24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
We need to ask Bricktop what he thinks... whistle

finally I probably will never own either 6.8 or 300ACC despite the fact that I hate reloading for the 223 for some reason.

To everyone else, get a life, when someone posts (a newer member) about their new rifle in some caliber you don't like then "so what" its their money and its already spent!!

Last edited by jimmyp; 08/24/11.

GB1

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,170
T
TWR Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,170
I think that's the main problem I have with the 6.8, I already have a 308 and a 243AI in a bolt gun that is miles ahead of the 6.8 or 6.5G. I do have a few friends with 6WOA's and they are alright but still no 243AI...

I think I could live anywhere in the world with a 308 and a 223 and get by just fine, I'm boring I guess but they work. If I get hooked by something other than those two, it has to do something way special, not be almost or close or even just a tad better...

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
The same I have a few bolt guns but I go through phases of boredom. So the blackout has got to be interesting and a lot of fun but not for me, the 6.8 sure its more but not so much more it makes me want to try it.


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
Quote
there are 2-3 different chambers, some manufacturers have the original chamber others a slower twist and longer throat


Interesting that this bothers Jimmy as to the 6.8spc, but not the .223 which has the .223, 5.56 and Wylde chamber.

The differences between the 3 6.8spc chambers and the 3 .223 chambers are very similar. In both cases, use of the latter two chambers will fire any ammo developed for any of the three.

And I'd still love to know where Jimmy came up with this Lee24esque claim:

Quote
Besides the 6.8 is slowly dieing out, fewer and fewer rounds are loaded and purchased each year.


[Linked Image]



Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by cliff444
The 6.8 runs a 110 gr boolit at 2750....



That's pretty impressive.

What load is that, and how much barrel length?

I've noticed most of the commercial 110gr loads are in the 2550-2600 fps range, with a 20" bbl.
You are comparing the loads made for the old chambers versus the loads made for the new chambers. That's like comparing a 243 to a 243AI. Are they the same? I have a stock Stag 7 Hunter that shoots the SSA tactical 110 accubonds at 2750 fps. My reloads, not pushed that hard, get 2780 and I haven't even tried the new AA2200 powder that should get me up to 2800 fps in my 20 inch barrel. I have a 223 also along with 270's, 7wsm, 06, 22's, pistols, revolvers, shotguns, airguns, whatever. Conceivably I could hunt everything I hunt with a 223. What fun would that be. A lot of us here have different calibers because that is what we like to do. You want to go turn on the tv every night and only watch I love Lucy? Oh, and Jimmyp. Seems I have been hunting, reloading, and pretty much doing all things gun related since the early 60's when I was old enough to start hunting. I ain't a newbie, nor do i post "internet velocities". Someone wants to talk about their 300 whatever, I'll read about it. But when you say that 2750 equals 2450 with the 2450 having a BC that sucks azz, I gotta call foul.

IC B2

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,078
M
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,078
Originally Posted by cliff444
...You are comparing the loads made for the old chambers versus the loads made for the new chambers....



I'm not comparing anything.

I didn't know the 6.8 was getting 2750 with 110s. That's good performance.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
its odd that the 6.8 guys are such a sensitive and emotional group.


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
Originally Posted by jimmyp
its odd that the 6.8 guys are truthful,such a sensitive and emotional group whereas I like to make stuff up..


[Linked Image]



Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
Bwaahhhahaaaaaa..

it is good to laugh!

The disparity is so big that there is no question. 223 Is one of our top sellers
Series A is composed of our real top sellers hence we can discount due to long run production efficiencies.
There is no machine or material differences in any of our dies just simple costs based on volume


www.redding-reloading.com

Last edited by jimmyp; 08/26/11.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
I own three .223 uppers. Why you insist on defending a round that no one has criticized, is beyond me.

Your logical disconnect is the equivalent of stating that because the .308 Win is the most popular short action cartridge, that the 7mm-08 must be heading the way of the dodo bird.



[Linked Image]



IC B3

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
NO not defending or slamming anything as a matter of fact the SSA 85 grain TSX load looks very interesting. Even in diversity we can find common ground, at the same time while I would not probably buy a blackout it has its niche as well, then if someone wants to hunt with it, more power too them. Now if they come here and say "I lost a deer because it did not do a good job" this in my opinion would be a better topic to jump all over someone's cartridge choice in.


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13,957
Just stop making unsubstantiated claims, that's all I have asked of you.


[Linked Image]



Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
I wish the 6.8 was more popular, I would like to have one, I am just one of those that like to be able to buy ammunition anywhere I might be.



Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 94
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 94
that's a really great anology. I loved shooting marbles in the dirt when I was a boy. It is nice, though, to have a big bag of marbles.

We're just boys with our toys!


A DEO FORMAVIT IN BELLO PROBAVIT
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
Ha too true. On comparing the little 300ACC round to a 6.8SPC its clear that one is designed to be more effective than the 223 at distance and one is designed to be used with a suppressor.


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,312
Likes: 1
S
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,312
Likes: 1
Thats why JD Jones called it the Whisper!


NRA Life Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
Those 220 grain slugs while like lobbing artillery at a distance just have to carry a lot of momentum..


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Originally Posted by jimmyp
Ha too true. On comparing the little 300ACC round to a 6.8SPC its clear that one is designed to be more effective than the 223 at distance and one is designed to be used with a suppressor.
First you say they are the same, then you say they are different. You sound a lot like one of the current crop of politico's.

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 18,318
Likes: 1
Huh? The 6.8 is not the same as a 270 Winchester. At least that's what my congressman told me to say.


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,199
Originally Posted by jimmyp
its hard to say, in my friends gunshop they sell 100's of the 223 rifles of all makes and have a single 6.8 upper on the rack that has been there for a while. It may be growing but at what rate and what percentage of total sales? Not much is my observation, there is a small vocal minority but once you get past launching a 22 from a 14 inch barrel into 16 or 18 inch barrel lengths the need for the 6.8 kind of fades away (ask the Eskimo's they kill everything with the 223). Some people like to pour cold water all over another man's choice in firearms or calibers and treat said purchases with disdain. In my opinion there is just not that much difference in the 3 we are talking about and anyone that says there is has some type of hangup over one or the other of the cartridges.
Guess you have a short memory. Typical post from someone who doesn't know jack about the 6.8.

Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

579 members (06hunter59, 10Glocks, 10gaugemag, 1234, 01Foreman400, 10ring1, 62 invisible), 2,480 guests, and 1,227 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,590
Posts18,492,128
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.141s Queries: 55 (0.016s) Memory: 0.9088 MB (Peak: 1.0234 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 22:23:42 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS