24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 176
W
wmwise Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
W
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 176
Howdy Guys, Well I am looking for some input. I am thinking of building a Varmint/Target rifle based on the Ruger #1 with a heavy barrel with a 1 in 9 twist. Have decided on a 22-250 Rem or the 220 swift. Looking for some input of what you guys think is the better round and why. I reload so ammo will not be a problem.

Thanks
Bill


DE OPPRESSO LIBER
SUA SPONTE
GB1

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,568
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,568
I've shot many 22-250 and 220 Swifts over the years. They are both great choices for varmints. The critters you shoot won't ever know the difference when hit with either round. The Swift has an edge in velocity by a small margin. With reloading, the main thing I've found between the 22-250 and the Swift is that to get good accuracy in the 22-250, I often have to back off the loads to a reduced velocity. Unlike the 22-250, I've found with the Swift that I can get good accuracy without giving up velocity. I shoot some pretty stiff, (safe) full house loads out of the Swift and get great accuracy too. This hasn't been the case with the 22-250. I've always found I needed to back off the loads in the 22-250 to get tight groups. That is my experience based on my personal loadings of both rounds over the years. So take your pick, flip a coin, but if I had to pick between the two, it would be the Swift.

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
V
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
V
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Go with the Swift, just 'cause it's there.

You're already going with the #1, and there's a non-typical choice on your part (classy, but non-typical); so mate it with a similar round.

The .220 will do everything a .22-250 will do, plus give you an extra gear if you ever want/need it.

Which is better is irrelevant; either will certainly do the job it's asked to do. The fact that you're considering the .220 likely says where you're leaning and you should go for it based on that.

BTW - You should also make sure to alert the local vermin population to stay WAY WAY down range. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />




Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
D
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
The 220 Swift is still king of the 22's, even with the new whizbang magnums. I have always wanted a Swift just because it is not that common.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,718
2
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
2
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,718
Well said. I'll second it.
222

IC B2

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,846
Likes: 6
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,846
Likes: 6
wmwise,

I have owned and shot both chamberings, albeit the Swift far more than the 22-250. Both are great rounds. I would lean toward the Swift. It is interesting that you have chosen a 1 in 9 twist. Are you planning to focus on using the heavier bullets, 55 grains and up? The traditional twist for the Swift is 1 in 14, which is probably why mine won't group anything heavier than 55 grains very well. If shooting bullets heavier than 55 grains is your goal than I would definently go with the Swift. It would be interesting to have a 1 in 9 Swift to play around with. Good luck. Mart


Chronographs, bore scopes and pattern boards have broke a lot of hearts.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 45
F
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
F
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 45
1 in 9, eh? I've given this a bit of thought myself. I shoot the Swift and 22-250 both. I prefer the Swift, but my 22-250 dosen't stretch cases as bad. Another angle to consider, not many Swift shooters around.....Keeps my 22-250 shooting buddies from "borrowing" my ammo!!!

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,619
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,619
Look at the numbers of factory ammo. Some are pushing the 22-250 faster than the Swift. Assuming the printed numbers are correct
http://www.winchester.com/products/catal...=1&action=1


I am one gun away from happy
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,619
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,619
PS I have a #1 in each caliber so I am not prejudice
http://photos.ohioglockers.com/Toy-chest/22_250_220_Swift


I am one gun away from happy
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 568
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 568
If you are handloading then it makes little difference what the factory ammo does.
I have a 220 Swift in a Ruger #1 and it is at least 100 fps faster than any 22-250 load in the new Nosler manual.
I like it under the tin roof at the range too! It keeps the people from setting up right next to you. I am hoping to try some new 55 gr Ballistic Tips in mine this week. I should be getting about 3800 fps with them. That should let the prairie dogs know I'm not just messin round. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif" alt="" />
GWN


Use Enough Gun!
IC B3

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,619
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,619
Good point about handloading.
If you do not handload you can get the Winchester varmint packs real reasonable. You will end up paying more for the Swift.
100 or 200 fps makes very little difference on a 40 or 50 gr bullet


I am one gun away from happy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 390
D
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
D
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 390
After loading for over 30 years and hearing all the tales of how bad the swift was on barrels and fussy to load i had my remington 700 Varmint special rebarreled with a new 220 swift barrel taken off a Model 700 VSSF. I could not be happier, most loads shoot very well and some loads are amazing. RL 15 and a 50 grain Nosler Ballistic tip shoots .250 three shots and under .5 for five shots. the 55 grain Sierra blitz king and RL 15 are also great. By changing to Remington cases from Winchester I eliminated the need to turn necks and I have also found the swift no harder than any other caliber to load and in fact easier than some. Also my swift will outshoot my sako 22 PPC for three shot groups but not for five shot groups, as my main use of the 220 is shooting crows this is not an issue. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" />

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 39,301
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 39,301
I had a #1 that came from the factory as a 22-250. It was a 22 BR when I got it and it was GREAT! Just a little slower than 22-250 but whatever you shoot with it will never know the difference. Short fat case with small primer pocket and fitted neck equal tiny groups. It was the second sub quarter inch five shot hundred yard gun I have owned and I am kicking myself for getting rid of it. I found 400 yard sage rats to be no problem when using the BR wit 50 grain V-Max bullets and several powders. I know it's not what you asked but it is wourthy of thinking about.


The first time I shot myself in the head...

Meniere's Sucks Big Time!!!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,430
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,430
I had a Ruger 220 Swift that I enjoyed shooting for years and currently have a 22-250 and a .223 WSSM. The whizzum is now my favorite and should not be overlooked. It shoots like a house afire.


MacDonald
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,712
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,712
If you decide to go with the .220 Swift buy an Xdie to go with it or else you will go nuts having to trim cases on nearly every loading. That has been my experience. Otherwise a fun round.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 875
E
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 875
just picked up a #1v in 220. ive tried quite a few varmit calibers and rifles. this is the best so far, even when compared to a 22/250 vs sf and a ruger mkII 220, the mmkII showed me the 220 works.

on the other side of the gunsafe sits a m77 tang safety 22/250. this rifle shoots pretty decent for an old rifle. and is keeper.

id buy your project rifle new scope it and see if you think still want to build, chances are the 250 or 220 in the v model will make you cahnge your mind

good luck
Evan

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 644
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 644

OK, objectively I can't see where it makes a huge difference. That said, my several Swifts outperform the 22-250 by enough velocityt that I simply prefer it. Cases get trimmed about every 5th firing, the same as with most other cartridges.

Barrel life is relative to pressure. 22-250s, Swifts and 223 WSSMs are all capable of excellent velocity but run high pressures to achieve it. How about a cartridge, a wildcat, that will give similar velocities but extend barrel life?

Since you are considering what chambering and since the cost of a good barrel and smithing are not cheap you may wish to evaluate an overlooked wildcat, the 220 Howell. I rebarreled a No1 to this chambering, 26", and find that it developes velocities equal to the 22-250 but at significantly reduced chamber pressure. This equates to longer barrel life and longer brass life. My Howell now has 3,000 rounds down the tube and a good look with a bore scope shows little errosion, accuracy remains superb and the whole project has been mega fun.

Hmm, maybe Ken is on to something here.


1,992 coyotes since 1964
1,000,000 rounds downrange
1,250,000 motorcycle miles
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 406
J
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
J
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 406
Guys:
38/rl15/55Ballistic Tip=3800fps+ right out of the Alliant handbook. This load also shoots one hole 3 shot groups. Some of the other guys mentioned they were getting the same type of accuracy. This is common with the Swift. As to case trimming, the only way I can imagine having to trim every time, is with some kind of chamber problem. The load I referenced earlier is max, and I don't trim more often than every 4 or 5 loadings.

Great choice.

Jerry


NRA Endowment Life Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,843
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,843
Man!!! No one has mentioned the best caliber of all...the 225Win! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
J
New Member
Offline
New Member
J
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3
Quote


Since you are considering what chambering and since the cost of a good barrel and smithing are not cheap you may wish to evaluate an overlooked wildcat, the 220 Howell. I rebarreled a No1 to this chambering, 26", and find that it developes velocities equal to the 22-250 but at significantly reduced chamber pressure. This equates to longer barrel life and longer brass life. My Howell now has 3,000 rounds down the tube and a good look with a bore scope shows little errosion, accuracy remains superb and the whole project has been mega fun.



My 1st post, hello all.

I am interested in the 220 Howell. I currently have a 22-250 Rem Stealth with a little throat erosion. I am going to have the barrel set back and rebored to 22-250 Akley Improved.

Question: Can I rechamber it to the 220 Howell? Or is the action too short?

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

200 members (1minute, 2five7, 2ndwind, 264mag, 17CalFan, 219 Wasp, 28 invisible), 2,127 guests, and 1,030 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,206
Posts18,503,843
Members73,994
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.158s Queries: 54 (0.028s) Memory: 0.9040 MB (Peak: 1.0136 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-11 05:54:58 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS