Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Palins Speech this morning

does anyone here think she shoul appologise or at least put a spin on her websight?
The one with the crosshairs on Giffords?
And the statement to " reload" below?

I know she tried to explain it as a surveyors sight...
but does anyone think that?

Guy named Matthew Scully has worked with her in the past.

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1838808,00.html

She also uses one of Al Gore's former speechwriters.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/02/palin-hired-former-gore-speechwriter-for-big-speech/

I imagine she does as well though perhaps not. If she does, Barry would be well served to hire him/her and fire whomever he's used for the last 2 years.

I don't. If anyone thinks she was literally calling for anyone to be shot it is THEIR problem. If we apoligize to everyone with such twisted perception it would be all we ever did. Actually.... we are halfway there now.
She probably ought to just have on her website a generic blanket permanent apology for anyone she ever has or ever will offend and be done with it.

Great speech. The Jug-eared Kenyan in office should have been the one delivering such a fine speech like this imo, not Sarah. He should have stepped right up (like he did for Hasan) and tried to calm the political discourse. Of course there's no chance of that happening as Loughner is a white male and must have been crazed by the right.

Sarah nailed the speech and did great.

Wook

I'm really a little too angree to say how I feel about these "people" who can only look at a tragedy as a political oportunity to degrade someone else. I do have to ask, though, that Redneck please stop libeling our poor skunks.

Sarah said it quite well this morning.

she's sure getting the pub, anyway

As a land surveyor, I can tell you that there are cross-hairs in the total station instruments commonly used in the profession.

Does she finish the thing or get up and quit at about the 4 minute mark?

Only caught a few sound bites, and thought she expressed herself well.

!

Dang! That was good! For the record, she finished.

Wook

MSN has a about 9000 comments on her speech and the tenor of them is filled with hate. I posted my thoughts supporting Sarah and hard to believe they haven't posted them. Feel free to leave a comment of your own and try to vote.

http://politics.newsvine.com/_question/2011/01/12/5822380-vote-weigh-in-on-palins-reaction?gt1=43001

I know that as well.
Do you think Sarah did ( before Sat)?

I am amazed at how strongly the lib media is vilifying Palin over this single term, "blood libel".

It's as if the rest of her speech never existed to these people. They are in a positive frenzy! It's amazing. Simply amazing.

Their hate has blinded them to anything else!

Great speech, writer or not.

She loves her hyperbole. "Blood libel," "death panels," she is great as this stuff. Or at least her puppeteers are good at it....

The "blood libel" was designed to get everybody in a tissy, and not pay attention to Bam Bams speach.

Genius.

And who has their hand up your ass making you talk and type?

BP...