140 grain is THE bullet weight - perfect on deer, and the Corelokt is proven - THE way to go."

Ok, let's also consider the 270/130 is THE standard load that made the 270 Winchester popular.

Let's Compare what a NEW round like a 270 Pony Express would look like, directly against a 7mm-08 Remington 140 Corelokt load. Assume both 24" test barrels.

270-08 with 130 gr. Nosler Accbond at 2950 fps. This is Speed/Energy/Drop w/200 yds Zero. Ballistic Coefficient is .435 and Sectional Density .242 for load.

270/130 Accbond/ 2950fps: (Winchester 270-08 130 gr. Ballistic Silvertip!)

Muzzle 2950 2512
100 1.6 -6 2736 2161
200 0.0 0 2533 1852
300 -7.0 9 2339 1579
400 -20.4 19 2154 1340
500 -41.3 32 1977 1129

Now take the 7mm-08 Rem w/140 Corelokt at Factory Specs. B.C. is right from Remington catalog online - .390 and S.D. is .248. Published specs are:

Velocity (ft/sec)
Cartridge Type Bullet Muzzle 100 200 300 400 500

Remington� Express� 140 2860 2625 2402 2189 1988 1798

Energy (ft-lbs)
Cartridge_Type Bullet Muzzle 100 200 300 400 500
Remington� Express� 140 2542 2142 1793 1490 1228 1005

Long-Range Trajectory
Cartridge Type Bullet 100 150 200 250 300 400 500

Remington� Express� 1.8 1.6 zero -3.1 -7.8 -22.9 -46.8

Ballistic Calculator used for first example above shows the 7/08:

7mm/140 Corelokt/2860 fps

Muzzle 2860 2543
100 1.8 -7 2627 2145
200 0.0 0 2407 1800
300 -7.8 10 2198 1501
400 -22.8 22 1999 1242
500 -46.6 36 1811 1019

So what I see is a round that offers BETTER ballistics than Rem's 7-08 baby w/hallmark 140 Corelokt ammo, with LIGHTER recoil. One might give up 100 fps in the 'Pony Express' 270-08 vs. a 270 Winchester, both in 130gr loads, BUT gains a handier short action rifle smile

In addition, a 110 Accubond and/or Barnes can run around 3200 mv to impress speed freaks, AND flatten deer, with less recoil yet.

AND you can go one step further for lighter recoil and use an 85 TSX Barnes at 3400-3500 (max) or less, and kill deer all day long to a good 300 yds or so, which MOST beginners likely won't shoot 1/2 or 1/3 that far as their mentor's will set them up on closer shots often times starting out.

Lastly, a Sierra 90 gr. HP can be factory loaded to Devastate varmints like coyotes at 3400-3500 fps.

SO gang, HERE you have it.

A round that from inception will DELIVER the goods unlike the 260 that was spec'd at 2750 w/140 and upon introduction, ran about 2550 mv w/first ammo production, getting the 260 off to a horrible launch, besides which USA hunters/buying public as a whole never has been much interested in the 6.5mm/264s though it's slowly turning.

There is NO arguing the fact that the 270 is known as a great flat light recoiling deer round. Many view the 243 as a flat varmint and crossover dual purpose deer round, and IT IS, and a great one on deer WITH proper bullets. Yet History shows the reputation for MANY, or Perception of the 243 on deer is lackluster.

The 308 Winchester - it stands on it's own for killing, yet it has MORE recoil than a 243/100gr load, 260/130-140 load, 7-08/140 load as it typically drives 150-168gr bullets for loads commonly chosen by deer hunters, and it even kicks more than a 270 Winchester 130 grain if not mistaken.

YET, if Winchester were So inclined to come out with a PRACTICAL SENSIBLE NON MAGNUM light recoiling flat shooting deer killing cartridge, I honestly believe a 270-08 makes ALOT of sense compared to the above rounds.

Recall Remington long ago comparing the 7/08 to the 280? Or how about the 260 to the 270 Winchester?

Well I think a campaign to compare the 270 in a short action 308 case sized platform is long overdue.

What say you Winchester? Wanna play to win?

OR do you want to see Rem spin off the 6.8 SPC and do a NEW round like their 6.5 and 7mm version on YOUR 308 Winchester baby?

Remington would likely go with the name 6.8mm -08 to keep the 6.8 name in the limelight pushing the SPC round for AR/M-16 platform, while positioning a 6.8mm -08 in bolts/levers, single shots, and Non-AR semi-auto's.

From one Loony, I can say I won't buy or use a 6.8mm ANYTHING (just don't like the name personally), but if a 270-08 WINCHESTER hits the market, then I will be using. In fact, I am sure Winchester will send my the first prototype/production along w/ammo for a thorough testing, and send me off to some exotic hunts to prove it's worth!

The future will be interesting to see if Winchester OR Remington will do a 270-08!

Now here comes my 'Shellacking' LOL smile

BTW, if Winchester Management wants to hire me to run Marketing, send me a PM. Seriously! Otherwise, I will send you a bill for my INNOVATION in Profitable Product Design complete with full Marketing Campaign wink Contact me and we will hammer out the final details of my employment contract and my current and future marketing ideas.

Oh come on guys�this is good stuff. This is the essence of a rifle loony. Look at all them words�it�s gotta be true!!

Actually 65, you do make a good case; bout as good as a case for a .280 over a .270 (or by your logic, a .270 over a .280)�I mean, there are guys who will go to their grave actually BELIEVING there is a difference. I have nothing against �em�but don�t try to convince me.

Smack �em in the right spot, and cartridge rarely matters. Sometimes bullets matters, but much less than rifle loony�s would have you believe.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,248
C
Con Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,248
65BR,
Don't bother trying to convince me ... I'm planning to build one at some stage. You can load for it with 7mm-08 dies with the expander plug removed by the way. In Victoria, Australia ... deer hunting for Red and Sambar deer requires a 277" minimum, 130gr minimum and 2" case or longer. Thus the legalities assist it, though the steep/heavy terrain tends not to.

Here's why it wont be done ... your domestic manufacturers are now inclined to release ammunition with 'premium' on it ... ammunition cost will kill it when it comes to the average shooter/hunter. If you can market it with a dirt cheap load, it will take off amongst non-reloader types. A positive is that a regular 130gr cup/core designed for the 270Win will most likely do exceptionally well anyway in this cartridge. Keep price of ammunition down, it will get bought. I'd be inclined to have its ammunition production outsourced entirely to say PPU who make both a cup/core 130gr 277" plus 308 sized bras in 243Win, 7mm-08 and 308Win. And you know how much Americans like out of country sourced products.

Reloaders will not buy a plethora of hedastamped brass, they'll neck up 243Win/260Win or neck down 308Win/7mm-08 ... this was evident in Australia with 338Federal and 358Win ... I don't know anyone with a quantity of headstamped 338Federal or 358Win brass

In a Model 7 or Winchester Featherweight with light contour 22" barrel, or a Tikka T3 ... I'd be all over one like a rash.
Cheers...
Con
PS: The 338Federal whilst 'still-born' to some degree is an amazingly efficient performer. I correspond with a few local shooters that use it and all report favourable outcomes despite the lack of recoil and blast ... even in lightweights like the T3. Animals taken have included scrub cattle, camels, small, medium and large deer, pigs, goats etc... When you get over the 'awe' at being pushed by a 338WinMag and having your ears hammered to see 4 feet of your victim in the air when you've recover from the recoil ... the virtues of the 338Federal start coming out when the very same animals are being killed just as well without the fuss at the gun end. grin The 358Win is exactly the same ... i know of three family members hunting the same animals over hounds with 358Win, 35Whelen and 338WinMag ... the 358Win in a BLR with 200gr Hornady spirepoints is the kids starter rifle, but over the course of time its equally as effective as the larger cartridges but there's no shock and awe and bravado in shooting a pea-shooter like a 358Win. grin

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,401
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,401
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
The comparison is rigged in favor of the 270.

Your comparing a bullet with a good BC in the 270, to different style bullet with a relatively low BC in the 7mm.

If you want to do a reasonably fair comparison, put a .277" 130gr Corlokt (BC .336) against a .284" 140gr Corlokt (BC .390) and see how they stack up.

Or A .277" 130gr NBT (BC .433) vs a .284" 140gr NBT (BC .485) and compare ballistics.




That said, the newer lightweight monometal bullets for the 6.8 SPC would surely make the 270-08 a fast stepper.



Or better yet, the .277 130 Accubond vs. the .284 140 Accubond (since Federal loads both)...


“There are some who can live without wild things and some who cannot.”
ALDO LEOPOLD
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,477
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,477
6BR,
Between 6.5 and 7mm lie copious versions of commericial chamberings that are ideal for deer-sized game, but that still won't stop the creation of more wildcats - guys love to tinker.

The flip side is that they don't necessarily create profit-making opportunities for gun companies.

Two different realities.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 199
9
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
9
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 199
what's this thread about?,,,

The .270 Savage?


"If the American flag was a rifle cartridge, it would be a .30-'06"

"The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition" Robert Ruark...
IC B3

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,893
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,893
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Reloder28
65Br,
In comparison, there is no reason for the 270/08 to have been ignored this long.




And what reason would there be for its existance?


For those who desire to hunt with 130 gr .277 bullets in a short action gun that's not a magnum. Pretty simple.


"I never thought I'd live to see the day that a U.S. president would raise an army to invade his own country."
Robert E. Lee
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,978
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,978
Originally Posted by Reloder28
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Reloder28
65Br,
In comparison, there is no reason for the 270/08 to have been ignored this long.




And what reason would there be for its existance?


For those who desire to hunt with 130 gr .277 bullets in a short action gun that's not a magnum.

And are totally ignorant of the ballistic advantages of a good 140g 7mm-08 load..

Pretty simple.


There, fixed that for you.. grin


To all gunmaker critics-
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.."- Teddy Roosevelt
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
Originally Posted by Reloder28
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Reloder28
65Br,
In comparison, there is no reason for the 270/08 to have been ignored this long.




And what reason would there be for its existance?


For those who desire to hunt with 130 gr .277 bullets in a short action gun that's not a magnum. Pretty simple.



The term WSM tripping you up?




I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
Originally Posted by jim62
Originally Posted by Reloder28
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Reloder28
65Br,
In comparison, there is no reason for the 270/08 to have been ignored this long.




And what reason would there be for its existance?


For those who desire to hunt with 130 gr .277 bullets in a short action gun that's not a magnum.

And are totally ignorant of the ballistic advantages of a good 140g 7mm-08 load..

Pretty simple.


There, fixed that for you.. grin


And that too.....+1



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,893
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,893
Jim 62: I do not disagree. I happen to be partial to 7mm's.

Jwp475: I happen to like WSM's as well. I bought my son-in-law a 7 & mine is a 300. Really like it. It is my primary hunter.

THe 260 Rem is a relatively new commercial offering. I thought it unnecessary myself since the 6.5 x 55 is so proven. Evidently there are those who liked it enough to move Rem to make it.


"I never thought I'd live to see the day that a U.S. president would raise an army to invade his own country."
Robert E. Lee
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274
I think this suggested cartridge is one of those where, if you stumble across a good rifle in the caliber, at a good price, it will work nicely - but you wouldn't really go out of your way to obtain one. Sorta like a drilling I saw today, with the rifle barrel in 9.3x72R, and a very reasonable price. A 9.3x72R isn't something I'd build in a new rifle, but it in a drilling it would do the job on deer.

I have a good light rifle in .308. If I wanted something faster/flatter shooting in a light rifle, I'd probably look for a .270 WSM, or belly up to the bar for a .270 Win, Roy, or 7mm mag.


"...the designer of the .270 Ingwe cartridge!..."

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908


The 9.3X74R will do the job on Cape Buffalo



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
S
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
S
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
Loaded with W760 or H414?


"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,908


Jack used IMR 4064 in his 9.3 and Shawn used IMR-4350 in his and they both took Capes without a hitch



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Now that's funny right there, that is:


JWALL


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Page 3 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 13 14

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

614 members (1eyedmule, 163bc, 06hunter59, 1936M71, 10gaugeman, 69 invisible), 2,596 guests, and 1,335 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,716
Posts18,475,621
Members73,941
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.143s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9119 MB (Peak: 1.0933 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-28 23:04:15 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS