|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 413 |
Any idea why this is? If I try to look through them for more than about 20 seconds at a stretch my eyes start hurting. I have an older set of Weaver Classic 8x42s that don't have this problem. When I took them to Yellowstone a couple years ago, I could glass with the Weavers for extended periods of time, and my eyes were fine. Do I just have them focused wrong, or should I just get a different binoc? I love the size and weight of the Yosemites, since they are light enough that I will actually lug them around the NH woods (call me a sissy if you want ). The Weavers are a bit too husky to comfortably lug around all day, and an 8x42 is more than I really need or want for the type of hunting I do.
This isn't 'Nam Donny, there are RULES...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,581 |
Might be out of collimation. Eye strain is the symptom of this. Return and try another pair. http://dictionary.babylon.com/colimation/
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,209 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,209 Likes: 1 |
When my eyes hurt I look through my 6x Yo's and it makes everything feel better!
Send that pair back!!!
Quit giving in inch by inch then looking back to lament the mile behind ya and wonder how to preserve those few feet left in front of ya. They'll never stop until they're stopped. That's a fact.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,246
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,246 |
Make sure you are looking through the right end..... +1 on the collimation, as I had an older set of Leupolds that had to go back. They were killing my eyes, as compared to the view through an "normal" example of the same binocular.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,055
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,055 |
Give up on them immediately and use something else
- talk to your dealer or Leupold
and consider reading the now somewhat aging book on optics by John Barsness on Optics for the Hunter in which the suggestion is made repeatedly that one of things extra money buys is ruggedness - and porro designs are inherently less rugged and so more likely to go out of alignment that is lose collimation.
Consider the 6x32 Katmai - current production is phase coated and improved over first production - for a replacement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,489
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,489 |
Sounds like a focus problem. Used my 8x this weekend and I really enjoy them. Handy and light, but clear.
stumpy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 817
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 817 |
Give up on them immediately and use something else - talk to your dealer or Leupold
and consider reading the now somewhat aging book on optics by John Barsness on Optics for the Hunter in which the suggestion is made repeatedly that one of things extra money buys is ruggedness - and porro designs are inherently less rugged and so more likely to go out of alignment that is lose collimation.
Consider the 6x32 Katmai - current production is phase coated and improved over first production - for a replacement. That's a bit harsh. Sure roofs are inherently more rugged than porros, but porros aren't weak or flimsy by any means. I own lots of good binos including roofs (8x42 Pentax DCF & 8x42 Leica Ultravids and porros (6x30 Yosemite, 7x50 Fujinon MTRC, 8x32 Nikon SE and 10x42 Nikon SE). The only one I ever had to have recolimated were the Pentax DCF roofs. I don't take that as evidence that roofs are weaker, just that this pair got knocked out of alignment. The 6x30 Yosemites are very well respected, they are tough, waterproof, have adjustable eyecups and optics way-way beyond what their price would indicate. I'm sure the OP wouldn't go wrong with 6x32 Katmai's, but the Katmai's are more expensive and I wouldn't presume to tell a stranger how much he can afford to spend. Leupold will certainly fix his Yosemites for free and they should give him years of good, trouble free use as mine have. John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,380 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,380 Likes: 1 |
send them to Leupold - they are out of collimation. Leupold will fix them for free and return them to you for no charge.
drover
223 Rem, my favorite cartridge - you can't argue with truckloads of dead PD's and gophers.
24hourcampfire.com - The site where there is a problem for every solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 410
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 410 |
out of collimation. or the IPD is not adjusted to your eyes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 413 |
Thanks for the help guys! I don't have them in front of me now, but I will snag them later, play with the focus some more, and if that doesn't work I will send them back to Leupold.
This isn't 'Nam Donny, there are RULES...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 817
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 817 |
I assume you already had the focus under control, so it's probably collimation. One way to test collimation is to move one tube way out of focus with your diopter, then focus on a star with one eye closed, open the other eye and you should see a sharp pinpoint, the in-focus star, within a larger blurred, out-of-focus star. If so the collimation is good, if the two are slightly offset, then the collimation is bad.
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 413
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 413 |
I played around with the focus some more today, and couldn't get the thing any better, so I am going to give Leupold a call and see what they want to do with them.
This isn't 'Nam Donny, there are RULES...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581 |
Go look at a power line with the binocular. Move the glass away from your eyes so you are looking through the exit pupils. If the line seperates in to two lines or a broken line, or if you can't get it to show a straight line at all, then the collimation is shot.
Steve
Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881 |
I'd test them as Steve suggests. The other thing is that the little Leupolds are a very light glass. With 8X magnification, any binocular that light will be tough on the eyes, especially if used from standing. That's why I will not buy them in 8X, only in 6X. While I think very highly of the 8X Katmais, I won't have one in anything but 6X as well for the same reason. E
|
|
|
|
521 members (222Sako, 10Glocks, 219 Wasp, 21, 1minute, 1OntarioJim, 54 invisible),
2,389
guests, and
1,204
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,432
Posts18,489,316
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|