24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Good to know. Those are two powders I haven't used in my .338 Fed.

Dennis


"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."

"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."

"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
GB1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
P
prm Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Thx himmelrr. 2550 is what I was figuring for a 210 Partition load in the 338Fed. That's enough for me. Go Navy from an X F-14D RIO.

Last edited by prm; 09/09/09.
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
G
New Member
Offline
New Member
G
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Ok, guy's, I build the 338 Redneck. It is designed for a specific purpose. Originally to kill large game. Eastern Black bear, elk,
wild boar, etc. It is a 300 WSM necked up to 338. I use Douglas
Premium XX air gauged barrel's with a recessed target crown.
Head spaced to .002. RCBS has custom made my dies and Klymer Mfg.
made my finish reamer. So far they are all over the world in large plains game hunts. I do the loads for most of my customers specific needs. Accuracy at 100 yrds. with 200 gr. Nosler BTBT,
sub 1/2" groups with 1 in 10 twist. Muzzle velocity 3100 Ft Per Sec. Equal to a Lapua in 200 Gr.
Contact Bill Plumlee @ pro_gunembarqmail.com for more details.
I hope this clear' up some questions. Good Hunting, Bill

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Bill-you're running a 338/300 WSM with 200's @ 3100? How long of tube?

And welcome to the Fire?

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,284
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,284
I considered the 338 WSM but knew the donor action would have to be reworked to get the WSM case to properly fit and feed.

I had doubts with the RCM case too. Once I got a box of 338 RCM brass and made a dummy all doubts were gone. Feeds very well from a SA Ruger M77 tang safety.

I have posted this before..the 338 RCM I built has a 22" barrel. Mag box lengthened to 3.1". OAL approx 3.050". 225 accubonds with 61 grs of RL-17 yields 2750 fps. Really liking the 7 lb package.

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Hmm, my sample of one (338 WSM) is on a M70 WSM no mods or reworking at all and it fits and feeds like a dream? Maybe I just got lucky?

A light small 33 is a heck of a nice rig either way.

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,300
I guess it does not count cause its not a 338WSM but my 300WSM feeds fast enough and is reliable to make two shots at a running deer.

why not a 358 RCM?


Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
G
New Member
Offline
New Member
G
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
As I mentioned earlier, I'm using a Douglas XX Premium barrel. I forgot to mention it is 26" with a target crown. The load is accurate and hot,but the recoil is no problem at least not to any of my customers or me. The Barnes bullets are not as fast, more in the 2950 range as are the 210 partition, sameo sameo.
Bill

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
what powders are you using Bill?

reason I ask is it's tough to find someone else who's running one. I've had mine for about 7 years or so I'd guess, fun lil rig.

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 441
P
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
P
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 441
Originally Posted by jimmyp
why not a 358 RCM?


It could surely be done (a "better" 358 Win?) But I'd prefer the 35 on a full-length case (the 375 necked down = 358 Nukalpiaq, a different 35 Newton.)

Last edited by Pointbock; 11/02/10.

Support your local brewer.
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Originally Posted by Mark R Dobrenski
Hmm, my sample of one (338 WSM) is on a M70 WSM no mods or reworking at all and it fits and feeds like a dream? Maybe I just got lucky?


If you got lucky then so did I. Never a problem with a couple of three I built.


Used to be bobski, member since '01
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28,277
You hunting elk this year Bob?

Dober


"True respect starts with the way you treat others, and it is earned over a lifetime of demonstrating kindness, honor and dignity"....Tony Dungy
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
G
New Member
Offline
New Member
G
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
The 338 REDNECK is a 325 wsm necked up to 338 wsm., But here's the kicker . 200 gr. Hornady SST 3277 fps. and 225 Hornady SST 2980 fps. This has been my focus since I started building these rifles ten years ago. Lower recoil, less powder and impressive ballistics in a manageable rifle frame. I prefer the Remington WSM to rebarrel
for this round, But I have rebarreled many different WSM chambered rifles, for a variety of customers and reasons.

Early Remingtons required bolt face work to accept the WSM over the RSAUM dimentions, But it worked . The new WSM Rem. are by far better. OAL, is right and the bolt face is factory. This combination of change has made the 338 REDNECKtm a formidable choice when choosing a large game rifle, with power and tested accuracy comparable to a 338 Lapua. Check it for yourself.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
Originally Posted by gunhog
The 338 REDNECK is a 325 wsm necked up to 338 wsm., But here's the kicker . 200 gr. Hornady SST 3277 fps. and 225 Hornady SST 2980 fps. This has been my focus since I started building these rifles ten years ago. Lower recoil, less powder and impressive ballistics in a manageable rifle frame. I prefer the Remington WSM to rebarrel
for this round, But I have rebarreled many different WSM chambered rifles, for a variety of customers and reasons.

Early Remingtons required bolt face work to accept the WSM over the RSAUM dimentions, But it worked . The new WSM Rem. are by far better. OAL, is right and the bolt face is factory. This combination of change has made the 338 REDNECKtm a formidable choice when choosing a large game rifle, with power and tested accuracy comparable to a 338 Lapua. Check it for yourself.
That's a touch difficult for me to believe on those speeds.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,999
3
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
3
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,999

Gunhog,

I'd be a little more than interested in how you are getting a 225 grain .338" bullet to 2980 fps. Let alone how you are pushing a bullet of only 25 grains lighter in weight at nearly 300 fps faster.

What's your load data..?
What are your strain gauges saying.?


"I'd rather have an Army of Asses led by a Lion, than an Army of Lions led by an Ass." (George Washington)
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,422
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,422
If I remember correctly, Winchester was asked why they developed the 325WSM instead of a 338 and their answer was that the numbers just wouldn't work.I didn't understand this and still don't. I've always thought that they would of been better ahead.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,076
Originally Posted by 358wsm

Gunhog,

I'd be a little more than interested in how you are getting a 225 grain .338" bullet to 2980 fps. Let alone how you are pushing a bullet of only 25 grains lighter in weight at nearly 300 fps faster.

What's your load data..?
What are your strain gauges saying.?
I can get a WinMag to those speeds but I'll need a cheater bar to open the bolt and the primer will hit the dirt.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,999
3
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
3
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,999
Tacomic,

I have a perspective about this, the 338WSM. It might not fully reach the 338 Winchester numbers, which is fine in my book, it wouldn't have to.
The 338 Winchester isn't a failure, and it doesn't reach the 340 Weatherby numbers. In the same light, the 340 Weatherby magnum isn't a failure and it doesn't quite get there with the 338 RUM, but it's not a failure either.

I dare say that the 338 WSM would come within 100-150 fps of the 338 Winchester magnum with bullets up to 225 grains, and as you and I know, 100-150 fps in the field just doesn't matter either way.

Even now, with the 325 WSM already out there, Winchester could sell a pile of 338-WSM's... me thinks.



Bloodworks,

I agree. I also wonder if Gunhog isn't posting anymore because he he may have been injured, or worse. Let's hope not.

I don't know who else here has worked with the 338-WSM, other than Dober and Bob338. I think they both could offer some real world numbers that too would be safe.


The WSM case has enough capacity to perform without having to push it.


There are a few of us running the 358-WSM here at the 'fire. Loading to insane pressures just isn't needed.

I am VERY content pushing various 225 grain bullets to 2950 fps. and 250 grain bullets to 2800 fps.

I know of two powders that will do that in my rifle without beating up the brass, cratering primers, causing sticky bolt life, or stretching the case head beyond acceptable dimensions.

I seriously doubt that those velocities can be safely had from that WSM case with those bullet weights by reducing the bore diameter from 358 to 338. Let alone reach the numbers that Gunhog is advertizing.

I'd still like to see what his strain gauges have to reveal.



YMMV

Scott


"I'd rather have an Army of Asses led by a Lion, than an Army of Lions led by an Ass." (George Washington)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,024
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,024
Originally Posted by 358wsm
I am VERY content pushing various 225 grain bullets to 2950 fps.....


Yup.



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,079
A
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
A
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,079
Originally Posted by 358wsm
Tacomic,

I have a perspective about this, the 338WSM. It might not fully reach the 338 Winchester numbers, which is fine in my book, it wouldn't have to.
The 338 Winchester isn't a failure, and it doesn't reach the 340 Weatherby numbers. In the same light, the 340 Weatherby magnum isn't a failure and it doesn't quite get there with the 338 RUM, but it's not a failure either.

I dare say that the 338 WSM would come within 100-150 fps of the 338 Winchester magnum with bullets up to 225 grains, and as you and I know, 100-150 fps in the field just doesn't matter either way.

Even now, with the 325 WSM already out there, Winchester could sell a pile of 338-WSM's... me thinks.



Bloodworks,

I agree. I also wonder if Gunhog isn't posting anymore because he he may have been injured, or worse. Let's hope not.

I don't know who else here has worked with the 338-WSM, other than Dober and Bob338. I think they both could offer some real world numbers that too would be safe.


The WSM case has enough capacity to perform without having to push it.


There are a few of us running the 358-WSM here at the 'fire. Loading to insane pressures just isn't needed.

I am VERY content pushing various 225 grain bullets to 2950 fps. and 250 grain bullets to 2800 fps.

I know of two powders that will do that in my rifle without beating up the brass, cratering primers, causing sticky bolt life, or stretching the case head beyond acceptable dimensions.

I seriously doubt that those velocities can be safely had from that WSM case with those bullet weights by reducing the bore diameter from 358 to 338. Let alone reach the numbers that Gunhog is advertizing.

I'd still like to see what his strain gauges have to reveal.



YMMV

Scott


The wildcatters in Indiana have a cartridge called the .358 Express which is a WSSM case opened up to .358 to meet the caliber and case length restrictions for deer hunting. It fits into Bolt, single shot and AR platforms which some of the DOW employees are rumored to use for their own deer hunting. Also made up under a coupel of additional names as it is not SAAMI registered.

The good news is that is is still legal to hunt yotes with a .460 Weatherby or your favourite .375 H&H as a light rifle.

John


When truth is ignored, it does not change an untruth from remaining a lie.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

663 members (12344mag, 10gaugemag, 10gaugeman, 160user, 007FJ, 16penny, 67 invisible), 3,313 guests, and 1,344 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,483
Posts18,471,832
Members73,936
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.110s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8986 MB (Peak: 1.0530 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-27 02:11:09 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS